Top

Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -)

Published in:

01-08-2018 | Original Article

Smartphones in clinical practice: doctors’ experience at two Dublin paediatric teaching hospitals

Authors: Taha S. El Hadidy, Abdulrahman E. Alshafei, Alan E. Mortell, Eva M. Doherty

Published in: Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) | Issue 3/2018

Abstract

Introduction

We conducted a study at two main centres for paediatric surgery in the Republic of Ireland, Temple Street Children’s University Hospital (TSCUH) and Our Lady’s Children’s Hospital Crumlin (OLCHC).

Aim

The aim of the study was to assess doctors’ opinions, frequency and methods of smartphone use in clinical practice.

Methods

Doctors (n = 265) at the two hospitals were invited to complete a 12-item survey. Descriptive statistics were calculated accordingly.

Results

Almost 50% (132/256) responded; 98.4% owned a smartphone and 76% owned an iPhone. Seventy-nine percent used medical apps and 59% used the OLCHC formulary. Ninety-seven percent used smartphones for inter-team communication with 73.5% (n = 97) using WhatsApp. Smartphone camera was used by 57% for clinical photos and 41% for photos of radiological imaging. Only 42% reported obtaining consent for smartphone camera use from patients or guardians. Ninety-two percent either ‘strongly agreed’ or ‘agreed’ that smartphones positively impact their practice.

Conclusion

Smartphone usage is universal among healthcare professionals and their influence is growing in patient care.

Ong LTK (2002) The impact of medical technology on healthcare today. Hong Kong J Emerg Med 9(4):231–236CrossRef

Giordano V, Koch HA, Mendes CH, Bergamin A, de Souza FS, do Amaral NP (2015) WhatsApp messenger is useful and reproducible in the assessment of tibial plateau fractures: inter- and intra-observer agreement study. Int J Med Inform 84(2):141–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.11.002 CrossRefPubMed

Wu R, Rossos P, Quan S, Reeves S, Lo V, Wong B, Cheung M, Morra D (2011) An evaluation of the use of smartphones to communicate between clinicians: a mixed-methods study. J Med Internet Res 13(3):e59. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1655 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

EPG Health Media Focus Group (2012) Healthcare professional use of mobile devices: a comparative study between Europe and US in 2010 and 2012. EPG Health Media, Kent

Dicianno BE, Parmanto B, Fairman AD, Crytzer TM, Yu DX, Pramana G et al (2015) Perspectives on the evolution of mobile (mHealth) technologies and application to rehabilitation. Phys Ther 95(3):397–405. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20130534 CrossRefPubMed

Weightman AL, Williamson J (2005) The value and impact of information provided through library services for patient care: a systematic review. Health Inf Libr J 22(1):4–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2005.00549.x CrossRef

Mosa ASM, Yoo I, Sheets LA (2012) Systematic review of healthcare applications for smartphones. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 12(1):67. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-12-67 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Sondhi V, Devgan A (2013) Translating technology into patient care: smartphone applications in pediatric health care. Med J Armed Forces India 69(2):156–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mjafi.2013.03.003 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Institute of Medicine Committee on Quality of Health Care in A (2001) Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. National Academies Press (US) copyright 2001 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved., Washington (DC)

10.

Prgomet M, Georgiou A, Westbrook JI (2009) The impact of mobile handheld technology on hospital physicians’ work practices and patient care: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 16(6):792–801. https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M3215 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Hickam DH, Severance S, Feldstein A, Ray L, Gorman P, Schuldheis S et al (2003) The effect of health care working conditions on patient safety. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ) 74:1–3

12.

Collins S, Currie L, Bakken S, Cimino JJ (2006) Interruptions during the use of a CPOE System for MICU rounds. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings; 2006:895-

13.

Choi JS, Yi B, Park JH, Choi K, Jung J, Park SW, Rhee PL (2011) The uses of the smartphone for doctors: an empirical study from Samsung Medical Center. Healthc Inform Res 17(2):131–138. https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2011.17.2.131 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Koehler DYK, Yujovic O et al (2012) Medical students’ use of and attitudes towards medical applications. J Mob Technol Med 1(4):16–21. https://doi.org/10.7309/jmtm.73 CrossRef

15.

Varkey P, Tan NC, Girotto R, Tang WR, Liu YT, Chen HC (2008) A picture speaks a thousand words: the use of digital photography and the Internet as a cost-effective tool in monitoring free flaps. Ann Plast Surg 60(1):45–48. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e31805003df CrossRefPubMed

16.

Garritty C, El Emam K (2006) Who’s using PDAs? Estimates of PDA use by health care providers: a systematic review of surveys. J Med Internet Res 8(2):e7. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8.2.e7 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Nason GJ, Burke MJ, Aslam A, Kelly ME, Akram CM, Giri SK et al (2015) The use of smartphone applications by urology trainees. Surgeon 13(5):263–266CrossRefPubMed

18.

O’Reilly MK, Nason GJ, Liddy S, Fitzgerald CW, Kelly ME, Shields C (2014) DOCSS: doctors on-call smartphone study. Ir J Med Sci (1971 -) 183(4):573–577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-013-1053-4 CrossRef

19.

Payne KFB, Wharrad H, Watts K (2012) Smartphone and medical related app use among medical students and junior doctors in the United Kingdom (UK): a regional survey. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 12(1):121. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-12-121 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Couchman GR, Forjuoh SN, Rascoe TG, Reis MD, Koehler B, Walsum KL (2005) E-mail communications in primary care: what are patients’ expectations for specific test results? Int J Med Inform 74(1):21–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2004.08.005 CrossRefPubMed

21.

Perlemuter L, Yomtov B (2002) Feasibility and usefulness of dedicated software and e-mail for self-monitoring blood glucose in treating diabetes. Diabet Med 19(8):701–702. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00688_6.x CrossRefPubMed

22.

Anyanwu CO, Lipoff JB (2015) Smartphones, photography, and security in dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol 72(1):193–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2014.09.035 CrossRefPubMed

23.

Wani SA, Rabah SM, AlFadil S, Dewanjee N, Najmi Y (2013) Efficacy of communication amongst staff members at plastic and reconstructive surgery section using smartphone and mobile WhatsApp. Indian J Plast Surg 46(3):502–505. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.121990 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Naqvi GA, Daly M, Dawood A, Kurkuri A, Kutty S (2014) Smart consultation for musculoskeletal trauma: accuracy of using smart phones for fracture diagnosis. Surgeon 12(1):32–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2013.09.001 CrossRefPubMed

25.

Kunde L, McMeniman E, Parker M (2013) Clinical photography in dermatology: ethical and medico-legal considerations in the age of digital and smartphone technology. Australas J Dermatol 54(3):192–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajd.12063 CrossRefPubMed

26.

Rosenfield D, Hébert PC, Stanbrook MB, MacDonald NE, Flegel K (2011) Being smarter with smartphones. CMAJ 183(18):E1276-ECrossRef

27.

Nabulyato WM, Jeyaseelan L, Malagelada F, Heaton S (2016) Legal, ethical and practical considerations of smartphone use in orthopaedics. Bull R Coll Surg Engl. 98(6):252–257CrossRef

28.

Directorate I (2010) Mobile phone policy Hsenet.hse.ie: Health Service Executive. [2.0: Available from: https://www.hse.ie/eng/services/Publications/pp/ict/Mobile_Phone_Device_Policy.pdf]

29.

General Medical Council Guidance (1998) Making and using visual and audio recordings of patients. J Audiov Media Med 21(1):23–25

30.

Office of the Data Protection Commissioner RoI (1988–2003) Data protection acts of 1988 & 2003. Available from: http://www.welfare.ie/en/downloads/dsfadataprotectionguide.pdf

31.

Neill FO (2014) Policy for nursing staff on the use of SMART/ Personal mobile phones for work purposes. Available from: http://www.olchc.ie/Files-Uploaded/Nursing-Guidelines/Smart-and-Personal-Phone-Usefor-Work-Purposes-2014.pdf

32.

Cumming DRS, Furber SB, Paul DJ (2014) Beyond Moore's law. Philos Transact A Math Phys Eng Sci 372(2012):20130376CrossRef

33.

Johansson PE, Petersson GI, Nilsson GC (2010) Personal digital assistant with a barcode reader—a medical decision support system for nurses in home care. Int J Med Inform 79(4):232–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.01.004 CrossRefPubMed

34.

Bierbrier R, Lo V, Wu RC (2014) Evaluation of the accuracy of smartphone medical calculation apps. J Med Internet Res 16(2):e32. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3062 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

Richardson WS, Burdette SD (2003) Practice corner: taking evidence in hand. ACP J Club 138(1):A9PubMed

36.

Serdar MA, Turan M, Cihan M (2008) Rapid access to information resources in clinical biochemistry: medical applications of personal digital assistants (PDA). Clin Exp Med 8(2):117–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-008-0166-y CrossRefPubMed

37.

Lundberg GD (2005) The first 10 years of Medscape, 1995–2005: from delusion through vision to a culture. Medscape Gen Med 7(2):51

Title: Smartphones in clinical practice: doctors’ experience at two Dublin paediatric teaching hospitals
Authors: Taha S. El Hadidy
Abdulrahman E. Alshafei
Alan E. Mortell
Eva M. Doherty
Publication date: 01-08-2018
Publisher: Springer London
Published in: Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0021-1265
Electronic ISSN: 1863-4362
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-017-1713-x

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Heart Failure Video

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Smartphones in clinical practice: doctors’ experience at two Dublin paediatric teaching hospitals

Abstract

Introduction

Aim

Methods

Results

Conclusion

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Semaglutide benefits people with type 2 diabetes and obesity-related heart failure

Incentivised to exercise

New intervention for STEMI-related cardiogenic shock

» View more highlights on the ACC 2024 congress hub page

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Introduction

Aim

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Progress of statistical analysis in biomedical research through the historical review of the development of the Framingham score

A cadaveric study of aortic arch variation in an Irish population

Using the theory of planned behavior framework for designing interventions related to organ donation

Evaluation of the effectiveness and patients’ contentment with transanal haemorrhoidal artery dearterialisation and mucopexy (THD) for treatment of haemorrhoidal disease: a 6-year study

A rare ocular complication of neisseria gonorrhoeae

In recognition of Ireland’s doctor scientists: Carel le Roux, Seamas Donnelly and Michael P Keane

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Semaglutide benefits people with type 2 diabetes and obesity-related heart failure

Incentivised to exercise

New intervention for STEMI-related cardiogenic shock

» View more highlights on the ACC 2024 congress hub page