Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) 2/2018

01-05-2018 | Original Article

Evaluating the perioperative safety of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for large, non-metastatic renal tumours: a comparative analysis of T1-T2 with T3a tumours

Authors: E. M. Bolton, D. Hennessy, P. E. Lonergan, F. T. Darcy, R. P. Manecksha, T. H. Lynch

Published in: Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) | Issue 2/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

With increasing surgeon experience, the use of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) in large and locally advanced renal tumours (T3a) is gaining favour in urological practice. There are limited studies reporting surgical outcomes in such groups. The aim of this study was to review our experience with LRN in these patients.

Methods

Data was retrospectively collected on 201 consecutive patients who underwent LRN for renal cancer by a single surgeon. Perioperative parameters assessed were age, gender, American Society of Anaesthesiologists score (ASA), waist circumference, tumour size, specimen size, histological subtypes, anaesthetic duration, operative approach and technique, surgery duration, blood loss, pre and postoperative renal function, complication rate and duration of hospital stay.

Results

Of 201 patients undergoing LRN, 43 (21%) patients had T3a tumours (group 2). The remaining 158 (79%) patients had T1 tumours (group1). Mean tumour size in group 2 was 12.2 cm. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) was more common in males than females (131/201; 65%). Patients with T3a disease were more likely to have an ASA score of 2 (37/201; 18%). In the majority of patients across both groups, LRN was completed using a 3-port approach (173/201; 86%). There were no significant differences between groups in terms of mean anaesthetic duration, average surgical time, average estimated blood loss, complication rate and mean hospital stay.

Conclusion

Our study shows that LRN has equivalent perioperative outcomes and safety in larger and locally advanced renal tumours.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ljungberg B et al (2015) EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update. Eur Urol 67(5):913–924CrossRefPubMed Ljungberg B et al (2015) EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update. Eur Urol 67(5):913–924CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Nalavenkata S, Jarvis TR, Rashid P Incidental small renal mass: current management. ANZ J Surg 81(11):797–803 Nalavenkata S, Jarvis TR, Rashid P Incidental small renal mass: current management. ANZ J Surg 81(11):797–803
3.
4.
go back to reference Ono Y et al (2001) The long-term outcome of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for small renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 165(6 Pt 1):1867–1870CrossRefPubMed Ono Y et al (2001) The long-term outcome of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for small renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 165(6 Pt 1):1867–1870CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Gill IS et al (2001) Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in 100 patients: a single center experience from the United States. Cancer 92(7):1843–1855CrossRefPubMed Gill IS et al (2001) Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in 100 patients: a single center experience from the United States. Cancer 92(7):1843–1855CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Laird A et al (2015) Matched pair analysis of laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for the treatment of T3 renal cell carcinoma. World J Urol 33(1):25–32CrossRefPubMed Laird A et al (2015) Matched pair analysis of laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for the treatment of T3 renal cell carcinoma. World J Urol 33(1):25–32CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Hemal AK, Kumar A (2009) A prospective comparison of laparoscopic and robotic radical nephrectomy for T1-2N0M0 renal cell carcinoma. World J Urol 27(1):89–94CrossRefPubMed Hemal AK, Kumar A (2009) A prospective comparison of laparoscopic and robotic radical nephrectomy for T1-2N0M0 renal cell carcinoma. World J Urol 27(1):89–94CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hemal AK et al (2007) Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for large renal tumors: a long-term prospective comparison. J Urol 177(3):862–866CrossRefPubMed Hemal AK et al (2007) Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for large renal tumors: a long-term prospective comparison. J Urol 177(3):862–866CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Colombo JR Jr et al (2008) Seven years after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: oncologic and renal functional outcomes. Urology 71(6):1149–1154CrossRefPubMed Colombo JR Jr et al (2008) Seven years after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: oncologic and renal functional outcomes. Urology 71(6):1149–1154CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Permpongkosol S et al (2005) Long-term survival analysis after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol 174(4 Pt 1):1222–1225CrossRefPubMed Permpongkosol S et al (2005) Long-term survival analysis after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol 174(4 Pt 1):1222–1225CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Bensalah K et al (2009) Survival of patients with nonmetastatic pT3 renal tumours: a matched comparison of laparoscopic vs open radical nephrectomy. BJU Int 104(11):1714–1717CrossRefPubMed Bensalah K et al (2009) Survival of patients with nonmetastatic pT3 renal tumours: a matched comparison of laparoscopic vs open radical nephrectomy. BJU Int 104(11):1714–1717CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Rassweiler J et al (1993) Transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy: training, technique, and results. J Endourol 7(6):505–515 discussion 515-6 CrossRefPubMed Rassweiler J et al (1993) Transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy: training, technique, and results. J Endourol 7(6):505–515 discussion 515-6 CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Chapman TN et al (2008) Laparoscopic lymph node dissection in clinically node-negative patients undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal carcinoma. Urology 71(2):287–291CrossRefPubMed Chapman TN et al (2008) Laparoscopic lymph node dissection in clinically node-negative patients undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal carcinoma. Urology 71(2):287–291CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Guinan P et al (1997) TNM staging of renal cell carcinoma: Workgroup No. 3. Union international Contre le Cancer (UICC) and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). Cancer 80(5):992–993CrossRefPubMed Guinan P et al (1997) TNM staging of renal cell carcinoma: Workgroup No. 3. Union international Contre le Cancer (UICC) and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). Cancer 80(5):992–993CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Steinberg AP et al (2004) Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for large (greater than 7 cm, T2) renal tumors. J Urol 172(6 Pt 1):2172–2176CrossRefPubMed Steinberg AP et al (2004) Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for large (greater than 7 cm, T2) renal tumors. J Urol 172(6 Pt 1):2172–2176CrossRefPubMed
16.
17.
go back to reference Guzzo TJ et al (2009) Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for patients with pathologic T3b renal-cell carcinoma: the Johns Hopkins experience. J Endourol 23(1):63–67CrossRefPubMed Guzzo TJ et al (2009) Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for patients with pathologic T3b renal-cell carcinoma: the Johns Hopkins experience. J Endourol 23(1):63–67CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Jeon SH et al Comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for large renal tumors: a retrospective analysis of multi-center results. BJU Int 107(5):817–821 Jeon SH et al Comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for large renal tumors: a retrospective analysis of multi-center results. BJU Int 107(5):817–821
Metadata
Title
Evaluating the perioperative safety of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for large, non-metastatic renal tumours: a comparative analysis of T1-T2 with T3a tumours
Authors
E. M. Bolton
D. Hennessy
P. E. Lonergan
F. T. Darcy
R. P. Manecksha
T. H. Lynch
Publication date
01-05-2018
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0021-1265
Electronic ISSN: 1863-4362
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-017-1652-6

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) 2/2018 Go to the issue