Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Children's Orthopaedics 6/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Original Clinical Article

Longitudinal radiographic behavior of accessory navicular in pediatric patients

Authors: Derrick M. Knapik, Sahejmeet S. Guraya, Keegan T. Conry, Daniel R. Cooperman, Raymond W. Liu

Published in: Journal of Children's Orthopaedics | Issue 6/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

An accessory navicular is generally asymptomatic and discovered incidentally on radiographs. The natural history of an accessory navicular in the pediatric population is largely undescribed.

Methods

The medical charts of 261 pediatric subjects undergoing 2620 annual unilateral radiographs of the foot and ankle (age range 0.25–7 years at enrollment) were reviewed. Radiographs were examined to determine the incidence of accessory navicular, with focus on the age at appearance and, if present, the age at fusion. Skeletal maturity was graded based on ossification pattern of the calcaneal apophysis.

Results

Accessory navicular was identified in 19 subjects (n = 12 males, n = 7 females, p = 0.43), appearing significantly earlier in the female subjects than in the male ones (p = 0.03). Fusion was documented in 42% (n = 8) of subjects, occurring at a mean (±standard deviation) age of 12.5 ± 1.0 years in females and 14.1 ± 2.7 years in males. Skeletal maturity grading demonstrated comparable stages of maturity at the time of fusion between male and female subjects (p = 0.5). Based on an analysis of 160 subjects with serial images extending at least one standard deviation past the mean age of appearance, the overall incidence was 12%.

Conclusion

Our review of pediatric subjects showed that accessory navicular appeared earlier in females than in males. Fusion occurred in 42% of patients at comparable levels of skeletal maturity between the male and female subjects. No significant differences in overall incidence, skeletal maturity, fusion rate, or age of fusion were noted between the male and female subjects.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Coskun N, Yuksel M, Cevener M et al (2009) Incidence of accessory ossicles and sesamoid bones in the feet: a radiographic study of the turkish subjects. Surg Radiol Anat 31:19–24CrossRefPubMed Coskun N, Yuksel M, Cevener M et al (2009) Incidence of accessory ossicles and sesamoid bones in the feet: a radiographic study of the turkish subjects. Surg Radiol Anat 31:19–24CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Coughlin M (2007) Sesamoids and accessory bones of the foot. In: Coughlin M, Mann R, Saltzman C (eds) Surgery of the foot and ankle, 8th edn. Mosby, Philadelphia, PA, pp 531–610 Coughlin M (2007) Sesamoids and accessory bones of the foot. In: Coughlin M, Mann R, Saltzman C (eds) Surgery of the foot and ankle, 8th edn. Mosby, Philadelphia, PA, pp 531–610
3.
go back to reference Huang J, Zhang Y, Ma X et al (2014) Accessory navicular bone incidence in chinese patients: a retrospective analysis of X-rays following trauma or progressive pain onset. Surg Radiol Anat 36:167–172CrossRefPubMed Huang J, Zhang Y, Ma X et al (2014) Accessory navicular bone incidence in chinese patients: a retrospective analysis of X-rays following trauma or progressive pain onset. Surg Radiol Anat 36:167–172CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Sarrafian S (1993) Osteology. In: Sarrafian S (ed) Anatomy of the foot and ankle. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 89–112 Sarrafian S (1993) Osteology. In: Sarrafian S (ed) Anatomy of the foot and ankle. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 89–112
6.
go back to reference Perdikakis E, Grigoraki E, Karantanas A (2011) Os naviculare: the multi-ossicle configuration of a normal variant. Skeletal Radiol 40:85–88CrossRefPubMed Perdikakis E, Grigoraki E, Karantanas A (2011) Os naviculare: the multi-ossicle configuration of a normal variant. Skeletal Radiol 40:85–88CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Issever AS, Minden K, Eshed I, Hermann KG (2007) Accessory navicular bone: when ankle pain does not originate from the ankle. Clin Rheumatol 26:2143–2144CrossRefPubMed Issever AS, Minden K, Eshed I, Hermann KG (2007) Accessory navicular bone: when ankle pain does not originate from the ankle. Clin Rheumatol 26:2143–2144CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Mellado JM, Ramos A, Salvado E et al (2003) Accessory ossicles and sesamoid bones of the ankle and foot: imaging findings, clinical significance and differential diagnosis. Eur Radiol 13[Suppl 6]:L164–L177CrossRef Mellado JM, Ramos A, Salvado E et al (2003) Accessory ossicles and sesamoid bones of the ankle and foot: imaging findings, clinical significance and differential diagnosis. Eur Radiol 13[Suppl 6]:L164–L177CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Bencardino JT, Rosenberg ZS (2001) MR imaging and CT in the assessment of osseous abnormalities of the ankle and foot. Magn Reson Imaging Clin North Am 9:567–578, xi Bencardino JT, Rosenberg ZS (2001) MR imaging and CT in the assessment of osseous abnormalities of the ankle and foot. Magn Reson Imaging Clin North Am 9:567–578, xi
11.
12.
go back to reference Bennett GL, Weiner DS, Leighley B (1990) Surgical treatment of symptomatic accessory tarsal navicular. J Pediatr Orthop 10:445–449CrossRefPubMed Bennett GL, Weiner DS, Leighley B (1990) Surgical treatment of symptomatic accessory tarsal navicular. J Pediatr Orthop 10:445–449CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Macnicol MF, Voutsinas S (1984) Surgical treatment of the symptomatic accessory navicular. J Bone Joint Surg Br 66:218–226PubMed Macnicol MF, Voutsinas S (1984) Surgical treatment of the symptomatic accessory navicular. J Bone Joint Surg Br 66:218–226PubMed
14.
go back to reference Kruse RW, Chen J (1995) Accessory bones of the foot: clinical significance. Mil Med 160:464–467PubMed Kruse RW, Chen J (1995) Accessory bones of the foot: clinical significance. Mil Med 160:464–467PubMed
15.
go back to reference Demeyere N, De Maeseneer M, Osteaux M (2001) Quiz case. symptomatic type II accessory navicular. Eur J Radiol 37:60–63CrossRefPubMed Demeyere N, De Maeseneer M, Osteaux M (2001) Quiz case. symptomatic type II accessory navicular. Eur J Radiol 37:60–63CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Sella EJ, Lawson JP (1987) Biomechanics of the accessory navicular synchondrosis. Foot Ankle 8:156–163CrossRefPubMed Sella EJ, Lawson JP (1987) Biomechanics of the accessory navicular synchondrosis. Foot Ankle 8:156–163CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Keles Coskun N, Arican RY, Utuk A, Ozcanli H, Sindel T (2009) The incidence of accessory navicular bone types in turkish subjects. Surg Radiol Anat 31:675–679CrossRefPubMed Keles Coskun N, Arican RY, Utuk A, Ozcanli H, Sindel T (2009) The incidence of accessory navicular bone types in turkish subjects. Surg Radiol Anat 31:675–679CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Behrents RG, Broadbent BH (1984) In search of truth for the greater good of man: a chronological account of the Bolton-Brush growth studies. The Bolton-Brush Growth Study Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Dentistry, Cleveland Behrents RG, Broadbent BH (1984) In search of truth for the greater good of man: a chronological account of the Bolton-Brush growth studies. The Bolton-Brush Growth Study Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Dentistry, Cleveland
19.
go back to reference Nicholson AD, Liu RW, Sanders JO, Cooperman DR (2015) Relationship of calcaneal and iliac apophyseal ossification to peak height velocity timing in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97:147–154CrossRefPubMed Nicholson AD, Liu RW, Sanders JO, Cooperman DR (2015) Relationship of calcaneal and iliac apophyseal ossification to peak height velocity timing in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97:147–154CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420–428CrossRefPubMed Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420–428CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Fleiss J (1986) The design and analysis of clinical experiments. Wiley, New York Fleiss J (1986) The design and analysis of clinical experiments. Wiley, New York
22.
go back to reference Lawson JP, Ogden JA, Sella E, Barwick KW (1984) The painful accessory navicular. Skeletal Radiol 12:250–262CrossRefPubMed Lawson JP, Ogden JA, Sella E, Barwick KW (1984) The painful accessory navicular. Skeletal Radiol 12:250–262CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Tanner J, Healy M, Goldstein H, Cameron N (2001) Assessment of skeletal maturity and prediction of adult height (TW3). WB Saunders, London Tanner J, Healy M, Goldstein H, Cameron N (2001) Assessment of skeletal maturity and prediction of adult height (TW3). WB Saunders, London
24.
go back to reference Tanner JM, Davies PS (1985) Clinical longitudinal standards for height and height velocity for north american children. J Pediatr 107:317–329CrossRefPubMed Tanner JM, Davies PS (1985) Clinical longitudinal standards for height and height velocity for north american children. J Pediatr 107:317–329CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Choi YS, Lee KT, Kang HS, Kim EK (2004) MR imaging findings of painful type II accessory navicular bone: correlation with surgical and pathologic studies. Korean J Radiol 5:274–279CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Choi YS, Lee KT, Kang HS, Kim EK (2004) MR imaging findings of painful type II accessory navicular bone: correlation with surgical and pathologic studies. Korean J Radiol 5:274–279CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Scott AT, Sabesan VJ, Saluta JR, Wilson MA, Easley ME (2009) Fusion versus excision of the symptomatic type II accessory navicular: a prospective study. Foot Ankle Int 30:10–15CrossRefPubMed Scott AT, Sabesan VJ, Saluta JR, Wilson MA, Easley ME (2009) Fusion versus excision of the symptomatic type II accessory navicular: a prospective study. Foot Ankle Int 30:10–15CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Longitudinal radiographic behavior of accessory navicular in pediatric patients
Authors
Derrick M. Knapik
Sahejmeet S. Guraya
Keegan T. Conry
Daniel R. Cooperman
Raymond W. Liu
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Journal of Children's Orthopaedics / Issue 6/2016
Print ISSN: 1863-2521
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2548
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-016-0777-x

Other articles of this Issue 6/2016

Journal of Children's Orthopaedics 6/2016 Go to the issue