Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 2/2014

01-03-2014 | Original Article

Accessory navicular bone incidence in Chinese patients: a retrospective analysis of X-rays following trauma or progressive pain onset

Authors: Jiazhang Huang, Yijun Zhang, Xin Ma, Xu Wang, Chao Zhang, Li Chen

Published in: Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy | Issue 2/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Optimal treatment of symptomatic accessory navicular bones, generally asymptomatic ‘extra’ ossicles in the front interior ankle, remains debated.

Objective

Incidence and type of accessory navicular bones in Chinese patients were examined as a basis for improving diagnostic and treatment standards.

Methods

Accessory navicular bones were retrospectively examined in 1,625 (790 men and 835 women) patients with trauma-induced or progressive symptomatic ankle pain grouped by gender and age from August 2011 to May 2012. Anterior–posterior/oblique X-ray images; presence; type; affected side; modified Coughlin’s classification types 1, 2A, 2B, and 3; and subgroups a–c were recorded.

Results

Accessory navicular bones were found in 329 (20.2 %) patients (143 men and 186 women; mean age, 47.24 ± 18.34, ranging 14–96 years). Patients aged 51–60 exhibited most accessory navicular bones (29.7 %), with risk slightly higher in women and generally increasing from minimal 10.9 % at ages 11–20 to age 51 and thereafter declining to 0.4 % by age 90. The incidence was 41.6 % for Type 1 (Type 1a: 9.1 %, Type 1b: 15.5 %, and Type 1c: 19.4 %), 36.8 % for Type 2 (Type 2Aa: 2.1 %, Type 2Ab: 13.7 %, Type 2Ac: 5.1 %, Type 2Ba: 2.1 %, 2Bb: 2.1 %, and 2Bc: 11.6 %), and 21.6 % for Type 3 (Type 3a: 4.5 %, Type 3b: 14 %, and Type 3c: 3.0 %).

Conclusions

Approximately one-fifth (20.3 %) of ankle pain patients exhibited accessory navicular bones, with Type 2 most common and middle-aged patients most commonly affected. Thus, accessory navicular bones may be less rare than previously thought, underlying treatable symptomatic conditions of foot pain and deformity.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bencardino JT, Rosenberg ZS (2001) MR imaging and CT in the assessment of osseous abnormalities of the ankle and foot. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 9:567–578PubMed Bencardino JT, Rosenberg ZS (2001) MR imaging and CT in the assessment of osseous abnormalities of the ankle and foot. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 9:567–578PubMed
2.
go back to reference Chen YJ, Hsu RW, Liang SC (1997) Degeneration of the accessory navicular synchondrosis presenting as rupture of the posterior tibial tendon. J Bone Jt Surg Am 79:1791–1798 Chen YJ, Hsu RW, Liang SC (1997) Degeneration of the accessory navicular synchondrosis presenting as rupture of the posterior tibial tendon. J Bone Jt Surg Am 79:1791–1798
3.
go back to reference Choi YS, Lee KT, Kang HS, Kim EK (2004) MR imaging findings of painful type II accessory navicular bone: correlation with surgical and pathologic studies. Korean J Radiol 5:274–279PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Choi YS, Lee KT, Kang HS, Kim EK (2004) MR imaging findings of painful type II accessory navicular bone: correlation with surgical and pathologic studies. Korean J Radiol 5:274–279PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Coskun N, Yuksel M, Cevener M et al (2009) Incidence of accessory ossicles and sesamoid bones in the feet: a radiographic study of the Turkish subjects. Surg Radiol Anat 31:19–24PubMedCrossRef Coskun N, Yuksel M, Cevener M et al (2009) Incidence of accessory ossicles and sesamoid bones in the feet: a radiographic study of the Turkish subjects. Surg Radiol Anat 31:19–24PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Coughlin M (2006) Sesamoid and accessory bones of the foot. In: Coughlin M (ed) Surgery of the foot and ankle, 8th edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 590–595 Coughlin M (2006) Sesamoid and accessory bones of the foot. In: Coughlin M (ed) Surgery of the foot and ankle, 8th edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 590–595
6.
go back to reference Fredrick LA, Beall DP, Ly JQ, Fish JR (2005) The symptomatic accessory navicular bone: a report and discussion of the clinical presentation. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 34:47–50PubMedCrossRef Fredrick LA, Beall DP, Ly JQ, Fish JR (2005) The symptomatic accessory navicular bone: a report and discussion of the clinical presentation. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 34:47–50PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Geist E (1914) Supernumerary bone of the foot: a roentgen study of the feet of 100 normal individuals. Am J Orthop Surg 12:403 Geist E (1914) Supernumerary bone of the foot: a roentgen study of the feet of 100 normal individuals. Am J Orthop Surg 12:403
8.
go back to reference Geist ES (1925) The accessory scaphoid bone. J Bone Jt Surg 7:570–574 Geist ES (1925) The accessory scaphoid bone. J Bone Jt Surg 7:570–574
9.
go back to reference Grogan DP, Gasser SI, Ogden JA (1989) The painful accessory navicular: a clinical and histopathological study. Foot Ankle 10:164–169PubMedCrossRef Grogan DP, Gasser SI, Ogden JA (1989) The painful accessory navicular: a clinical and histopathological study. Foot Ankle 10:164–169PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kiter E, Gunal I, Turgut A, Kose N (2000) Evaluation of simple excision in the treatment of symptomatic accessory navicular associated with flat feet. J Orthop Sci 5:333–335PubMedCrossRef Kiter E, Gunal I, Turgut A, Kose N (2000) Evaluation of simple excision in the treatment of symptomatic accessory navicular associated with flat feet. J Orthop Sci 5:333–335PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lawson JP (1994) International Skeletal Society Lecture in honor of Howard D. Dorfman. Clinically significant radiologic anatomic variants of the skeleton. Am J Roentgenol 163:249–255CrossRef Lawson JP (1994) International Skeletal Society Lecture in honor of Howard D. Dorfman. Clinically significant radiologic anatomic variants of the skeleton. Am J Roentgenol 163:249–255CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lawson JP, Ogden JA, Sella E, Barwick KW (1984) The painful accessory navicular. Skelet Radiol 12:250–262CrossRef Lawson JP, Ogden JA, Sella E, Barwick KW (1984) The painful accessory navicular. Skelet Radiol 12:250–262CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Mellado JM, Ramos A, Salvado E, Camins A, Danus M, Sauri A (2003) Accessory ossicles and sesamoid bones of the ankle and foot: imaging findings, clinical significance and differential diagnosis. Eur Radiol 13(Suppl 4):L164–L177CrossRef Mellado JM, Ramos A, Salvado E, Camins A, Danus M, Sauri A (2003) Accessory ossicles and sesamoid bones of the ankle and foot: imaging findings, clinical significance and differential diagnosis. Eur Radiol 13(Suppl 4):L164–L177CrossRef
14.
15.
go back to reference Mosel LD, Kat E, Voyvodic F (2004) Imaging of the symptomatic type II accessory navicular bone. Australas Radiol 48:267–271PubMedCrossRef Mosel LD, Kat E, Voyvodic F (2004) Imaging of the symptomatic type II accessory navicular bone. Australas Radiol 48:267–271PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Mygind HB (1953) The accessory tarsal scaphoid; clinical features and treatment. Acta Orthop Scand 23:142–151PubMedCrossRef Mygind HB (1953) The accessory tarsal scaphoid; clinical features and treatment. Acta Orthop Scand 23:142–151PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Nakayama S, Sugimoto K, Takakura Y, Tanaka Y, Kasanami R (2005) Percutaneous drilling of symptomatic accessory navicular in young athletes. Am J Sports Med 33:531–535PubMedCrossRef Nakayama S, Sugimoto K, Takakura Y, Tanaka Y, Kasanami R (2005) Percutaneous drilling of symptomatic accessory navicular in young athletes. Am J Sports Med 33:531–535PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Romanowski CA, Barrington NA (1992) The accessory navicular—an important cause of medial foot pain. Clin Radiol 46:261–264PubMedCrossRef Romanowski CA, Barrington NA (1992) The accessory navicular—an important cause of medial foot pain. Clin Radiol 46:261–264PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Sarrafian SK (1993) Osteology. In: Sarrafian SK (ed) Anatomy of the foot and ankle. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 89–112 Sarrafian SK (1993) Osteology. In: Sarrafian SK (ed) Anatomy of the foot and ankle. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 89–112
20.
go back to reference Sella EJ, Lawson JP (1987) Biomechanics of the accessory navicular synchondrosis. Foot Ankle 8:156–163PubMedCrossRef Sella EJ, Lawson JP (1987) Biomechanics of the accessory navicular synchondrosis. Foot Ankle 8:156–163PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Accessory navicular bone incidence in Chinese patients: a retrospective analysis of X-rays following trauma or progressive pain onset
Authors
Jiazhang Huang
Yijun Zhang
Xin Ma
Xu Wang
Chao Zhang
Li Chen
Publication date
01-03-2014
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy / Issue 2/2014
Print ISSN: 0930-1038
Electronic ISSN: 1279-8517
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-013-1158-5

Other articles of this Issue 2/2014

Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 2/2014 Go to the issue