Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship 2/2015

Open Access 01-06-2015

Web-based self-management for young cancer survivors: consideration of user requirements and barriers to implementation

Authors: Louise Moody, Andrew Turner, Jane Osmond, Louise Hooker, Joanna Kosmala-Anderson, Lynn Batehup

Published in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship | Issue 2/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

As the population of young cancer survivors increases, there is a need to develop alternative ways of providing post-treatment support. Online systems potentially offer self-management and e-learning support following cancer treatment. This research aims to explore the self-management support needs of teenage and young adult cancer survivors and consider whether those needs can be met through a web-based self-management resource.

Methods

A mixed methods approach was adopted including an online survey (n = 24), focus groups and interviews with teenage and young adult cancer survivors (n = 7) and interviews with parents of survivors (n = 6), information technology specialists (n = 8) and clinical, nursing and social work professionals (n = 11).

Results

All stakeholders were supportive of web-based self-management to meet information and support needs that would supplement continued direct interaction with clinical staff. Barriers to implementation were identified in terms of risks to young people, governance issues and the challenges of providing a long-term service.

Conclusion

Computer access and use amongst teenagers and young adults is commonplace, and there is an expectation that self-management needs will be met at least partially online in the future. There is a desire for online social support through peer interaction as well personal developmental and clinical management. These elements may need to be run through different systems to cater for governance requirements.

Implications for Cancer Survivors

An online self-management system could provide support at a number of different levels. The barriers to implementation should be addressed, to ensure that survivors can be supported in this way in the future.
Footnotes
1
A UK charity supporting children, young people and their families in dealing with cancer. Their community workers provide practical and emotional support to young people, helping them cope with the emotional impact of cancer, social isolation and education, employment and training issues.
 
2
N3 = NHS national broadband network linking all NHS-based organisations allowing secure communication
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Birch JM, Alston RD, Kelsey AM, Quinn MJ, Babb P, McNally RJ. Classification and incidence of cancers in adolescents and young adults in England 1979–1997. Br J Cancer. 2002;87(11):1267–74.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Birch JM, Alston RD, Kelsey AM, Quinn MJ, Babb P, McNally RJ. Classification and incidence of cancers in adolescents and young adults in England 1979–1997. Br J Cancer. 2002;87(11):1267–74.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Hall EA, Boves AW, Bowman J, Walsh RA, James EL. Young adult cancer survivors’ psychosocial well-being: a cross-sectional study assessing quality of life, unmet needs, and health behaviors. Support Care Cancer. 2011. doi:10.1007/s00520-011-1221-x.PubMed Hall EA, Boves AW, Bowman J, Walsh RA, James EL. Young adult cancer survivors’ psychosocial well-being: a cross-sectional study assessing quality of life, unmet needs, and health behaviors. Support Care Cancer. 2011. doi:10.​1007/​s00520-011-1221-x.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Zebrack B, Bleyer A, Albritton K, Medearis S, Tang J. Assessing the health care needs of adolescent and young adult cancer patients and survivors. Cancer. 2006;107(12):2915–23.CrossRefPubMed Zebrack B, Bleyer A, Albritton K, Medearis S, Tang J. Assessing the health care needs of adolescent and young adult cancer patients and survivors. Cancer. 2006;107(12):2915–23.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Narsavage G, Romeo E. Education and support needs of younger and older cancer survivors. Appl Nurs Res. 2003;16(2):103–9.CrossRefPubMed Narsavage G, Romeo E. Education and support needs of younger and older cancer survivors. Appl Nurs Res. 2003;16(2):103–9.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Rabin C, Simpson N, Morrow K, Pinot B. Behavioral and psychosocial program needs of young adult cancer survivors. Qual Health Res. 2011;21(6):796–806.CrossRefPubMed Rabin C, Simpson N, Morrow K, Pinot B. Behavioral and psychosocial program needs of young adult cancer survivors. Qual Health Res. 2011;21(6):796–806.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Evan EE, Zeltzer LK. Psychosocial dimensions of cancer adolescent and young adults. Pediatric Oncology Group of Ontario Symposium “Walking two worlds—adolescent and young adult oncology,” Ontario, Canada; 2006 Evan EE, Zeltzer LK. Psychosocial dimensions of cancer adolescent and young adults. Pediatric Oncology Group of Ontario Symposium “Walking two worlds—adolescent and young adult oncology,” Ontario, Canada; 2006
7.
go back to reference Zebrack BJ. Psychological, social, and behavioral issues for young adults with cancer. Cancer. 2011;117:2289–94.CrossRefPubMed Zebrack BJ. Psychological, social, and behavioral issues for young adults with cancer. Cancer. 2011;117:2289–94.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Seale C, Charteris-Black J, MacFarlane A, McPherson A. Interviews and internet forums: a comparison of two sources of qualitative data. Qual Health Res. 2010;20:595–606.CrossRefPubMed Seale C, Charteris-Black J, MacFarlane A, McPherson A. Interviews and internet forums: a comparison of two sources of qualitative data. Qual Health Res. 2010;20:595–606.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Smith AB, Bashore L. The effect of clinic-based health promotion education on perceived health status and health promotion behaviors of adolescent and young adult cancer survivors. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2006;23(6):326–34.CrossRefPubMed Smith AB, Bashore L. The effect of clinic-based health promotion education on perceived health status and health promotion behaviors of adolescent and young adult cancer survivors. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2006;23(6):326–34.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Zebrack B. Information and service needs for young adult cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer. 2009;17(4):349–57.CrossRefPubMed Zebrack B. Information and service needs for young adult cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer. 2009;17(4):349–57.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Oeffinger KC, Eshelman DA, Tomlinson GE, Buchanon GR. Programs for adult survivors of childhood cancer. Support Care Cancer. 1998;17(4):349–57. Oeffinger KC, Eshelman DA, Tomlinson GE, Buchanon GR. Programs for adult survivors of childhood cancer. Support Care Cancer. 1998;17(4):349–57.
12.
go back to reference McLaghlin M, Nam Y, Gould J, Pade C, Meeske KA, Ruccione KS, et al. A videosharing social networking intervention for young adult cancer survivors. Comput Hum Behav. 2012;28:631–41.CrossRef McLaghlin M, Nam Y, Gould J, Pade C, Meeske KA, Ruccione KS, et al. A videosharing social networking intervention for young adult cancer survivors. Comput Hum Behav. 2012;28:631–41.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Zebrack B, Oeffinger KC, Hou P, Kaplan S. Advocacy skills training for young adult cancer survivors: the Young Adult Survivors Conference at Camp Māk-a-Dream. Support Care Cancer. 2006;14(7):779–82.CrossRefPubMed Zebrack B, Oeffinger KC, Hou P, Kaplan S. Advocacy skills training for young adult cancer survivors: the Young Adult Survivors Conference at Camp Māk-a-Dream. Support Care Cancer. 2006;14(7):779–82.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Bloom JR, Stewart SL, D’Onofrio CL, Luce J, Banks PJ. Addressing the needs of young breast cancer survivors at the 5 year milestone: can a short term, low intensity intervention produce change? J Cancer Surviv. 2008;2:190–204.CrossRefPubMed Bloom JR, Stewart SL, D’Onofrio CL, Luce J, Banks PJ. Addressing the needs of young breast cancer survivors at the 5 year milestone: can a short term, low intensity intervention produce change? J Cancer Surviv. 2008;2:190–204.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Cassano J, Nagel K, O’Mara L. Talking with other who ‘just know’: perceptions of adolescents with cancer who participated in a teen group. J Pediatr Nurs. 2008;24(4):193–9.CrossRef Cassano J, Nagel K, O’Mara L. Talking with other who ‘just know’: perceptions of adolescents with cancer who participated in a teen group. J Pediatr Nurs. 2008;24(4):193–9.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Aziz NM, Oeffinger KC, Brooks S, Turoff AJ. Comprehensive long-term follow-up programs for pediatric cancer survivors. Cancer. 2006;107(4):841–8.CrossRefPubMed Aziz NM, Oeffinger KC, Brooks S, Turoff AJ. Comprehensive long-term follow-up programs for pediatric cancer survivors. Cancer. 2006;107(4):841–8.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Meneses K, MnNees P, Azuero A, Jukkala A. Development of the fertility and cancer project: an internet approach to help young cancer survivors. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2010;37(2):191–8.CrossRefPubMed Meneses K, MnNees P, Azuero A, Jukkala A. Development of the fertility and cancer project: an internet approach to help young cancer survivors. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2010;37(2):191–8.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Lorig KR, Ritter PL, Laurent DD, Plant K. Internet-based chronic disease self-management: a randomized trial. Med Care. 2006;44(11):964–71.CrossRefPubMed Lorig KR, Ritter PL, Laurent DD, Plant K. Internet-based chronic disease self-management: a randomized trial. Med Care. 2006;44(11):964–71.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Lorig KR, Ritter PL, Dost A, Plant K, Laurent DD, McNeil I. The expert patients programme online, a 1-year study of an Internet-based self-management programme for people with long-term conditions. Chron Illn. 2008;4(4):247–56.CrossRef Lorig KR, Ritter PL, Dost A, Plant K, Laurent DD, McNeil I. The expert patients programme online, a 1-year study of an Internet-based self-management programme for people with long-term conditions. Chron Illn. 2008;4(4):247–56.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Lorig KR, Ritter PL, Laurent DD, Plant K. The internet-based arthritis self-management program: a one-year randomized trial for patients with arthritis or fibromyalgia. Arthritis Care Res. 2008;59(7):1009–17.CrossRef Lorig KR, Ritter PL, Laurent DD, Plant K. The internet-based arthritis self-management program: a one-year randomized trial for patients with arthritis or fibromyalgia. Arthritis Care Res. 2008;59(7):1009–17.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Lorig K, Ritter PL, Laurent DD, Plant K, Green M, Jernigan VBB, et al. Online diabetes self-management program: a randomized study. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(6):1275–81.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Lorig K, Ritter PL, Laurent DD, Plant K, Green M, Jernigan VBB, et al. Online diabetes self-management program: a randomized study. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(6):1275–81.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Wantland DJ, Portillo CJ, Holzemer WR, Slaughter R, McGhee EM. The effectiveness of web-based vs. non-web-based interventions: a meta-analysis of behavioral change outcomes. J Med Internet Res. 2004;6(4):e40.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Wantland DJ, Portillo CJ, Holzemer WR, Slaughter R, McGhee EM. The effectiveness of web-based vs. non-web-based interventions: a meta-analysis of behavioral change outcomes. J Med Internet Res. 2004;6(4):e40.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Elwell L, Grogan S, Coulson N. Adolescents living with cancer: the role of computer-mediated support groups. J Health Psychol. 2011;16:236–49.CrossRefPubMed Elwell L, Grogan S, Coulson N. Adolescents living with cancer: the role of computer-mediated support groups. J Health Psychol. 2011;16:236–49.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Chapple A, McPherson A. The decision to have a prosthesis: a qualitative study of men with testicular cancer. Psycho-Oncology. 2004;13(9):654–64.CrossRefPubMed Chapple A, McPherson A. The decision to have a prosthesis: a qualitative study of men with testicular cancer. Psycho-Oncology. 2004;13(9):654–64.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Taylor RM, Pearce S, Gibson F, Fern L, Whelan J. Developing a conceptual model of teenage and young adult experiences of cancer through meta-synthesis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(6):832–46.CrossRefPubMed Taylor RM, Pearce S, Gibson F, Fern L, Whelan J. Developing a conceptual model of teenage and young adult experiences of cancer through meta-synthesis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(6):832–46.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Simard S. Fear of cancer recurrence inventory: development and initial validation of a multidimensional measure of fear of cancer recurrence. Support Care Cancer. 2009;17(3):241–51.CrossRefPubMed Simard S. Fear of cancer recurrence inventory: development and initial validation of a multidimensional measure of fear of cancer recurrence. Support Care Cancer. 2009;17(3):241–51.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference van Harten WH, van Noort O, Warmerdam R, Hendricks H, Seidel E. Assessment of rehabilitation needs in cancer patients. Int J Rehabil Res. 1998;21:247–57.CrossRefPubMed van Harten WH, van Noort O, Warmerdam R, Hendricks H, Seidel E. Assessment of rehabilitation needs in cancer patients. Int J Rehabil Res. 1998;21:247–57.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Helgeson VS, Snyder P, Seltman H. Psychological and physical adjustment to breast cancer over 4 years: identifying distinct trajectories of change. Health Psychol. 2004;23(1):3–15.CrossRefPubMed Helgeson VS, Snyder P, Seltman H. Psychological and physical adjustment to breast cancer over 4 years: identifying distinct trajectories of change. Health Psychol. 2004;23(1):3–15.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Shipps B, Phillips B. Social networks, interactivity and satisfaction: assessing socio-technical behaviours factors as an extension to technology acceptance. J Theor Appl Electron Commer Res. 2013;8(1):35–52.CrossRef Shipps B, Phillips B. Social networks, interactivity and satisfaction: assessing socio-technical behaviours factors as an extension to technology acceptance. J Theor Appl Electron Commer Res. 2013;8(1):35–52.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Legris P, Ingham J, Collerette P. Why do people use information technology?: a critical review of the technology acceptance model. Inf Manag. 2003;40(3):191–204.CrossRef Legris P, Ingham J, Collerette P. Why do people use information technology?: a critical review of the technology acceptance model. Inf Manag. 2003;40(3):191–204.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Web-based self-management for young cancer survivors: consideration of user requirements and barriers to implementation
Authors
Louise Moody
Andrew Turner
Jane Osmond
Louise Hooker
Joanna Kosmala-Anderson
Lynn Batehup
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Cancer Survivorship / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 1932-2259
Electronic ISSN: 1932-2267
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-014-0400-4

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

Journal of Cancer Survivorship 2/2015 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine