Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship 2/2015

01-06-2015

Preventive care receipt and office visit use among breast and colorectal cancer survivors relative to age- and gender-matched cancer-free controls

Authors: Jennifer Elston Lafata, Ramzi G. Salloum, Paul A. Fishman, Debra Pearson Ritzwoller, Maureen C. O’Keeffe-Rosetti, Mark C. Hornbrook

Published in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship | Issue 2/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

We compare breast and colorectal cancer survivors’ annual receipt of preventive care and office visits to that of age- and gender-matched cancer-free controls.

Methods

Automated data, including tumor registries, were used to identify insured individuals aged 50+ at the time of breast or colorectal cancer diagnosis between 2000 and 2008 as well as cancer-free controls receiving care from four integrated delivery systems. Those with metastatic or un-staged disease, or a prior cancer diagnosis were excluded. Annual visits to primary care, oncology, and surgery as well as receipt of mammography, colorectal cancer, Papanicolaou, bone densitometry, and cholesterol screening were observed for 5 years. We used generalized estimating equations that accounted for repeated observations over time per person to test annual service use differences by cancer survivor/cancer-free control status and whether survivor/cancer-free status associations were moderated by patient age <65 years and calendar year of diagnosis.

Results

A total of 3743 breast and 1530 colorectal cancer survivors were identified, representing 12,923 and 5103 patient-years of follow-up, respectively. Compared to cancer-free controls, breast and colorectal cancer survivors were equally or more likely to use all types of office visits and to receive cancer screenings and bone densitometry testing. Both breast and colorectal cancer survivors were less likely than cancer-free controls to receive cholesterol testing, regardless of age, year of diagnosis, or use of primary care.

Implications for Cancer Survivors

Programs targeting cancer survivors may benefit from addressing a broad range of primary preventive care needs, including recommended cardiovascular disease screening.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Mandel JS et al. Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study. N Engl J Med. 1993;328(19):1365–71.CrossRefPubMed Mandel JS et al. Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study. N Engl J Med. 1993;328(19):1365–71.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Duffy CM, Clark MA, Allsworth JE. Health maintenance and screening in breast cancer survivors in the United States. Cancer Detect Prev. 2006;30(1):52–7.CrossRefPubMed Duffy CM, Clark MA, Allsworth JE. Health maintenance and screening in breast cancer survivors in the United States. Cancer Detect Prev. 2006;30(1):52–7.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Bellizzi KM et al. Health behaviors of cancer survivors: examining opportunities for cancer control intervention. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(34):8884–93.CrossRefPubMed Bellizzi KM et al. Health behaviors of cancer survivors: examining opportunities for cancer control intervention. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(34):8884–93.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Trask PC et al. Cancer screening practices among cancer survivors. Am J Prev Med. 2005;28(4):351–6.CrossRefPubMed Trask PC et al. Cancer screening practices among cancer survivors. Am J Prev Med. 2005;28(4):351–6.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Findley PA, Sambamoorthi U. Preventive health services and lifestyle practices in cancer survivors: a population health investigation. J Cancer Surviv. 2009;3(1):43–58.CrossRefPubMed Findley PA, Sambamoorthi U. Preventive health services and lifestyle practices in cancer survivors: a population health investigation. J Cancer Surviv. 2009;3(1):43–58.CrossRefPubMed
8.
9.
go back to reference Earle CC, Neville BA. Under use of necessary care among cancer survivors. Cancer. 2004;101(8):1712–9.CrossRefPubMed Earle CC, Neville BA. Under use of necessary care among cancer survivors. Cancer. 2004;101(8):1712–9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Earle CC et al. Quality of non-breast cancer health maintenance among elderly breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(8):1447–51.CrossRefPubMed Earle CC et al. Quality of non-breast cancer health maintenance among elderly breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(8):1447–51.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Snyder CF et al. Comparing care for breast cancer survivors to non-cancer controls: a five-year longitudinal study. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(4):469–74.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Snyder CF et al. Comparing care for breast cancer survivors to non-cancer controls: a five-year longitudinal study. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(4):469–74.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Snyder CF et al. Prevention, screening, and surveillance care for breast cancer survivors compared with controls: changes from 1998 to 2002. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(7):1054–61.CrossRefPubMed Snyder CF et al. Prevention, screening, and surveillance care for breast cancer survivors compared with controls: changes from 1998 to 2002. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(7):1054–61.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Cooper GS et al. The utility of administrative data for measuring adherence to cancer surveillance care guidelines. Med Care. 2007;45(1):66–72.CrossRefPubMed Cooper GS et al. The utility of administrative data for measuring adherence to cancer surveillance care guidelines. Med Care. 2007;45(1):66–72.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Elston Lafata J et al. Routine surveillance care after cancer treatment with curative intent. Med Care. 2005;43(6):592–9.CrossRefPubMed Elston Lafata J et al. Routine surveillance care after cancer treatment with curative intent. Med Care. 2005;43(6):592–9.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Lamont EB et al. Measuring disease-free survival and cancer relapse using Medicare claims from CALGB breast cancer trial participants (companion to 9344). J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98(18):1335–8.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Lamont EB et al. Measuring disease-free survival and cancer relapse using Medicare claims from CALGB breast cancer trial participants (companion to 9344). J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98(18):1335–8.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Screening for osteoporosis: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med, 2011. 154(5): p. 356–64. Screening for osteoporosis: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med, 2011. 154(5): p. 356–64.
19.
go back to reference Salloum RG et al. Adherence to surveillance care guidelines after breast and colorectal cancer treatment with curative intent. Cancer. 2012;118(22):5644–51.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Salloum RG et al. Adherence to surveillance care guidelines after breast and colorectal cancer treatment with curative intent. Cancer. 2012;118(22):5644–51.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Hornbrook MC et al. Building a virtual cancer research organization. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2005;35:12–25.CrossRefPubMed Hornbrook MC et al. Building a virtual cancer research organization. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2005;35:12–25.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Klabunde CN et al. A refined comorbidity measurement algorithm for claims-based studies of breast, prostate, colorectal, and lung cancer patients. Ann Epidemiol. 2007;17(8):584–90.CrossRefPubMed Klabunde CN et al. A refined comorbidity measurement algorithm for claims-based studies of breast, prostate, colorectal, and lung cancer patients. Ann Epidemiol. 2007;17(8):584–90.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Fishman PA et al. The challenge of conducting comparative effectiveness research in cancer: the impact of a fragmented U.S. health-care system. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2013;2013(46):99–105.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Fishman PA et al. The challenge of conducting comparative effectiveness research in cancer: the impact of a fragmented U.S. health-care system. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2013;2013(46):99–105.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Fenton JJ et al. Influence of primary care use on population delivery of colorectal cancer screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18(2):640–5.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Fenton JJ et al. Influence of primary care use on population delivery of colorectal cancer screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18(2):640–5.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Shires DA et al. Colorectal cancer screening use among insured primary care patients. Am J Manage Care. 2011;17(7):480–8. Shires DA et al. Colorectal cancer screening use among insured primary care patients. Am J Manage Care. 2011;17(7):480–8.
28.
go back to reference McCarthy BD et al. Screening mammography use: the importance of a population perspective. Am J Prev Med. 1996;12(2):91–5.PubMed McCarthy BD et al. Screening mammography use: the importance of a population perspective. Am J Prev Med. 1996;12(2):91–5.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Snyder CF et al. Preventive care for colorectal cancer survivors: a 5-year longitudinal study. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(7):1073–9.CrossRefPubMed Snyder CF et al. Preventive care for colorectal cancer survivors: a 5-year longitudinal study. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(7):1073–9.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Hudson SV et al. Adult cancer survivors discuss follow-up in primary care: ‘not what i want, but maybe what i need’. Ann Fam Med. 2012;10(5):418–27.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Hudson SV et al. Adult cancer survivors discuss follow-up in primary care: ‘not what i want, but maybe what i need’. Ann Fam Med. 2012;10(5):418–27.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine, N.R.C.o.t.N.A., From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. 2006: Washington DC. Institute of Medicine, N.R.C.o.t.N.A., From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. 2006: Washington DC.
Metadata
Title
Preventive care receipt and office visit use among breast and colorectal cancer survivors relative to age- and gender-matched cancer-free controls
Authors
Jennifer Elston Lafata
Ramzi G. Salloum
Paul A. Fishman
Debra Pearson Ritzwoller
Maureen C. O’Keeffe-Rosetti
Mark C. Hornbrook
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Cancer Survivorship / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 1932-2259
Electronic ISSN: 1932-2267
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-014-0401-3

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

Journal of Cancer Survivorship 2/2015 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine