Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction 2/2018

Open Access 01-08-2018 | Original Article

Measurement of wire deflection on loading may indicate union in Ilizarov constructs, an in vitro model

Authors: Beth Lineham, Todd Stewart, Paul Harwood

Published in: Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction | Issue 2/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

No entirely reliable method exists for assessing union during Ilizarov treatment. Premature removal results in potential treatment failure; hence, alternative methods warrant investigation. Wire deflection might provide an indication of fracture site deformation on weight bearing, indicating progress towards union. This study aimed to test a method for assessing wire deflection within an Ilizarov frame. (1) To assess the repeatability of our novel measurement method in measuring wire deflection within an Ilizarov frame in vitro. (2) To compare the amount of wire deflection in an unstable model with that in an intact bone model. (3) To assess accuracy of this method by comparing wire deflection measured with overall machine extension. Tests were performed on clinical grade-tensioned fine wire 4-ring Ilizarov constructs stabilising a simulated fracture, with and without an unstable defect. Models were sequentially loaded to 700 N using an Instron testing machine. A digital depth gauge attached to the superior ring measured relative wire displacement at the ring closest to the fracture. Tests were repeated 3 times. (1) Both unstable and stable bone models produced highly repeatable load deformation curves (R2 = 0.98 and 0.99). (2) In the unstable model, wires tensioned at 882 and 1274 N produced mean maximum deflections of 2.41 and 2.69 mm compared with 0.05 and 0.04 mm in the intact bone model (significant p < 0.0001). (3) Wire deflection and machine extension results were strongly correlated (r = 0.99). A measurable difference in wire deflection between stable and unstable situations exists using this method which appears accurate and repeatable, with clear correlation between displacement and load and displacement and machine extension. This approach might be clinically applicable, and further clinical testing is required.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Babatunde OM, Fragomen AT, Rozbruch SR (2010) Noninvasive quantitative assessment of bone healing after distraction osteogenesis. HSS J 6(1):71–78CrossRefPubMed Babatunde OM, Fragomen AT, Rozbruch SR (2010) Noninvasive quantitative assessment of bone healing after distraction osteogenesis. HSS J 6(1):71–78CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Corrales LA, Morshed S, Bhandari M, Miclau T III (2008) Variability in the assessment of fracture-healing in orthopaedic trauma studies. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol 90A(9):1862–1868CrossRef Corrales LA, Morshed S, Bhandari M, Miclau T III (2008) Variability in the assessment of fracture-healing in orthopaedic trauma studies. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol 90A(9):1862–1868CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Richardson J, J H. The measurement of fracture healing. In: De Bastiani G, Apley A, Goldberg A (eds) Orthofix external fixation in trauma and orthopaedics, 1 edn. Springer, London, p 32-44 Richardson J, J H. The measurement of fracture healing. In: De Bastiani G, Apley A, Goldberg A (eds) Orthofix external fixation in trauma and orthopaedics, 1 edn. Springer, London, p 32-44
4.
go back to reference Watson MA, Mathias KJ, Maffulli N (2000) External ring fixators: an overview. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H J Eng Med 214(H5):459–470CrossRef Watson MA, Mathias KJ, Maffulli N (2000) External ring fixators: an overview. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H J Eng Med 214(H5):459–470CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lie CW (2009) W C. Limb lengthening in short-stature patients using monolateral and circular external fixators. Hong Kong Med J 15:280–284PubMed Lie CW (2009) W C. Limb lengthening in short-stature patients using monolateral and circular external fixators. Hong Kong Med J 15:280–284PubMed
6.
go back to reference Adair A, Narayan B, Andrews C, Laverick M, Marsh D (2003) The complication rate in Ilizarov surgery. Orthop Proc 85-B(SUPP II):139 Adair A, Narayan B, Andrews C, Laverick M, Marsh D (2003) The complication rate in Ilizarov surgery. Orthop Proc 85-B(SUPP II):139
7.
go back to reference Paley D, Herzenberg JE, Paremain G, Bhave A (1997) Femoral lengthening over an intramedullary nail. A matched-case comparison with Ilizarov femoral lengthening. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79(10):1464–1480CrossRefPubMed Paley D, Herzenberg JE, Paremain G, Bhave A (1997) Femoral lengthening over an intramedullary nail. A matched-case comparison with Ilizarov femoral lengthening. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79(10):1464–1480CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Britten S, Hepworth A, Hasson M, Sian PS (2008) Avoiding premature frame removal in tibial fractures. Orthop Proc 90-B(SUPP III):569 Britten S, Hepworth A, Hasson M, Sian PS (2008) Avoiding premature frame removal in tibial fractures. Orthop Proc 90-B(SUPP III):569
9.
go back to reference Siffert RS, Kaufman JJ (1996) Acoustic assessment of fracture healing. Capabilities and limitations of “a lost art”. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead, NJ) 25(9):614–618 Siffert RS, Kaufman JJ (1996) Acoustic assessment of fracture healing. Capabilities and limitations of “a lost art”. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead, NJ) 25(9):614–618
10.
go back to reference Lowet G, VanderPerre G (1996) Ultrasound velocity measurement in long bones: measurement method and simulation of ultrasound wave propagation. J Biomech 29(10):1255–1262CrossRefPubMed Lowet G, VanderPerre G (1996) Ultrasound velocity measurement in long bones: measurement method and simulation of ultrasound wave propagation. J Biomech 29(10):1255–1262CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Eyres KS, Bell MJ, Kanis JA (1993) Methods of assessing new bone formation during limb lengthening. Ultrasonography, dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and radiography compared. Bone Joint J 75-B(3):358-64 Eyres KS, Bell MJ, Kanis JA (1993) Methods of assessing new bone formation during limb lengthening. Ultrasonography, dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and radiography compared. Bone Joint J 75-B(3):358-64
12.
go back to reference Bail HJ, Kolbeck S, Krummrey G et al (2002) Ultrasound can predict regenerate stiffness in distraction osteogenesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:362–367CrossRef Bail HJ, Kolbeck S, Krummrey G et al (2002) Ultrasound can predict regenerate stiffness in distraction osteogenesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:362–367CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Markel MD, Chao EY (1993) Noninvasive monitoring techniques for quantitative description of callus mineral content and mechanical properties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 293:37–45 Markel MD, Chao EY (1993) Noninvasive monitoring techniques for quantitative description of callus mineral content and mechanical properties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 293:37–45
14.
go back to reference Richards J (1987) Stiffness in healing fractures. CRC Crit Rev Biomed Eng 15(2):145–185 Richards J (1987) Stiffness in healing fractures. CRC Crit Rev Biomed Eng 15(2):145–185
15.
go back to reference Cunningham JL, Kenwright J, Kershaw CJ (1990) Biomechanical measurement of fracture-healing. J Med Eng Technol 14(3):92–101CrossRefPubMed Cunningham JL, Kenwright J, Kershaw CJ (1990) Biomechanical measurement of fracture-healing. J Med Eng Technol 14(3):92–101CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Kristiansen B, Borgwardt A (1992) Fracture-healing monitored with strain-gauges-external fixation of 7 humeral neck fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 63(6):612–614PubMed Kristiansen B, Borgwardt A (1992) Fracture-healing monitored with strain-gauges-external fixation of 7 humeral neck fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 63(6):612–614PubMed
17.
go back to reference Bedzinski R, Tyndyk M (2000) Experimental methods of stress and strain analysis in orthopaedics biomechanics. Acta Bioeng Biomech 2(2):3–23 Bedzinski R, Tyndyk M (2000) Experimental methods of stress and strain analysis in orthopaedics biomechanics. Acta Bioeng Biomech 2(2):3–23
18.
go back to reference Kummer FJ (1989) Biomechanics of the Ilizarov external fixator. Bull Hosp Joint Dis Orthop Inst 49(2):140–147 Kummer FJ (1989) Biomechanics of the Ilizarov external fixator. Bull Hosp Joint Dis Orthop Inst 49(2):140–147
19.
go back to reference Gessmann J, Baecker H, Jettkant B, Muhr G (2011) Seybold D (2011) Direct and indirect loading of the Ilizarov external fixator: the effect on the interfragmentary movements and compressive loads. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 6(1):27–31CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gessmann J, Baecker H, Jettkant B, Muhr G (2011) Seybold D (2011) Direct and indirect loading of the Ilizarov external fixator: the effect on the interfragmentary movements and compressive loads. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 6(1):27–31CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference La Russa V, Skallerud B, Klaksvik J, Foss OA (2011) Reduction in wire tension caused by dynamic loading. An experimental Ilizarov frame study. J Biomech 44(8):1454–1458CrossRefPubMed La Russa V, Skallerud B, Klaksvik J, Foss OA (2011) Reduction in wire tension caused by dynamic loading. An experimental Ilizarov frame study. J Biomech 44(8):1454–1458CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Aquarius R, Van Kampen A, Verdonschot N (2007) Rapid pre-tension loss in the Ilizarov external fixator: an in vitro study. Acta Orthop 78(5):654–660CrossRefPubMed Aquarius R, Van Kampen A, Verdonschot N (2007) Rapid pre-tension loss in the Ilizarov external fixator: an in vitro study. Acta Orthop 78(5):654–660CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Measurement of wire deflection on loading may indicate union in Ilizarov constructs, an in vitro model
Authors
Beth Lineham
Todd Stewart
Paul Harwood
Publication date
01-08-2018
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 1828-8936
Electronic ISSN: 1828-8928
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11751-018-0306-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction 2/2018 Go to the issue