Skip to main content
Top
Published in: General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 12/2019

01-12-2019 | Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation | Original Article

Early outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation for degenerated aortic bioprostheses in Japanese patients: insights from the AORTIC VIV study

Authors: Kizuku Yamashita, Satsuki Fukushima, Yusuke Shimahara, Yasuhiro Hamatani, Hideaki Kanzaki, Tetsuya Fukuda, Chisato Izumi, Satoshi Yasuda, Junjiro Kobayashi, Tomoyuki Fujita

Published in: General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | Issue 12/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

The valve-in-valve procedure, in which a transcatheter heart valve (THV) is implanted into a degenerated bioprosthetic valve, is standardized for high-risk patients. However, this procedure is challenging in Japanese patients who have a small aortic annulus. We investigated the feasibility, safety, and therapeutic efficacy of the valve-in-valve procedure involving a degenerated stented bioprosthesis, stentless bioprosthesis, or THV.

Methods

We performed a single-center, non-comparative study of the aortic valve-in-valve procedure (AORTIC VIV study). Beginning in October 2016, the aortic valve-in-valve procedure was performed in seven patients with a stented bioprosthesis, in three patients with a stentless bioprosthesis, and in one patient with a THV.

Results

No 30-day post-procedure mortality or severe morbidities occurred. The mean echocardiographic gradient in the aortic position improved from 41 (38–48) to 17 (11–22) mmHg at 30 days (p = 0.01). No paravalvular or mild and more transvalvular leaks were detected. The New York Heart Association functional class improved from 2 (2–2.5) to 1 (1–1) at 30 days postoperatively (p = 0.01). Although the procedure failed in two patients with an implanted stentless bioprosthesis, the third patient with a stentless bioprosthesis and the one patient with a degenerated THV successfully underwent the valve-in-valve procedure.

Conclusions

Feasibility, safety, and potential efficacy of the aortic valve-in-valve procedure were confirmed in selected Japanese patients with a degenerated aortic bioprosthesis. The valve-in-valve procedure for stentless bioprostheses was technically challenging.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP 3rd, Fleisher LA, et al. 2017 AHA/ACC Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2017;135:e1159–95.CrossRef Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP 3rd, Fleisher LA, et al. 2017 AHA/ACC Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2017;135:e1159–95.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Dvir D, Webb JG, Bleiziffer S, Pasic M, Waksman R, Kodali S, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in failed bioprosthetic surgical valves. JAMA. 2014;312:162–70.CrossRef Dvir D, Webb JG, Bleiziffer S, Pasic M, Waksman R, Kodali S, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in failed bioprosthetic surgical valves. JAMA. 2014;312:162–70.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Pibarot P, Simonato M, Barbanti M, Linke A, Kornowski R, Rudolph T, et al. Impact of pre-existing prosthesis-patient mismatch on survival following aortic valve-in-valve procedures. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11:133–41.CrossRef Pibarot P, Simonato M, Barbanti M, Linke A, Kornowski R, Rudolph T, et al. Impact of pre-existing prosthesis-patient mismatch on survival following aortic valve-in-valve procedures. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11:133–41.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Deeb GM, Chetcuti SJ, Reardon MJ, Patel HJ, Grossman PM, Schreiber T, et al. 1-Year results in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement with failed surgical bioprostheses. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10:1034–44.CrossRef Deeb GM, Chetcuti SJ, Reardon MJ, Patel HJ, Grossman PM, Schreiber T, et al. 1-Year results in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement with failed surgical bioprostheses. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10:1034–44.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Matsumoto Y, Fujita T, Hata H, Shimahara Y, Sato S, Kobayashi J. Hemodynamic performance and durability of mosaic bioprostheses for aortic valve replacement, up to 13 years. Circ J. 2015;79:1044–51.CrossRef Matsumoto Y, Fujita T, Hata H, Shimahara Y, Sato S, Kobayashi J. Hemodynamic performance and durability of mosaic bioprostheses for aortic valve replacement, up to 13 years. Circ J. 2015;79:1044–51.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Minakata K, Tanaka S, Okawa Y, Shimamoto M, Kaneko T, Takahara Y. Long-term outcome of the carpentier-edwards pericardial valve in the aortic position in Japanese patients. Circ J. 2014;78:882–9.CrossRef Minakata K, Tanaka S, Okawa Y, Shimamoto M, Kaneko T, Takahara Y. Long-term outcome of the carpentier-edwards pericardial valve in the aortic position in Japanese patients. Circ J. 2014;78:882–9.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Yamashita K, Fukushima S, Shimahara Y, Yamasaki T, Matsumoto Y, Kawamoto N, et al. Study protocol for transcatheter aortic valve replacement for a degenerated aortic bioprosthesis in a Japanese Cohort. Circ Rep. 2019;2:102–6.CrossRef Yamashita K, Fukushima S, Shimahara Y, Yamasaki T, Matsumoto Y, Kawamoto N, et al. Study protocol for transcatheter aortic valve replacement for a degenerated aortic bioprosthesis in a Japanese Cohort. Circ Rep. 2019;2:102–6.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kappetein AP, Head SJ, Généreux P, Piazza N, van Mieghem NM, Blackstone EH, et al. Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:1438–54.CrossRef Kappetein AP, Head SJ, Généreux P, Piazza N, van Mieghem NM, Blackstone EH, et al. Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:1438–54.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Holmes DR Jr, Mack MJ, Kaul S, Agnihotri A, Alexander KP, Bailey SR, et al. 2012 ACCF/AATS/SCAI/STS expert consensus document on transcatheter aortic valve replacement: developed in collaboration with the American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Heart Failure Society of America, Mended Hearts, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93:1340–95.CrossRef Holmes DR Jr, Mack MJ, Kaul S, Agnihotri A, Alexander KP, Bailey SR, et al. 2012 ACCF/AATS/SCAI/STS expert consensus document on transcatheter aortic valve replacement: developed in collaboration with the American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Heart Failure Society of America, Mended Hearts, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93:1340–95.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Mihaljevic T, Nowicki ER, Rajeswaran J, Blackstone EH, Lagazzi L, Thomas J, et al. Survival after valve replacement for aortic stenosis: implications for decision making. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135:1270–8.CrossRef Mihaljevic T, Nowicki ER, Rajeswaran J, Blackstone EH, Lagazzi L, Thomas J, et al. Survival after valve replacement for aortic stenosis: implications for decision making. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135:1270–8.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Gurvitch R, Cheung A, Ye J, Wood DA, Willson AB, Toggweiler S, et al. Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for failed surgical bioprosthetic valves. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:2196–209.CrossRef Gurvitch R, Cheung A, Ye J, Wood DA, Willson AB, Toggweiler S, et al. Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for failed surgical bioprosthetic valves. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:2196–209.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bapat V, Attia R, Redwood S, Hancock J, Wilson K, Young C, et al. Use of transcatheter heart valves for a valve-in-valve implantation in patients with degenerated aortic bioprosthesis: technical considerations and results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;144:1372–9.CrossRef Bapat V, Attia R, Redwood S, Hancock J, Wilson K, Young C, et al. Use of transcatheter heart valves for a valve-in-valve implantation in patients with degenerated aortic bioprosthesis: technical considerations and results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;144:1372–9.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Azadani AN, Reardon M, Simonato M, Aldea G, Nickenig G, Kornowski R, et al. Effect of transcatheter aortic valve size and position on valve-in-valve hemodynamics: an in vitro study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;153:1303–15.CrossRef Azadani AN, Reardon M, Simonato M, Aldea G, Nickenig G, Kornowski R, et al. Effect of transcatheter aortic valve size and position on valve-in-valve hemodynamics: an in vitro study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;153:1303–15.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Bapat VN, Attia RQ, Condemi F, Visagan R, Guthrie M, Sunni S, et al. Fluoroscopic guide to an ideal implant position for Sapien XT and CoreValve during a valve-in-valve procedure. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6:1186–94.CrossRef Bapat VN, Attia RQ, Condemi F, Visagan R, Guthrie M, Sunni S, et al. Fluoroscopic guide to an ideal implant position for Sapien XT and CoreValve during a valve-in-valve procedure. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6:1186–94.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Webb JG, Mack MJ, White JM, Dvir D, Blanke P, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation within degenerated aortic surgical bioprostheses: PARTNER 2 valve-in-valve registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69:2253–62.CrossRef Webb JG, Mack MJ, White JM, Dvir D, Blanke P, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation within degenerated aortic surgical bioprostheses: PARTNER 2 valve-in-valve registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69:2253–62.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Yamashita K, Fujita T, Fukushima S, Shimahara Y, Kume Y, Matsumoto Y, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for degenerated 19-mm aortic bioprosthetic valve. Circ J. 2017;82:289–92.CrossRef Yamashita K, Fujita T, Fukushima S, Shimahara Y, Kume Y, Matsumoto Y, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for degenerated 19-mm aortic bioprosthetic valve. Circ J. 2017;82:289–92.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kirwan C, Richardson G, Rothman MT. Is there a role for balloon valvuloplasty in patients with stenotic aortic bioprosthetic valves? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004;63:251–3.CrossRef Kirwan C, Richardson G, Rothman MT. Is there a role for balloon valvuloplasty in patients with stenotic aortic bioprosthetic valves? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004;63:251–3.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Early outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation for degenerated aortic bioprostheses in Japanese patients: insights from the AORTIC VIV study
Authors
Kizuku Yamashita
Satsuki Fukushima
Yusuke Shimahara
Yasuhiro Hamatani
Hideaki Kanzaki
Tetsuya Fukuda
Chisato Izumi
Satoshi Yasuda
Junjiro Kobayashi
Tomoyuki Fujita
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Published in
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery / Issue 12/2019
Print ISSN: 1863-6705
Electronic ISSN: 1863-6713
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-019-01133-3

Other articles of this Issue 12/2019

General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 12/2019 Go to the issue