Top

Published in:

22-06-2022 | Original Article

Development of a robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) program. Lessons learned after 2500 cases

Authors: Luis Herrera, Juan Escalon, Matthew Johnston, Alexis Sanchez, Renata Sanchez, Ivan Mogollon

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 2/2023

Abstract

Robotic surgery provides significant advantages in terms of an optimal three-dimensional and magnified view of the surgical field, superior maneuverability of surgical instruments, removal of surgeon’s tremor and excellent ergonomics. Nonetheless, the adoption of this technology in thoracic surgery has been slower than in other specialties such as urology, gynecology or digestive surgery. In this article we describe our institution’s experience in robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) in the span from 2012 to 2020. During this time the average annual growth of the program has been 55%. Among the most frequently procedures performed were lobectomies, wedge resection and segmentectomies. Surgical time and length of stay decreased as the number of procedures performed increased, relative to the learning curve. Additional important elements considered relevant to the success of the program are the resources available, leadership, motivation of the surgical team, adequate and stepwise training, as well as the collection of data for periodic analysis of results. All those initiatives have led to a relevant improvement of financial variables reflecting a cost reduction.

Chung G, Hinoul P, Coplan P, Yoo A (2020) Trends in the diffusion of robotic surgery in prostate, uterus, and colorectal procedures: a retrospective population-based study. J Robot Surg 15(2):275–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11701-020-01102-6CrossRefPubMed

Melfi FMA, Menconi GF, Mariani AM, Angeletti CA (2002) Early experience with robotic technology for thoracoscopic surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 21(5):864–868. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-7940(02)00102-1/2/21-5-864-TBL001.GIFCrossRefPubMed

Shahin GMM, Bruinsma GJBB, Stamenkovic S, Cuesta MA (2019) Training in robotic thoracic surgery—the European way. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 8(2):20209–20209. https://doi.org/10.3978/16558CrossRef

Terra RM et al (2019) Building a large robotic thoracic surgery program in an emerging country: experience in Brazil. World J Surg 43(11):2920–2926. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00268-019-05086-9CrossRefPubMed

Gossot D, Seguin-Givelet A (2018) Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) major pulmonary resections: different approaches and focus on the full thoracoscopic fissure-based technique. Shanghai Chest. https://doi.org/10.21037/SHC.2018.03.06CrossRef

Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS (2013) How to teach robotic pulmonary resection. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 25(1):76–82. https://doi.org/10.1053/J.SEMTCVS.2013.01.004CrossRefPubMed

Luthringer T, Aleksic I, Caire A, Albala DM (2012) Developing a successful robotics program. Curr Opin Urol 22(1):40–46. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0B013E32834D5455CrossRefPubMed

Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Minnich DJ (2011) Starting a robotic program in general thoracic surgery: why, how, and lessons learned. Ann Thorac Surg 91(6):1729–1737. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ATHORACSUR.2011.01.104CrossRefPubMed

Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Skylizard L, Minnich DJ (2011) Initial consecutive experience of completely portal robotic pulmonary resection with 4 arms. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 142(4):740–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JTCVS.2011.07.022CrossRefPubMed

10.

Reddy RM, Gorrepati ML, Oh DS, Mehendale S, Reed MF (2018) Robotic-assisted versus thoracoscopic lobectomy outcomes from high-volume thoracic surgeons. Ann Thorac Surg 106(3):902–908. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ATHORACSUR.2018.03.048CrossRefPubMed

11.

Gonsenhauser I, Abaza R, Mekhjian H, Moffatt-Bruce SD (2012) Developing a multidisciplinary robotic surgery quality assessment program. J Healthc Qual 34(3):43–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1945-1474.2012.00205.XCrossRefPubMed

12.

Kajiwara N et al (2018) Cost-benefit performance simulation of robot-assisted thoracic surgery as required for financial viability under the 2016 revised reimbursement paradigm of the Japanese national health insurance system. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 24(2):73–80. https://doi.org/10.5761/ATCS.OA.17-00094CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Giedelman C et al (2020) Establishing a successful robotic surgery program and improving operating room efficiency: literature review and our experience report. J Robot Surg 15(3):435–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11701-020-01121-3CrossRefPubMed

14.

Estes SJ, Goldenberg D, Winder JS, Juza RM, Lyn-Sue JR (2017) Best practices for robotic surgery programs. JSLS. https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2016.00102CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Pereira-Arias JG et al (2019) How to build a robotic program. Arch Esp Urol 72(3):227–238PubMed

16.

Lee DJ, Ding J, Guzzo TJ (2019) Improving operating room efficiency. Curr Urol Rep 20(6):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11934-019-0895-3CrossRef

17.

Garbens A, Lay AH, Steinberg RL, Gahan JC (2020) Experienced bedside-assistants improve operative outcomes for surgeons early in their learning curve for robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Robot Surg 15(4):619–626. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11701-020-01146-8CrossRefPubMed

18.

Sanchez A et al (2022) Robotic surgery: financial impact of surgical trays optimization in bariatric and thoracic surgery. J Robot Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11701-022-01412-XCrossRefPubMed

19.

Greenberg JA, Schwarz E, Paige J, Dort J, Bachman S (2021) At-home hands-on surgical training during COVID19: proof of concept using a virtual telementoring platform. Surg Endosc 35(5):1963–1969. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00464-021-08470-6/TABLES/2CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Melfi FMA, Mussi A (2008) Robotically assisted lobectomy: learning curve and complications. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 18(3):289–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.THORSURG.2008.06.001CrossRef

21.

Gharagozloo F, Margolis M, Tempesta B, Strother E, Najam F (2009) Robot-assisted lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer: report of 100 consecutive cases. Ann Thorac Surg 88(2):380–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ATHORACSUR.2009.04.039CrossRefPubMed

22.

Bilgic E et al (2017) Effectiveness of telementoring in surgery compared with on-site mentoring: a systematic review. Surgical Innovation 24(4):379–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350617708725CrossRefPubMed

23.

Nguyen DM et al (2020) Clinical and economic comparative effectiveness of robotic-assisted, video-assisted thoracoscopic, and open lobectomy. J Thorac Dis 12(3):296–306. https://doi.org/10.21037/JTD.2020.01.40CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Title: Development of a robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) program. Lessons learned after 2500 cases
Authors: Luis Herrera
Juan Escalon
Matthew Johnston
Alexis Sanchez
Renata Sanchez
Ivan Mogollon
Publication date: 22-06-2022
Publisher: Springer London
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 2/2023
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-022-01430-9

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Development of a robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) program. Lessons learned after 2500 cases

Abstract

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 2/2023

RoCS: Robotic Curriculum for young Surgeons

Correction to: Impact of robot‑assisted surgery appearance on reduction of annual blood transfusion cases in Japan: application of meta‑analysis and NDB open data

Virtual classroom proficiency-based progression for robotic surgery training (VROBOT): a randomised, prospective, cross-over, effectiveness study

What are clinically relevant performance metrics in robotic surgery? A systematic review of the literature

Robot-assisted groin hernia repair is primarily performed by specialized surgeons: a scoping review

Objective performance indicators of cardiothoracic residents are associated with vascular injury during robotic-assisted lobectomy on porcine models