Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 3/2020

01-06-2020 | Septicemia | Original Article

Outcomes and peri-operative complications of robotic pyelolithotomy

Authors: Michael L. Schulster, Daniel A. Sidhom, Kathryn Sturgeon, James F. Borin, Marc A. Bjurlin

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 3/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Standard of care for large or complex renal stones is percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Robotic pyelolithotomy, however, may be a feasible alternative, but limited data exist on its outcomes and complications. Our study objective was to describe the outcomes and peri-operative complications of robotic pyelolithotomy for complex renal calculi. We performed a retrospective analysis of robotic pyelolithotomy at our tertiary academic institution from 2015 to 2018. Demographics, stone clearance rates, complications, estimated blood loss, operative time, and length of stay were reported. 15 patients were included with a median age of 59 years (SD 15.3, 27–80) and BMI 25 kg/m2 (SD 4.6, 20.9–35.7). Median follow-up was 4 months. Median stone size was 3 cm (SD 1.2 cm, 2–5 cm). Concomitant pyeloplasty was performed in 2 patients, complete stone clearance in 11 (73%) cases and 4 out of 5 (80%) with a solitary stone. Median operative time was 191.5 min (SD 64.8 min, 110–303 min), with no open conversion. Median EBL was 70 ml (SD 65 ml, 20–250 ml) and median length of stay was 1 day (SD 1 day, 1–5 days). Median change in creatinine and eGFR were − 0.02 mg/dl and + 3 ml/min/1.73 m2. There were no cases of sepsis or post-operative fever and only one case of transfusion. Robotic pyelolithotomy appears safe and effective. Ultimately, less bleeding, lower septicemia, renal parenchymal preservation, and favorable stone-free rates in a single procedure make this as an attractive option in the management of select patients with large renal stone disease.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL, Monga M, Murad MH, Nelson CP, Pace KT, Pais VM Jr, Pearle MS, Preminger GM, Razvi H, Shah O, Matlaga BR (2016) Surgical management of stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, Part I. J Urol 196(4):1153–1160PubMedCrossRef Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL, Monga M, Murad MH, Nelson CP, Pace KT, Pais VM Jr, Pearle MS, Preminger GM, Razvi H, Shah O, Matlaga BR (2016) Surgical management of stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, Part I. J Urol 196(4):1153–1160PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K et al (2016) EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol 69(3):475–482PubMedCrossRef Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K et al (2016) EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol 69(3):475–482PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bryniarski P, Paradysz A, Zyczkowski M, Kupilas A, Nowakowski K, Bogacki R (2012) A randomized controlled study to analyze the safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery in the management of renal stones more than 2 cm in diameter. J Endourol 26(1):52–57PubMedCrossRef Bryniarski P, Paradysz A, Zyczkowski M, Kupilas A, Nowakowski K, Bogacki R (2012) A randomized controlled study to analyze the safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery in the management of renal stones more than 2 cm in diameter. J Endourol 26(1):52–57PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Karakoyunlu N, Goktug G, Sener NC et al (2015) A comparison of standard PCNL and staged retrograde FURS in pelvis stones over 2 cm in diameter: a prospective randomized study. Urolithiasis 43(3):283–287PubMedCrossRef Karakoyunlu N, Goktug G, Sener NC et al (2015) A comparison of standard PCNL and staged retrograde FURS in pelvis stones over 2 cm in diameter: a prospective randomized study. Urolithiasis 43(3):283–287PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Srisubat A, Potisat S, Lojanapiwat B, Setthawong V, Laopaiboon M (2014) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11:cd007044 Srisubat A, Potisat S, Lojanapiwat B, Setthawong V, Laopaiboon M (2014) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11:cd007044
6.
go back to reference Duvdevani M, Razvi H, Sofer M et al (2007) Third prize: contemporary percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: 1585 procedures in 1338 consecutive patients. J Endourol 21(8):824–829PubMedCrossRef Duvdevani M, Razvi H, Sofer M et al (2007) Third prize: contemporary percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: 1585 procedures in 1338 consecutive patients. J Endourol 21(8):824–829PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Lingeman JE, Nakada SY, Pearle MS, Wolf JS (2005) Chapter 1: sAUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J Urol 173(6):1991–2000PubMedCrossRef Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Lingeman JE, Nakada SY, Pearle MS, Wolf JS (2005) Chapter 1: sAUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J Urol 173(6):1991–2000PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Michel MS, Trojan L, Rassweiler JJ (2007) Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 51(4):899–906PubMedCrossRef Michel MS, Trojan L, Rassweiler JJ (2007) Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 51(4):899–906PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference de la Rosette J, Assimos D, Desai M et al (2011) The clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients. J Endourol 25(1):11–17PubMedCrossRef de la Rosette J, Assimos D, Desai M et al (2011) The clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients. J Endourol 25(1):11–17PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Xue W, Pacik D, Boellaard W et al (2012) Management of single large nonstaghorn renal stones in the CROES PCNL global study. J Urol 187(4):1293–1297PubMedCrossRef Xue W, Pacik D, Boellaard W et al (2012) Management of single large nonstaghorn renal stones in the CROES PCNL global study. J Urol 187(4):1293–1297PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Khosla A, Wagner AA (2016) Robotic surgery of the kidney, bladder, and prostate. Surg Clin N Am 96(3):615–636PubMedCrossRef Khosla A, Wagner AA (2016) Robotic surgery of the kidney, bladder, and prostate. Surg Clin N Am 96(3):615–636PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Siddiqui KM, Albala DM (2016) Robotic-assisted surgery and treatment of urolithiasis. Int J Surg (London, England) 36(Pt D):673–675CrossRef Siddiqui KM, Albala DM (2016) Robotic-assisted surgery and treatment of urolithiasis. Int J Surg (London, England) 36(Pt D):673–675CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Swearingen R, Sood A, Madi R et al (2017) Zero-fragment nephrolithotomy: a multi-center evaluation of robotic pyelolithotomy and nephrolithotomy for treating renal stones. Eur Urol 72(6):1014–1021PubMedCrossRef Swearingen R, Sood A, Madi R et al (2017) Zero-fragment nephrolithotomy: a multi-center evaluation of robotic pyelolithotomy and nephrolithotomy for treating renal stones. Eur Urol 72(6):1014–1021PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ghani KR, Trinh QD, Jeong W et al (2014) Robotic nephrolithotomy and pyelolithotomy with utilization of the robotic ultrasound probe. Int Braz J Urol 40(1):125–126PubMedCrossRef Ghani KR, Trinh QD, Jeong W et al (2014) Robotic nephrolithotomy and pyelolithotomy with utilization of the robotic ultrasound probe. Int Braz J Urol 40(1):125–126PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference King SA, Klaassen Z, Madi R (2014) Robot-assisted anatrophic nephrolithotomy: description of technique and early results. J Endourol 28(3):325–329PubMedCrossRef King SA, Klaassen Z, Madi R (2014) Robot-assisted anatrophic nephrolithotomy: description of technique and early results. J Endourol 28(3):325–329PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Badani KK, Hemal AK, Fumo M et al (2006) Robotic extended pyelolithotomy for treatment of renal calculi: a feasibility study. World J Urol 24(2):198–201PubMedCrossRef Badani KK, Hemal AK, Fumo M et al (2006) Robotic extended pyelolithotomy for treatment of renal calculi: a feasibility study. World J Urol 24(2):198–201PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hemal AK, Nayyar R, Gupta NP, Dorairajan LN (2010) Experience with robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery in upper tract urolithiasis. Can J Urol 17(4):5299–5305PubMed Hemal AK, Nayyar R, Gupta NP, Dorairajan LN (2010) Experience with robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery in upper tract urolithiasis. Can J Urol 17(4):5299–5305PubMed
18.
go back to reference Atug F, Castle EP, Burgess SV, Thomas R (2005) Concomitant management of renal calculi and pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction with robotic laparoscopic surgery. BJU Int 96(9):1365–1368PubMedCrossRef Atug F, Castle EP, Burgess SV, Thomas R (2005) Concomitant management of renal calculi and pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction with robotic laparoscopic surgery. BJU Int 96(9):1365–1368PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lee RS, Passerotti CC, Cendron M, Estrada CR, Borer JG, Peters CA (2007) Early results of robot assisted laparoscopic lithotomy in adolescents. J Urol 177(6):2306–2309PubMedCrossRef Lee RS, Passerotti CC, Cendron M, Estrada CR, Borer JG, Peters CA (2007) Early results of robot assisted laparoscopic lithotomy in adolescents. J Urol 177(6):2306–2309PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Mufarrij PW, Woods M, Shah OD et al (2008) Robotic dismembered pyeloplasty: a 6-year, multi-institutional experience. J Urol 180(4):1391–1396PubMedCrossRef Mufarrij PW, Woods M, Shah OD et al (2008) Robotic dismembered pyeloplasty: a 6-year, multi-institutional experience. J Urol 180(4):1391–1396PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Gaur DD, Agarwal DK, Purohit KC, Darshane AS (1994) Retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy. J Urol 151(4):927–929PubMedCrossRef Gaur DD, Agarwal DK, Purohit KC, Darshane AS (1994) Retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy. J Urol 151(4):927–929PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Ramakumar S, Lancini V, Chan DY, Parsons JK, Kavoussi LR, Jarrett TW (2002) Laparoscopic pyeloplasty with concomitant pyelolithotomy. J Urol 167(3):1378–1380PubMedCrossRef Ramakumar S, Lancini V, Chan DY, Parsons JK, Kavoussi LR, Jarrett TW (2002) Laparoscopic pyeloplasty with concomitant pyelolithotomy. J Urol 167(3):1378–1380PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Nambirajan T, Jeschke S, Albqami N, Abukora F, Leeb K, Janetschek G (2005) Role of laparoscopy in management of renal stones: single-center experience and review of literature. J Endourol 19(3):353–359PubMedCrossRef Nambirajan T, Jeschke S, Albqami N, Abukora F, Leeb K, Janetschek G (2005) Role of laparoscopy in management of renal stones: single-center experience and review of literature. J Endourol 19(3):353–359PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Wang X, Li S, Liu T, Guo Y, Yang Z (2013) Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy compared to percutaneous nephrolithotomy as surgical management for large renal pelvic calculi: a meta-analysis. J Urol 190(3):888–893PubMedCrossRef Wang X, Li S, Liu T, Guo Y, Yang Z (2013) Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy compared to percutaneous nephrolithotomy as surgical management for large renal pelvic calculi: a meta-analysis. J Urol 190(3):888–893PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Basiri A, Tabibi A, Nouralizadeh A et al (2014) Comparison of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with renal pelvic stones: a randomized clinical trial. Urol J 11(6):1932–1937PubMed Basiri A, Tabibi A, Nouralizadeh A et al (2014) Comparison of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with renal pelvic stones: a randomized clinical trial. Urol J 11(6):1932–1937PubMed
26.
go back to reference Rule AD, Bergstralh EJ, Melton LJ, Li X, Weaver AL, Lieske JC (2009) Kidney stones and the risk for chronic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol CJASN 4(4):804–811PubMedCrossRef Rule AD, Bergstralh EJ, Melton LJ, Li X, Weaver AL, Lieske JC (2009) Kidney stones and the risk for chronic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol CJASN 4(4):804–811PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Lojanapiwat B, Kitirattrakarn P (2011) Role of preoperative and intraoperative factors in mediating infection complication following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urol Int 86(4):448–452PubMedCrossRef Lojanapiwat B, Kitirattrakarn P (2011) Role of preoperative and intraoperative factors in mediating infection complication following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urol Int 86(4):448–452PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Tefekli A, Tepeler A, Akman T et al (2012) The comparison of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of solitary large renal pelvic stones. Urol Res 40(5):549–555PubMedCrossRef Tefekli A, Tepeler A, Akman T et al (2012) The comparison of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of solitary large renal pelvic stones. Urol Res 40(5):549–555PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Desai M, De Lisa A, Turna B et al (2011) The clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: staghorn versus nonstaghorn stones. J Endourol 25(8):1263–1268PubMedCrossRef Desai M, De Lisa A, Turna B et al (2011) The clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: staghorn versus nonstaghorn stones. J Endourol 25(8):1263–1268PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Raman JD, Bagrodia A, Gupta A et al (2009) Natural history of residual fragments following percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. J Urol 181(3):1163–1168PubMedCrossRef Raman JD, Bagrodia A, Gupta A et al (2009) Natural history of residual fragments following percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. J Urol 181(3):1163–1168PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Portis AJ, Laliberte MA, Tatman P, Lendway L, Rosenberg MS, Bretzke CA (2014) Retreatment after percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the computed tomographic era: long-term follow-up. Urology 84(2):279–284PubMedCrossRef Portis AJ, Laliberte MA, Tatman P, Lendway L, Rosenberg MS, Bretzke CA (2014) Retreatment after percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the computed tomographic era: long-term follow-up. Urology 84(2):279–284PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Bai Y, Tang Y, Deng L et al (2017) Management of large renal stones: laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy. BMC Urol 17(1):75PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Bai Y, Tang Y, Deng L et al (2017) Management of large renal stones: laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy. BMC Urol 17(1):75PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Parsons JK, Messer K, Palazzi K, Stroup SP, Chang D (2014) Diffusion of surgical innovations, patient safety, and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. JAMA Surg 149(8):845–851PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Parsons JK, Messer K, Palazzi K, Stroup SP, Chang D (2014) Diffusion of surgical innovations, patient safety, and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. JAMA Surg 149(8):845–851PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Outcomes and peri-operative complications of robotic pyelolithotomy
Authors
Michael L. Schulster
Daniel A. Sidhom
Kathryn Sturgeon
James F. Borin
Marc A. Bjurlin
Publication date
01-06-2020
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 3/2020
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-019-01004-2

Other articles of this Issue 3/2020

Journal of Robotic Surgery 3/2020 Go to the issue