Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 4/2018

01-12-2018 | Original Article

Robotic kidney autotransplantation in a porcine model: a procedure-specific training platform for the simulation of robotic intracorporeal vascular anastomosis

Authors: Ho Yee Tiong, Benjamin Yen Seow Goh, Edmund Chiong, Lincoln Guan Lim Tan, Anatharaman Vathsala

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 4/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Robotic-assisted kidney transplantation (RKT) with the Da Vinci (Intuitive, USA) platform has been recently developed to improve outcomes by decreasing surgical site complications and morbidity, especially in obese patients. This potential paradigm shift in the surgical technique of kidney transplantation is performed in only a few centers. For wider adoption of this high stake complex operation, we aimed to develop a procedure-specific simulation platform in a porcine model for the training of robotic intracorporeal vascular anastomosis and evaluating vascular anastomoses patency. This paper describes the requirements and steps developed for the above training purpose. Over a series of four animal ethics’ approved experiments, the technique of robotic-assisted laparoscopic autotransplantation of the kidney was developed in Amsterdam live pigs (60–70 kg). The surgery was based around the vascular anastomosis technique described by Menon et al. This non-survival porcine training model is targeted at transplant surgeons with robotic surgery experience. Under general anesthesia, each pig was placed in lateral decubitus position with the placement of one robotic camera port, two robotic 8 mm ports and one assistant port. Robotic docking over the pig posteriorly was performed. The training platform involved the following procedural steps. First, ipsilateral iliac vessel dissection was performed. Second, robotic-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy was performed with in situ perfusion of the kidney with cold Hartmann’s solution prior to complete division of the hilar vessels, ureter and kidney mobilization. Thirdly, the kidney was either kept in situ for orthotopic autotransplantation or mobilized to the pelvis and orientated for the vascular anastomosis, which was performed end to end or end to side after vessel loop clamping of the iliac vessels, respectively, using 6/0 Gore-Tex sutures. Following autotransplantation and release of vessel loops, perfusion of the graft was assessed using intraoperative indocyanine green imaging and monitoring urine output after unclamping. This training platform demonstrates adequate face and content validity. With practice, arterial anastomotic time could be improved, showing its construct validity. This porcine training model can be useful in providing training for robotic intracorporeal vascular anastomosis and may facilitate confident translation into a transplant human recipient.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Abaza R, Ghani KR, Sood A et al (2014) Robotic kidney transplantation with intraoperative regional hypothermia. BJU Int 113:679–681CrossRef Abaza R, Ghani KR, Sood A et al (2014) Robotic kidney transplantation with intraoperative regional hypothermia. BJU Int 113:679–681CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Boggi U, Vistoli F, Signori S et al (2011) Robotic renal transplantation: first European case. Transpl Int 24:213–218CrossRef Boggi U, Vistoli F, Signori S et al (2011) Robotic renal transplantation: first European case. Transpl Int 24:213–218CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Giulianotti P, Gorodner V, Sbrana F et al (2010) Robotic transabdominal kidney transplantation in a morbidly obese patient. Am J Transplant 10:1478–1482CrossRef Giulianotti P, Gorodner V, Sbrana F et al (2010) Robotic transabdominal kidney transplantation in a morbidly obese patient. Am J Transplant 10:1478–1482CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Gordon ZN, Angell J, Abaza R (2014) Completely intracorporeal robotic renal autotransplantation. J Urol 192:1516–1522CrossRef Gordon ZN, Angell J, Abaza R (2014) Completely intracorporeal robotic renal autotransplantation. J Urol 192:1516–1522CrossRef
5.
go back to reference He B, Mou L, Sharpe K et al (2014) Laparoscopic kidney transplant by extra peritoneal approach: the safe transition from laboratory to the clinic. Am J Transplant 14:1931–1936CrossRef He B, Mou L, Sharpe K et al (2014) Laparoscopic kidney transplant by extra peritoneal approach: the safe transition from laboratory to the clinic. Am J Transplant 14:1931–1936CrossRef
6.
go back to reference He B, Musk GC, Mou L et al (2013) Laparoscopic surgery for kidney orthotopic transplant in the pig model. JSLS 17:126–131CrossRef He B, Musk GC, Mou L et al (2013) Laparoscopic surgery for kidney orthotopic transplant in the pig model. JSLS 17:126–131CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hoznek A, Zaki SK, Samadi DB et al (2002) Robotic assisted kidney transplantation: an initial experience. J Urol 167:1604–1606CrossRef Hoznek A, Zaki SK, Samadi DB et al (2002) Robotic assisted kidney transplantation: an initial experience. J Urol 167:1604–1606CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Lynch RJ, Ranney DN, Shijie C et al (2009) Obesity, surgical site infection, and outcome following renal transplantation. Ann Surg 250:1014–1020CrossRef Lynch RJ, Ranney DN, Shijie C et al (2009) Obesity, surgical site infection, and outcome following renal transplantation. Ann Surg 250:1014–1020CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Mcculloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB et al (2009) No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet 374:1105–1112CrossRef Mcculloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB et al (2009) No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet 374:1105–1112CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Menon M, Abaza R, Sood A et al (2014) Robotic kidney transplantation with regional hypothermia: evolution of a novel procedure utilizing the IDEAL guidelines (IDEAL phase 0 and 1). Eur Urol 65:1001–1009CrossRef Menon M, Abaza R, Sood A et al (2014) Robotic kidney transplantation with regional hypothermia: evolution of a novel procedure utilizing the IDEAL guidelines (IDEAL phase 0 and 1). Eur Urol 65:1001–1009CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Menon M, Sood A, Bhandari M et al (2014) Robotic kidney transplantation with regional hypothermia: a step-by-step description of the Vattikuti Urology Institute-Medanta technique (IDEAL phase 2a). Eur Urol 65:991–1000CrossRef Menon M, Sood A, Bhandari M et al (2014) Robotic kidney transplantation with regional hypothermia: a step-by-step description of the Vattikuti Urology Institute-Medanta technique (IDEAL phase 2a). Eur Urol 65:991–1000CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Modi P, Pal B, Kumar S et al (2015) Laparoscopic transplantation following transvaginal insertion of the kidney: description of technique and outcome. Am J Transplant 15:1915–1922CrossRef Modi P, Pal B, Kumar S et al (2015) Laparoscopic transplantation following transvaginal insertion of the kidney: description of technique and outcome. Am J Transplant 15:1915–1922CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Modi P, Pal B, Modi J et al (2013) Retroperitoneoscopic living-donor nephrectomy and laparoscopic kidney transplantation: experience of initial 72 cases. Transplantation 95:100–105CrossRef Modi P, Pal B, Modi J et al (2013) Retroperitoneoscopic living-donor nephrectomy and laparoscopic kidney transplantation: experience of initial 72 cases. Transplantation 95:100–105CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Modi P, Rizvi J, Pal B et al (2011) Laparoscopic kidney transplantation: an initial experience. Am J Transplant 11:1320–1324CrossRef Modi P, Rizvi J, Pal B et al (2011) Laparoscopic kidney transplantation: an initial experience. Am J Transplant 11:1320–1324CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Oberholzer J, Giulianotti P, Danielson KK et al (2013) Minimally invasive robotic kidney transplantation for obese patients previously denied access to transplantation. Am J Transplant 13:721–728CrossRef Oberholzer J, Giulianotti P, Danielson KK et al (2013) Minimally invasive robotic kidney transplantation for obese patients previously denied access to transplantation. Am J Transplant 13:721–728CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Oyen O (2008) Minimally invasive kidney transplantation (MIKT). J Surg Res 145:4CrossRef Oyen O (2008) Minimally invasive kidney transplantation (MIKT). J Surg Res 145:4CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Oyen O, Scholz T, Hartmann A et al (2006) Minimally invasive kidney transplantation: the first experience. Transplant Proc 38:2798–2802CrossRef Oyen O, Scholz T, Hartmann A et al (2006) Minimally invasive kidney transplantation: the first experience. Transplant Proc 38:2798–2802CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Rosales A, Salvador JT, Urdaneta G et al (2010) Laparoscopic kidney transplantation. Eur Urol 57:164–167CrossRef Rosales A, Salvador JT, Urdaneta G et al (2010) Laparoscopic kidney transplantation. Eur Urol 57:164–167CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Sood A, Ghosh P, Jeong W et al (2015) Minimally invasive kidney transplantation: perioperative considerations and key 6-month outcomes. Transplantation 99:316–323CrossRef Sood A, Ghosh P, Jeong W et al (2015) Minimally invasive kidney transplantation: perioperative considerations and key 6-month outcomes. Transplantation 99:316–323CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Sood A, Ghosh P, Menon M et al (2015) Robotic renal transplantation: current status. J Minim Access Surg 11:35–39CrossRef Sood A, Ghosh P, Menon M et al (2015) Robotic renal transplantation: current status. J Minim Access Surg 11:35–39CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Wszola M, Kwiatkowski A, Ostaszewska A et al (2013) Surgical site infections after kidney transplantation—where do we stand now? Transplantation 95:878–882CrossRef Wszola M, Kwiatkowski A, Ostaszewska A et al (2013) Surgical site infections after kidney transplantation—where do we stand now? Transplantation 95:878–882CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Robotic kidney autotransplantation in a porcine model: a procedure-specific training platform for the simulation of robotic intracorporeal vascular anastomosis
Authors
Ho Yee Tiong
Benjamin Yen Seow Goh
Edmund Chiong
Lincoln Guan Lim Tan
Anatharaman Vathsala
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 4/2018
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-018-0806-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2018

Journal of Robotic Surgery 4/2018 Go to the issue