Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 1/2018

01-03-2018 | Original Article

Single-port hysterectomy: robotic versus laparoscopic

Authors: Mete Gungor, Korhan Kahraman, Polat Dursun, Esra Ozbasli, Canan Genim

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

This study evaluated the feasibility and safety of robotic single port hysterectomy and laparoscopic single port hysterectomy, and to compare the perioperative parameters of the two systems. Twenty patients underwent robotic single port hysterectomy and 25 patients underwent laparoscopic single port hysterectomy. All hysterectomies were successfully performed via a single port and there were no conversions to conventional multi-port laparoscopy, multi-port robotic, open surgery, or vaginal surgery. The median operative time and hysterectomy time in robotic and laparoscopic groups were 90 vs. 90 min (P 0.74), 57.5 vs. 60 min (P 0.17), respectively. The median estimated blood loss was 40 ml in the robotic group and 50 ml in the laparoscopic group (P 0.77). No operative and post-operative complications were observed in the two groups. The median time to discharge from the hospital was one day for both techniques (P 0.17). Robotic and laparoscopic single port systems are feasible and safe for hysterectomy operation in terms of operative time, conversion to laparotomy or multiport laparoscopy/robotic rates, complication rates, and postoperative results in the hands of experienced surgeons. The possible benefits of robotic single port surgery compared with conventional laparoscopy should be evaluated in further randomized controlled studies.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Reich H, DeCaprio J, McGlynn F (1989) Laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Gynecol Surg 5:213–216CrossRef Reich H, DeCaprio J, McGlynn F (1989) Laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Gynecol Surg 5:213–216CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Jung YW, Kim YT, Lee DW et al (2010) The feasibility of scarless single-port transumbilical total laparoscopic hysterectomy: initial clinical experience. Surg Endosc 24:1686–1692CrossRefPubMed Jung YW, Kim YT, Lee DW et al (2010) The feasibility of scarless single-port transumbilical total laparoscopic hysterectomy: initial clinical experience. Surg Endosc 24:1686–1692CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Kim YW, Park BJ, Ro DY, Kim TE (2010) Single-port laparoscopic myomectomy using a new single-port transumbilical morcellation system: initial clinical study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17:587–592CrossRefPubMed Kim YW, Park BJ, Ro DY, Kim TE (2010) Single-port laparoscopic myomectomy using a new single-port transumbilical morcellation system: initial clinical study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17:587–592CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kim TJ, Lee YY, Kim MJ et al (2009) Single-port access laparoscopic adnexal surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 16:612–615CrossRefPubMed Kim TJ, Lee YY, Kim MJ et al (2009) Single-port access laparoscopic adnexal surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 16:612–615CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Ramirez PT (2009) Single-port laparoscopic surgery: is a single incision the next frontier in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery? Gynecol Oncol 114:143–144CrossRefPubMed Ramirez PT (2009) Single-port laparoscopic surgery: is a single incision the next frontier in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery? Gynecol Oncol 114:143–144CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Fader AN, Escobar PF (2009) Laparo endoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology: technique and initial report. Gynecol Oncol 114:157–161CrossRefPubMed Fader AN, Escobar PF (2009) Laparo endoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology: technique and initial report. Gynecol Oncol 114:157–161CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Wright JD, Barrena Medel NI, Sehouli J, Fujiwara K, Herzog TJ (2012) Contemporary management of endometrial cancer. Lancet 379(9823):1352–1360CrossRefPubMed Wright JD, Barrena Medel NI, Sehouli J, Fujiwara K, Herzog TJ (2012) Contemporary management of endometrial cancer. Lancet 379(9823):1352–1360CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Benedetti Panici P, Basile S, Maneschi F et al (2008) Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs. no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 100:1707–1716CrossRefPubMed Benedetti Panici P, Basile S, Maneschi F et al (2008) Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs. no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 100:1707–1716CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, Tavender F, Curr F, Garry R (2006) Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev Issue 2, Art. No: CD003677 Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, Tavender F, Curr F, Garry R (2006) Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev Issue 2, Art. No: CD003677
10.
go back to reference Eltabbach GH, Shamonki MI, Moody JM, Garafano LL (2000) Hysterectomy for obese women with endometrial cancer: laparoscopy or laparotomy? Gynecol Oncol 78:329–335CrossRef Eltabbach GH, Shamonki MI, Moody JM, Garafano LL (2000) Hysterectomy for obese women with endometrial cancer: laparoscopy or laparotomy? Gynecol Oncol 78:329–335CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Albright BB, Witte T, Tofte AN et al (2016) Robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 23:18–27CrossRefPubMed Albright BB, Witte T, Tofte AN et al (2016) Robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 23:18–27CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Gungor M, Kahraman K, Ozbasli E, Genim C (2015) Ovarian cystectomy for a dermoid cyst with the new single-port robotic system. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 24:123–126CrossRefPubMed Gungor M, Kahraman K, Ozbasli E, Genim C (2015) Ovarian cystectomy for a dermoid cyst with the new single-port robotic system. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 24:123–126CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Fagotti A, Gagliardi ML, Fanfani F et al (2012) Perioperative outcomes of total laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy versus total robotic hysterectomy in endometrial cancer patients: a multicentre study. Gynecol Oncol 125:552–555CrossRefPubMed Fagotti A, Gagliardi ML, Fanfani F et al (2012) Perioperative outcomes of total laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy versus total robotic hysterectomy in endometrial cancer patients: a multicentre study. Gynecol Oncol 125:552–555CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Paek J, Lee JD, Kong TW, Chang SJ, Ryu HS (2016) Robotic single-site versus laparo endoscopic single-site hysterectomy: a propensity score matching study. Surg Endosc 33:1043–1050CrossRef Paek J, Lee JD, Kong TW, Chang SJ, Ryu HS (2016) Robotic single-site versus laparo endoscopic single-site hysterectomy: a propensity score matching study. Surg Endosc 33:1043–1050CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lopez S, Mulla ZD, Hernandez L, Garza DM, Payne TN, Farnam RW (2016) A comparison of outcomes between robotic-assisted, single-site laparoscopy versus laparoendoscopic single site for benign hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 23:84–88CrossRefPubMed Lopez S, Mulla ZD, Hernandez L, Garza DM, Payne TN, Farnam RW (2016) A comparison of outcomes between robotic-assisted, single-site laparoscopy versus laparoendoscopic single site for benign hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 23:84–88CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Single-port hysterectomy: robotic versus laparoscopic
Authors
Mete Gungor
Korhan Kahraman
Polat Dursun
Esra Ozbasli
Canan Genim
Publication date
01-03-2018
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-017-0699-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Journal of Robotic Surgery 1/2018 Go to the issue