Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 1/2017

01-03-2017 | Original Article

Coaxial robot-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site myomectomy

Authors: Antonio R. Gargiulo, Souzana Choussein, Serene S. Srouji, Laura E. Cedo, Pedro F. Escobar

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

We report our experience with coaxial robot-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site (RA-LESS) myomectomy, including a detailed description of the technique and outcomes from our first 21 cases. This was a retrospective cohort study carried out at the reproductive endocrinology and gynecologic oncology divisions at two academic medical centers. RA-LESS myomectomy was performed with the da Vinci Si Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Inc, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) employing standard rigid 8 or 5 mm instrumentation in a coaxial arrangement through a standard laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) port (GelPOINT Advanced Access Platform, Applied Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA). Cases were completed between October 2011 and November 2013. Twenty-one patients underwent surgery. Mean age (±SD) was 38.1 ± 5.8 years, and mean BMI was 29.4 ± 4.7 kg/m2. Menorrhagia, pelvic pressure, and urinary frequency were the main presenting symptoms. Mean diameter of the largest tumor was 5.7 ± 1.9 cm (median 5.9 cm, range 2.1–9.5 cm), while mean number of tumors removed was 2.2 ± 1.8, ranging from 1 to 8 per surgery. Mean operative time was 154.2 ± 55.2 min (median 152 min, range 85–290 min). Mean blood loss was 57.9 ± 53.7 cc (median 50 cc, range 5–200 cc) and length of hospital stay ranged between 0 and 3 days (median 0). All procedures were successfully performed without conversion to conventional LESS surgery, multi-port laparoscopy or laparotomy. RA-LESS myomectomy with coaxial use of standard rigid instrumentation is a safe and reproducible addition to the minimally invasive surgeons’ armamentarium, with excellent cosmetic and postoperative outcomes in selected patients. Further investigation is needed to define the patient groups that will most benefit from it.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sizzi O, Rossetti A, Malzoni M et al (2007) Italian multicenter study on complications of laparoscopic myomectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 14:453–462CrossRefPubMed Sizzi O, Rossetti A, Malzoni M et al (2007) Italian multicenter study on complications of laparoscopic myomectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 14:453–462CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Mais V, Ajossa S, Guerriero S et al (1996) Laparoscopic versus abdominal myomectomy: a prospective, randomized trial to evaluate benefits in early outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 174:654–658CrossRefPubMed Mais V, Ajossa S, Guerriero S et al (1996) Laparoscopic versus abdominal myomectomy: a prospective, randomized trial to evaluate benefits in early outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 174:654–658CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Seracchioli R, Rossi S, Govoni F et al (2000) Fertility and obstetric outcome after laparoscopic myomectomy of large myomata: a randomized comparison with abdominal myomectomy. Hum Reprod 15:2663–2668CrossRefPubMed Seracchioli R, Rossi S, Govoni F et al (2000) Fertility and obstetric outcome after laparoscopic myomectomy of large myomata: a randomized comparison with abdominal myomectomy. Hum Reprod 15:2663–2668CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Palomba S, Zupi E, Falbo A et al (2007) A multicenter randomized, controlled study comparing laparoscopic versus minilaparotomic myomectomy: reproductive outcomes. Fertil Steril 88:933–941CrossRefPubMed Palomba S, Zupi E, Falbo A et al (2007) A multicenter randomized, controlled study comparing laparoscopic versus minilaparotomic myomectomy: reproductive outcomes. Fertil Steril 88:933–941CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Liu G, Zolis L, Kung R et al (2010) The laparoscopic myomectomy: a survey of Canadian gynaecologists. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 32:139–148CrossRefPubMed Liu G, Zolis L, Kung R et al (2010) The laparoscopic myomectomy: a survey of Canadian gynaecologists. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 32:139–148CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Barakat EE, Bedaiwy MA, Zimberg S et al (2011) Robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of surgical outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 117:256–265CrossRefPubMed Barakat EE, Bedaiwy MA, Zimberg S et al (2011) Robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of surgical outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 117:256–265CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Kosumi T, Kubota A, Usui N et al (2001) Laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy using a single umbilical puncture method. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 11:63–65PubMed Kosumi T, Kubota A, Usui N et al (2001) Laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy using a single umbilical puncture method. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 11:63–65PubMed
8.
go back to reference Bush AJ, Morris SN, Millham FH et al (2011) Women’s preferences for minimally invasive incisions. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 18:640–643CrossRefPubMed Bush AJ, Morris SN, Millham FH et al (2011) Women’s preferences for minimally invasive incisions. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 18:640–643CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Goebel K, Goldberg JM (2014) Women’s preference of cosmetic results after gynecologic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21:64–67CrossRefPubMed Goebel K, Goldberg JM (2014) Women’s preference of cosmetic results after gynecologic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21:64–67CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Yeung PP Jr, Bolden CR, Westreich D et al (2013) Patient preferences of cosmesis for abdominal incisions in gynecologic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 20:79–84CrossRefPubMed Yeung PP Jr, Bolden CR, Westreich D et al (2013) Patient preferences of cosmesis for abdominal incisions in gynecologic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 20:79–84CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Fasola M et al (2005) One-trocar salpingectomy for the treatment of tubal pregnancy: a ‘marionette-like’ technique. BJOG 112:1417–1419CrossRefPubMed Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Fasola M et al (2005) One-trocar salpingectomy for the treatment of tubal pregnancy: a ‘marionette-like’ technique. BJOG 112:1417–1419CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Lee YY, Kim TJ, Kim CJ et al (2009) Single-port access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a novel method with a wound retractor and a glove. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 16:450–453CrossRefPubMed Lee YY, Kim TJ, Kim CJ et al (2009) Single-port access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a novel method with a wound retractor and a glove. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 16:450–453CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Han CM, Lee CL, Su H et al (2013) Single-port laparoscopic myomectomy: initial operative experience and comparative outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet 287:295–300CrossRefPubMed Han CM, Lee CL, Su H et al (2013) Single-port laparoscopic myomectomy: initial operative experience and comparative outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet 287:295–300CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Choi CH, Kim TH, Kim SH et al (2014) Surgical outcomes of a new approach to laparoscopic myomectomy: single-port and modified suture technique. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21:580–585CrossRefPubMed Choi CH, Kim TH, Kim SH et al (2014) Surgical outcomes of a new approach to laparoscopic myomectomy: single-port and modified suture technique. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21:580–585CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Yoshiki N, Okawa T, Kubota T (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic myomectomy with intracorporeal suturing. Fertil Steril 95:2426–2428CrossRefPubMed Yoshiki N, Okawa T, Kubota T (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic myomectomy with intracorporeal suturing. Fertil Steril 95:2426–2428CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Gill IS, Advincula AP, Aron M et al (2010) Consensus statement of the consortium for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. Surg Endosc 24:762–768CrossRefPubMed Gill IS, Advincula AP, Aron M et al (2010) Consensus statement of the consortium for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. Surg Endosc 24:762–768CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Eisenberg D, Vidovszky TJ, Lau J et al (2013) Comparison of robotic and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery systems in a suturing and knot tying task. Surg Endosc 27:3182–3186CrossRefPubMed Eisenberg D, Vidovszky TJ, Lau J et al (2013) Comparison of robotic and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery systems in a suturing and knot tying task. Surg Endosc 27:3182–3186CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Sendag F, Akdemir A, Oztekin MK (2014) Robotic single-incision transumbilical total hysterectomy using a single-site robotic platform: initial report and technique. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 21:147–151CrossRefPubMed Sendag F, Akdemir A, Oztekin MK (2014) Robotic single-incision transumbilical total hysterectomy using a single-site robotic platform: initial report and technique. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 21:147–151CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Pluchino N, Buchs NC, Drakopoulos P et al (2014) Robotic single-site combined cholecystectomy and hysterectomy: advantages and limits. Int J Surg Case Rep. 5:1025–1027CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pluchino N, Buchs NC, Drakopoulos P et al (2014) Robotic single-site combined cholecystectomy and hysterectomy: advantages and limits. Int J Surg Case Rep. 5:1025–1027CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Scheib SA, Fader AN (2015) Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique. Am J Obstet Gynecol 212(179):e171–e178 Scheib SA, Fader AN (2015) Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique. Am J Obstet Gynecol 212(179):e171–e178
23.
go back to reference Lewis EI, Srouji SS, Gargiulo AR (2015) Robotic single-site myomectomy: initial report and technique. Fertil Steril 103(1370–1377):e1371 Lewis EI, Srouji SS, Gargiulo AR (2015) Robotic single-site myomectomy: initial report and technique. Fertil Steril 103(1370–1377):e1371
24.
go back to reference Gargiulo AR, Bailey AP, Srouji SS (2013) Robot-assisted single-incision laparoscopic myomectomy: initial report and technique. J Robot Surg. 7:137–142CrossRefPubMed Gargiulo AR, Bailey AP, Srouji SS (2013) Robot-assisted single-incision laparoscopic myomectomy: initial report and technique. J Robot Surg. 7:137–142CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Escobar PF, Fader AN, Paraiso MF et al (2009) Robotic-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology: initial report and technique. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 16:589–591CrossRefPubMed Escobar PF, Fader AN, Paraiso MF et al (2009) Robotic-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology: initial report and technique. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 16:589–591CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Tinelli A, Malvasi A, Guido M et al (2011) Adhesion formation after intracapsular myomectomy with or without adhesion barrier. Fertil Steril 95:1780–1785CrossRefPubMed Tinelli A, Malvasi A, Guido M et al (2011) Adhesion formation after intracapsular myomectomy with or without adhesion barrier. Fertil Steril 95:1780–1785CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Rosenbaum L (2016) N-of-1 policymaking-tragedy, trade-offs, and the demise of morcellation. N Engl J Med 374:986–990CrossRefPubMed Rosenbaum L (2016) N-of-1 policymaking-tragedy, trade-offs, and the demise of morcellation. N Engl J Med 374:986–990CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Srouji SS, Kaser DJ, Gargiulo AR (2015) Techniques for contained morcellation in gynecologic surgery. Fertil Steril 103:e34CrossRefPubMed Srouji SS, Kaser DJ, Gargiulo AR (2015) Techniques for contained morcellation in gynecologic surgery. Fertil Steril 103:e34CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Kim TJ, Lee YY, An JJ et al (2012) Does single-port access (SPA) laparoscopy mean reduced pain? A retrospective cohort analysis between SPA and conventional laparoscopy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 162:71–74CrossRefPubMed Kim TJ, Lee YY, An JJ et al (2012) Does single-port access (SPA) laparoscopy mean reduced pain? A retrospective cohort analysis between SPA and conventional laparoscopy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 162:71–74CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Kim TJ, Lee YY, Cha HH et al (2010) Single-port-access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes. Surg Endosc 24:2248–2252CrossRefPubMed Kim TJ, Lee YY, Cha HH et al (2010) Single-port-access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes. Surg Endosc 24:2248–2252CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Yim GW, Jung YW, Paek J et al (2010) Transumbilical single-port access versus conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy: surgical outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203(26):e21–e26 Yim GW, Jung YW, Paek J et al (2010) Transumbilical single-port access versus conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy: surgical outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203(26):e21–e26
32.
go back to reference Caillet M, Vandromme J, Rozenberg S et al (2010) Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis: a retrospective study. Fertil Steril 94:1844–1847CrossRefPubMed Caillet M, Vandromme J, Rozenberg S et al (2010) Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis: a retrospective study. Fertil Steril 94:1844–1847CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Gargiulo AR, Srouji SS, Missmer SA et al (2012) Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy compared with standard laparoscopic myomectomy. Obstet Gynecol 120:284–291CrossRefPubMed Gargiulo AR, Srouji SS, Missmer SA et al (2012) Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy compared with standard laparoscopic myomectomy. Obstet Gynecol 120:284–291CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Kim YW, Park BJ, Ro DY et al (2010) Single-port laparoscopic myomectomy using a new single-port transumbilical morcellation system: initial clinical study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 17:587–592CrossRefPubMed Kim YW, Park BJ, Ro DY et al (2010) Single-port laparoscopic myomectomy using a new single-port transumbilical morcellation system: initial clinical study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 17:587–592CrossRefPubMed
35.
36.
37.
go back to reference Escobar PF, Bedaiwy MA, Fader AN et al (2010) Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery in patients with benign adnexal disease. Fertil Steril 93:2074 e2077–2010 Escobar PF, Bedaiwy MA, Fader AN et al (2010) Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery in patients with benign adnexal disease. Fertil Steril 93:2074 e2077–2010
38.
go back to reference Murji A, Patel VI, Leyland N et al (2013) Single-incision laparoscopy in gynecologic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 121:819–828CrossRefPubMed Murji A, Patel VI, Leyland N et al (2013) Single-incision laparoscopy in gynecologic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 121:819–828CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Choussein S, Srouji SS, Farland LV et al (2015) Flexible carbon dioxide laser fiber versus ultrasonic scalpel in robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 22:1183–1190CrossRefPubMed Choussein S, Srouji SS, Farland LV et al (2015) Flexible carbon dioxide laser fiber versus ultrasonic scalpel in robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 22:1183–1190CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Keller DS, Ibarra S, Flores-Gonzalez JR et al (2016) Outcomes for single-incision laparoscopic colectomy surgery in obese patients: a case-matched study. Surg Endosc 30:739–744CrossRefPubMed Keller DS, Ibarra S, Flores-Gonzalez JR et al (2016) Outcomes for single-incision laparoscopic colectomy surgery in obese patients: a case-matched study. Surg Endosc 30:739–744CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Beninato T, Kleiman DA, Soni A et al (2015) Expanding the indications for single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy to all patients with biliary disease: is it safe? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 25:10–14CrossRefPubMed Beninato T, Kleiman DA, Soni A et al (2015) Expanding the indications for single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy to all patients with biliary disease: is it safe? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 25:10–14CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Wright JD, Tergas AI, Cui R, Burke WM, Hou JY, Ananth CV, Chen L, Richards C, Neugut AI, Hershman DL (1010) Use of electric power morcellation and prevalence of underlying cancer in women who undergo myomectomy. JAMA Oncol. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2014.206 Wright JD, Tergas AI, Cui R, Burke WM, Hou JY, Ananth CV, Chen L, Richards C, Neugut AI, Hershman DL (1010) Use of electric power morcellation and prevalence of underlying cancer in women who undergo myomectomy. JAMA Oncol. doi:10.​1001/​jamaoncol.​2014.​206
Metadata
Title
Coaxial robot-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site myomectomy
Authors
Antonio R. Gargiulo
Souzana Choussein
Serene S. Srouji
Laura E. Cedo
Pedro F. Escobar
Publication date
01-03-2017
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 1/2017
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-016-0603-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Journal of Robotic Surgery 1/2017 Go to the issue