Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 12/2020

01-12-2020 | Sleeve Gastrectomy | Brief Communication

Pressure-Sensing Gastric Calibration Tube for Minimizing Sleeve Volume Variation in Sleeve Gastrectomy Compared with Current Standard Technique

Authors: Parker E. Ludwig, Trevor J. Huff, Kristin Bremer, Kalyana C. Nandipati

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 12/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

The sleeve gastrectomy technique is dependent on the size of the bougie and the surgeon’s technical skills. Standardization of the sleeve gastrectomy technique may potentially minimize the volume inconsistency and improve outcomes. A volume and pressure-sensitive gastric calibration tube may create a standard sleeve size and minimize interoperator variation. The objective of preliminary testing was to establish the variability of sleeve gastrectomy size in gastric explants, and to compare that with the variability of sleeve gastrectomy size when performed with a volume and pressure-sensitive gastric calibration tube. Three operators performed six sleeve gastrectomies each on commercially processed porcine gastric explants, half with a 40 Fr bougie, and a half with a pressure-sensing and volume-controllable gastric calibration tube prototype. The resulting sleeves were evaluated using standard statistical methods. The pressure-sensitive gastric calibration tube demonstrated superior consistency to a standard 40 Fr bougie by common measures of variation. However, further investigation is warranted to characterize the significance of this difference.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Andersen T, Pedersen BH. Pouch volume, stoma diameter, and clinical outcome after gastroplasty for morbid obesity. A prospective study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1984;19:643–9.CrossRef Andersen T, Pedersen BH. Pouch volume, stoma diameter, and clinical outcome after gastroplasty for morbid obesity. A prospective study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1984;19:643–9.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Flanagan null. Measurement of functional pouch volume following the gastric bypass procedure. Obes Surg. 1996;6:38–43.CrossRef Flanagan null. Measurement of functional pouch volume following the gastric bypass procedure. Obes Surg. 1996;6:38–43.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Halverson JD, Koehler RE. Gastric bypass: analysis of weight loss and factors determining success. Surgery. 1981;90:446–55.PubMed Halverson JD, Koehler RE. Gastric bypass: analysis of weight loss and factors determining success. Surgery. 1981;90:446–55.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Roberts K, Duffy A, Kaufman J, et al. Size matters: gastric pouch size correlates with weight loss after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:1397–402.CrossRef Roberts K, Duffy A, Kaufman J, et al. Size matters: gastric pouch size correlates with weight loss after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:1397–402.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Weiner RA, Weiner S, Pomhoff I, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy — influence of sleeve size and resected gastric volume. Obes Surg. 2007;17:1297–305.CrossRef Weiner RA, Weiner S, Pomhoff I, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy — influence of sleeve size and resected gastric volume. Obes Surg. 2007;17:1297–305.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Rosenthal RJ. International sleeve gastrectomy expert panel consensus statement: best practice guidelines based on experience of >12,000 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8:8–19.CrossRef Rosenthal RJ. International sleeve gastrectomy expert panel consensus statement: best practice guidelines based on experience of >12,000 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8:8–19.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Deguines J-B, Verhaeghe P, Yzet T, et al. Is the residual gastric volume after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy an objective criterion for adapting the treatment strategy after failure? Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9:660–6.CrossRef Deguines J-B, Verhaeghe P, Yzet T, et al. Is the residual gastric volume after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy an objective criterion for adapting the treatment strategy after failure? Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9:660–6.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Deitel M, Gagner M, Erickson AL, et al. Third international summit: current status of sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7:749–59.CrossRef Deitel M, Gagner M, Erickson AL, et al. Third international summit: current status of sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7:749–59.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Celio AC, Kasten KR, Brinkley J, et al. Effect of surgeon volume on sleeve gastrectomy outcomes. Obes Surg. 2016;26:2700–4.CrossRef Celio AC, Kasten KR, Brinkley J, et al. Effect of surgeon volume on sleeve gastrectomy outcomes. Obes Surg. 2016;26:2700–4.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference ElGeidie A, ElHemaly M, Hamdy E, et al. The effect of residual gastric antrum size on the outcome of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11:997–1003.CrossRef ElGeidie A, ElHemaly M, Hamdy E, et al. The effect of residual gastric antrum size on the outcome of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11:997–1003.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ferrua MJ, Singh RP. Modeling the fluid dynamics in a human stomach to gain insight of food digestion. J Food Sci. 2010;75:R151–62.CrossRef Ferrua MJ, Singh RP. Modeling the fluid dynamics in a human stomach to gain insight of food digestion. J Food Sci. 2010;75:R151–62.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Pressure-Sensing Gastric Calibration Tube for Minimizing Sleeve Volume Variation in Sleeve Gastrectomy Compared with Current Standard Technique
Authors
Parker E. Ludwig
Trevor J. Huff
Kristin Bremer
Kalyana C. Nandipati
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 12/2020
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04885-7

Other articles of this Issue 12/2020

Obesity Surgery 12/2020 Go to the issue