Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 2/2019

01-02-2019 | Original Contributions

Impact of Patient Attrition from Bariatric Surgery Practice on Clinical Outcomes

Authors: Julia A. Jurgensen, Wendy Reidt, Todd Kellogg, Manpreet Mundi, Meera Shah, Maria L. Collazo Clavell

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 2/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Obesity has become a global epidemic. Bariatric surgery remains the most successful modality for producing sustained weight loss. Attrition rates after bariatric surgery are currently reported between 3 and 63% depending on the type of bariatric operation and the length of follow-up provided by the bariatric surgery team. It is currently unknown if patient attrition from bariatric surgery programs impact clinical outcomes. The availability of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) and the Mayo Clinic Midwest unified electronic medical record (EMR) provide a unique opportunity to explore this topic.

Methods

Raw data was downloaded from MBSAQIP database for all laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) cases between May 1, 2008 and January 8, 2015 (N = 1242). Baseline weight and preexisting comorbidities (type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia) were recorded using the MBSAQIP database and the EMR. Current weight and comorbidity data (type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia) were subsequently collected at the time closest to the patient’s surgical anniversary dates during the following assessment periods: years 1, 2, and 3 after surgery. Mean percentage total weight loss (TWL) was calculated at each time frame for each patient. Data was summarized using descriptive statistics, including counts and percentages for categorical variables by either year or year and location.

Results

The number of patients seen by the bariatric surgery practice (BSP) compared to those seen by other providers within our practice (attrition to bariatric surgery practice (ABSP)) was highest in year 1 and reduced each subsequent year (year 1: BSP N = 740, ABSP N = 166, year 2: BSP N = 425, ABSP N = 309, and year 3: BSP N = 235, ABSP N = 325). The mean TWL in the BSP and ABSP groups at year 1 was 31.84% versus 30.19%, at year 2 was 31.34% versus 29.67%, and at year 3 was 29.01% versus 27.71% respectively. Differences were statistically significant between groups at years 1 and 2 (p < 0.05). A statistically significant difference was not found in year 3 despite a trend towards higher TWL in the BSP group. Among all patients, statistically significant differences (p < 0.0001) were observed between baseline and years 1, 2, and 3 for type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia.

Conclusions

Our study confirms the problem of patient attrition to follow up at our BSP. It is also the first to suggest a difference in weight loss outcomes among patients seen in BSP compared to those seen by other providers (ABSP) at 1 and 2 years after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). The potential implications of this observation on long-term weight maintenance after LRYGB and the impact on metabolic comorbidities remain unknown but warrant further investigation. It also warrants the development of strategies to improve patient retention in BSP and/or engagement of medical providers to achieve that end.
Literature
3.
4.
go back to reference Compher C, Hanlon A, Kang Y, et al. Attendance at clinical visits predicts weight loss after gastric bypass surgery. Obes Surg. 2012;22:927–34.CrossRefPubMed Compher C, Hanlon A, Kang Y, et al. Attendance at clinical visits predicts weight loss after gastric bypass surgery. Obes Surg. 2012;22:927–34.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference DeNino W, Osler T, Evans E, et al. Travel distance as factor in follow-up visit compliance in post-laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding population. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6:597–600.CrossRefPubMed DeNino W, Osler T, Evans E, et al. Travel distance as factor in follow-up visit compliance in post-laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding population. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6:597–600.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Gould J, Beverstein G, Reinhardt S, et al. Impact of routine and long-term follow-up on weight loss after laparoscopic gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3:627–30.CrossRefPubMed Gould J, Beverstein G, Reinhardt S, et al. Impact of routine and long-term follow-up on weight loss after laparoscopic gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3:627–30.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Lara M, Baker M, Larson C, et al. Travel distance, age, and sex as factors in follow-up visit compliance in the post-gastric bypass population. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2005;1:17–21.CrossRefPubMed Lara M, Baker M, Larson C, et al. Travel distance, age, and sex as factors in follow-up visit compliance in the post-gastric bypass population. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2005;1:17–21.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference McVay M, Friedman K, Applegate K, et al. Patient predictors of follow-up care attendance in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9:956–62.CrossRefPubMed McVay M, Friedman K, Applegate K, et al. Patient predictors of follow-up care attendance in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9:956–62.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Miller B, Murphy K, O'Brien P, et al. Development of a measure of barriers to laproscopic adjustment gastric banding (LAGB) aftercare attendance. Obes Surg. 2016;26:776–84.CrossRefPubMed Miller B, Murphy K, O'Brien P, et al. Development of a measure of barriers to laproscopic adjustment gastric banding (LAGB) aftercare attendance. Obes Surg. 2016;26:776–84.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Moroshko I, Brennan L, O-Brien P. Predictors of attrition in bariatric aftercare: a systemic review of the literature. Obes Surg. 2012;22:1640–7.CrossRefPubMed Moroshko I, Brennan L, O-Brien P. Predictors of attrition in bariatric aftercare: a systemic review of the literature. Obes Surg. 2012;22:1640–7.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Pontiroli A, Fossati A, Vedani P, et al. Post-surgery adherence to scheduled visits and compliance, more than personality disorders, predict outcomes of bariatric restrictive surgery in morbidly obese patients. Obes Surg. 2007;17:1492–7.CrossRefPubMed Pontiroli A, Fossati A, Vedani P, et al. Post-surgery adherence to scheduled visits and compliance, more than personality disorders, predict outcomes of bariatric restrictive surgery in morbidly obese patients. Obes Surg. 2007;17:1492–7.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Schauer P, Bhatt D, Kirwan J, et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes – 5-year outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(7):641–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schauer P, Bhatt D, Kirwan J, et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes – 5-year outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(7):641–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Sivagnanam P, Rhodes M. The importance of follow-up and distance from Centre in weight loss after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Surgery Endoscopic. 2010;24:2432–8.CrossRef Sivagnanam P, Rhodes M. The importance of follow-up and distance from Centre in weight loss after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Surgery Endoscopic. 2010;24:2432–8.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Vidal P, Ramon J, Goday A, et al. Lack of adherence to follow-up visits after bariatric surgery: reasons and outcome. Obes Surg. 2014;24:179–83.CrossRefPubMed Vidal P, Ramon J, Goday A, et al. Lack of adherence to follow-up visits after bariatric surgery: reasons and outcome. Obes Surg. 2014;24:179–83.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Wheeler E, Prettyman A, Lenhard M, et al. Adherence to outpatient program postoperative appointments after bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4:515–20.CrossRefPubMed Wheeler E, Prettyman A, Lenhard M, et al. Adherence to outpatient program postoperative appointments after bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4:515–20.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Impact of Patient Attrition from Bariatric Surgery Practice on Clinical Outcomes
Authors
Julia A. Jurgensen
Wendy Reidt
Todd Kellogg
Manpreet Mundi
Meera Shah
Maria L. Collazo Clavell
Publication date
01-02-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3565-5

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

Obesity Surgery 2/2019 Go to the issue