Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 8/2018

01-08-2018 | Original Contributions

Sensitivity and Specificity of 50% Excess Weight Loss (50%EWL) and Twelve Other Bariatric Criteria for Weight Loss Success

Authors: Arnold W. van de Laar, A. S. van Rijswijk, H. Kakar, S. C. Bruin

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 8/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Criteria for bariatric weight loss success are numerous. Most of them are arbitrary. None of them is evidence-based. Our objective was to determine their sensitivity and specificity.

Methods

Thirteen common bariatric weight loss criteria were compared to a benchmark reflecting the gold standard in bariatric surgery. We used an elaborate baseline BMI-independent weight loss percentile chart, based on retrospective data after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB), performed between 2007 and 2017. Percentile curves p31.6 (patients’ expectation), p25 (interquartile range), p15.9 (1 standard deviation (SD) below median), and p10.9 (surgeons’ goal) were used as possible cutoff for success to determine true or false positive and negative results beyond 1 year.

Results

We operated 4497 primary LRYGB patients, with mean follow-up 22 (± 1 SD 19; range 0–109) months, 3031 patients with last result ≥ 1 year, 518 ≥ 5 years. For all four cutoff percentile curves for success, specificities were low (2–72%) for criteria < 35 body mass index (BMI), ≥ 25percentage excess BMI loss (%EBMIL), ≥ 50%EBMIL, ≥ 15 percentage total weight loss (%TWL), ≥ 20%TWL, ≥ 25 percentage excess weight loss (%EWL), and high (83–96%) for < 30 BMI. No criterion had > 80% specificity and sensitivity for a cutoff above p15.9. For p15.9, they were both > 80% for criteria ≥ 10 BMI reduction and ≥ 50%EWL, both > 90% for ≥ 25%TWL and ≥ 35 percentage alterable weight loss (%AWL). All criteria had high sensitivities for all cutoff percentile curves (87–100%), except < 30 BMI (65–78%).

Conclusions

For the first time, common bariatric criteria for weight loss success were systematically validated. Most criteria recognized success very well (high sensitivities), but ≥ 15%TWL, ≥ 20%TWL, < 35BMI, ≥ 25%EWL, ≥ 25%EBMIL, and ≥ 50%EBMIL left too many poor responders unnoticed (low specificities). Bariatric weight loss success is best assessed by comparing results to percentile curve 1 SD below median (p15.9) in a bariatric baseline BMI-independent weight loss percentile chart. Criteria ≥ 35%AWL and ≥ 25%TWL came close to that curve, both with > 90% sensitivity and specificity. Among others, criterion ≥ 50%EBMIL did not.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Marathe PH, Gao HX, Close KL. American Diabetes Association standards of medical care in diabetes 2017. J Diabetes. 2017;9(4):320–4.CrossRefPubMed Marathe PH, Gao HX, Close KL. American Diabetes Association standards of medical care in diabetes 2017. J Diabetes. 2017;9(4):320–4.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Marek RJ, Heinberg LJ, Lavery M, et al. A review of psychological assessment instruments for use in bariatric surgery evaluations. Psychol Assess. 2016;28(9):1142–57.CrossRefPubMed Marek RJ, Heinberg LJ, Lavery M, et al. A review of psychological assessment instruments for use in bariatric surgery evaluations. Psychol Assess. 2016;28(9):1142–57.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Ballantyne GH. Measuring outcomes following bariatric surgery: weight loss parameters, improvement in co-morbid conditions, change in quality of life and patient satisfaction. Obes Surg. 2003;13(6):954–64.CrossRefPubMed Ballantyne GH. Measuring outcomes following bariatric surgery: weight loss parameters, improvement in co-morbid conditions, change in quality of life and patient satisfaction. Obes Surg. 2003;13(6):954–64.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Buchwald H, Estok R, Fahrbach K, et al. Weight and type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2009;122(3):248–56.CrossRefPubMed Buchwald H, Estok R, Fahrbach K, et al. Weight and type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2009;122(3):248–56.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Sjöström L, Narbro K, Sjöström CD, et al. Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:741–52.CrossRefPubMed Sjöström L, Narbro K, Sjöström CD, et al. Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:741–52.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference van de Laar AW. The %EBMIL/%EWL double booby-trap. A comment on studies that compare the effect of bariatric surgery between heavier and lighter patients. Obes Surg. 2015;26:612–3.CrossRef van de Laar AW. The %EBMIL/%EWL double booby-trap. A comment on studies that compare the effect of bariatric surgery between heavier and lighter patients. Obes Surg. 2015;26:612–3.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Dallal RM, Quebbemann BB, Hunt LH, et al. Analysis of weight loss after bariatric surgery using mixed-effects linear modeling. Obes Surg. 2009;19:732–7.CrossRefPubMed Dallal RM, Quebbemann BB, Hunt LH, et al. Analysis of weight loss after bariatric surgery using mixed-effects linear modeling. Obes Surg. 2009;19:732–7.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference van de Laar A, de Caluwé L, Dillemans B. Relative outcome measures for bariatric surgery. Evidence against excess weight loss and excess bodymass index loss from a series of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients. Obes Surg. 2011;21(6):763–7.CrossRefPubMed van de Laar A, de Caluwé L, Dillemans B. Relative outcome measures for bariatric surgery. Evidence against excess weight loss and excess bodymass index loss from a series of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients. Obes Surg. 2011;21(6):763–7.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Hatoum IJ, Kaplan LM. Advantages of percent weight-loss as a method of reporting weight-loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obesity. 2013;21(8):1519–25.CrossRefPubMed Hatoum IJ, Kaplan LM. Advantages of percent weight-loss as a method of reporting weight-loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obesity. 2013;21(8):1519–25.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Sczepaniak JP, Owens ML, Shukla H, et al. Comparability of weight loss reporting after gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy using BOLD data 2008–2011. Obes Surg. 2015;25(5):788–95.CrossRefPubMed Sczepaniak JP, Owens ML, Shukla H, et al. Comparability of weight loss reporting after gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy using BOLD data 2008–2011. Obes Surg. 2015;25(5):788–95.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Corcelles R, Boules M, Froylich D, et al. Total weight loss as the outcome measure of choice after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2016;26(8):1794–8.CrossRefPubMed Corcelles R, Boules M, Froylich D, et al. Total weight loss as the outcome measure of choice after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2016;26(8):1794–8.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Baltasar A, Perez N, Serra C, et al. Weight loss reporting: predicted body mass index after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2011;21(3):367–72.CrossRefPubMed Baltasar A, Perez N, Serra C, et al. Weight loss reporting: predicted body mass index after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2011;21(3):367–72.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Molina López A, Sabench Pereferrer F, Vives Espelta M, et al. Usefulness of Baltasar’s expected body mass index as an indicator of bariatric weight loss surgery. Obes Surg. 2016;26(11):2712–7.CrossRefPubMed Molina López A, Sabench Pereferrer F, Vives Espelta M, et al. Usefulness of Baltasar’s expected body mass index as an indicator of bariatric weight loss surgery. Obes Surg. 2016;26(11):2712–7.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference van de Laar AW. Algorithm for weight-loss after gastric bypass surgery considering body mass index, gender, and age from the Bariatric Outcome Longitudinal Database (BOLD). Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(1):55–61.CrossRefPubMed van de Laar AW. Algorithm for weight-loss after gastric bypass surgery considering body mass index, gender, and age from the Bariatric Outcome Longitudinal Database (BOLD). Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(1):55–61.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference van de Laar AW, Dollé MH, de Brauw LM, et al. Validating the alterable weight loss (AWL) metric with 2-year weight loss outcome of 500 patients after gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2014;24(7):1085–9.CrossRefPubMed van de Laar AW, Dollé MH, de Brauw LM, et al. Validating the alterable weight loss (AWL) metric with 2-year weight loss outcome of 500 patients after gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2014;24(7):1085–9.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Park JY, Kim YJ. Reply to the letter to editor entitled “The %EBMIL/%EWL double-booby trap. A comment on studies that compare the effect of bariatric surgery between heavier and lighter patients”. Obes Surg. 2016;26(3):614–6.CrossRefPubMed Park JY, Kim YJ. Reply to the letter to editor entitled “The %EBMIL/%EWL double-booby trap. A comment on studies that compare the effect of bariatric surgery between heavier and lighter patients”. Obes Surg. 2016;26(3):614–6.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference van de Laar AW, de Brauw LM, Meesters EW. Relationships between type-2 diabetes remission after gastric bypass and different weight loss metrics: arguments against excess weight loss in metabolic surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(2):274–82.CrossRefPubMed van de Laar AW, de Brauw LM, Meesters EW. Relationships between type-2 diabetes remission after gastric bypass and different weight loss metrics: arguments against excess weight loss in metabolic surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(2):274–82.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference van de Laar AW, de Brauw M, Bruin SC, et al. Weight-independent percentile chart of 2880 gastric bypass patients: a new look at bariatric weight loss results. Obes Surg. 2016;26(12):2891–8.CrossRefPubMed van de Laar AW, de Brauw M, Bruin SC, et al. Weight-independent percentile chart of 2880 gastric bypass patients: a new look at bariatric weight loss results. Obes Surg. 2016;26(12):2891–8.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference van de Laar AW, Dollé MH, de Brauw LM, et al. Which baseline weight should be preferred as reference for weight loss results? Insights in bariatric weight loss mechanisms by comparing primary and revision gastric bypass patients. Obes Surg. 2015;25(4):687–93.CrossRefPubMed van de Laar AW, Dollé MH, de Brauw LM, et al. Which baseline weight should be preferred as reference for weight loss results? Insights in bariatric weight loss mechanisms by comparing primary and revision gastric bypass patients. Obes Surg. 2015;25(4):687–93.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference van de Laar A. Bariatric Outcomes Longitudinal Database (BOLD) suggests excess weight loss and excess BMI loss to be inappropriate outcome measures, demonstrating better alternatives. Obes Surg. 2012;22(12):1843–7.CrossRefPubMed van de Laar A. Bariatric Outcomes Longitudinal Database (BOLD) suggests excess weight loss and excess BMI loss to be inappropriate outcome measures, demonstrating better alternatives. Obes Surg. 2012;22(12):1843–7.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference van de Laar AW, Acherman YI. Weight loss percentile charts of large representative series: a benchmark defining sufficient weight loss challenging current criteria for success of bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2014;24(5):727–34.CrossRefPubMed van de Laar AW, Acherman YI. Weight loss percentile charts of large representative series: a benchmark defining sufficient weight loss challenging current criteria for success of bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2014;24(5):727–34.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Brethauer SA, Kim J, El Chaar M, et al. ASMBS Clinical Issues Committee. Standardized outcomes reporting in metabolic and bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2015;25(4):587–606.CrossRefPubMed Brethauer SA, Kim J, El Chaar M, et al. ASMBS Clinical Issues Committee. Standardized outcomes reporting in metabolic and bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2015;25(4):587–606.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Livhits M, Mercado C, Yermilov I, et al. Preoperative predictors of weight loss following bariatric surgery: systematic review. Obes Surg. 2012;22(1):70–89.CrossRefPubMed Livhits M, Mercado C, Yermilov I, et al. Preoperative predictors of weight loss following bariatric surgery: systematic review. Obes Surg. 2012;22(1):70–89.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Deitel M, Gawdat K, Melissas J. Reporting weight loss 2007. Obes Surg. 2007;14:565–8.CrossRef Deitel M, Gawdat K, Melissas J. Reporting weight loss 2007. Obes Surg. 2007;14:565–8.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Weigley ES. Average? Ideal? Desirable? A brief overview of height-weight tables in the United States. J Am Diet Assoc. 1984;84(4):417–23.PubMed Weigley ES. Average? Ideal? Desirable? A brief overview of height-weight tables in the United States. J Am Diet Assoc. 1984;84(4):417–23.PubMed
28.
go back to reference Mann JP, Jakes AD, Hayden JD, et al. Systematic review of definitions of failure in revisional bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2015;25(3):571–4.CrossRefPubMed Mann JP, Jakes AD, Hayden JD, et al. Systematic review of definitions of failure in revisional bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2015;25(3):571–4.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Aminian A, Jamal M, Augustin T, et al. Failed surgical weight loss does not necessarily mean failed metabolic effects. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015;17(10):682–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Aminian A, Jamal M, Augustin T, et al. Failed surgical weight loss does not necessarily mean failed metabolic effects. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015;17(10):682–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Mor A, Sharp L, Portenier D, et al. Weight loss at first postoperative visit predicts long-term outcome of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass using Duke weight loss surgery chart. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(5):556–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mor A, Sharp L, Portenier D, et al. Weight loss at first postoperative visit predicts long-term outcome of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass using Duke weight loss surgery chart. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(5):556–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference Kolotkin RL, Crosby RD, Gress RE, et al. Two-year changes in health-related quality of life in gastric bypass patients compared with severely obese controls. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009 Mar-Apr;5(2):250–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kolotkin RL, Crosby RD, Gress RE, et al. Two-year changes in health-related quality of life in gastric bypass patients compared with severely obese controls. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009 Mar-Apr;5(2):250–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Nelson DW, Blair KS, Martin MJ. Analysis of obesity-related outcomes and bariatric failure rates with the duodenal switch vs gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Arch Surg. 2012;147(9):847–54.CrossRefPubMed Nelson DW, Blair KS, Martin MJ. Analysis of obesity-related outcomes and bariatric failure rates with the duodenal switch vs gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Arch Surg. 2012;147(9):847–54.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Courcoulas AP, Christian NJ, Belle SH, et al. Weight change and health outcomes at 3 years after bariatric surgery among individuals with severe obesity. JAMA. 2013;310(22):2416–25.PubMedPubMedCentral Courcoulas AP, Christian NJ, Belle SH, et al. Weight change and health outcomes at 3 years after bariatric surgery among individuals with severe obesity. JAMA. 2013;310(22):2416–25.PubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Thereaux J, Czernichow S, Corigliano N, et al. Five-year outcomes of gastric bypass for super-super-obesity (BMI ≥ 60 kg/m2): a case matched study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(1):32–7.CrossRefPubMed Thereaux J, Czernichow S, Corigliano N, et al. Five-year outcomes of gastric bypass for super-super-obesity (BMI ≥ 60 kg/m2): a case matched study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(1):32–7.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Wood GC, Benotti PN, Lee CJ, et al. Evaluation of the association between preoperative clinical factors and long-term weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(11):1056–62.CrossRefPubMed Wood GC, Benotti PN, Lee CJ, et al. Evaluation of the association between preoperative clinical factors and long-term weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(11):1056–62.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Ames GE, Heckman MG, Diehl NN, et al. Guiding patients toward the appropriate surgical treatment for obesity: should presurgery psychological correlates influence choice between Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and vertical sleeve gastrectomy? Obes Surg. 2017;27(10):2759–67.CrossRefPubMed Ames GE, Heckman MG, Diehl NN, et al. Guiding patients toward the appropriate surgical treatment for obesity: should presurgery psychological correlates influence choice between Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and vertical sleeve gastrectomy? Obes Surg. 2017;27(10):2759–67.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Sensitivity and Specificity of 50% Excess Weight Loss (50%EWL) and Twelve Other Bariatric Criteria for Weight Loss Success
Authors
Arnold W. van de Laar
A. S. van Rijswijk
H. Kakar
S. C. Bruin
Publication date
01-08-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 8/2018
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3173-4

Other articles of this Issue 8/2018

Obesity Surgery 8/2018 Go to the issue