Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 3/2017

01-03-2017 | Original Contributions

The Impact of Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch (BPD/DS) Over 9 Years

Authors: Gladys W. Strain, Mehyar H. Torghabeh, Michel Gagner, Faith Ebel, Gregory F. Dakin, Jonathan S. Abelson, Daniel Connolly, Alfons Pomp

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There is limited information on the multiple long-term effects of the biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD/DS).

Methods

Patients who consented to a BPD/DS from 1999 to 2010 were evaluated for weight change, complications, comorbidity resolution, body composition, quality of life, and depressive symptoms during visits at 1, 3,5, 7, and 9 years. Descriptive statistics, analysis of variance, and pair-wise comparisons were calculated for each of the five follow-up cohorts vs. the baseline cohort.

Results

Between 1999 and 2010, 284 patients received a BPD/DS; 275 patients (69.8 % women) age 42.7 years, BMI 53.4 kg/m2 qualified for baseline analysis. Two hundred seventy-five patients were available in year 1; 275 patients in year 3; 273 patients in year 5; 259 patients in year 7; and 228 patients in year 9. Gender distribution was not different. BMI was 30.1 at 1 year and 32.0 at 9 years. Body fat was reduced to 26 % after 2 years. Complications requiring surgery were significant. Nutritional problems developed in 29.8 % of patients over the course of observation. The baseline Beck Depression Index (BDI) was 13.9 and 7.2 in year 1. Year 1 through 9 remained unchanged. There were significant positive changes in quality of life between baseline and year 1 for most domains. These positive changes were maintained for the follow-up cohorts. After surgery the resolution of comorbidities continued for the 9 years.

Conclusions

Weight loss during the first year was well maintained, resolving comorbidities and improving quality of life. Rates of surgical complications resemble other bariatric procedures. Long-term nutrient deficiencies are of concern.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Farrell TM, Haggerty SP, Overby DW, et al. Clinical application of laparoscopic bariatric surgery: an evidence-based review. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:930–49.CrossRefPubMed Farrell TM, Haggerty SP, Overby DW, et al. Clinical application of laparoscopic bariatric surgery: an evidence-based review. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:930–49.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: systemic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292:1724–37.CrossRefPubMed Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: systemic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292:1724–37.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Chang SH, Stoll CR, Song J, et al. The effectiveness and risks of bariatric surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis, 2003–2012. JAMA: Surg. 2014;149(3):275–87. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2013.3654. Chang SH, Stoll CR, Song J, et al. The effectiveness and risks of bariatric surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis, 2003–2012. JAMA: Surg. 2014;149(3):275–87. doi:10.​1001/​jamasurg.​2013.​3654.
4.
go back to reference Buchwald H, Orien DM. Metabolic/bariatric surgery world wide 2011. Obesity Surg. 2013;23:427–36.CrossRef Buchwald H, Orien DM. Metabolic/bariatric surgery world wide 2011. Obesity Surg. 2013;23:427–36.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Anderson B, Gill RS, de Gara CJ, Karmali S, Gagner M. Biliopancreatic Diversion: The Effectiveness of Duodenal Switch and Its Limitations. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2013, Article ID:974762, 8 pp. Anderson B, Gill RS, de Gara CJ, Karmali S, Gagner M. Biliopancreatic Diversion: The Effectiveness of Duodenal Switch and Its Limitations. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2013, Article ID:974762, 8 pp.
7.
go back to reference Topart P, Becouarn G, Salle A. Five- year follow-up after biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7:199–205.CrossRefPubMed Topart P, Becouarn G, Salle A. Five- year follow-up after biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7:199–205.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hess DS, Hess DW, Oakley RS. The biliopancreatic Diversion with the duodenal switch: results beyond 10 years. Obes Surg. 2005;15:408–16.CrossRefPubMed Hess DS, Hess DW, Oakley RS. The biliopancreatic Diversion with the duodenal switch: results beyond 10 years. Obes Surg. 2005;15:408–16.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Ren CJ, Patterson E, Gagner M. Early results of laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: a case series of 40 consecutive patients. Obes Surg. 2000;10:514–23.CrossRefPubMed Ren CJ, Patterson E, Gagner M. Early results of laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: a case series of 40 consecutive patients. Obes Surg. 2000;10:514–23.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Strain GW, Wang J, Gagner M, et al. Bioimpedance for severe obesity: Comparing research methods for total body water and resting energy expenditure. Obesity. 2008;16:1953–6.CrossRefPubMed Strain GW, Wang J, Gagner M, et al. Bioimpedance for severe obesity: Comparing research methods for total body water and resting energy expenditure. Obesity. 2008;16:1953–6.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Beeson WL, Batech M, Schultz L, et al. Comparison of body composition by bioelectric impedance analysis and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in Hispanic diabetics. Int J Body Comp Res. 2010;8:45–50. Beeson WL, Batech M, Schultz L, et al. Comparison of body composition by bioelectric impedance analysis and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in Hispanic diabetics. Int J Body Comp Res. 2010;8:45–50.
12.
go back to reference Feisard MI, Greenway FL, Delany JP. Comparisons of methods to assess body composition changes during a period of weight loss. Obes Res. 2005;13:845–54.CrossRef Feisard MI, Greenway FL, Delany JP. Comparisons of methods to assess body composition changes during a period of weight loss. Obes Res. 2005;13:845–54.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Faria SL, Faria OP, Careal MDA, et al. Validation study of multi-frequency bioelectric impedance with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry among obese patients. Obes Surg. 2014;24:1476–80.CrossRefPubMed Faria SL, Faria OP, Careal MDA, et al. Validation study of multi-frequency bioelectric impedance with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry among obese patients. Obes Surg. 2014;24:1476–80.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Ware J, Snow K, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. 1993; The Health Institute, New England Medical Center: Boston. Ware J, Snow K, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. 1993; The Health Institute, New England Medical Center: Boston.
15.
go back to reference Kolotkin RL, Crosby RD, Kosloski KD, et al. Development of a brief measure to assess quality of life in obesity. Obes Res. 2001;9:102–11.CrossRefPubMed Kolotkin RL, Crosby RD, Kosloski KD, et al. Development of a brief measure to assess quality of life in obesity. Obes Res. 2001;9:102–11.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Kolotkin RL, Crosby RD. Psychometric evaluation of the Impact of Weight on Quality Of Life-Lite Questionnaire (IWQOL-Lite) in a community sample. Qual Life Res. 2002;11:157–71.CrossRefPubMed Kolotkin RL, Crosby RD. Psychometric evaluation of the Impact of Weight on Quality Of Life-Lite Questionnaire (IWQOL-Lite) in a community sample. Qual Life Res. 2002;11:157–71.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelsohn M, et al. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961;4:561–71.CrossRefPubMed Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelsohn M, et al. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961;4:561–71.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Beck AT, Steer RA, Garbin MG. Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clin Psychol Rev. 1988;8:77–100.CrossRef Beck AT, Steer RA, Garbin MG. Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clin Psychol Rev. 1988;8:77–100.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Strain GW, Gagner M, Pomp A, et al. A comparison of weight loss (WL) and body composition (BC) changes with four surgical procedures. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5:582–7.CrossRefPubMed Strain GW, Gagner M, Pomp A, et al. A comparison of weight loss (WL) and body composition (BC) changes with four surgical procedures. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5:582–7.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Sovik TT, Taha O, Aasheim ET, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic gastric bypass versus laparoscopic duodenal switch for super obesity. Br J Surg. 2010;97:160–6.CrossRefPubMed Sovik TT, Taha O, Aasheim ET, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic gastric bypass versus laparoscopic duodenal switch for super obesity. Br J Surg. 2010;97:160–6.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Topart PA, Becouarm G. Revision and reversal after biliopancreatic diversion for excessive side effects or ineffective weight loss: a review of the current literature on indications and procedures. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11:965–72.CrossRefPubMed Topart PA, Becouarm G. Revision and reversal after biliopancreatic diversion for excessive side effects or ineffective weight loss: a review of the current literature on indications and procedures. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11:965–72.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Risstad H, Søvik TT, Engström M, et al. Five-year outcomes after laparoscopic gastric bypass and laparoscopic duodenal switch in patients with body mass index of 50 to 60: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2015;150(4):352–61.CrossRefPubMed Risstad H, Søvik TT, Engström M, et al. Five-year outcomes after laparoscopic gastric bypass and laparoscopic duodenal switch in patients with body mass index of 50 to 60: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2015;150(4):352–61.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Bardaro SJ, Gagner M, Consten E, et al. Routine cholecystectomy during laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch is not necessary. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3(5):549–53.CrossRefPubMed Bardaro SJ, Gagner M, Consten E, et al. Routine cholecystectomy during laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch is not necessary. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3(5):549–53.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Crea N, Pata G, Di Betta E, et al. Long-term results of biliopancreatic diversion with or without gastric preservation for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2011;21:139–45.CrossRefPubMed Crea N, Pata G, Di Betta E, et al. Long-term results of biliopancreatic diversion with or without gastric preservation for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2011;21:139–45.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Gourash WF, Ebel F, Lancaster K, et al. Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (LABS): Retention strategy and results at 24 months. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;10:514–9.CrossRef Gourash WF, Ebel F, Lancaster K, et al. Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (LABS): Retention strategy and results at 24 months. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;10:514–9.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Isom KA, Andromatos I, Ariango M, et al. Nutrition and metabolic support recommendation for the bariatric patient. Nutr Clin Pract. 2014;29:718–39.CrossRefPubMed Isom KA, Andromatos I, Ariango M, et al. Nutrition and metabolic support recommendation for the bariatric patient. Nutr Clin Pract. 2014;29:718–39.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Saif T, Strain G, Gagner M, et al. An evaluation of nutrient status after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy 1, 3, and 5 years after surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8:542–9.CrossRefPubMed Saif T, Strain G, Gagner M, et al. An evaluation of nutrient status after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy 1, 3, and 5 years after surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8:542–9.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The Impact of Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch (BPD/DS) Over 9 Years
Authors
Gladys W. Strain
Mehyar H. Torghabeh
Michel Gagner
Faith Ebel
Gregory F. Dakin
Jonathan S. Abelson
Daniel Connolly
Alfons Pomp
Publication date
01-03-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2371-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Obesity Surgery 3/2017 Go to the issue