Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 11/2014

01-11-2014 | Original Contributions

Patient Preferences and Bariatric Surgery Procedure Selection; the Need for Shared Decision-Making

Authors: Andrew L. Weinstein, Bryan J. Marascalchi, Matthew A. Spiegel, John K. Saunders, Angela Fagerlin, Manish Parikh

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 11/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for patients suffering from obesity-related comorbidities. There is little data regarding how patients choose one particular bariatric procedure over another. This study aimed to better define the relationship between preferences of patients considering bariatric surgery and the procedure patients undergo.

Methods

A bilingual questionnaire was administered to all prospective patients seen between March 1 and August 31, 2012. The questionnaire assessed basic knowledge of bariatric surgery (based on the information seminar) as well as patient preferences of the various outcomes and complications for sleeve gastrectomy, gastric bypass, and gastric banding.

Results

One hundred seventy-two patients completed the questionnaire. Fifty-eight percent of patients chose “maximum weight loss” as the most important outcome, and 65 % chose “leak” as the most concerning complication. Subgroup analysis of patients with diabetes revealed that 58 % chose “curing diabetes” as the most important outcome. Nineteen percent of patients were either not sure which procedure they wanted or changed their decision after consultation with the surgeon.

Conclusions

The decision to choose one bariatric procedure over another is complex and is based on factors beyond absolute patient preferences. Although maximum weight loss is a commonly reported preference for patients seeking bariatric surgery, patients with diabetes are more focused on diabetes remission. Most patients have already decided which procedure to undergo prior to surgeon consultation. Patients may benefit from shared decision making, which integrates patient values and preferences along with current medical evidence to assist in the complex bariatric surgery selection process.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292:1724–37.PubMedCrossRef Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292:1724–37.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hutter MM, Schirmer BD, Jones D, et al. First report from the American College of Surgeons Bariatric Surgery Center Network: laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy has morbidity and effectiveness positioned between the band and the bypass. Ann Surg. 2011;254(3):410–20.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Hutter MM, Schirmer BD, Jones D, et al. First report from the American College of Surgeons Bariatric Surgery Center Network: laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy has morbidity and effectiveness positioned between the band and the bypass. Ann Surg. 2011;254(3):410–20.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Tice J, Karliner L, Walsh J, et al. Gastric banding or bypass? A systematic review comparing the two most popular bariatric procedures. Am J Med. 2008;121:885–93.PubMedCrossRef Tice J, Karliner L, Walsh J, et al. Gastric banding or bypass? A systematic review comparing the two most popular bariatric procedures. Am J Med. 2008;121:885–93.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Gastrointestinal Surgery for Severe Obesity. NIH Consensus Statement, March 25–27, 9 (1991), pp. 1–20. Gastrointestinal Surgery for Severe Obesity. NIH Consensus Statement, March 25–27, 9 (1991), pp. 1–20.
5.
go back to reference Nguyen N, Nguyen B, Gebhart A, et al. Changes in the makeup of bariatric surgery: a national increase in the use of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216:252–7.PubMedCrossRef Nguyen N, Nguyen B, Gebhart A, et al. Changes in the makeup of bariatric surgery: a national increase in the use of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216:252–7.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Prasad C, Batsis J, Lopez-Jimenez F et al. Risk perception of obesity and bariatric surgery in patients seeking treatment for obesity. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2012 Nov 2. Prasad C, Batsis J, Lopez-Jimenez F et al. Risk perception of obesity and bariatric surgery in patients seeking treatment for obesity. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2012 Nov 2.
7.
go back to reference Kaly P, Orellana S, Torrella T, et al. Unrealistic weight loss expectations in candidates for bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4:6–10.PubMedCrossRef Kaly P, Orellana S, Torrella T, et al. Unrealistic weight loss expectations in candidates for bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4:6–10.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Apovian C, Huskey K, Chiodi S, et al. Patient factors associated with undergoing laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding vs. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for weight loss. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217:1118–25.PubMedCrossRef Apovian C, Huskey K, Chiodi S, et al. Patient factors associated with undergoing laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding vs. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for weight loss. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217:1118–25.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Parikh M, Dasari M, McMacken M, et al. Does a preoperative medically supervised weight loss program improve bariatric surgery outcomes? A pilot randomized study. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:853–61.PubMedCrossRef Parikh M, Dasari M, McMacken M, et al. Does a preoperative medically supervised weight loss program improve bariatric surgery outcomes? A pilot randomized study. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:853–61.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Arterburn D, Westbrok E, Bogart T, et al. Randomized trial of a video-based patient decision aid for bariatric surgery. Obesity. 2011;19:1669–75.PubMedCrossRef Arterburn D, Westbrok E, Bogart T, et al. Randomized trial of a video-based patient decision aid for bariatric surgery. Obesity. 2011;19:1669–75.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Taddeucci R, Madan A, Tichansky D. Band versus bypass: influence of an educational seminar and surgeon visit on patient preference. Surg Obes Rel Dis 2007;452-455. Taddeucci R, Madan A, Tichansky D. Band versus bypass: influence of an educational seminar and surgeon visit on patient preference. Surg Obes Rel Dis 2007;452-455.
12.
go back to reference Ren CJ, Cabrera I, Bajaram K, et al. Factors influencing patient choice for bariatric operation. Obes Surg. 2005;15:202–6.PubMedCrossRef Ren CJ, Cabrera I, Bajaram K, et al. Factors influencing patient choice for bariatric operation. Obes Surg. 2005;15:202–6.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Barry M, Edgman-Levitan S. Shared decision making—the pinnacle of patient-centered care. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:780–1.PubMedCrossRef Barry M, Edgman-Levitan S. Shared decision making—the pinnacle of patient-centered care. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:780–1.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Nelson D, Blair K, Martin M. Analysis of obesity-related outcomes and bariatric failure rates with the duodenal switch vs. gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Arch Surg. 2012;147:847–54.PubMedCrossRef Nelson D, Blair K, Martin M. Analysis of obesity-related outcomes and bariatric failure rates with the duodenal switch vs. gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Arch Surg. 2012;147:847–54.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference DeMaria E, Pate V, Warthen M, et al. Baseline data from American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Centers of Excellence using the bariatric outcomes longitudinal database. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6:347–55.PubMedCrossRef DeMaria E, Pate V, Warthen M, et al. Baseline data from American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Centers of Excellence using the bariatric outcomes longitudinal database. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6:347–55.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Patient Preferences and Bariatric Surgery Procedure Selection; the Need for Shared Decision-Making
Authors
Andrew L. Weinstein
Bryan J. Marascalchi
Matthew A. Spiegel
John K. Saunders
Angela Fagerlin
Manish Parikh
Publication date
01-11-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 11/2014
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-014-1270-6

Other articles of this Issue 11/2014

Obesity Surgery 11/2014 Go to the issue