Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 1/2014

01-01-2014 | Original Contributions

Obesity Surgery Smartphone Apps: a Review

Authors: Daniel J. Stevens, John A. Jackson, Noah Howes, Justin Morgan

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study are to review available smartphone applications (‘apps’) relating to weight loss surgery, and assess the level of medical professional involvement in their design

Methods

Smartphone apps relating to weight loss surgery were identified by searching the three app stores: Apple’s App Store, Google Play (Android) and Blackberry AppWorld. A data search was undertaken using keywords and phrases relating to weight loss surgery. Apps designed for the non-surgical treatment of obesity were excluded.

Results

A total of 38 apps were identified (Google Play = 17, Apple App Store = 21, Blackberry World = 0). Ten of 38 apps were duplicated therefore 28 apps were reviewed. Mean app rating was 3.6/5 and mean app cost was £1.89. Twenty-six of 28 (92.9%) apps were designed for use by patients. Apps were categorised into the following categories: patient information (ten), patient support forums (six), patient record tools (six), weight loss clinic advertisements (four), a journal app (one) and a conference tool (one). Health professional involvement was evident in 12 of 28 (42.9%) apps.

Conclusions

This study has identified that the majority of available apps relating to weight loss surgery do not have health professional input. The establishment of a ‘quality stamp’ provided by an established bariatric surgical body could improve the confidence with which patients and clinicians use these new information sources. Weight loss surgery apps offer a unique opportunity to provide accurate and reliable patient information and their use as part of the informed consent process should be explored.
Literature
1.
3.
go back to reference Makanjuola JK, Rao AR, Hale J, et al. Urology apps: a review of all apps available for urologists. BJU Int. 2012;110(4):475–7.PubMedCrossRef Makanjuola JK, Rao AR, Hale J, et al. Urology apps: a review of all apps available for urologists. BJU Int. 2012;110(4):475–7.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference O’Neill S, Brady RR. Colorectal smartphone apps: opportunities and risks. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14(9):e530–4.PubMedCrossRef O’Neill S, Brady RR. Colorectal smartphone apps: opportunities and risks. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14(9):e530–4.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Dasari KB, White SM, Pateman J. Survey of iPhone usage among anaesthetists in England. Anaesthesia. 2011;66(7):630–1.PubMedCrossRef Dasari KB, White SM, Pateman J. Survey of iPhone usage among anaesthetists in England. Anaesthesia. 2011;66(7):630–1.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kailas A, Chong CC, Watanabe F. From mobile phones to personal wellness dashboards. IEEE Pulse. 2010;1(1):57–63.PubMedCrossRef Kailas A, Chong CC, Watanabe F. From mobile phones to personal wellness dashboards. IEEE Pulse. 2010;1(1):57–63.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Freshwater MF. iPhone and iPad applications for plastic surgeons. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64(10):1397–9.PubMedCrossRef Freshwater MF. iPhone and iPad applications for plastic surgeons. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64(10):1397–9.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference NIH Conference. Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity: Consensus Development Conference Panel. Ann Intern Med. 1991;115(12):956–61.CrossRef NIH Conference. Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity: Consensus Development Conference Panel. Ann Intern Med. 1991;115(12):956–61.CrossRef
13.
14.
go back to reference Pellegrini CA, Duncan JM, Moller AC, et al. A smartphone-supported weight loss program: design of the ENGAGED randomized controlled trial. England: BMC Public Health; 2012. 12 p104. Pellegrini CA, Duncan JM, Moller AC, et al. A smartphone-supported weight loss program: design of the ENGAGED randomized controlled trial. England: BMC Public Health; 2012. 12 p104.
15.
go back to reference Hamilton AD, Brady RR. Medical professional involvement in smartphone ‘apps’ in dermatology. Br J Dermatol. 2012;167(1):220–1.PubMedCrossRef Hamilton AD, Brady RR. Medical professional involvement in smartphone ‘apps’ in dermatology. Br J Dermatol. 2012;167(1):220–1.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Rosser BA, Eccleston C. Smartphone applications for pain management. J Telemed Telecare. 2011;17(6):308–12.PubMedCrossRef Rosser BA, Eccleston C. Smartphone applications for pain management. J Telemed Telecare. 2011;17(6):308–12.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Wee CC, Pratt JS, Fanelli R, et al. Best practice updates for informed consent and patient education in weight loss surgery. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009;17(5):885–8.CrossRef Wee CC, Pratt JS, Fanelli R, et al. Best practice updates for informed consent and patient education in weight loss surgery. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009;17(5):885–8.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Faden RR, Beauchamp TL. A history and theory of informed consent. New York: Oxford University Press; 1986. Faden RR, Beauchamp TL. A history and theory of informed consent. New York: Oxford University Press; 1986.
Metadata
Title
Obesity Surgery Smartphone Apps: a Review
Authors
Daniel J. Stevens
John A. Jackson
Noah Howes
Justin Morgan
Publication date
01-01-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 1/2014
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-013-1010-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

Obesity Surgery 1/2014 Go to the issue

Letter to the Editor

Letter to the Editor