Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 6/2011

01-06-2011 | Clinical Research

Sweet Eating: A Definition and the Development of the Dutch Sweet Eating Questionnaire

Authors: Margot van den Heuvel, Rogier Hörchner, Anneke Wijtsma, Noufissa Bourhim, Dascha Willemsen, Elisabeth M. H. Mathus-Vliegen

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 6/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Previous studies have suggested that patients who are defined as so-called sweet eaters have more difficulties to lose weight and to maintain weight loss after both conservative treatment and restrictive bariatric surgery, such as gastric banding. There is, however, no agreement on the definition of sweet eating. Also, a questionnaire to measure sweet eating is not available. Therefore, the aim of our study was to agree on a definition of sweet eating and to construct a valid and reliable questionnaire that might be of help to assess the influence of sweet eating on weight loss after bariatric surgery.

Methods

A Delphi Study design was chosen to define sweet eating. Based on the Delphi rounds, a questionnaire with self-reported sweets intake was constructed and validated.

Results

Nine experts with different scientific backgrounds participated in the Delphi Study which consisted of four rounds. They finally agreed on the definition that sweet eating can be defined as an eating behavior in which at least 50% of daily consumed carbohydrates consist of simple carbohydrates and which can be triggered by emotional factors (i.e., stress). They did not include the intake of artificial sweeteners in the definition. The Dutch Sweet Eating Questionnaire built on the four Delphi rounds was tested in 138 female patients and appeared to be both valid and reliable.

Conclusion

A shortcoming of this study is that the results may not be applicable to males and to non-Western populations. The definition and the questionnaire may be useful in future research regarding sweet eating and bariatric surgery outcomes in morbidly obese patients.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery. A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292:1724–37.PubMedCrossRef Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery. A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292:1724–37.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hörchner R, Tuinebreijer W, Kelder H. Eating patterns in morbidly obese patients before and after a gastric restrictive operation. Obes Surg. 2002;12(1):108–12(5).PubMedCrossRef Hörchner R, Tuinebreijer W, Kelder H. Eating patterns in morbidly obese patients before and after a gastric restrictive operation. Obes Surg. 2002;12(1):108–12(5).PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Nugent C, Bai CH, Elariny H, et al. Metabolic syndrome after laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2008;18:1278–86.PubMedCrossRef Nugent C, Bai CH, Elariny H, et al. Metabolic syndrome after laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2008;18:1278–86.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hudson S, Dixon J, O’Brien P. Sweet eating is not a predictor of outcome after lap-band® placement. Can we finally bury the myth? Obes Surg. 2002;12(6):789–94(6).PubMedCrossRef Hudson S, Dixon J, O’Brien P. Sweet eating is not a predictor of outcome after lap-band® placement. Can we finally bury the myth? Obes Surg. 2002;12(6):789–94(6).PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Wölnerhanssen BK, Peters T, Kern B, et al. Predictors of outcome in treatment of morbid obesity by laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: results of a prospective study of 380 patients. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases. 2008;4(4):500–6.PubMedCrossRef Wölnerhanssen BK, Peters T, Kern B, et al. Predictors of outcome in treatment of morbid obesity by laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: results of a prospective study of 380 patients. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases. 2008;4(4):500–6.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Sugerman HJ, Starkey JV, Birkenhauer R. A randomized prospective trial of gastric bypass versus vertical banded gastroplasty for morbid obesity and their effects on sweets versus non-sweets eaters. Annual Surgery. 1987;205(6):613–24.CrossRef Sugerman HJ, Starkey JV, Birkenhauer R. A randomized prospective trial of gastric bypass versus vertical banded gastroplasty for morbid obesity and their effects on sweets versus non-sweets eaters. Annual Surgery. 1987;205(6):613–24.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Busetto L, Segato G, De Luca M, et al. Weight loss and postoperative complications in morbidly obese patients with binge eating disorder treated by laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2005;15:195–201.PubMedCrossRef Busetto L, Segato G, De Luca M, et al. Weight loss and postoperative complications in morbidly obese patients with binge eating disorder treated by laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2005;15:195–201.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Dixon JB, O’Brien PE. Selecting the optimal patient for LAP-BAND placement. Am J Surg. 2002;184(6B):17S–20S.PubMedCrossRef Dixon JB, O’Brien PE. Selecting the optimal patient for LAP-BAND placement. Am J Surg. 2002;184(6B):17S–20S.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference van Strien T, Herman CP, Verheijden MW. Eating style, overeating, and overweight in a representative Dutch sample. Does external eating play a role? Appetite. 2009;52(2):380–7.PubMedCrossRef van Strien T, Herman CP, Verheijden MW. Eating style, overeating, and overweight in a representative Dutch sample. Does external eating play a role? Appetite. 2009;52(2):380–7.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Smith ER, Mackie DM. Social psychology. 3rd ed. New York: Psychology Press; 2007. Smith ER, Mackie DM. Social psychology. 3rd ed. New York: Psychology Press; 2007.
11.
go back to reference Schmitt N, Oswald FL. The impact of corrections for faking on the validity of noncognitive measures in selection settings. J Appl Psychol. 2006;91(3):613–21.PubMedCrossRef Schmitt N, Oswald FL. The impact of corrections for faking on the validity of noncognitive measures in selection settings. J Appl Psychol. 2006;91(3):613–21.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Sweet Eating: A Definition and the Development of the Dutch Sweet Eating Questionnaire
Authors
Margot van den Heuvel
Rogier Hörchner
Anneke Wijtsma
Noufissa Bourhim
Dascha Willemsen
Elisabeth M. H. Mathus-Vliegen
Publication date
01-06-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 6/2011
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-010-0094-2

Other articles of this Issue 6/2011

Obesity Surgery 6/2011 Go to the issue