Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 2/2020

01-06-2020 | Public Health | Symposium: Conflicts of Interest

Lessons from Corporate Influence in the Opioid Epidemic: Toward a Norm of Separation

Author: Jonathan H. Marks

Published in: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry | Issue 2/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

There is overwhelming evidence that the opioid crisis—which has cost hundreds of thousands of lives and trillions of dollars (and counting)—has been created or exacerbated by webs of influence woven by several pharmaceutical companies. These webs involve health professionals, patient advocacy groups, medical professional societies, research universities, teaching hospitals, public health agencies, policymakers, and legislators. Opioid companies built these webs as part of corporate strategies of influence that were designed to expand the opioid market from cancer patients to larger groups of patients with acute or chronic pain, to increase dosage as well as opioid use, to downplay the risks of addiction and abuse, and to characterize physicians’ concerns about the addiction and abuse risks as “opiophobia.” In the face of these pervasive strategies, conflict of interest policies have proven insufficient for addressing corporate influence in medical practice, medical research, and public health policy. Governments, the academy, and civil society need to develop counterstrategies to insulate themselves from corporate influence and to preserve their integrity and public trust. These strategies require a paradigm shift—from partnerships with the private sector, which are ordinarily vehicles for corporate influence, to a norm of separation.
Footnotes
1
The Sackler family’s arts philanthropy has attracted much attention. I focus my analysis here on relationships with entities in health and policy spheres because they appear to have most directly contributed to the opioid crisis. But I recognize that arts philanthropy also merits ethical scrutiny that I cannot provide in the space permitted.
 
2
Although university gifts made by Purdue Pharma and the Sackler family have attracted the most public scrutiny, the conviction of the former CEO of Insys, John Kapoor, drew attention to his gifts to the University of Buffalo’s School of Pharmacy and ultimately led to the removal of his name from the school’s building (McNeil 2019).
 
3
For a thoughtful critique of this definition, see Rodwin 2018. Rodwin argues that the Institute of Medicine’s 2009 definition of conflicts of interest “neglects the actor’s compromised loyalty to the party or mission she is supposed to serve” (70) and that, by referring to conflicts between primary and secondary interests rather than conflicts between obligations and interests, this definition “diminishes the conflict’s significance” (70). Rodwin also expresses concern that “[e]fforts to include so-called intellectual or nonfinancial conflicts as conflicts of interest blur the concept” (75).
 
4
Physicians are not dependent on drug companies for pens and mugs—they can afford to buy their own! But these small gifts influence them nonetheless. See, e.g., Sah and Fugh-Berman 2013; Lo and Grady 2017.
 
5
Although widely publicized investigations revealing opioid company payments to PAOs and health professional associations led to withdrawals of funding and, in a few cases, to the recipient organizations ceasing to operate, industry funding of patient advocacy groups remains pervasive. One recent study found that 83 per cent of the 104 largest groups received funding from drug, device, or biotechnology companies (McCoy et al. 2017). We should not expect disclosure alone to lead to the widespread elimination of these relationships, especially if the pervasiveness of these relationships reinforces the (problematic) view that they are acceptable or unavoidable.
 
Literature
go back to reference Aaron, D., and M. Siegel. 2017. Sponsorship of national health organizations by two major soda companies. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 52(1): 20–30.CrossRef Aaron, D., and M. Siegel. 2017. Sponsorship of national health organizations by two major soda companies. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 52(1): 20–30.CrossRef
go back to reference Applbaum, K. 2009. Getting to yes: Corporate power and the creation of a psychopharmaceutical blockbuster. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry 33(2): 185–215.CrossRef Applbaum, K. 2009. Getting to yes: Corporate power and the creation of a psychopharmaceutical blockbuster. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry 33(2): 185–215.CrossRef
go back to reference Bachynski, K.E. and D.S. Goldberg. 2018. Time out: NFL conflicts of interest with public health efforts to prevent TBI. Injury Prevention 24(3): 180–184. Bachynski, K.E. and D.S. Goldberg. 2018. Time out: NFL conflicts of interest with public health efforts to prevent TBI. Injury Prevention 24(3): 180–184.
go back to reference Bekelman, J.E., Y. Li, and C.P. Gross. 2003. Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: A systematic review. JAMA 289(4): 454–465.CrossRef Bekelman, J.E., Y. Li, and C.P. Gross. 2003. Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: A systematic review. JAMA 289(4): 454–465.CrossRef
go back to reference Bertrand, M., M. Bombardini, R. Fisman, B. Hackinen, and F. Trebbi. 2018. Hall of mirrors: Corporate philanthropy and strategic advocacy. NBER Working paper 25329 (December 2018). http://www.nber.org/papers/w25329. Accessed December 1, 2019. Bertrand, M., M. Bombardini, R. Fisman, B. Hackinen, and F. Trebbi. 2018. Hall of mirrors: Corporate philanthropy and strategic advocacy. NBER Working paper 25329 (December 2018). http://​www.​nber.​org/​papers/​w25329. Accessed December 1, 2019.
go back to reference Cain, D., G. Loewenstein, and D. Moore. 2005. The dirt on coming clean: Perverse effects of disclosing conflicts of interest. Journal of Legal Studies 34(1): 1–25.CrossRef Cain, D., G. Loewenstein, and D. Moore. 2005. The dirt on coming clean: Perverse effects of disclosing conflicts of interest. Journal of Legal Studies 34(1): 1–25.CrossRef
go back to reference Chambers, T. 2017. The illusion of transparency. American Journal of Bioethics 17(6): 32–33.CrossRef Chambers, T. 2017. The illusion of transparency. American Journal of Bioethics 17(6): 32–33.CrossRef
go back to reference Freudenberg, N. 2014. Lethal but legal: Corporations, consumption, and protecting public health. New York: Oxford University Press. Freudenberg, N. 2014. Lethal but legal: Corporations, consumption, and protecting public health. New York: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Gluck, A.R., A. Hall, and G. Curfman. 2018. Civil litigation and the opioid crisis: The role of courts in a national health crisis. Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics 46(2): 351–366.CrossRef Gluck, A.R., A. Hall, and G. Curfman. 2018. Civil litigation and the opioid crisis: The role of courts in a national health crisis. Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics 46(2): 351–366.CrossRef
go back to reference Goldberg, D.S. 2019. The Shadows of sunlight: Why disclosure should not be a priority in addressing conflicts of interest. Public Health Ethics 12(2): 202–212. Goldberg, D.S. 2019. The Shadows of sunlight: Why disclosure should not be a priority in addressing conflicts of interest. Public Health Ethics 12(2): 202–212.
go back to reference Greene, J.A., and S.H. Podolsky. 2009. Keeping modern in medicine: Pharmaceutical promotion and physician education in postwar America. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 83(2): 331–377.CrossRef Greene, J.A., and S.H. Podolsky. 2009. Keeping modern in medicine: Pharmaceutical promotion and physician education in postwar America. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 83(2): 331–377.CrossRef
go back to reference Hadland, S.E., M.S. Krieger, and B.D.L. Marshall. 2017. Industry payments to physicians for opioid products, 2013–2015. American Journal of Public Health 107(9): 1493–1495.CrossRef Hadland, S.E., M.S. Krieger, and B.D.L. Marshall. 2017. Industry payments to physicians for opioid products, 2013–2015. American Journal of Public Health 107(9): 1493–1495.CrossRef
go back to reference Hadland, S.E., M. Cerdá, Y. Li, M.S. Krieger, and B.D.L. Marshall. 2018. Association of pharmaceutical industry marketing of opioid products to physicians with subsequent opioid prescribing. JAMA Internal Medicine 178(6): 861–863.CrossRef Hadland, S.E., M. Cerdá, Y. Li, M.S. Krieger, and B.D.L. Marshall. 2018. Association of pharmaceutical industry marketing of opioid products to physicians with subsequent opioid prescribing. JAMA Internal Medicine 178(6): 861–863.CrossRef
go back to reference Hadland, S.E., A. Rivera-Aguirre, and B.D.L. Marshall. 2019. Association of Pharmaceutical Industry marketing of opioid products with mortality from opioid-related overdoses. JAMA Open 2019(1): e186007.CrossRef Hadland, S.E., A. Rivera-Aguirre, and B.D.L. Marshall. 2019. Association of Pharmaceutical Industry marketing of opioid products with mortality from opioid-related overdoses. JAMA Open 2019(1): e186007.CrossRef
go back to reference Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee (HSGAC). 2018a. Fueling an epidemic—Report Two: Exposing financial ties between opioid manufacturers and third party advocacy groups. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Senate. https://www.hsdl.org/?view&did=808171. Accessed December 1, 2019. Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee (HSGAC). 2018a. Fueling an epidemic—Report Two: Exposing financial ties between opioid manufacturers and third party advocacy groups. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Senate. https://​www.​hsdl.​org/​?​view&​did=​808171. Accessed December 1, 2019.
go back to reference Kanter, G.P. 2018. Extending the Sunshine Act from physicians to patient advocacy organizations. AJPH 108(8): 978–979.CrossRef Kanter, G.P. 2018. Extending the Sunshine Act from physicians to patient advocacy organizations. AJPH 108(8): 978–979.CrossRef
go back to reference Kanter, G.P., and G. Loewenstein. 2019. Evaluating open payments. JAMA 322(5): 401–402.CrossRef Kanter, G.P., and G. Loewenstein. 2019. Evaluating open payments. JAMA 322(5): 401–402.CrossRef
go back to reference Kanter, G.P., D. Carpenter, L. Lehmann, and M. Mello. 2019. Effect of the public disclosure of industry payments information on patients: Results from a population-based natural experiment. BMJ Open, no. 024020. Kanter, G.P., D. Carpenter, L. Lehmann, and M. Mello. 2019. Effect of the public disclosure of industry payments information on patients: Results from a population-based natural experiment. BMJ Open, no. 024020.
go back to reference Keefe, P.R. 2017. The family that built an empire of pain. New Yorker, October 30. 34–49. Keefe, P.R. 2017. The family that built an empire of pain. New Yorker, October 30. 34–49.
go back to reference Lessig, L. 2015. Republic, lost: The corruption of equality and the steps to end it. New York: Twelve. Lessig, L. 2015. Republic, lost: The corruption of equality and the steps to end it. New York: Twelve.
go back to reference Lin, D.H., E. Lucas, I.B. Murimi, et al. 2017. Financial conflicts of interest and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s 2016 guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain. JAMA Internal Medicine 177(3): 427–428. Lin, D.H., E. Lucas, I.B. Murimi, et al. 2017. Financial conflicts of interest and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s 2016 guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain. JAMA Internal Medicine 177(3): 427–428.
go back to reference Lo, B., and M. Field. 2009. Conflict of interest in medical research, education, and practice. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. Lo, B., and M. Field. 2009. Conflict of interest in medical research, education, and practice. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
go back to reference Lo, B., and D. Grady. 2017. Payments to physicians: Does the amount of money make a difference? JAMA 317(17): 1719–1720.CrossRef Lo, B., and D. Grady. 2017. Payments to physicians: Does the amount of money make a difference? JAMA 317(17): 1719–1720.CrossRef
go back to reference Loewenstein, G., D.M. Cain, and S. Sah. 2011. The limits of transparency: Pitfalls and potential of disclosing conflicts of interest. American Economic Review 101(3): 423–428.CrossRef Loewenstein, G., D.M. Cain, and S. Sah. 2011. The limits of transparency: Pitfalls and potential of disclosing conflicts of interest. American Economic Review 101(3): 423–428.CrossRef
go back to reference Loewenstein, G., S. Sah, and D. Cain. 2012. The unintended consequences of conflict of interest disclosure. JAMA 307(7): 669–670.CrossRef Loewenstein, G., S. Sah, and D. Cain. 2012. The unintended consequences of conflict of interest disclosure. JAMA 307(7): 669–670.CrossRef
go back to reference Lundh A., J. Lexchin, B. Mintzes, J. Schroll, and L. Bero. 2017. Industry sponsorship and research outcome. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Issue 2. Art. No.: MR000033. Lundh A., J. Lexchin, B. Mintzes, J. Schroll, and L. Bero. 2017. Industry sponsorship and research outcome. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Issue 2. Art. No.: MR000033.
go back to reference Macy, B. 2018. Dopesick: dealers, doctors, and the drug company that addicted America. New York: Little, Brown & Co. Macy, B. 2018. Dopesick: dealers, doctors, and the drug company that addicted America. New York: Little, Brown & Co.
go back to reference Marks, J.H. 2017. Caveat partner: Sharing responsibility for health with the food industry. American Journal of Public Health 107(3): 360–361.CrossRef Marks, J.H. 2017. Caveat partner: Sharing responsibility for health with the food industry. American Journal of Public Health 107(3): 360–361.CrossRef
go back to reference ———. 2019a. The Perils of partnership: Industry influence, institutional integrity, and public health. New York: Oxford University Press. ———. 2019a. The Perils of partnership: Industry influence, institutional integrity, and public health. New York: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference ———. 2019c. Are corporations nudging the nudgers? American Journal of Bioethics 19(5): 70–72. ———. 2019c. Are corporations nudging the nudgers? American Journal of Bioethics 19(5): 70–72.
go back to reference McCoy, M.S., M. Carniol, K. Chockley, J.W. Urwin, E.J. Emanuel, and H. Schmidt. 2017. Conflict of interest for patient advocacy organizations. New England Journal of Medicine 376: 880–885.CrossRef McCoy, M.S., M. Carniol, K. Chockley, J.W. Urwin, E.J. Emanuel, and H. Schmidt. 2017. Conflict of interest for patient advocacy organizations. New England Journal of Medicine 376: 880–885.CrossRef
go back to reference McCoy, M.S. 2018. Industry support of patient advocacy organizations: The case for an extension of the Sunshine Act provisions of the Affordable Care Act. American Journal of Public Health 108(8): 1026–1030.CrossRef McCoy, M.S. 2018. Industry support of patient advocacy organizations: The case for an extension of the Sunshine Act provisions of the Affordable Care Act. American Journal of Public Health 108(8): 1026–1030.CrossRef
go back to reference McCoy, M.S., and G.P. Kanter. 2018. Campaign contributions from political action committees to members of congressional committees responding to the opioid crisis. JAMA 320(14): 1489–1491.CrossRef McCoy, M.S., and G.P. Kanter. 2018. Campaign contributions from political action committees to members of congressional committees responding to the opioid crisis. JAMA 320(14): 1489–1491.CrossRef
go back to reference McGreal, C. 2018. American overdose: The opioid tragedy in three acts. New York: Hachette. McGreal, C. 2018. American overdose: The opioid tragedy in three acts. New York: Hachette.
go back to reference ———. 2018. Pain killer: An empire of deceit and the origin of America’s opioid epidemic. New York: Random House. ———. 2018. Pain killer: An empire of deceit and the origin of America’s opioid epidemic. New York: Random House.
go back to reference Michaels, D. 2008. Doubt is our product: How industry’s assault on science threatens your health. New York: Oxford University Press. Michaels, D. 2008. Doubt is our product: How industry’s assault on science threatens your health. New York: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference ———. 2020. The triumph of doubt: Dark money and the science of deception. New York: Oxford University Press. ———. 2020. The triumph of doubt: Dark money and the science of deception. New York: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Podolsky, S.H. 2015. The antibiotic era: Reform, resistance, and the pursuit of a rational therapeutics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Podolsky, S.H. 2015. The antibiotic era: Reform, resistance, and the pursuit of a rational therapeutics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
go back to reference Podolsky, S.H, D. Hertzberg, and J.A. Greene. 2019. Preying on prescribers (and their patients)—Pharmaceutical marketing, iatrogenic epidemics, and the Sackler legacy. New England Journal of Medicine 380(19): 1785–1787.CrossRef Podolsky, S.H, D. Hertzberg, and J.A. Greene. 2019. Preying on prescribers (and their patients)—Pharmaceutical marketing, iatrogenic epidemics, and the Sackler legacy. New England Journal of Medicine 380(19): 1785–1787.CrossRef
go back to reference Purdue Pharma. 2018. We manufacture prescription opioids. How could we not help fight the prescription and illicit opioid abuse crisis? New York Times, January 2. http://bit.ly/PurduePartnerAd. Accessed January 31, 2018. Purdue Pharma. 2018. We manufacture prescription opioids. How could we not help fight the prescription and illicit opioid abuse crisis? New York Times, January 2. http://​bit.​ly/​PurduePartnerAd. Accessed January 31, 2018.
go back to reference Quinones, S. 2006. Dreamland: The true tale of America’s opiate epidemic. New York: Bloomsbury. Quinones, S. 2006. Dreamland: The true tale of America’s opiate epidemic. New York: Bloomsbury.
go back to reference Relman, A.S. 1980. The new medical-industrial complex. New England Journal of Medicine 303(17): 963–970.CrossRef Relman, A.S. 1980. The new medical-industrial complex. New England Journal of Medicine 303(17): 963–970.CrossRef
go back to reference ———. 1984. Dealing with conflicts of interest. New England Journal of Medicine 310(18): 1182–1183. ———. 1984. Dealing with conflicts of interest. New England Journal of Medicine 310(18): 1182–1183.
go back to reference Rodwin, M. 2018. Attempts to redefine conflicts of interest. Accountability in Research 25(2): 67–78.CrossRef Rodwin, M. 2018. Attempts to redefine conflicts of interest. Accountability in Research 25(2): 67–78.CrossRef
go back to reference Rose, S.L. 2013. Patient advocacy organizations: Institutional conflicts of interest, trust, and trustworthiness. Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics 41(3): 680–687.CrossRef Rose, S.L. 2013. Patient advocacy organizations: Institutional conflicts of interest, trust, and trustworthiness. Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics 41(3): 680–687.CrossRef
go back to reference Rose, S.L., J. Highland, M.T. Karafa, and S. Joffe. 2017. Patient advocacy organizations, industry funding, and conflicts of interest. JAMA Internal Medicine 177(3): 344–350.CrossRef Rose, S.L., J. Highland, M.T. Karafa, and S. Joffe. 2017. Patient advocacy organizations, industry funding, and conflicts of interest. JAMA Internal Medicine 177(3): 344–350.CrossRef
go back to reference Ross, J., K. Hill, D. Egilman, and H. Krumholz. 2008. Guest authorship and ghostwriting in publications related to Rofecoxib: A case study of industry documents from Rofecoxib litigation. JAMA 299(15): 1800–1812.CrossRef Ross, J., K. Hill, D. Egilman, and H. Krumholz. 2008. Guest authorship and ghostwriting in publications related to Rofecoxib: A case study of industry documents from Rofecoxib litigation. JAMA 299(15): 1800–1812.CrossRef
go back to reference ———. 2019. Conflict of interest disclosure as a reminder of professional norms: Clients first! Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 154: 62–79. ———. 2019. Conflict of interest disclosure as a reminder of professional norms: Clients first! Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 154: 62–79.
go back to reference Sah, S., and A. Fugh-Berman. 2013. Physicians under the influence: Social psychology and industry marketing strategies. Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics 41(3): 665–672.CrossRef Sah, S., and A. Fugh-Berman. 2013. Physicians under the influence: Social psychology and industry marketing strategies. Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics 41(3): 665–672.CrossRef
go back to reference Sah, S., G. Loewenstein, and D. Cain. 2019. Insinuation anxiety: Concern that advice rejection will signal distrust after conflict of interest disclosure. Personal and Social Psychology Bulletin 45(7): 1099–1112. Sah, S., G. Loewenstein, and D. Cain. 2019. Insinuation anxiety: Concern that advice rejection will signal distrust after conflict of interest disclosure. Personal and Social Psychology Bulletin 45(7): 1099–1112.
go back to reference Schwab, T. 2019. US opioid prescribing: The federal government advisers with recent ties to big pharma. BMJ 366: I5167.CrossRef Schwab, T. 2019. US opioid prescribing: The federal government advisers with recent ties to big pharma. BMJ 366: I5167.CrossRef
go back to reference Sismondo, S. 2018. Ghost-managed medicine: Big pharma's invisible hands. Manchester, U.K.: Mattering Press. Sismondo, S. 2018. Ghost-managed medicine: Big pharma's invisible hands. Manchester, U.K.: Mattering Press.
go back to reference Steinman, M., L. Bero, M. Chren, and C. Landefeld. 2006. Narrative review: The promotion of gabapentin: An analysis of internal industry documents. Annals of Internal Medicine 145(4): 284–293.CrossRef Steinman, M., L. Bero, M. Chren, and C. Landefeld. 2006. Narrative review: The promotion of gabapentin: An analysis of internal industry documents. Annals of Internal Medicine 145(4): 284–293.CrossRef
go back to reference Volkow, N., and F.S. Collins. 2017. The role of science in addressing the opioid crisis. New England Journal of Medicine 377(4): 391–394.CrossRef Volkow, N., and F.S. Collins. 2017. The role of science in addressing the opioid crisis. New England Journal of Medicine 377(4): 391–394.CrossRef
go back to reference Young, I.M. 2011. Responsibility for justice. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Young, I.M. 2011. Responsibility for justice. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Lessons from Corporate Influence in the Opioid Epidemic: Toward a Norm of Separation
Author
Jonathan H. Marks
Publication date
01-06-2020
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Published in
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry / Issue 2/2020
Print ISSN: 1176-7529
Electronic ISSN: 1872-4353
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-020-09982-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2020

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 2/2020 Go to the issue