Top

Published in:

Open Access 01-09-2019 | Original Research

Subsidizing PGD: The Moral Case for Funding Genetic Selection

Authors: James M. Kemper, Christopher Gyngell, Julian Savulescu

Published in: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry | Issue 3/2019

Abstract

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) allows the detection of genetic abnormalities in embryos produced through in vitro fertilization (IVF). Current funding models in Australia provide governmental subsidies for couples undergoing IVF, but do not extend to PGD. There are strong reasons for publicly funding PGD that follow from the moral principles of autonomy, beneficence and justice for both parents and children. We examine the objections to our proposal, specifically concerns regarding designer babies and the harm of disabled individuals, and show why these are substantially outweighed by arguments for subsidizing PGD. We argue that an acceptance of PGD is aligned with present attitudes towards procreative decision making and IVF use, and that it should therefore receive government funding.

For a comprehensive list, see http://guide.hfea.gov.uk/pgd/.

This view is articulated, but not endorsed, by Gardner.

Adamson, G.D. 2009. Global cultural and socioeconomic factors that influence access to assisted reproductive technologies. Women’s Health 5(4): 351–358.PubMed

Appel, J.M. 2012. Toward an ethical eugenics. JONA’S Healthcare Law, Ethics, and Regulation 14(1): 7–13.CrossRef

Chang, J., S.L. Boulet, G. Jeng, L. Flowers, and D.M. Kissin. 2016. Outcomes of in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic diagnosis: An analysis of the United States assisted reproductive technology surveillance data, 2011-2012. Fertility and Sterility 105(2): 394–400.CrossRef

change.org. 2016. Have PGD recognized and funded under medicare. Change.org. https://www.change.org/p/malcolm-turnbull-have-pgd-recognized-and-funded-under-medicare (Accessed 13 June 2019).

change.org. 2017. Campaigning Medicare Australia for PGD funding. Change.org. https://www.change.org/p/greg-hunt-mp-campaigning-medicare-australia-for-pgd-funding (Accessed 13 June 2019)

Cicero. 1933. On the nature of the gods. Translated by H. Rackham. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

van Dussen, L., M. Biegstraaten, M.G. Dijkgraaf, and C.E. Hollak. 2014. Modelling Gaucher disease progression: Long-term enzyme replacement therapy reduces the incidence of splenectomy and bone complications. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 9(1): 112.CrossRef

Dworkin, R. 2011. Life’s dominion. New York: Vintage.

Elhassen, D., K. Coleman, P. Mernagh, S. Campbell, L. Fodero, and J. Scuteri. 2015. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

Enoch, D. 2017. Hypothetical consent and the value(s) of autonomy. Ethics 128(1): 6–36.CrossRef

Feinberg, J. 1980. The child’s right to an open future in whose child? In Childrens’ rights, parental authority, and state power, edited by W. Aiken and H. LaFollette, 123–153. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.

Fitzgerald, O., C.P. Repon, K. Harris, and G.M. Chambers. 2018. Assisted reproductive technology in Australia and New Zealand 2016. Sydney: National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit, University of New South Wales, Sydney.

Gardner, M. 2015. Beneficence and procreation. Philosophical Studies 173(2): 321–336.CrossRef

Gyngell, C., and T. Douglas. 2018. Selecting against disability: The liberal eugenic challenge and the argument from cognitive diversity. Journal of Applied Philosophy 35(2): 319–340.CrossRef

Gyngell, C and J. Savulescu 2018. The simple case for germline gene editing. In Genes for Life: The impact of the genetic revolution, edited by M. Delatycki, G. Blashki & H. Sykes, pp 28-45. Future Leaders

Habermas, J. 2003. The future of human nature. Cambridge: Polity.

Handyside, A.H., E.H. Kontogianni, K. Hardy, and R.M. Winston. 1990. Pregnancies from biopsied human preimplantation embryos sexed by Y-specific DNA amplification. Nature 344(6268): 768–770.CrossRef

Harris, J. 2000. Clones, genes, and reproductive autonomy. The ethics of human cloning. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 913(September): 209–217.PubMed

Harris, J. 2010. Enhancing evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRef

Hofmann, B. 2017. “You are inferior!” Revisiting the expressivist argument. Bioethics 31(7): 505–514.CrossRef

IVF Australia. 2017. IVF treatment costs. https://www.ivf.com.au/ivf-fees/ivf-costs. Accessed 18 April 2018.

Juth, N. 2012. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: Ethical aspects, 2nd ed. Vol. 10. Chichester, U.K.: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Kass, L.R. 2003. Ageless bodies, happy souls: Biotechnology and the pursuit of perfection. The New Atlantis 1(Spring): 9–28.

Mackie, J.L. 1984. Rights, utility, and universalization. In Utility and rights, edited by R.G. Frey, 86–105. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Malek, J., and J. Daar. 2012. The case for a parental duty to use preimplantation genetic diagnosis for medical benefit. The American Journal of Bioethics 12(4): 3–11.CrossRef

Medical Services Advisory Committee. 2017. Public summary document. Australian Government. http://www.msac.gov.au/internet/msac/publishing.nsf/content/1165.1-public. Accessed 18 April 2018.

Miller, D. 2017. Justice. In Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, Fall 2017 ed., edited by E.N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/justice/. Accessed 18 April 2018.

Parfit, D. 2017. Future people, the non-identity problem, and person-affecting principles. Philosophy & Public Affairs 45(2): 118–157.CrossRef

Petersen, T.S. 2005. Just diagnosis? Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and injustices to disabled people. Journal of Medical Ethics 31(4): 231–234.CrossRef

Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Robertson, J.A. 2003. Procreative liberty in the era of genomics. American Journal of Law & Medicine 29(4): 439–487.

Sandel, M.J. 2004. The case against perfection: What’s wrong with designer children, bionic athletes, and genetic engineering. Atlantic Monthly 292(3): 50–54, 56–60, 62.

Savulescu, J. 2001. Procreative beneficence: Why we should select the best children. Bioethics 15(5–6): 413–426.CrossRef

Savulescu, J., and G. Kahane. 2009. The moral obligation to create children with the best chance of the best life. Bioethics 23(5): 274–290.CrossRef

Watt, H. 2004. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: Choosing the “good enough” child. Health Care Analysis 12(1): 51–60.CrossRef

Whetstine, L.M. 2015. Ethical challenges in assisted reproduction: The place of preimplantation genetic diagnosis in a just society. Journal of Child Neurology 30(5): 547–550.CrossRef

Zegers-Hochschild, F 2006. The impact of cultural diversity and socioeconomics on the global practice of ART. ICMART's World Report on ART. Presented at: 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. New Orleans, LA, USA, 23–26 October (2006).

Zimmerman, A.B. 2009. Do you hear the people sing? Balancing parental authority and a child's right to thrive: the cochlear implant debate. Journal of Health Biomedical Law. 5:309–30.

Title: Subsidizing PGD: The Moral Case for Funding Genetic Selection
Authors: James M. Kemper
Christopher Gyngell
Julian Savulescu
Publication date: 01-09-2019
Publisher: Springer Singapore
Published in: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 1176-7529
Electronic ISSN: 1872-4353
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-019-09932-2

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Subsidizing PGD: The Moral Case for Funding Genetic Selection

Abstract

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

The Landscape of the “Spirit of Sport”

Clarifying legal tests: Who a parent is and how to warn of unknown risks

Pride Before a Fall: Shame, Diagnostic Crossover, and Eating Disorders

Using the Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah to Furnish an Islamic Bioethics: Conceptual and Practical Issues

All Across the Universe: Bioethics Across Cultures

A Journey Through Global Bioethics