Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3/2019

01-09-2019 | Critical Response

Using the Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah to Furnish an Islamic Bioethics: Conceptual and Practical Issues

Author: Aasim I. Padela

Published in: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry | Issue 3/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

The field of Islamic bioethics is currently in development as thinkers delineate its normative content, ethical scope and research methods. Some scholars have offered Islamic bioethical frameworks based on the maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah, the higher objectives of Islamic law, to help advance the field. Accordingly, a recent JBI paper by Ibrahim and colleagues describes a method for using the maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah to provide moral end-goals and deliberative mechanisms for an Islamic bioethics. Herein I highlight critical conceptual and practical gaps in the model with the hopes of fostering greater discussion about how maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah frameworks may fit within Islamic bioethics deliberation.
Footnotes
1
The term maslahah can refer to different ideas within the Islamic ethical tradition. Most generally it refers to human interests or benefits, and this is the way Ibrahim and colleagues use the term. However, in the context of discussing the maqāṣid, the term can take on different meanings. The first is one that the polymath Islamic theologian-jurist Imam al-Ghazālī uses when he states “what we mean by interests (maṣalih) are those interests that conform specifically to the objectives of Islamic law (maqāṣid),” and harms are detriments to these interests (see his al-Mustašfá min ‘ilm al-usúl). In this way, benefits are those human interests that align the higher objectives of Islamic law. The second usage of the term maslahah is to refer to a specific ethico-legal device within Islamic law through which human benefits can ground Islamic legal rulings. This scope of this device as grounds is debated across the Islamic legal schools (see Opwis 2005; al-Būṭī 2000).
 
2
The term mafsada refers to human detriments and harms. In the context of the maqāṣid, a harm (mafsada) is that which harms the higher objectives or promotes what is contrary to them (see Ibn ʿAbd al-Salām, al-Izz al-Qawāʿid al-kubrā al-mawsūm bi qawāʿid al-aḥkām fī iṣlāḥ al-anām).
 
Literature
go back to reference Ahmed, M. 2016. Muslims and medical ethics: Time to move forward by going back. Journal of Religion and Health 55(2): 367–368.CrossRef Ahmed, M. 2016. Muslims and medical ethics: Time to move forward by going back. Journal of Religion and Health 55(2): 367–368.CrossRef
go back to reference Aksoy, S. 2010. Some principles of Islamic ethics as found in Harrison Philosophy. Journal of Medical Ethics 36(4): 226–229.CrossRef Aksoy, S. 2010. Some principles of Islamic ethics as found in Harrison Philosophy. Journal of Medical Ethics 36(4): 226–229.CrossRef
go back to reference Attia, G. E. 2007. Towards realization of the higher intents of Islamic law. Translated by Nancy Roberts. London: The International Institute of Islamic Thought. Attia, G. E. 2007. Towards realization of the higher intents of Islamic law. Translated by Nancy Roberts. London: The International Institute of Islamic Thought.
go back to reference Auda, J. 2008a. Maqāṣid al-sharīʿah as philosophy of Islamic law: A systems approach. London; Washington D.C.: International Institute of Islamic Thought. Auda, J. 2008a. Maqāṣid al-sharīʿah as philosophy of Islamic law: A systems approach. London; Washington D.C.: International Institute of Islamic Thought.
go back to reference Auda, J. 2008b. Maqāṣid al-sharīʿah: A beginner's guide. Occasional Papers Series. London: International Institute of Islamic Thought. Auda, J. 2008b. Maqāṣid al-sharīʿah: A beginner's guide. Occasional Papers Series. London: International Institute of Islamic Thought.
go back to reference Bagheri, A., and K.A. Al-Ali. 2018. Islamic bioethics: Current issues and challenges (Intercultural dialogue in bioethics). New Jersey: World Scientific. Bagheri, A., and K.A. Al-Ali. 2018. Islamic bioethics: Current issues and challenges (Intercultural dialogue in bioethics). New Jersey: World Scientific.
go back to reference al-Būṭī, M.S.R. 2000. Ḍawābiṭ al-maṣlaḥa fī al-sharīʿa al-islāmiyya. Beirut, Lebanon: Muʼassasat al-Risāla. al-Būṭī, M.S.R. 2000. Ḍawābiṭ al-maṣlaḥa fī al-sharīʿa al-islāmiyya. Beirut, Lebanon: Muʼassasat al-Risāla.
go back to reference Chamsi-Pasha, H., and M.A. Albar. 2013. Western and Islamic bioethics: How close is the gap? Avicenna Journal of Medicine 3(1): 8–14.CrossRef Chamsi-Pasha, H., and M.A. Albar. 2013. Western and Islamic bioethics: How close is the gap? Avicenna Journal of Medicine 3(1): 8–14.CrossRef
go back to reference Clarke, M., T. Eich, and J. Schreiber. 2015. The social politics of Islamic bioethics. Die Welt des Islams 55(3-4): 265–277.CrossRef Clarke, M., T. Eich, and J. Schreiber. 2015. The social politics of Islamic bioethics. Die Welt des Islams 55(3-4): 265–277.CrossRef
go back to reference Ebrahim, A.F.M., 2014. Vaccination in the context of al-maqāṣid al-sharīʿah (objectives of divine law) and Islamic medical jurisprudence. Arabian Journal of Business Management Review 3(9): 44–52.CrossRef Ebrahim, A.F.M., 2014. Vaccination in the context of al-maqāṣid al-sharīʿah (objectives of divine law) and Islamic medical jurisprudence. Arabian Journal of Business Management Review 3(9): 44–52.CrossRef
go back to reference Ghaly, M. 2013. Islamic bioethics in the twenty-first century. Zygon 48(3): 592–599.CrossRef Ghaly, M. 2013. Islamic bioethics in the twenty-first century. Zygon 48(3): 592–599.CrossRef
go back to reference Kamali, M.H. 2012. Maqāṣid al-sharīʿah. Edited by Dr. Anas S. Al Shaikh-Ali and Shiraz Khan. Occasional Papers Series: The International Institute of Islamic Thought and the International Institute of Advanced Islamic Studies. Kamali, M.H. 2012. Maqāṣid al-sharīʿah. Edited by Dr. Anas S. Al Shaikh-Ali and Shiraz Khan. Occasional Papers Series: The International Institute of Islamic Thought and the International Institute of Advanced Islamic Studies.
go back to reference Kasule, O.H. 2010. Biomedical ethics: An Islamic formulation. Journal of Islamic Medical Association 42: 38–40. Kasule, O.H. 2010. Biomedical ethics: An Islamic formulation. Journal of Islamic Medical Association 42: 38–40.
go back to reference Nyazee, I.A.K. 2005. Theories of Islamic law, Islamabad, Pakistan: Islamic Research Institute and International Institute of Islamic Thought. Nyazee, I.A.K. 2005. Theories of Islamic law, Islamabad, Pakistan: Islamic Research Institute and International Institute of Islamic Thought.
go back to reference Opwis, F. 2005. Maslaha in contemporary Islamic legal theory. Islamic Law and Society 12(2):182–223.CrossRef Opwis, F. 2005. Maslaha in contemporary Islamic legal theory. Islamic Law and Society 12(2):182–223.CrossRef
go back to reference Padela, A.I. 2013. Islamic bioethics: Between sacred law, lived experiences, and state authority. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 34(2): 65–80.CrossRef Padela, A.I. 2013. Islamic bioethics: Between sacred law, lived experiences, and state authority. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 34(2): 65–80.CrossRef
go back to reference Padela, A.I. 2018. The essential dimensions of health according to the maqāṣid al-sharīʿah frameworks of Abu Ishaq al-Shatibi and Jamal-al-Din-'Atiyah. International Medical Journal of Malaysia 17(Special Issue 1). Padela, A.I. 2018. The essential dimensions of health according to the maqāṣid al-sharīʿah frameworks of Abu Ishaq al-Shatibi and Jamal-al-Din-'Atiyah. International Medical Journal of Malaysia 17(Special Issue 1).
go back to reference Padela, A., and A. Mohiuddin. 2015. Ethical obligations and clinical goals in end-of-life care: Deriving a quality-of-life construct based on the Islamic concept of accountability before God (taklīf). American Journal of Bioethics 15(1): 3–13.CrossRef Padela, A., and A. Mohiuddin. 2015. Ethical obligations and clinical goals in end-of-life care: Deriving a quality-of-life construct based on the Islamic concept of accountability before God (taklīf). American Journal of Bioethics 15(1): 3–13.CrossRef
go back to reference Qureshi, O., and A.I. Padela. 2016. When must a patient seek healthcare? Bringing the perspectives of Islamic jurists and clinicians into dialogue. Zygon 51(3): 592–625.CrossRef Qureshi, O., and A.I. Padela. 2016. When must a patient seek healthcare? Bringing the perspectives of Islamic jurists and clinicians into dialogue. Zygon 51(3): 592–625.CrossRef
go back to reference Ramadan, T. 2013. The challenges and future of applied Islamic ethics discourse: A radical reform? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 34(2): 105–115.CrossRef Ramadan, T. 2013. The challenges and future of applied Islamic ethics discourse: A radical reform? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 34(2): 105–115.CrossRef
go back to reference Ramadan, T. 2008. Radical reform: Islamic ethics and liberation. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Ramadan, T. 2008. Radical reform: Islamic ethics and liberation. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Ramadan, T. 2009. Radical reform: Islamic ethics and liberation. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Ramadan, T. 2009. Radical reform: Islamic ethics and liberation. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Raysūnī, A. 2005. Imam al-Shatibi's theory of the higher objectives and intents of Islamic law. London: Washington: International Institute of Islamic Thought.CrossRef Raysūnī, A. 2005. Imam al-Shatibi's theory of the higher objectives and intents of Islamic law. London: Washington: International Institute of Islamic Thought.CrossRef
go back to reference Sachedina, A. 2007. The search for Islamic bioethics principles. In Principles of Health Care Ethics, edited by R.E. Ashcroft, 117–125. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Sachedina, A. 2007. The search for Islamic bioethics principles. In Principles of Health Care Ethics, edited by R.E. Ashcroft, 117–125. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
go back to reference Saifuddeen, S.M., N.N. Rahman, N.M. Isa, and A. Baharuddin. 2014. Maqāṣid al-sharīʿah as a complementary framework to conventional bioethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 20(2): 317–327.CrossRef Saifuddeen, S.M., N.N. Rahman, N.M. Isa, and A. Baharuddin. 2014. Maqāṣid al-sharīʿah as a complementary framework to conventional bioethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 20(2): 317–327.CrossRef
go back to reference Shāṭibī, I., I.A.K. Nyazee, and R.M. Rammuny. 2011. The reconciliation of the fundamentals of Islamic law, 1st ed. Reading, U.K.: Garnet Publications. Shāṭibī, I., I.A.K. Nyazee, and R.M. Rammuny. 2011. The reconciliation of the fundamentals of Islamic law, 1st ed. Reading, U.K.: Garnet Publications.
Metadata
Title
Using the Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah to Furnish an Islamic Bioethics: Conceptual and Practical Issues
Author
Aasim I. Padela
Publication date
01-09-2019
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Published in
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 1176-7529
Electronic ISSN: 1872-4353
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-019-09940-2

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3/2019 Go to the issue