Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 2/2018

01-06-2018 | Original Research

Moving Forward on Consent Practices in Australia

Authors: Rebekah E. McWhirter, Lisa Eckstein

Published in: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry | Issue 2/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Allowing persons to make an informed choice about their participation in research is a pre-eminent ethical and legal requirement. Almost universally, this requirement has been addressed through the provision of written patient information sheets and consent forms. Researchers and others have raised concerns about the extent to which such forms—particularly given their frequent lengthiness and complexity—provide participants with the tools and knowledge necessary for autonomous decision-making. Concerns are especially pronounced for certain participant groups, such as persons with low literacy and Indigenous persons. Multimedia strategies have the potential to usefully supplement current consent practices in Australia; however, information is needed about the need for supplementary consent practices, along with drivers for and barriers against adoption. This study initiates the required evidence base through an audit of informed consent practices for medical research in the Australian state of Tasmania to assess the need for, and current uptake of, supplementary consent strategies. Drivers for and barriers against adoption of multimedia consent practices were explored in detail through interviews with key stakeholders, including researchers, HREC chairs and members, and research participants, including Indigenous participants.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
Section 4.1 of the National Statement identifies these groups as pregnant women and the human fetus; children and young people; people in dependent or unequal relationships; people highly dependent on medical care; people with a cognitive impairment, intellectual disability, or mental illness; people who may be involved in illegal activities; Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders; and people in other countries.
 
Literature
go back to reference Afolabi, M., N. Mcgrath, U. D’Alessandro, et al. 2017. Development and evaluation of a multimedia tool for obtaining informed consent in the Gambia: A mixed method study. BMJ Global Health 2 (S2): A6–A7. Afolabi, M., N. Mcgrath, U. D’Alessandro, et al. 2017. Development and evaluation of a multimedia tool for obtaining informed consent in the Gambia: A mixed method study. BMJ Global Health 2 (S2): A6–A7.
go back to reference Afolabi, M.O., K. Bojang, U. D’Alessandro, et al. 2014. Multimedia informed consent tool for a low literacy African research population: Development and pilot-testing. Journal of Clinical Research & Bioethics 5(3): 178. Afolabi, M.O., K. Bojang, U. D’Alessandro, et al. 2014. Multimedia informed consent tool for a low literacy African research population: Development and pilot-testing. Journal of Clinical Research & Bioethics 5(3): 178.
go back to reference Albala, I., M. Doyle, and P.S. Appelbaum. 2010. The evolution of consent forms for research: A quarter century of changes’. IRB: Ethics & Human Research 32(3): 7–11. Albala, I., M. Doyle, and P.S. Appelbaum. 2010. The evolution of consent forms for research: A quarter century of changes’. IRB: Ethics & Human Research 32(3): 7–11.
go back to reference Australian Government National Health and Medical Research Council. 2007. National statement on ethical conduct in human research. Canberra. Australian Government National Health and Medical Research Council. 2007. National statement on ethical conduct in human research. Canberra.
go back to reference Beardsley, E., M. Jefford, and L. Mileshkin. 2007. Longer consent forms for clinical trials compromise patient understanding: So why are they lengthening? Journal of Clinical Oncology 25(9): e13–14.CrossRefPubMed Beardsley, E., M. Jefford, and L. Mileshkin. 2007. Longer consent forms for clinical trials compromise patient understanding: So why are they lengthening? Journal of Clinical Oncology 25(9): e13–14.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Berger, O., B.H. Gronberg, K. Sand, S. Kaasa, and J.H. Loge. 2008. The length of consent documents in oncological trials is doubled in twenty years. Annals of Oncology 20(2): 379–385.CrossRefPubMed Berger, O., B.H. Gronberg, K. Sand, S. Kaasa, and J.H. Loge. 2008. The length of consent documents in oncological trials is doubled in twenty years. Annals of Oncology 20(2): 379–385.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Bickmore, T.W., L.M. Pfeifer, and M.K. Paasche-Orlow. 2009. Using computer agents to explain medical documents to patients with low health literacy. Patient Education and Counseling 75(3): 315–320.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bickmore, T.W., L.M. Pfeifer, and M.K. Paasche-Orlow. 2009. Using computer agents to explain medical documents to patients with low health literacy. Patient Education and Counseling 75(3): 315–320.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Breese, P.E., W.J. Burman, S. Goldberg, and S.E. Weis. 2007. Education level, primary language, and comprehension of the informed consent process. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 2(4): 69–79.CrossRefPubMed Breese, P.E., W.J. Burman, S. Goldberg, and S.E. Weis. 2007. Education level, primary language, and comprehension of the informed consent process. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 2(4): 69–79.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Buccini, L.D.., D. Iverson, P. Caputi, and C. Jones. 2010. An Australian based study on the readability of HIV/AIDS and Type 2 diabetes clinical trial informed consent documents. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 7(3): 313–319.CrossRef Buccini, L.D.., D. Iverson, P. Caputi, and C. Jones. 2010. An Australian based study on the readability of HIV/AIDS and Type 2 diabetes clinical trial informed consent documents. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 7(3): 313–319.CrossRef
go back to reference Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. 2010. Tri-Council policy statement: Ethical conduct for research involving humans. Ottawa. Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. 2010. Tri-Council policy statement: Ethical conduct for research involving humans. Ottawa.
go back to reference Castelnuovo, B., K. Newell, Y.C. Manabe, and G. Robertson. 2014. Multi-media educational tool increases knowledge of clinical trials in Uganda. Journal of Clinical Research & Bioethics 5(January): 165. Castelnuovo, B., K. Newell, Y.C. Manabe, and G. Robertson. 2014. Multi-media educational tool increases knowledge of clinical trials in Uganda. Journal of Clinical Research & Bioethics 5(January): 165.
go back to reference Christopher, P., M. Foti, K. Roy-Bujnowski, and P. Appelbaum. 2007. Consent form readability and educational levels of potential participants in mental health research. Psychiatric Services 58(2): 227–232.CrossRefPubMed Christopher, P., M. Foti, K. Roy-Bujnowski, and P. Appelbaum. 2007. Consent form readability and educational levels of potential participants in mental health research. Psychiatric Services 58(2): 227–232.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Emanuel, E., D. Wendler, and C. Grady. 2000. What makes clinical research ethical? JAMA 283(20): 2701–2711.CrossRefPubMed Emanuel, E., D. Wendler, and C. Grady. 2000. What makes clinical research ethical? JAMA 283(20): 2701–2711.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Faden, R., and T. Beauchamp. 1986. A history and theory of informed consent. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Faden, R., and T. Beauchamp. 1986. A history and theory of informed consent. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Falagas, M., I. Korbila, K. Giannopoulou, B. Kondilis, and G. Peppas. 2009. Informed consent: How much and what do patients understand? The American Journal of Surgery 198(3): 420–435.CrossRefPubMed Falagas, M., I. Korbila, K. Giannopoulou, B. Kondilis, and G. Peppas. 2009. Informed consent: How much and what do patients understand? The American Journal of Surgery 198(3): 420–435.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Flory J., and Emanuel E. 2004. Interventions to improve research participants’ understanding in informed consent for research: A systematic review. JAMA 292(13): 1593–1601.CrossRefPubMed Flory J., and Emanuel E. 2004. Interventions to improve research participants’ understanding in informed consent for research: A systematic review. JAMA 292(13): 1593–1601.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Grady, C. 2015. Enduring and emerging challenges of informed consent. New England Journal of Medicine 372(9): 855–862.CrossRefPubMed Grady, C. 2015. Enduring and emerging challenges of informed consent. New England Journal of Medicine 372(9): 855–862.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Grady, C., S. Cummings, M. Rowbotham, M. McConnell, E. Ashley, and G. Kang. 2017. Informed consent. New England Journal of Medicine 376(9): 856–867.CrossRefPubMed Grady, C., S. Cummings, M. Rowbotham, M. McConnell, E. Ashley, and G. Kang. 2017. Informed consent. New England Journal of Medicine 376(9): 856–867.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Harmell, A., B. Palmer, and D. Jeste. 2012. Preliminary study of a web-based tool for enhancing the informed consent process in schizophrenia research. Schizophrenia Research 141(2-3): 247–250.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Harmell, A., B. Palmer, and D. Jeste. 2012. Preliminary study of a web-based tool for enhancing the informed consent process in schizophrenia research. Schizophrenia Research 141(2-3): 247–250.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference High Court of Australia. 1992. Rogers v Whitaker, 175 CLR 479. High Court of Australia. 1992. Rogers v Whitaker, 175 CLR 479.
go back to reference Jefford, M., L. Mileshkin, J. Matthews, et al. 2011. Satisfaction with the decision to participate in cancer clinical trials is high, but understanding is a problem. Supportive Care in Cancer 19(3): 371–379.CrossRefPubMed Jefford, M., L. Mileshkin, J. Matthews, et al. 2011. Satisfaction with the decision to participate in cancer clinical trials is high, but understanding is a problem. Supportive Care in Cancer 19(3): 371–379.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Jeste, D., B. Palmer, S. Golshan, et al. 2009. Multimedia consent for research in people with schizophrenia and normal subjects: A randomized controlled trial. Schizophrenia Bulletin 35(4): 719–729.CrossRefPubMed Jeste, D., B. Palmer, S. Golshan, et al. 2009. Multimedia consent for research in people with schizophrenia and normal subjects: A randomized controlled trial. Schizophrenia Bulletin 35(4): 719–729.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Joffe, S., E. Cook, P. Cleary, J. Clark, and J. Weeks. 2001. Quality of informed consent in cancer clinical trials: A cross-sectional survey. The Lancet 358(9295): 1772–1777.CrossRef Joffe, S., E. Cook, P. Cleary, J. Clark, and J. Weeks. 2001. Quality of informed consent in cancer clinical trials: A cross-sectional survey. The Lancet 358(9295): 1772–1777.CrossRef
go back to reference Mahnke, A., J. Plasek, D. Hoffman, et al. 2014. A rural community’s involvement in the design and usability testing of a computer-based informed consent process for the personalized medicine research project. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A 164(1): 129–140.CrossRef Mahnke, A., J. Plasek, D. Hoffman, et al. 2014. A rural community’s involvement in the design and usability testing of a computer-based informed consent process for the personalized medicine research project. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A 164(1): 129–140.CrossRef
go back to reference Nishimura, A., J. Carey, P. Erwin, J. Tilburt, M. Murad, and J. McCormick. 2013. Improving understanding in the research informed consent process: A systematic review of 54 interventions tested in randomized control trials. BMC Medical Ethics 14(1): 28.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nishimura, A., J. Carey, P. Erwin, J. Tilburt, M. Murad, and J. McCormick. 2013. Improving understanding in the research informed consent process: A systematic review of 54 interventions tested in randomized control trials. BMC Medical Ethics 14(1): 28.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Olver, I., L. Buchanan, C. Laidlaw, and G. Poulton. 1995. The adequacy of consent forms for informing patients entering oncological clinical trials. Annals of Oncology 6(9): 867–870.CrossRefPubMed Olver, I., L. Buchanan, C. Laidlaw, and G. Poulton. 1995. The adequacy of consent forms for informing patients entering oncological clinical trials. Annals of Oncology 6(9): 867–870.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Paasche-Orlow, M., F. Brancati, H. Taylor, S. Jain, A. Pandit, and M. Wolf. 2013. Readability of consent form templates: A second look. IRB: Ethics & Human Research 35(4): 12–19. Paasche-Orlow, M., F. Brancati, H. Taylor, S. Jain, A. Pandit, and M. Wolf. 2013. Readability of consent form templates: A second look. IRB: Ethics & Human Research 35(4): 12–19.
go back to reference Paasche-Orlow, M., H. Taylor, and F. Brancati. 2003. Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability. New England Journal of Medicine 348(8): 721–726.CrossRefPubMed Paasche-Orlow, M., H. Taylor, and F. Brancati. 2003. Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability. New England Journal of Medicine 348(8): 721–726.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Rowbotham, M., J. Astin, K. Greene, and S. Cummings. 2013. Interactive informed consent: Randomized comparison with paper consents. PLOS ONE 8(3): e58603.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rowbotham, M., J. Astin, K. Greene, and S. Cummings. 2013. Interactive informed consent: Randomized comparison with paper consents. PLOS ONE 8(3): e58603.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Simon, C., D. Klein, and H. Schartz. 2016. Interactive multimedia consent for biobanking: A randomized trial. Genetics in Medicine 18(1): 57–64.CrossRefPubMed Simon, C., D. Klein, and H. Schartz. 2016. Interactive multimedia consent for biobanking: A randomized trial. Genetics in Medicine 18(1): 57–64.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Supreme Court of Western Australia -Court of Appeal. 2008. Hassan v The Minister for Health [No 2] 149. WASCA. Supreme Court of Western Australia -Court of Appeal. 2008. Hassan v The Minister for Health [No 2] 149. WASCA.
go back to reference Tamariz, L., A. Palacio, M. Robert, and E. Marcus. 2013. Improving the informed consent process for research subjects with low literacy: A systematic review. Journal of General Internal Medicine 28(1): 121–126.CrossRefPubMed Tamariz, L., A. Palacio, M. Robert, and E. Marcus. 2013. Improving the informed consent process for research subjects with low literacy: A systematic review. Journal of General Internal Medicine 28(1): 121–126.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Taylor, H., and D. Bramley. 2012. An analysis of the readability of patient information and consent forms used in research studies in anaesthesia in Australia and New Zealand. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 40(6): 995–998.PubMed Taylor, H., and D. Bramley. 2012. An analysis of the readability of patient information and consent forms used in research studies in anaesthesia in Australia and New Zealand. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 40(6): 995–998.PubMed
go back to reference World Medical Association. 2013. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 310(20): 2191–2194.CrossRef World Medical Association. 2013. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 310(20): 2191–2194.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Moving Forward on Consent Practices in Australia
Authors
Rebekah E. McWhirter
Lisa Eckstein
Publication date
01-06-2018
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Published in
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 1176-7529
Electronic ISSN: 1872-4353
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-018-9843-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 2/2018 Go to the issue