Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Osteoporosis 1/2020

01-12-2020 | Bisphosphonate | Review

Cumulative network meta-analyses, practice guidelines, and actual prescriptions for postmenopausal osteoporosis: a meta-epidemiological study

Authors: Yuki Kataoka, Yan Luo, Anna Chaimani, Akira Onishi, Miho Kimachi, Yasushi Tsujimoto, Mohammad Hassan Murad, Tianjing Li, Andrea Cipriani, Toshi A. Furukawa

Published in: Archives of Osteoporosis | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Summary

We compared the cumulative network meta-analyses with the recommendations in postmenopausal osteoporosis practice guidelines and actual prescribing practices in the USA. There was no apparent discrepancy between guideline recommendations and drug prescribing rankings, with the exception of vitamin D and calcium, when we used cumulative NMAs as references.

Purpose

To compare the results of cumulative network meta-analyses (NMAs) with the recommendations in postmenopausal osteoporosis practice guidelines and actual prescribing practices in the USA.

Methods

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched to retrieve randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in July 2017. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s National Guideline Clearinghouse and associated society websites were searched to retrieve guidelines in June 2018. We used the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) to analyze prescription data from 1996 to 2015. Two independent investigators selected eligible RCTs. One investigator selected potential eligible guidelines, which were confirmed by another investigator. Two independent investigators extracted data from included RCTs. One investigator extracted recommendations from guidelines, which were confirmed by another investigator. (Registration: UMIN000031894)

Results

We analyzed data from 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2015. We chose hip fracture as the primary outcome of cumulative NMAs. We included 51 trials, 17 guidelines, and 5099 postmenopausal osteoporosis patients from the MEPS. Bisphosphonate, including alendronate, and combination of vitamin D and calcium (vDCa) were consistently recommendable from an efficacy viewpoint in NMAs and recommended in guidelines. Alendronate was the most prescribed drug (more than 30% over the observation period); however, vDCa was seldom prescribed. The maximum proportion was 5.3% from 2011 to 2015.

Conclusions

In postmenopausal osteoporosis, there was no apparent discrepancy between guideline recommendations and drug prescribing rankings, with the exception of vDCa, when we used cumulative NMAs as references.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
4.
go back to reference Hanney SR, Castle-Clarke S, Grant J et al (2015) How long does biomedical research take? Studying the time taken between biomedical and health research and its translation into products, policy, and practice. Heal Res Policy Syst 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-13-1 Hanney SR, Castle-Clarke S, Grant J et al (2015) How long does biomedical research take? Studying the time taken between biomedical and health research and its translation into products, policy, and practice. Heal Res Policy Syst 13. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​1478-4505-13-1
9.
10.
go back to reference Barrionuevo P, Kapoor E, Asi N, Alahdab F, Mohammed K, Benkhadra K, Almasri J, Farah W, Sarigianni M, Muthusamy K, al Nofal A, Haydour Q, Wang Z, Murad MH (2019) Efficacy of pharmacological therapies for the prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women: a network meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 104:1623–1630. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2019-00192CrossRefPubMed Barrionuevo P, Kapoor E, Asi N, Alahdab F, Mohammed K, Benkhadra K, Almasri J, Farah W, Sarigianni M, Muthusamy K, al Nofal A, Haydour Q, Wang Z, Murad MH (2019) Efficacy of pharmacological therapies for the prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women: a network meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 104:1623–1630. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1210/​jc.​2019-00192CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Higgins JPT, Green S E (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0, updated Ma. The Cochrane Collaboration Higgins JPT, Green S E (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0, updated Ma. The Cochrane Collaboration
14.
go back to reference Owen RK, Tincello DG, Keith RA (2015) Network meta-analysis: development of a three-level hierarchical modeling approach incorporating dose-related constraints. Value Health 18:116–126CrossRef Owen RK, Tincello DG, Keith RA (2015) Network meta-analysis: development of a three-level hierarchical modeling approach incorporating dose-related constraints. Value Health 18:116–126CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lu G, Ades AE (2006) Assessing evidence inconsistency in mixed treatment comparisons. J Am Stat Assoc 101:447–459CrossRef Lu G, Ades AE (2006) Assessing evidence inconsistency in mixed treatment comparisons. J Am Stat Assoc 101:447–459CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Lu G, Ades AE (2004) Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons. Stat Med 23:3105–3124CrossRef Lu G, Ades AE (2004) Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons. Stat Med 23:3105–3124CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Chaimani A, Higgins JPT, Mavridis D et al (2013) Graphical tools for network meta-analysis in STATA. PLoS One 8:e76654CrossRef Chaimani A, Higgins JPT, Mavridis D et al (2013) Graphical tools for network meta-analysis in STATA. PLoS One 8:e76654CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Salanti G, Ades AE, Ioannidis JPA (2011) Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial. J Clin Epidemiol 64:163–171CrossRef Salanti G, Ades AE, Ioannidis JPA (2011) Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial. J Clin Epidemiol 64:163–171CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Chaimani A, Salanti G (2015) Visualizing assumptions and results in network meta-analysis: the network graphs package. Stata J 15:905–950CrossRef Chaimani A, Salanti G (2015) Visualizing assumptions and results in network meta-analysis: the network graphs package. Stata J 15:905–950CrossRef
21.
go back to reference CINeMA: Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis [Software] CINeMA: Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis [Software]
37.
go back to reference Balas EA, Boren SA (2000) Managing clinical knowledge for health care improvement. Yearb Med Inform Balas EA, Boren SA (2000) Managing clinical knowledge for health care improvement. Yearb Med Inform
39.
46.
go back to reference Hill SC, Zuvekas SH, Zodet MW (2011) Implications of the accuracy of MEPS prescription drug data for health services research. Inquiry 48:242–259CrossRef Hill SC, Zuvekas SH, Zodet MW (2011) Implications of the accuracy of MEPS prescription drug data for health services research. Inquiry 48:242–259CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Cumulative network meta-analyses, practice guidelines, and actual prescriptions for postmenopausal osteoporosis: a meta-epidemiological study
Authors
Yuki Kataoka
Yan Luo
Anna Chaimani
Akira Onishi
Miho Kimachi
Yasushi Tsujimoto
Mohammad Hassan Murad
Tianjing Li
Andrea Cipriani
Toshi A. Furukawa
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Archives of Osteoporosis / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 1862-3522
Electronic ISSN: 1862-3514
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-020-0697-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Archives of Osteoporosis 1/2020 Go to the issue