Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Osteoporosis 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Osteoporosis | Original Article

Public priorities for osteoporosis and fracture research: results from a focus group study

Authors: Ashley Hawarden, Clare Jinks, Waheed Mahmood, Laurna Bullock, Steven Blackburn, Stephen Gwilym, Zoe Paskins

Published in: Archives of Osteoporosis | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Summary

Four focus groups were conducted with members of the public to identify important areas for future osteoporosis research. Participants identified priorities to increase public awareness of osteoporosis, reduce delays in diagnosis, improve communication between healthcare providers and to improve follow-up and information provision about causes of osteoporosis, medication harms and prognosis.

Purpose

Patients and the public must be involved in setting research agendas to ensure relevant and impactful questions are prioritised. This study aimed to understand what people living with osteoporosis and fragility fractures felt was important to research, to inform the content of a national survey on research priorities in this area.

Methods

Focus groups were conducted with members of the public with experience of osteoporosis or fragility fractures. The topic guide was co-developed with a patient and public involvement research user group, and explored participants’ experiences of osteoporosis including diagnosis, management and effect upon their lives, what aspects of their ongoing care was most important to them and what about their care or condition could be improved. Focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically.

Results

A total of twenty-three participants were recruited to four focus groups. Analysis identified two main themes: challenges in living with osteoporosis and healthcare services for osteoporosis. Information needs was a further cross-cutting theme. Participants called for increased public awareness of osteoporosis and wanted healthcare services to address conflicting messages about diet, exercise and medication. Participants described long delays in diagnosis, poor communication between primary and secondary care and the need for structured follow-up as important areas for future research to address.

Conclusion

The findings from this study provide an understanding of research priorities from the perspective of patients and the public, have informed the content of a national survey and have implications for patient education, health services research and policy.
Literature
8.
go back to reference Partridge N, Scadding J (2004) The James Lind Alliance: patients and clinicians should jointly identify their priorities for clinical trials. Lancet 364:1923–1924CrossRef Partridge N, Scadding J (2004) The James Lind Alliance: patients and clinicians should jointly identify their priorities for clinical trials. Lancet 364:1923–1924CrossRef
11.
go back to reference de Wit MPT, Berlo SE, Aanerud GJ, Aletaha D, Bijlsma JW, Croucher L, da Silva JAP, Glusing B, Gossec L, Hewlett S, Jongkees M, Magnusson D, Scholte-Voshaar M, Richards P, Ziegler C, Abma TA (2011) European League Against Rheumatism recommendations for the inclusion of patient representatives in scientific projects. Ann Rheum Dis 70:722–726. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2010.135129CrossRefPubMed de Wit MPT, Berlo SE, Aanerud GJ, Aletaha D, Bijlsma JW, Croucher L, da Silva JAP, Glusing B, Gossec L, Hewlett S, Jongkees M, Magnusson D, Scholte-Voshaar M, Richards P, Ziegler C, Abma TA (2011) European League Against Rheumatism recommendations for the inclusion of patient representatives in scientific projects. Ann Rheum Dis 70:722–726. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1136/​ard.​2010.​135129CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Brown K, Dyas J, Chahal P et al (2006) Discovering the research priorities of people with diabetes in a multicultural community: a focus group study. Br J Gen Pract J R Coll Gen Pract 56:206–2013 Brown K, Dyas J, Chahal P et al (2006) Discovering the research priorities of people with diabetes in a multicultural community: a focus group study. Br J Gen Pract J R Coll Gen Pract 56:206–2013
19.
go back to reference Jinks C, Mahmood W, Jayakumar P, Gwilym S, Blackburn S, Worrall A, Paskins Z, on behalf of Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences Research User Group and National Osteoporosis Society (2016) OP0251-PARE patient and public involvement in design, analysis and reporting of a public priority setting exercise for research in osteoporosis. Ann Rheum Dis 75:153.2–153. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-eular.3302 Jinks C, Mahmood W, Jayakumar P, Gwilym S, Blackburn S, Worrall A, Paskins Z, on behalf of Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences Research User Group and National Osteoporosis Society (2016) OP0251-PARE patient and public involvement in design, analysis and reporting of a public priority setting exercise for research in osteoporosis. Ann Rheum Dis 75:153.2–153. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1136/​annrheumdis-2016-eular.​3302
Metadata
Title
Public priorities for osteoporosis and fracture research: results from a focus group study
Authors
Ashley Hawarden
Clare Jinks
Waheed Mahmood
Laurna Bullock
Steven Blackburn
Stephen Gwilym
Zoe Paskins
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Archives of Osteoporosis / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 1862-3522
Electronic ISSN: 1862-3514
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-020-00766-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Archives of Osteoporosis 1/2020 Go to the issue