Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Osteoporosis 1/2020

01-12-2020 | Osteoporosis | Original Article

Impact of spine-hip discordance on fracture risk assessment and treatment qualification in Canada: the Manitoba BMD registry

Authors: William D. Leslie, Suzanne N. Morin, Lisa M. Lix, Neil Binkley

Published in: Archives of Osteoporosis | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Summary

In 50,330 women undergoing bone mineral density (BMD) testing, adjusting FRAX® major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) probability for T-score differences between lumbar spine and femoral neck had a small impact on treatment qualification, with only 1.1% reclassified from below to above the 20% MOF intervention threshold.

Purpose

Discordance between lumbar spine and femoral neck T-score measurements are frequently encountered in clinical practice. The FRAX tool accepts femoral neck BMD as an optional input but does not consider lumbar spine BMD, though adjustments based upon T-score difference have been proposed. This analysis was undertaken to examine change in treatment qualification using the lumbar spine T-score adjustment to FRAX assuming an intervention threshold of 20% MOF.

Methods

Women aged > 50 years with baseline FRAX MOF probability computed with femoral neck BMD of ≥ 20% but without previous high-risk fracture or high-risk medication use were identified in the province of Manitoba BMD registry. If lumbar spine T-score was lower than the femoral neck T-score, MOF probability was recalculated, and treatment qualification, reassessed.

Results

The study population consisted of 50,300 women (mean age 64.2 ± 8.6 years). During mean follow-up of 9.5 years, 4550 sustained incident MOF. The baseline mean T-score difference (femoral neck minus lumbar spine) was − 0.2 ± 1.1. Recalculated MOF probability using the T-score difference significantly improved overall net reclassification index for incident MOF prediction (+ 0.017, p < 0.001). A total of 561 (1.1%) of these women were reclassified from below to above 20% MOF probability based upon the T-score difference. No individuals with MOF probability less than 15% were reclassified to the higher risk category. Risk reclassification increased with lower lumbar spine T-score (15.6% reclassification for lumbar spine T-score of − 3.5 or lower, 4.0% of the study population) and larger T-score differences (9.7% reclassification for T-score difference of 2.5 or more, < 1% of the study population).

Conclusions

Very few women showed risk reclassification based upon adjusting FRAX MOF probability for lumbar spine T-score. Reclassification occurred only in those with baseline MOF probability > 15%.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Brown JP, Josse RG (2002) Scientific Advisory Council of the Osteoporosis Society of C. 2002 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada. CMAJ. 167(10 Suppl):S1–S34PubMedPubMedCentral Brown JP, Josse RG (2002) Scientific Advisory Council of the Osteoporosis Society of C. 2002 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada. CMAJ. 167(10 Suppl):S1–S34PubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Papaioannou A, Morin S, Cheung AM, Atkinson S, Brown JP, Feldman S, Hanley DA, Hodsman A, Jamal SA, Kaiser SM, Kvern B, Siminoski K, Leslie WD, for the Scientific Advisory Council of Osteoporosis Canada (2010) 2010 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: summary. CMAJ. 182(17):1864–1873CrossRef Papaioannou A, Morin S, Cheung AM, Atkinson S, Brown JP, Feldman S, Hanley DA, Hodsman A, Jamal SA, Kaiser SM, Kvern B, Siminoski K, Leslie WD, for the Scientific Advisory Council of Osteoporosis Canada (2010) 2010 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: summary. CMAJ. 182(17):1864–1873CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Cummings SR, Bates D, Black DM (2002) Clinical use of bone densitometry: scientific review. JAMA. 288(15):1889–1897CrossRef Cummings SR, Bates D, Black DM (2002) Clinical use of bone densitometry: scientific review. JAMA. 288(15):1889–1897CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hans DB, Kanis JA, Baim S, Bilezikian JP, Binkley N, Cauley JA, Compston JE, Cooper C, Dawson-Hughes B, el-Hajj Fuleihan G, Leslie WD, Lewiecki EM, Luckey MM, McCloskey E, Papapoulos SE, Poiana C, Rizzoli R, FRAX(®) Position Development Conference Members (2011) Joint official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and International Osteoporosis Foundation on FRAX(®). Executive summary of the 2010 position development conference on interpretation and use of FRAX® in clinical practice. J Clin Densitom. 14(3):171–180CrossRef Hans DB, Kanis JA, Baim S, Bilezikian JP, Binkley N, Cauley JA, Compston JE, Cooper C, Dawson-Hughes B, el-Hajj Fuleihan G, Leslie WD, Lewiecki EM, Luckey MM, McCloskey E, Papapoulos SE, Poiana C, Rizzoli R, FRAX(®) Position Development Conference Members (2011) Joint official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and International Osteoporosis Foundation on FRAX(®). Executive summary of the 2010 position development conference on interpretation and use of FRAX® in clinical practice. J Clin Densitom. 14(3):171–180CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Hans D, Cooper C, Baim S, Bilezikian JP, Binkley N et al (2011) Interpretation and use of FRAX in clinical practice. Osteoporos Int. 22(9):2395–2411CrossRef Kanis JA, Hans D, Cooper C, Baim S, Bilezikian JP, Binkley N et al (2011) Interpretation and use of FRAX in clinical practice. Osteoporos Int. 22(9):2395–2411CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Leslie WD, Lix LM, Johansson H, Oden A, McCloskey E, Kanis JA (2011) Spine-hip discordance and fracture risk assessment: a physician-friendly FRAX enhancement. Osteoporos Int. 22(3):839–847CrossRef Leslie WD, Lix LM, Johansson H, Oden A, McCloskey E, Kanis JA (2011) Spine-hip discordance and fracture risk assessment: a physician-friendly FRAX enhancement. Osteoporos Int. 22(3):839–847CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Leslie WD, Kovacs CS, Olszynski WP, Towheed T, Kaiser SM, Prior JC, Josse RG, Jamal SA, Kreiger N, Goltzman D, CaMos Research Group (2011) Spine-hip T-score difference predicts major osteoporotic fracture risk independent of FRAX®: a population-based report from CAMOS. J Clin Densitom. 14(3):286–293CrossRef Leslie WD, Kovacs CS, Olszynski WP, Towheed T, Kaiser SM, Prior JC, Josse RG, Jamal SA, Kreiger N, Goltzman D, CaMos Research Group (2011) Spine-hip T-score difference predicts major osteoporotic fracture risk independent of FRAX®: a population-based report from CAMOS. J Clin Densitom. 14(3):286–293CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Johansson H, Kanis JA, Oden A, Leslie WD, Fujiwara S, Gluer CC et al (2014) Impact of femoral neck and lumbar spine BMD discordances on FRAX probabilities in women: a meta-analysis of international cohorts. Calcif Tissue Int. 95(5):428–435CrossRef Johansson H, Kanis JA, Oden A, Leslie WD, Fujiwara S, Gluer CC et al (2014) Impact of femoral neck and lumbar spine BMD discordances on FRAX probabilities in women: a meta-analysis of international cohorts. Calcif Tissue Int. 95(5):428–435CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Leslie WD, Metge C (2003) Establishing a regional bone density program: lessons from the Manitoba experience. J Clin Densitom. 6(3):275–282CrossRef Leslie WD, Metge C (2003) Establishing a regional bone density program: lessons from the Manitoba experience. J Clin Densitom. 6(3):275–282CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Leslie WD, Caetano PA, Macwilliam LR, Finlayson GS (2005) Construction and validation of a population-based bone densitometry database. J Clin Densitom. 8(1):25–30CrossRef Leslie WD, Caetano PA, Macwilliam LR, Finlayson GS (2005) Construction and validation of a population-based bone densitometry database. J Clin Densitom. 8(1):25–30CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Looker AC, Wahner HW, Dunn WL, Calvo MS, Harris TB, Heyse SP, Johnston Jr CC, Lindsay R (1998) Updated data on proximal femur bone mineral levels of US adults. Osteoporos Int. 8(5):468–489CrossRef Looker AC, Wahner HW, Dunn WL, Calvo MS, Harris TB, Heyse SP, Johnston Jr CC, Lindsay R (1998) Updated data on proximal femur bone mineral levels of US adults. Osteoporos Int. 8(5):468–489CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hans D, Downs RW Jr, Duboeuf F, Greenspan S, Jankowski LG, Kiebzak GM et al (2006) Skeletal sites for osteoporosis diagnosis: the 2005 ISCD official positions. J Clin Densitom. 9(1):15–21CrossRef Hans D, Downs RW Jr, Duboeuf F, Greenspan S, Jankowski LG, Kiebzak GM et al (2006) Skeletal sites for osteoporosis diagnosis: the 2005 ISCD official positions. J Clin Densitom. 9(1):15–21CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Leslie WD, Martineau P, Bryanton M, Lix LM (2019) Which is the preferred site for bone mineral density monitoring as an indicator of treatment-related anti-fracture effect in routine clinical practice? A registry-based cohort study. Osteoporos Int. 30(7):1445–1453CrossRef Leslie WD, Martineau P, Bryanton M, Lix LM (2019) Which is the preferred site for bone mineral density monitoring as an indicator of treatment-related anti-fracture effect in routine clinical practice? A registry-based cohort study. Osteoporos Int. 30(7):1445–1453CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Oden A, Johansson H, Borgstrom F, Strom O, McCloskey E (2009) FRAX and its applications to clinical practice. Bone. 44(5):734–743CrossRef Kanis JA, Oden A, Johansson H, Borgstrom F, Strom O, McCloskey E (2009) FRAX and its applications to clinical practice. Bone. 44(5):734–743CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Leslie WD, Lix LM, Langsetmo L, Berger C, Goltzman D, Hanley DA, Adachi JD, Johansson H, Oden A, McCloskey E, Kanis JA (2011) Construction of a FRAX® model for the assessment of fracture probability in Canada and implications for treatment. Osteoporos Int. 22(3):817–827CrossRef Leslie WD, Lix LM, Langsetmo L, Berger C, Goltzman D, Hanley DA, Adachi JD, Johansson H, Oden A, McCloskey E, Kanis JA (2011) Construction of a FRAX® model for the assessment of fracture probability in Canada and implications for treatment. Osteoporos Int. 22(3):817–827CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Leslie WD, Morin SN, Lix LM, Martineau P, Bryanton M, McCloskey EV et al (2020) Reassessment intervals for transition from low to high fracture risk among adults older than 50 years. JAMA Netw Open. 3(1):e1918954CrossRef Leslie WD, Morin SN, Lix LM, Martineau P, Bryanton M, McCloskey EV et al (2020) Reassessment intervals for transition from low to high fracture risk among adults older than 50 years. JAMA Netw Open. 3(1):e1918954CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Lix LM, Azimaee M, Osman BA, Caetano P, Morin S, Metge C, Goltzman D, Kreiger N, Prior J, Leslie WD (2012) Osteoporosis-related fracture case definitions for population-based administrative data. BMC Public Health. 12:301CrossRef Lix LM, Azimaee M, Osman BA, Caetano P, Morin S, Metge C, Goltzman D, Kreiger N, Prior J, Leslie WD (2012) Osteoporosis-related fracture case definitions for population-based administrative data. BMC Public Health. 12:301CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Epp R, Alhrbi M, Ward L, Leslie WD (2018) Radiological validation of fracture definitions from administrative data. J Bone Miner Res. 33(Supp 1):S275 Epp R, Alhrbi M, Ward L, Leslie WD (2018) Radiological validation of fracture definitions from administrative data. J Bone Miner Res. 33(Supp 1):S275
19.
go back to reference Satagopan JM, Ben-Porat L, Berwick M, Robson M, Kutler D, Auerbach AD (2004) A note on competing risks in survival data analysis. Br J Cancer. 91(7):1229–1235CrossRef Satagopan JM, Ben-Porat L, Berwick M, Robson M, Kutler D, Auerbach AD (2004) A note on competing risks in survival data analysis. Br J Cancer. 91(7):1229–1235CrossRef
20.
go back to reference McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Oden A, Kanis JA (2009) From relative risk to absolute fracture risk calculation: the FRAX algorithm. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 7(3):77–83CrossRef McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Oden A, Kanis JA (2009) From relative risk to absolute fracture risk calculation: the FRAX algorithm. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 7(3):77–83CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Pencina MJ, D'Agostino RB Sr, D'Agostino RB Jr, Vasan RS (2008) Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond. Stat Med. 27(2):157–172 discussion 207-12CrossRef Pencina MJ, D'Agostino RB Sr, D'Agostino RB Jr, Vasan RS (2008) Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond. Stat Med. 27(2):157–172 discussion 207-12CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Leening MJ, Vedder MM, Witteman JC, Pencina MJ, Steyerberg EW (2014) Net reclassification improvement: computation, interpretation, and controversies: a literature review and clinician’s guide. Ann Intern Med. 160(2):122–131CrossRef Leening MJ, Vedder MM, Witteman JC, Pencina MJ, Steyerberg EW (2014) Net reclassification improvement: computation, interpretation, and controversies: a literature review and clinician’s guide. Ann Intern Med. 160(2):122–131CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Blake GM, Patel R, Knapp KM, Fogelman I (2003) Does the combination of two BMD measurements improve fracture discrimination? J Bone Miner Res. 18(11):1955–1963CrossRef Blake GM, Patel R, Knapp KM, Fogelman I (2003) Does the combination of two BMD measurements improve fracture discrimination? J Bone Miner Res. 18(11):1955–1963CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Fink HA, Harrison SL, Taylor BC, Cummings SR, Schousboe JT, Kuskowski MA, Stone KL, Ensrud KE, Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF) Group (2008) Differences in site-specific fracture risk among older women with discordant results for osteoporosis at hip and spine: study of osteoporotic fractures. J Clin Densitom. 11(2):250–259CrossRef Fink HA, Harrison SL, Taylor BC, Cummings SR, Schousboe JT, Kuskowski MA, Stone KL, Ensrud KE, Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF) Group (2008) Differences in site-specific fracture risk among older women with discordant results for osteoporosis at hip and spine: study of osteoporotic fractures. J Clin Densitom. 11(2):250–259CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedel H (1996) Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. BMJ. 312(7041):1254–1259CrossRef Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedel H (1996) Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. BMJ. 312(7041):1254–1259CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Stone KL, Seeley DG, Lui LY, Cauley JA, Ensrud K, Browner WS, Nevitt MC, Cummings SR, Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group (2003) BMD at multiple sites and risk of fracture of multiple types: long-term results from the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 18(11):1947–1954CrossRef Stone KL, Seeley DG, Lui LY, Cauley JA, Ensrud K, Browner WS, Nevitt MC, Cummings SR, Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group (2003) BMD at multiple sites and risk of fracture of multiple types: long-term results from the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 18(11):1947–1954CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Nguyen ND, Frost SA, Center JR, Eisman JA, Nguyen TV (2008) Development of prognostic nomograms for individualizing 5-year and 10-year fracture risks. Osteoporos Int. 19(10):1431–1444CrossRef Nguyen ND, Frost SA, Center JR, Eisman JA, Nguyen TV (2008) Development of prognostic nomograms for individualizing 5-year and 10-year fracture risks. Osteoporos Int. 19(10):1431–1444CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Nguyen ND, Frost SA, Center JR, Eisman JA, Nguyen TV (2007) Development of a nomogram for individualizing hip fracture risk in men and women. Osteoporos Int. 18(8):1109–1117CrossRef Nguyen ND, Frost SA, Center JR, Eisman JA, Nguyen TV (2007) Development of a nomogram for individualizing hip fracture risk in men and women. Osteoporos Int. 18(8):1109–1117CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C. Validation of QFracture compared with FRAX: analysis prepared for NICE 2011. 2011. Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C. Validation of QFracture compared with FRAX: analysis prepared for NICE 2011. 2011.
30.
go back to reference Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C (2012) Derivation and validation of updated QFracture algorithm to predict risk of osteoporotic fracture in primary care in the United Kingdom: prospective open cohort study. BMJ. 344:e3427CrossRef Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C (2012) Derivation and validation of updated QFracture algorithm to predict risk of osteoporotic fracture in primary care in the United Kingdom: prospective open cohort study. BMJ. 344:e3427CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Cosman F, de Beur SJ, LeBoff MS, Lewiecki EM, Tanner B, Randall S, Lindsay R, National Osteoporosis Foundation (2014) Clinician's guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 25(10):2359–2381CrossRef Cosman F, de Beur SJ, LeBoff MS, Lewiecki EM, Tanner B, Randall S, Lindsay R, National Osteoporosis Foundation (2014) Clinician's guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 25(10):2359–2381CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Impact of spine-hip discordance on fracture risk assessment and treatment qualification in Canada: the Manitoba BMD registry
Authors
William D. Leslie
Suzanne N. Morin
Lisa M. Lix
Neil Binkley
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Archives of Osteoporosis / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 1862-3522
Electronic ISSN: 1862-3514
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-020-00763-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Archives of Osteoporosis 1/2020 Go to the issue