Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Osteoporosis 1-2/2013

01-12-2013 | Original Article

Sri Lankan FRAX model and country-specific intervention thresholds

Author: Sarath Lekamwasam

Published in: Archives of Osteoporosis | Issue 1-2/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Summary

There is a wide variation in fracture probabilities estimated by Asian FRAX models, although the outputs of South Asian models are concordant. Clinicians can choose either fixed or age-specific intervention thresholds when making treatment decisions in postmenopausal women. Cost-effectiveness of such approach, however, needs to be addressed.

Purpose

This study examined suitable fracture probability intervention thresholds (ITs) for Sri Lanka, based on the Sri Lankan FRAX model.

Methods

Fracture probabilities were estimated using all Asian FRAX models for a postmenopausal woman of BMI 25 kg/m2 and has no clinical risk factors apart from a fragility fracture, and they were compared. Age-specific ITs were estimated based on the Sri Lankan FRAX model using the method followed by the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group in the UK. Using the age-specific ITs as the reference standard, suitable fixed ITs were also estimated.

Results

Fracture probabilities estimated by different Asian FRAX models varied widely. Japanese and Taiwan models showed higher fracture probabilities while Chinese, Philippine, and Indonesian models gave lower fracture probabilities. Output of remaining FRAX models were generally similar. Age-specific ITs of major osteoporotic fracture probabilities (MOFP) based on the Sri Lankan FRAX model varied from 2.6 to 18 % between 50 and 90 years. ITs of hip fracture probabilities (HFP) varied from 0.4 to 6.5 % between 50 and 90 years. In finding fixed ITs, MOFP of 11 % and HFP of 3.5 % gave the lowest misclassification and highest agreement.

Conclusion

Sri Lankan FRAX model behaves similar to other Asian FRAX models such as Indian, Singapore-Indian, Thai, and South Korean. Clinicians may use either the fixed or age-specific ITs in making therapeutic decisions in postmenopausal women. The economical aspects of such decisions, however, need to be considered.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Johnell O, Kanis JA (2004) An estimate of the worldwide prevalence, mortality and disability associated with hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 15(11):897–902PubMedCrossRef Johnell O, Kanis JA (2004) An estimate of the worldwide prevalence, mortality and disability associated with hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 15(11):897–902PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Cooper C, Cole ZA, Holroyd CR, Earl SC, Harvey NC, Dennison EM, Melton LJ, Cummings SR, Kanis JA (2011) Secular trends in the incidence of hip and other osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 22(5):1277–1288PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Cooper C, Cole ZA, Holroyd CR, Earl SC, Harvey NC, Dennison EM, Melton LJ, Cummings SR, Kanis JA (2011) Secular trends in the incidence of hip and other osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 22(5):1277–1288PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Mithal A, Dhingra V, Lau E, Stenmark J, Nauroy L (2009) The Asian Audit: epidemiology, costs and burden of osteoporosis in Asia 2009. International Osteoporosis Foundation. www.iofbonehealth.org/asian audit. Accessed 1 June 2013 Mithal A, Dhingra V, Lau E, Stenmark J, Nauroy L (2009) The Asian Audit: epidemiology, costs and burden of osteoporosis in Asia 2009. International Osteoporosis Foundation. www.​iofbonehealth.​org/​asian audit. Accessed 1 June 2013
5.
go back to reference National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (2008) Case finding for the management of osteoporosis with FRAX—assessment and intervention thresholds for the UK. Osteoporos Int 19(10):1395–1408CrossRef National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (2008) Case finding for the management of osteoporosis with FRAX—assessment and intervention thresholds for the UK. Osteoporos Int 19(10):1395–1408CrossRef
6.
go back to reference National Osteoporosis Foundation (2013) Clinician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. National Osteoporosis Foundation, Washington, DC National Osteoporosis Foundation (2013) Clinician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. National Osteoporosis Foundation, Washington, DC
8.
go back to reference Korthoewer D, Chandran M (2012) Osteoporosis management and the utilization of FRAX: a survey amongst health care professionals of the Asia-Pacific. Arch Osteoporos 7(1–2):193–200PubMedCrossRef Korthoewer D, Chandran M (2012) Osteoporosis management and the utilization of FRAX: a survey amongst health care professionals of the Asia-Pacific. Arch Osteoporos 7(1–2):193–200PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Fujiwara S, Nakamura T, Orimo H, Hosoi T, Gorai I, Oden A, Johansson H, Kanis JA (2008) Development and application of a Japanese model of the WHO fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX). Osteoporos Int 19(4):429–435PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Fujiwara S, Nakamura T, Orimo H, Hosoi T, Gorai I, Oden A, Johansson H, Kanis JA (2008) Development and application of a Japanese model of the WHO fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX). Osteoporos Int 19(4):429–435PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kanis JA, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Strom O, Borgstrom F, Oden A (2008) Case finding for the management of osteoporosis with FRAX—assessment and intervention thresholds for the UK. Osteoporos Int 19(10):1395–1408PubMedCrossRef Kanis JA, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Strom O, Borgstrom F, Oden A (2008) Case finding for the management of osteoporosis with FRAX—assessment and intervention thresholds for the UK. Osteoporos Int 19(10):1395–1408PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Sri Lankan FRAX model and country-specific intervention thresholds
Author
Sarath Lekamwasam
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Archives of Osteoporosis / Issue 1-2/2013
Print ISSN: 1862-3522
Electronic ISSN: 1862-3514
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-013-0148-x

Other articles of this Issue 1-2/2013

Archives of Osteoporosis 1-2/2013 Go to the issue