Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Osteoporosis International 4/2008

Open Access 01-04-2008 | Special Position Paper

Development and application of a Japanese model of the WHO fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX™)

Authors: S. Fujiwara, T. Nakamura, H. Orimo, T. Hosoi, I. Gorai, A. Oden, H. Johansson, J. A. Kanis

Published in: Osteoporosis International | Issue 4/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Summary

The present study estimated the 10-year probability using the Japanese version of WHO fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX™) in order to determine fracture probabilities that correspond to intervention thresholds currently used in Japan and to resolve some issues for its use in Japan.

Introduction

The objective of the present study was to evaluate a Japanese version of the WHO fracture risk assessment (FRAX™) tool to compute 10-year probabilities of osteoporotic fracture in Japanese men and women. Since lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) is used preferentially as a site for assessment, and densitometers use Japanese reference data, a second aim was to investigate the suitability and impact of this practice in Japan.

Methods

Fracture probabilities were computed from published data on the fracture and death hazards in Japan. Probabilities took account of age, sex, the presence of clinical risk factors and femoral neck BMD. Fracture probabilities were determined that were equivalent to intervention thresholds currently used in Japan. The difference between T-scores derived from international reference data and that using Japanese-specific normal ranges was estimated from published sources. The gradient of risk of BMD for fracture in Japan was compared to that for BMD at the lumbar spine in the Hiroshima cohort.

Results

The 10-year probabilities of a major osteoporosis-related fracture that corresponded to current intervention thresholds ranged from approximately 5% at the age of 50 years to more than 20% at the age of 80 years. The use of femoral neck BMD predicts fracture as well as or better than BMD tests at the lumbar spine. There were small differences in T-scores between those used for the model and those derived from a Japanese reference population.

Conclusions

The FRAX™ tool has been used to determine possible thresholds for therapeutic intervention, based on equivalence of risk with current guidelines. The approach will need to be supported by appropriate health economic analyses. Femoral neck BMD is suitable for the prediction of fracture risk among Japanese. However, when applying the FRAX™ model to Japan, T-scores and Z-scores should be converted to those derived from the international reference.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Orimo H, Sakata K (2006) The 4th nationwide survey for hip fracture in Japan (in Japanese). Japan Medical Journal 4180:25–30 Orimo H, Sakata K (2006) The 4th nationwide survey for hip fracture in Japan (in Japanese). Japan Medical Journal 4180:25–30
2.
go back to reference Hagino H, Katagiri H, Okano T, Yamamoto K, Teshima R (2005) Increasing incidence of hip fracture in Tottori prefecture, Japan: trend from 1086 to 2001. Osteoporos Int 16:1961–1968CrossRef Hagino H, Katagiri H, Okano T, Yamamoto K, Teshima R (2005) Increasing incidence of hip fracture in Tottori prefecture, Japan: trend from 1086 to 2001. Osteoporos Int 16:1961–1968CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Borgstrom F, De Laet C et al (2005) Assessment of fracture risk. Osteoporos Int 16:581–589PubMedCrossRef Kanis JA, Borgstrom F, De Laet C et al (2005) Assessment of fracture risk. Osteoporos Int 16:581–589PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C et al (2002) International variations in hip fracture probabilities: implications for risk assessment. J Bone Miner Res 17:1237–1244PubMedCrossRef Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C et al (2002) International variations in hip fracture probabilities: implications for risk assessment. J Bone Miner Res 17:1237–1244PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Black D, Cooper C et al (2002) A new approach to the development of assessment guidelines for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 13:527–536PubMedCrossRef Kanis JA, Black D, Cooper C et al (2002) A new approach to the development of assessment guidelines for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 13:527–536PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kanis JA on behalf of the World Health Organization Scientific Group (2008) Assessment of osteoporosis at the primary health-care level. Technical Report. WHO Collaborating Centre, University of Sheffield, UK (in press) Kanis JA on behalf of the World Health Organization Scientific Group (2008) Assessment of osteoporosis at the primary health-care level. Technical Report. WHO Collaborating Centre, University of Sheffield, UK (in press)
7.
go back to reference Orimo H, Sugioka Y, Fukunaga M et al (1998) Diagnostic criteria of primary osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Metab 16:139–150CrossRef Orimo H, Sugioka Y, Fukunaga M et al (1998) Diagnostic criteria of primary osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Metab 16:139–150CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Orimo H, Hayashi Y, Fukunaga M et al (2001) Diagnostic criteria for primary osteoporosis: year 2000 revision. J Bone Miner Metab 19:331–337PubMedCrossRef Orimo H, Hayashi Y, Fukunaga M et al (2001) Diagnostic criteria for primary osteoporosis: year 2000 revision. J Bone Miner Metab 19:331–337PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hagino H, Yamamoto K, Ohshiro H et al (1999) Changing incidence of hip, distal radius, and proximal humerus fractures in Tottori prefecture, Japan. Bone 24:265–270PubMedCrossRef Hagino H, Yamamoto K, Ohshiro H et al (1999) Changing incidence of hip, distal radius, and proximal humerus fractures in Tottori prefecture, Japan. Bone 24:265–270PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Fujiwara S, Kasagi F, Masunari N et al (2003) Fracture prediction from bone mineral density in Japanese men and women. J Bone Miner Res 18:1547–1553PubMedCrossRef Fujiwara S, Kasagi F, Masunari N et al (2003) Fracture prediction from bone mineral density in Japanese men and women. J Bone Miner Res 18:1547–1553PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, Jonsson B, de Laet C, Dawson A (2001) The burden of osteoporotic fractures: a method for setting intervention thresholds. Osteoporos Int 12:417–427PubMedCrossRef Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, Jonsson B, de Laet C, Dawson A (2001) The burden of osteoporotic fractures: a method for setting intervention thresholds. Osteoporos Int 12:417–427PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O et al (2007) The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performances of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women. Osteoporos Int 18:1033–1046PubMedCrossRef Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O et al (2007) The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performances of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women. Osteoporos Int 18:1033–1046PubMedCrossRef
14.
15.
go back to reference Looker AC, Wahner HW, Dunn WL, Calvo MS, Harris TB, Heyse SP (1998) Updated data on proximal femur bone mineral levels of US adults. Osteoporos Int 8:468–486PubMedCrossRef Looker AC, Wahner HW, Dunn WL, Calvo MS, Harris TB, Heyse SP (1998) Updated data on proximal femur bone mineral levels of US adults. Osteoporos Int 8:468–486PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Johnell O, Kanis JA, Oden A et al (2005) Predictive value of bone mineral density for hip and other fractures. J Bone and Miner Res 20:1185–1194PubMedCrossRef Johnell O, Kanis JA, Oden A et al (2005) Predictive value of bone mineral density for hip and other fractures. J Bone and Miner Res 20:1185–1194PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference De Laet C, Kanis JA, Oden A et al (2005) Body mass index as a predictor of fracture risk: a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 11:1330–1338CrossRef De Laet C, Kanis JA, Oden A et al (2005) Body mass index as a predictor of fracture risk: a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 11:1330–1338CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ross PD, Fujiwara S, Huang C et al (1995) Vertebral fracture prevalence in women in Hiroshima compared to Caucasians or Japanese in the US. Int J Epidemiol 24:1171–1177PubMedCrossRef Ross PD, Fujiwara S, Huang C et al (1995) Vertebral fracture prevalence in women in Hiroshima compared to Caucasians or Japanese in the US. Int J Epidemiol 24:1171–1177PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Oyama H, Fujiwara S, Masunari N, Hsu WL (2006) Comparisons between clinical vertebral fracture incidence and morphometric vertebral fracture incidence (in Japanese). Osteoporosis Jpn 148(Suppl 1):147 Oyama H, Fujiwara S, Masunari N, Hsu WL (2006) Comparisons between clinical vertebral fracture incidence and morphometric vertebral fracture incidence (in Japanese). Osteoporosis Jpn 148(Suppl 1):147
20.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Borgstrom F, Zethraeus N, Johnell O, Oden A, Jonsson B (2005) Intervention thresholds for osteoporosis in the UK. Bone 36:22–32PubMedCrossRef Kanis JA, Borgstrom F, Zethraeus N, Johnell O, Oden A, Jonsson B (2005) Intervention thresholds for osteoporosis in the UK. Bone 36:22–32PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Borgstrom F, Johnell O, Kanis JA, Jonsson B, Rehnberg C (2006) At what hip fracture risk is it cost-effective to treat? International intervention thresholds for the treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 17:1459–1471PubMedCrossRef Borgstrom F, Johnell O, Kanis JA, Jonsson B, Rehnberg C (2006) At what hip fracture risk is it cost-effective to treat? International intervention thresholds for the treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 17:1459–1471PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Eddy D, Johnston CC, Cummings SR et al (1998) Osteoporosis: review of the evidence for prevention, diagnosis and treatment and cost-effectiveness analysis. Osteoporos Int 8(Suppl 4):S7–S80 Eddy D, Johnston CC, Cummings SR et al (1998) Osteoporosis: review of the evidence for prevention, diagnosis and treatment and cost-effectiveness analysis. Osteoporos Int 8(Suppl 4):S7–S80
23.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A et al (2005) Smoking and fracture risk: a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 16:222–228PubMedCrossRef Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A et al (2005) Smoking and fracture risk: a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 16:222–228PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C et al (2004) A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk. Bone 35:375–382PubMedCrossRef Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C et al (2004) A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk. Bone 35:375–382PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Nakamura T, Turner CH, Yoshikawa T et al (1994) Do variations in hip geometry explain difference in hip fracture risk between Japanese and white Americans? J Bone Miner Res 7:1071–1076CrossRef Nakamura T, Turner CH, Yoshikawa T et al (1994) Do variations in hip geometry explain difference in hip fracture risk between Japanese and white Americans? J Bone Miner Res 7:1071–1076CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Yan L, Crabtree NJ, Reeve J et al (2004) Does hip strength analysis explain the lower incidence of hip fracture in the people’s republic of China? Bone 34:584–588PubMedCrossRef Yan L, Crabtree NJ, Reeve J et al (2004) Does hip strength analysis explain the lower incidence of hip fracture in the people’s republic of China? Bone 34:584–588PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Iki M, Kagamimori S, Kagawa Y, Matsuzaki Y, Yoneshima H, Marumo F for JPOS Study (2001) Bone mineral density of the spine, hip, and distal forearm in representative samples of the Japanese female population: Japanese population-based osteoporosis (JPOS) study. Osteoporos Int 12:529–537 Iki M, Kagamimori S, Kagawa Y, Matsuzaki Y, Yoneshima H, Marumo F for JPOS Study (2001) Bone mineral density of the spine, hip, and distal forearm in representative samples of the Japanese female population: Japanese population-based osteoporosis (JPOS) study. Osteoporos Int 12:529–537
Metadata
Title
Development and application of a Japanese model of the WHO fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX™)
Authors
S. Fujiwara
T. Nakamura
H. Orimo
T. Hosoi
I. Gorai
A. Oden
H. Johansson
J. A. Kanis
Publication date
01-04-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Osteoporosis International / Issue 4/2008
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Electronic ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-007-0544-4

Other articles of this Issue 4/2008

Osteoporosis International 4/2008 Go to the issue