Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 12/2020

01-12-2020 | Care | Original Research

A Qualitative Exploration of Seriously Ill Patients’ Experiences of Goals of Care Discussions in Australian Hospital Settings

Authors: Moira O’Connor, PhD, Kaaren J. Watts, PhD, Warren D. Kilburn, MEd&DevPsych, Kitty Vivekananda, PhD, Claire E. Johnson, PhD, Sharon Keesing, PhD, Georgia K. B. Halkett, PhD, Josephine Shaw, MPsych, Valerie Colgan, MSc (Nurse Education), Kevin Yuen, MBBS, FAChPM, Renate Jolly, BSc (Nursing), Simon C. Towler, FCICM, FANZCA, FACHSM, FAMA, Anupam Chauhan, MBBS MD FCICM, Margherita Nicoletti, MBBS, FAChPM, Anton D. Leonard, MB BCH BAO BA MPhil FCICM FANZCA MRCPI

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 12/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Goals of care (GOC) is a communication and decision-making process that occurs between a clinician and a patient (or surrogate decision-maker) during an episode of care to facilitate a plan of care that is consistent with the patient’s preferences and values. Little is known about patients’ experiences of these discussions.

Objective

This study explored patients’ perspectives of the GOC discussion in the hospital setting.

Design

An explorative qualitative design was used within a social constructionist framework.

Participants

Adult patients were recruited from six Australian hospitals across two states. Eligible patients had had a GOC discussion and they were identified by the senior nurse or their doctor for informed consent and interview.

Approach

Semi-structured individual or dyadic interviews (with the carer/family member present) were conducted at the bedside or at the patient’s home (for recently discharged patients). Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed for themes.

Key Results

Thirty-eight patient interviews were completed. The key themes identified were (1) values and expectations, and (2) communication (sub-themes: (i) facilitators of the conversation, (ii) barriers to the conversation, and (iii) influence of the environment). Most patients viewed the conversation as necessary and valued having their preferences heard. Effective communication strategies and a safe, private setting were facilitators of the GOC discussion. Deficits in any of these key elements functioned as a barrier to the process.

Conclusions

Effective communication, and patients’ values and expectations set the stage for goals of care discussions; however, the environment plays a significant role. Communication skills training and education designed to equip clinicians to negotiate GOC interactions effectively are essential. These interventions must also be accompanied by systemic changes including building a culture supportive of GOC, clear policies and guidelines, and champions who facilitate uptake of GOC discussions.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
5.
go back to reference Pastrana T, Jünger S, Ostgathe C, Elsner F, Radbruch L. A matter of definition–key elements identified in a discourse analysis of definitions of palliative care. Palliat Med 2008;22(3):222-32.CrossRefPubMed Pastrana T, Jünger S, Ostgathe C, Elsner F, Radbruch L. A matter of definition–key elements identified in a discourse analysis of definitions of palliative care. Palliat Med 2008;22(3):222-32.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Aleksova N, Demers C, Strachan PH et al. Barriers to goals of care discussions with hospitalized patients with advanced heart failure: feasibility and performance of a novel questionnaire. ESC Heart Fail 2016;3(4):245-252.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Aleksova N, Demers C, Strachan PH et al. Barriers to goals of care discussions with hospitalized patients with advanced heart failure: feasibility and performance of a novel questionnaire. ESC Heart Fail 2016;3(4):245-252.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Ceccarelli CM, Castner D, Haras MS. Advance care planning for patients with chronic kidney disease -- why aren’t nurses more involved? Nephrol Nurs J 2008;35(6):553-7.PubMed Ceccarelli CM, Castner D, Haras MS. Advance care planning for patients with chronic kidney disease -- why aren’t nurses more involved? Nephrol Nurs J 2008;35(6):553-7.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Orford NR, Milnes SL, Lambert N et al. Prevalence, goals of care and long-term outcomes of patients with life-limiting illness referred to a tertiary ICU. Crit Care Resusc 2016;18(3):181-8.PubMed Orford NR, Milnes SL, Lambert N et al. Prevalence, goals of care and long-term outcomes of patients with life-limiting illness referred to a tertiary ICU. Crit Care Resusc 2016;18(3):181-8.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Steinhauser KE, Christakis NA, Clipp EC, McNeilly M, McIntyre L, Tulsky JA. Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers. JAMA. 2000;284(19):2476-82.CrossRefPubMed Steinhauser KE, Christakis NA, Clipp EC, McNeilly M, McIntyre L, Tulsky JA. Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers. JAMA. 2000;284(19):2476-82.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Curtis JR, Engelberg RA, Nielsen EL, Au DH, Patrick DJ. Patient-physician communication about end-of-life care for patients with severe COPD. Eur Respir J 2004;24(2):200-5CrossRefPubMed Curtis JR, Engelberg RA, Nielsen EL, Au DH, Patrick DJ. Patient-physician communication about end-of-life care for patients with severe COPD. Eur Respir J 2004;24(2):200-5CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Johnson CE, Chong JC, Wilkinson A, Hayes B, Tait S, Waldron N. Goals of patient care system change with video-based education increases rates of advance cardiopulmonary resuscitation decision-making and discussions in hospitalised rehabilitation patients. Intern Med J 2017;47(7):798-806.CrossRefPubMed Johnson CE, Chong JC, Wilkinson A, Hayes B, Tait S, Waldron N. Goals of patient care system change with video-based education increases rates of advance cardiopulmonary resuscitation decision-making and discussions in hospitalised rehabilitation patients. Intern Med J 2017;47(7):798-806.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2001. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2001.
37.
40.
go back to reference Peereboom K, Coyle N. Facilitating goals-of-care discussions for patients with life-limiting disease—communication strategies for nurses. J Hosp Palliat Nurs 2012;14(4):251-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/NJH.0b013e3182533a7f Peereboom K, Coyle N. Facilitating goals-of-care discussions for patients with life-limiting disease—communication strategies for nurses. J Hosp Palliat Nurs 2012;14(4):251-8. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​NJH.​0b013e3182533a7f​
41.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3(2):77-101.CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3(2):77-101.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1990. Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1990.
44.
go back to reference Bradbury-Jones C. Enhancing rigour in qualitative health research: exploring subjectivity through Peshkin’s I’s. J Adv Nurs 2007;59(3):290-8.CrossRefPubMed Bradbury-Jones C. Enhancing rigour in qualitative health research: exploring subjectivity through Peshkin’s I’s. J Adv Nurs 2007;59(3):290-8.CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 2007;19(6):349-57CrossRefPubMed Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 2007;19(6):349-57CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Christakis NA, Smith JL, Parkes CM, Lamont EB. Extent and determinants of error in doctors’ prognoses in terminally ill patients: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2000;320(7233):469-73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Christakis NA, Smith JL, Parkes CM, Lamont EB. Extent and determinants of error in doctors’ prognoses in terminally ill patients: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2000;320(7233):469-73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
47.
52.
go back to reference Sidani S, Epstein D, Miranda J. Eliciting patient treatment preferences: A strategy to integrate evidence-based and patient-centered care. Worldviews Evid-Based Nurs 2006;3(3):116-23.CrossRefPubMed Sidani S, Epstein D, Miranda J. Eliciting patient treatment preferences: A strategy to integrate evidence-based and patient-centered care. Worldviews Evid-Based Nurs 2006;3(3):116-23.CrossRefPubMed
53.
go back to reference Epstein R, Street RJ. Patient-Centered Communication in Cancer Care: Promoting Healing and Reducing Suffering Publication No. 07-6225. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute; 2007. Epstein R, Street RJ. Patient-Centered Communication in Cancer Care: Promoting Healing and Reducing Suffering Publication No. 07-6225. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute; 2007.
54.
go back to reference Curtis JR, Wenrich MD, Carline JD, Shannon SE, Ambrozy DM, Ramsey PG. Understanding physicians’ skills at providing end-of-life care: perspectives of patients, families, and health care workers. J Gen Intern Med 2001;16(1):41-9.PubMedPubMedCentral Curtis JR, Wenrich MD, Carline JD, Shannon SE, Ambrozy DM, Ramsey PG. Understanding physicians’ skills at providing end-of-life care: perspectives of patients, families, and health care workers. J Gen Intern Med 2001;16(1):41-9.PubMedPubMedCentral
55.
go back to reference Cummings A, Lund S, Campling N, May CR, Richardson A, Myall M. Implementing communication and decision-making interventions directed at goals of care: a theory-led scoping review. BMJ Open 2017;7(10):e017056.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cummings A, Lund S, Campling N, May CR, Richardson A, Myall M. Implementing communication and decision-making interventions directed at goals of care: a theory-led scoping review. BMJ Open 2017;7(10):e017056.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
56.
go back to reference Childers JW, Back AL, Tulsky JA, Arnold RM. REMAP: a framework for goals of care conversations. J Oncol Pract 2017;13(10):e844-e50.CrossRefPubMed Childers JW, Back AL, Tulsky JA, Arnold RM. REMAP: a framework for goals of care conversations. J Oncol Pract 2017;13(10):e844-e50.CrossRefPubMed
63.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine Committee on the Future of Emergency Care in the United States Health System. Hospital-Based Emergency Care: At the Breaking Point. Washington, DC; 2006. Institute of Medicine Committee on the Future of Emergency Care in the United States Health System. Hospital-Based Emergency Care: At the Breaking Point. Washington, DC; 2006.
Metadata
Title
A Qualitative Exploration of Seriously Ill Patients’ Experiences of Goals of Care Discussions in Australian Hospital Settings
Authors
Moira O’Connor, PhD
Kaaren J. Watts, PhD
Warren D. Kilburn, MEd&DevPsych
Kitty Vivekananda, PhD
Claire E. Johnson, PhD
Sharon Keesing, PhD
Georgia K. B. Halkett, PhD
Josephine Shaw, MPsych
Valerie Colgan, MSc (Nurse Education)
Kevin Yuen, MBBS, FAChPM
Renate Jolly, BSc (Nursing)
Simon C. Towler, FCICM, FANZCA, FACHSM, FAMA
Anupam Chauhan, MBBS MD FCICM
Margherita Nicoletti, MBBS, FAChPM
Anton D. Leonard, MB BCH BAO BA MPhil FCICM FANZCA MRCPI
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Keyword
Care
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 12/2020
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06233-y

Other articles of this Issue 12/2020

Journal of General Internal Medicine 12/2020 Go to the issue