Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 12/2020

01-12-2020 | Original Research

Patients’ Views About the Disclosure of Collateral Findings in Pragmatic Clinical Trials: a Focus Group Study

Authors: Juli M. Bollinger, MS, Gail Geller, ScD, MHS, Kevin Weinfurt, PhD, Elizabeth May, MA, Stephanie R. Morain, PhD, MPH, Debra J. H. Mathews, PhD, MA, Jeremy Sugarman, MD, MPH, MA

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 12/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs) are increasingly being conducted to efficiently generate evidence to inform healthcare decision-making. Despite their growing acceptance, PCTs may involve a variety of ethical issues, including the management of pragmatic clinical trial-collateral findings (PCT-CFs), that is, information that emerges in PCTs that is unrelated to the primary research questions but may have implications for patients, clinicians, and health systems.

Objective

We sought to understand patients’ views about PCT-CF disclosure, including how, by whom, and the nature and extent of information provided.

Design

Prospective, qualitative focus group study.

Participants

Focus groups were conducted in Baltimore, MD; Houston, TX; and Seattle, WA (overall N = 66), during July and August 2019.

Approach

All groups discussed a hypothetical scenario involving the detection of a PCT-CF of contraindicated medications. Participants were asked about their reactions to the PCT-CF and issues related to its disclosure.

Key Results

Reactions to learning about the PCT-CF were mixed, ranging from fear of a significant health problem, anger that the contraindicated medications had gone unnoticed and/or for being included in research without their permission, to gratitude for the information. Preferences for how such disclosures are made varied but were driven by several consistent desires, namely minimizing patient harm and anxiety and demonstrating trust and respect. Many wanted their treating clinician to be informed of the PCT-CF so that they would be prepared to answer patients’ questions and to discuss treatment options.

Conclusions

The detection of PCT-CFs is likely to increase with further expansion of PCTs. As such, clinicians will undoubtedly become involved in the management of PCT-CFs. Our data illustrate some of the challenges clinicians may face when their patients are informed of a PCT-CF and the need to develop guidance for disclosing PCT-CFs in ways that align with patients’ preferences and values.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Finkelstein JA, Brickman AL, Capron A, Ford DE, Gombosev A, Greene SM, et al. Oversight on the borderline: Quality improvement and pragmatic research. Clin Trials. 2015;12(5):457-66.CrossRef Finkelstein JA, Brickman AL, Capron A, Ford DE, Gombosev A, Greene SM, et al. Oversight on the borderline: Quality improvement and pragmatic research. Clin Trials. 2015;12(5):457-66.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Topazian R, Bollinger J, Weinfurt KP, Dvoskin R, Mathews D, Brelsford K, et al. Physicians’ perspectives regarding pragmatic clinical trials. J Comp Eff Res. 2016;5(5):499-506.CrossRef Topazian R, Bollinger J, Weinfurt KP, Dvoskin R, Mathews D, Brelsford K, et al. Physicians’ perspectives regarding pragmatic clinical trials. J Comp Eff Res. 2016;5(5):499-506.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Califf RM, Sugarman J. Exploring the ethical and regulatory issues in pragmatic clinical trials. Clin Trials. 2015;12(5):436-41.CrossRef Califf RM, Sugarman J. Exploring the ethical and regulatory issues in pragmatic clinical trials. Clin Trials. 2015;12(5):436-41.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Morain SR, Weinfurt K, Bollinger J, Geller G, Mathews DJ, Sugarman J. Ethics and Collateral Findings in Pragmatic Clinical Trials. Am J Bioeth. 2020;20(1):6-18.CrossRef Morain SR, Weinfurt K, Bollinger J, Geller G, Mathews DJ, Sugarman J. Ethics and Collateral Findings in Pragmatic Clinical Trials. Am J Bioeth. 2020;20(1):6-18.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Sabin JE, Cocoros NM, Garcia CJ, Goldsack JC, Haynes K, Lin ND, et al. Bystander Ethics and Good Samaritanism: A Paradox for Learning Health Organizations. Hast Cent Rep. 2019;49(4):18-26.CrossRef Sabin JE, Cocoros NM, Garcia CJ, Goldsack JC, Haynes K, Lin ND, et al. Bystander Ethics and Good Samaritanism: A Paradox for Learning Health Organizations. Hast Cent Rep. 2019;49(4):18-26.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Weinfurt KP, Bollinger JM, Brelsford KM, Crayton TJ, Topazian RJ, Kass NE, et al. Patients’ Views Concerning Research on Medical Practices: Implications for Consent. AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2016;7(2):76-91.CrossRef Weinfurt KP, Bollinger JM, Brelsford KM, Crayton TJ, Topazian RJ, Kass NE, et al. Patients’ Views Concerning Research on Medical Practices: Implications for Consent. AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2016;7(2):76-91.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bradley EH, Curry LA, Devers KJ. Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Serv Res. 2007;42(4):1758-72.CrossRef Bradley EH, Curry LA, Devers KJ. Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Serv Res. 2007;42(4):1758-72.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Fallowfield L, Jenkins V. Communicating sad, bad, and difficult news in medicine. Lancet. 2004;363(9405):312-9.CrossRef Fallowfield L, Jenkins V. Communicating sad, bad, and difficult news in medicine. Lancet. 2004;363(9405):312-9.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Coffey M, Espin S, Hahmann T, Clairman H, Lo L, Friedman JN, et al. Parent Preferences for Medical Error Disclosure: A Qualitative Study. Hosp Pediatr. 2017;7(1):24-30.PubMed Coffey M, Espin S, Hahmann T, Clairman H, Lo L, Friedman JN, et al. Parent Preferences for Medical Error Disclosure: A Qualitative Study. Hosp Pediatr. 2017;7(1):24-30.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Kang SK, Spector-Bagdady K, Caplan AL, Braithwaite RS. Exome and Genome Sequencing and Parallels in Radiology: Searching for Patient-Centered Management of Incidental and Secondary Findings. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016;13(12 Pt A):1467-72.CrossRef Kang SK, Spector-Bagdady K, Caplan AL, Braithwaite RS. Exome and Genome Sequencing and Parallels in Radiology: Searching for Patient-Centered Management of Incidental and Secondary Findings. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016;13(12 Pt A):1467-72.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Wouters RHP, Cornelis C, Newson AJ, Bunnik EM, Bredenoord AL. Scanning the body, sequencing the genome: Dealing with unsolicited findings. Bioethics. 2017;31(9):648-56.CrossRef Wouters RHP, Cornelis C, Newson AJ, Bunnik EM, Bredenoord AL. Scanning the body, sequencing the genome: Dealing with unsolicited findings. Bioethics. 2017;31(9):648-56.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Pet DB, Holm IA, Williams JL, Myers MF, Novak LL, Brothers KB, et al. Physicians’ perspectives on receiving unsolicited genomic results. Genet Med. 2019;21(2):311-8.CrossRef Pet DB, Holm IA, Williams JL, Myers MF, Novak LL, Brothers KB, et al. Physicians’ perspectives on receiving unsolicited genomic results. Genet Med. 2019;21(2):311-8.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference de Boer AW, Drewes YM, de Mutsert R, Numans ME, den Heijer M, Dekkers OM, et al. Incidental findings in research: A focus group study about the perspective of the research participant. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018;47(1):230-7.CrossRef de Boer AW, Drewes YM, de Mutsert R, Numans ME, den Heijer M, Dekkers OM, et al. Incidental findings in research: A focus group study about the perspective of the research participant. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018;47(1):230-7.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Patients’ Views About the Disclosure of Collateral Findings in Pragmatic Clinical Trials: a Focus Group Study
Authors
Juli M. Bollinger, MS
Gail Geller, ScD, MHS
Kevin Weinfurt, PhD
Elizabeth May, MA
Stephanie R. Morain, PhD, MPH
Debra J. H. Mathews, PhD, MA
Jeremy Sugarman, MD, MPH, MA
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 12/2020
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06113-5

Other articles of this Issue 12/2020

Journal of General Internal Medicine 12/2020 Go to the issue