Top

Published in:

01-10-2020 | Original Research

Advanced Notification Calls Prior to Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Test in Previously Screened Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Authors: Briton Lee, MD, Shreya Patel, MD, MPH, Carly Rachocki, MPH, Rachel Issaka, MD, MAS, Eric Vittinghoff, PhD, Jean A. Shapiro, PhD, Uri Ladabaum, MD, MS, Ma Somsouk, MD, MAS

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 10/2020

Abstract

Background

Phone calls as part of multimodal fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach are effective but resource-intensive. Previous studies of advanced notification calls before FIT mailing have not differentiated patients’ prior screening status.

Objective

To determine the effectiveness of a phone call preceding mailing of a FIT kit on test completion rate for patients who have completed a prior FIT.

Design

Randomized controlled trial nested within a larger study. All patients were assigned to receive organized mailed FIT outreach in the larger study.

Participants

Patients in a safety-net health setting ages 50–75 years old with a previously negative FIT.

Interventions

Patients were assigned to either receive an advanced notification phone call or no phone call preceding a mailed FIT kit. Both groups received an informational postcard prior to the mailed FIT.

Main Measures

The primary outcome was FIT completion rate at 1 year. The secondary outcomes were FIT completion rates at 60, 90, and 180 days, rates stratified by demographic subgroups, and rates according to outcome of the phone call.

Key Results

A total of 1645 patients were assigned to advanced notification calls and 1595 were assigned to no call preceding the FIT mailing. Although FIT completion rate was higher at day 60 (55.5% vs. 50.8%, p < 0.01), an advanced notification call did not significantly improve FIT completion at 1 year (70.9% vs. 69.9%, p = 0.52). Of the patients assigned to receive an advanced notification call, 90.5% were spoken with or left a voicemail; patients who were spoken with were more likely to complete a FIT at 1 year compared with patients who were only left a voicemail or could not be left a voicemail (79.9% vs. 69.2% vs. 49.6%, p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Advanced notification phone calls prior to FIT mailing did not improve rates at 1 year for patients with a previously negative FIT.

Available only for authorised users

Singal AG, Gupta S, Tiro JA, et al. Outreach Invitations for FIT and Colonoscopy Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates: A Randomized Controlled Trial in a Safety-Net Health System. Cancer. 2016;122(3):456-463. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29770CrossRefPubMed

Chiu H-M, Chen SL-S, Yen AM-F, et al. Effectiveness of Fecal Immunochemical Testing in Reducing Colorectal Cancer Mortality from the One Million Taiwanese Screening Program. Cancer. 2015;121(18):3221-3229. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29462CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Levin TR, Corley DA, Jensen CD, et al. Effects of Organized Colorectal Cancer Screening on Cancer Incidence and Mortality in a Large Community-Based Population. Gastroenterology. 2018;155(5):1383-1391.e5. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2018.07.017CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Lara CL, Means KL, Morwood KD, et al. Colorectal Cancer Screening Interventions in 2 Health Care Systems Serving Disadvantaged Populations: Screening Uptake and Cost-effectiveness. Cancer. 2018;124(21):4130-4136. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.31691CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Dougherty MK, Brenner AT, Crockett SD, et al. Evaluation of Interventions Intended to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(12):1645-1658. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4637CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Cancer Screening: Multicomponent Interventions—Colorectal Cancer. The Guide to Community Preventive Services (The Community Guide). https://www.thecommunityguide.org/findings/cancer-screening-multicomponent-interventions-colorectal-cancer. Published February 9, 2017.

Issaka RB, Avila P, Whitaker E, Bent S, Somsouk M. Population Health Interventions to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening by Fecal Immunochemical Tests: A Systematic Review. Prev Med. 2019;118:113-121. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.10.021CrossRefPubMed

Lofters AK, Vahabi M, Prakash V, et al. Lay Health Educators Within Primary Care Practices to Improve Cancer Screening Uptake for South Asian Patients: Challenges in Quality Improvement. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017;11:495-503. doi:https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S127147CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Nielson CM, Rivelli JS, Fuoco MJ, et al. Effectiveness of Automated and Live Phone Reminders after Mailed-FIT Outreach in a Pilot Randomized Trial. Prev Med Rep. 2018;12:210-213. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.10.012CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Kiran T, Davie S, Moineddin R, Lofters A. Mailed Letter Versus Phone Call to Increase Uptake of Cancer Screening: A Pragmatic, Randomized Trial. J Am Board Fam Med JABFM. 2018;31(6):857-868. doi:https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2018.06.170369CrossRefPubMed

11.

Kempe KL, Shetterly SM, France EK, Levin TR. Automated phone and mail population outreach to promote colorectal cancer screening. Am J Manag Care. 2012;18(7):370-378.PubMed

12.

Mosen DM, Feldstein AC, Perrin N, et al. Automated Telephone Calls Improved Completion of Fecal Occult Blood Testing. Med Care. 2010;48(7):604-610. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181dbdce7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Basch CE, Wolf RL, Brouse CH, et al. Telephone Outreach to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening in an Urban Minority Population. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(12):2246-2253. doi:https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2005.067223CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Levy BT, Xu Y, Daly JM, Ely JW. A Randomized Controlled Trial to Improve Colon Cancer Screening in Rural Family Medicine: an Iowa Research Network (IRENE) Study. J Am Board Fam Med JABFM. 2013;26(5):486-497. doi:https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2013.05.130041CrossRefPubMed

15.

Baker DW, Brown T, Buchanan DR, et al. Comparative Effectiveness of a Multifaceted Intervention to Improve Adherence to Annual Colorectal Cancer Screening in Community Health Centers: a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(8):1235-1241. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.2352CrossRefPubMed

16.

Myers RE, Sifri R, Hyslop T, et al. A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Impact of Targeted and Tailored Interventions on Colorectal Cancer Screening. Cancer. 2007;110(9):2083-2091. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23022CrossRefPubMed

17.

Goldman SN, Liss DT, Brown T, et al. Comparative Effectiveness of Multifaceted Outreach to Initiate Colorectal Cancer Screening in Community Health Centers: a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(8):1178-1184. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-015-3234-5CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Rossi PG, Grazzini G, Anti M, et al. Direct Mailing of Faecal Occult Blood Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening: a Randomized Population Study from Central Italy. J Med Screen. 2011;18(3):121-127. doi:https://doi.org/10.1258/jms.2011.011009CrossRef

19.

Cole SR, Smith A, Wilson C, Turnbull D, Esterman A, Young GP. An Advance Notification Letter Increases Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening. J Med Screen. 2007;14(2):73-75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1258/096914107781261927CrossRefPubMed

20.

van Roon AHC, Hol L, Wilschut JA, et al. Advance Notification Letters Increase Adherence in Colorectal Cancer Screening: a Population-Based Randomized Trial. Prev Med. 2011;52(6):448-451. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.01.032CrossRefPubMed

21.

Senore C, Ederle A, DePretis G, et al. Invitation Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening Programmes: The Impact of an Advance Notification Letter. Prev Med. 2015;73:106-111. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.01.005CrossRefPubMed

22.

Somsouk M, Rachocki C, Mannalithara A, et al. Effectiveness and Cost of Organized Outreach for Colorectal Cancer Screening: a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. June 2019. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djz110

23.

Fedewa SA, Corley DA, Jensen CD, et al. Colorectal Cancer Screening Initiation After Age 50 Years in an Organized Program. Am J Prev Med. 2017;53(3):335-344. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2017.02.018CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Liss DT, Baker DW. Understanding Current Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening in the United States: the Contribution of Socioeconomic Status and Access to Care. Am J Prev Med. 2014;46(3):228-236. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2013.10.023CrossRefPubMed

25.

Morris NS, Field TS, Wagner JL, et al. The Association Between Health Literacy and Cancer-Related Attitudes, Behaviors, and Knowledge. J Health Commun. 2013;18 Suppl 1:223-241. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2013.825667CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Lopez-Class M, Luta G, Noone A-M, et al. Patient and Provider Factors Associated with Colorectal Cancer Screening in Safety Net Clinics Serving Low-Income, Urban Immigrant Latinos. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2012;23(3):1011-1019. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2012.0109CrossRefPubMed

27.

Wu Y, Liang Y, Zhou Q, et al. Effectiveness of a Short Message Service Intervention to Motivate People with Positive Results in Preliminary Colorectal Cancer Screening to Undergo Colonoscopy: a Randomized Controlled Trial. Cancer. March 2019. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32043

Title: Advanced Notification Calls Prior to Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Test in Previously Screened Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Authors: Briton Lee, MD
Shreya Patel, MD, MPH
Carly Rachocki, MPH
Rachel Issaka, MD, MAS
Eric Vittinghoff, PhD
Jean A. Shapiro, PhD
Uri Ladabaum, MD, MS
Ma Somsouk, MD, MAS
Publication date: 01-10-2020
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 10/2020
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06009-4

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Heart Failure Video

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Advanced Notification Calls Prior to Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Test in Previously Screened Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

Background

Objective

Design

Participants

Interventions

Main Measures

Key Results

Conclusions

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Semaglutide benefits people with type 2 diabetes and obesity-related heart failure

Incentivised to exercise

New intervention for STEMI-related cardiogenic shock

» View more highlights on the ACC 2024 congress hub page

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Objective

Design

Participants

Interventions

Main Measures

Key Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 10/2020

Mobility and Mortality During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Characterization of Patients Who Return to Hospital Following Discharge from Hospitalization for COVID-19

Trends in Ambulatory Electronic Consultations During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Dealing with the Lack of Time for Detailed Shared Decision-making in Primary Care: Everyday Shared Decision-making

When Is It Safe to See the Doctor?

Blackface in White Space: Using Admissions to Address Racism in Medical Education

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Semaglutide benefits people with type 2 diabetes and obesity-related heart failure

Incentivised to exercise

New intervention for STEMI-related cardiogenic shock

» View more highlights on the ACC 2024 congress hub page