Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 6/2020

01-06-2020 | Care | Original Research

The Relationship Between Follow-up Appointments and Access to Primary Care

Authors: Megan E. Price, MS, Nicolae Done, PhD, Steven D. Pizer, PhD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 6/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Health care operations managers need to balance scheduling frequent follow-ups for patients with chronic conditions and fitting in patients requiring care for new complaints.

Objective

We quantify how frequency of follow-up visits corresponds with access to care for patients receiving care from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).

Design

We use patient data collected between October 2013 and June 2016 by the Survey of Healthcare Experiences of Patients (SHEP). Our sample is comprised of 94,496 patients. We estimate logistic models with 1-month lagged facility-level predictors.

Main Measures

We calculate monthly measures characterizing facility-level service provision, including the average time between successive primary care visits, the average primary care visit length, the percentage of primary care appointments that are overbooked, the percent of visits that are unscheduled (i.e., walk-ins), and the ratio of patients to providers. We control for economic factors that are associated with health care supply and demand, including median household income, veteran priority status, the Zillow Housing Price Index, and veteran unemployment rates. We also control for patient demographics.

Patients

We restrict the data to patients with at least one in-person primary care visit who have provided information on their ability to access urgent and routine care.

Key Results

We find that shorter average follow-up times are associated with better access for patients needing urgent or routine care. A 1-month increase in the average time between successive primary care visits is associated with 10% (p < 0.001) lower odds of reporting being able to access urgent care within 1 day and 13% (p < 0.001) lower odds of reporting usually or always being able to access routine care when needed.

Conclusion

Facilities with higher average follow-up times are more likely to have patients report that they are unable to quickly access urgent or routine primary care.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine. (2001). Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine. Institute of Medicine. (2001). Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine.
2.
go back to reference Pizer SD, Davies ML, Prentice JC. Consult Coordination Affects Patient Experience. Am J Account Care. 2017. Pizer SD, Davies ML, Prentice JC. Consult Coordination Affects Patient Experience. Am J Account Care. 2017.
3.
go back to reference Prentice, J. C., & Pizer, S. D. (2007). Delayed access to health care and mortality. Health Serv Res, 42(2):644–62.CrossRef Prentice, J. C., & Pizer, S. D. (2007). Delayed access to health care and mortality. Health Serv Res, 42(2):644–62.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Yee, C. A., Minegishi, T., Frakt, A. B., & Pizer, S. D. (2019). Optimizing Resource Allocation in a Public Delivery System: Evidence from the Veterans Health Administration. Boston, MA: Partnered Evidence Based Policy Resource Center; VA Boston Healthcare System. Yee, C. A., Minegishi, T., Frakt, A. B., & Pizer, S. D. (2019). Optimizing Resource Allocation in a Public Delivery System: Evidence from the Veterans Health Administration. Boston, MA: Partnered Evidence Based Policy Resource Center; VA Boston Healthcare System.
5.
go back to reference Love, M., & Mainous, A. (1999). Commitment to a regular physician: how long will patients wait to see their own physician for acute illness? J Fam Pract, 48: 202–207.PubMed Love, M., & Mainous, A. (1999). Commitment to a regular physician: how long will patients wait to see their own physician for acute illness? J Fam Pract, 48: 202–207.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Kerr, E. A., Hays, R. D., Mitchison, A., Lee, M., & Siu, A. L. (1999). The Influence of Gatekeeping and Utilization Review on Patient Satisfaction. J Gen Intern Med, 287–296. Kerr, E. A., Hays, R. D., Mitchison, A., Lee, M., & Siu, A. L. (1999). The Influence of Gatekeeping and Utilization Review on Patient Satisfaction. J Gen Intern Med, 287–296.
7.
go back to reference Linn, M., Linn, B., & Stein, S. (1982). Satisfaction with ambulatory care and compliance in older patients. Med Care, 20: 606–14.CrossRef Linn, M., Linn, B., & Stein, S. (1982). Satisfaction with ambulatory care and compliance in older patients. Med Care, 20: 606–14.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Trivedi AN, Wilson IB., Charlton ME, Kizer KW. Agreement Between HEDIS Performance Assessments in the VA and Medicare Advantage: Is Quality in the Eye of the Beholder? INQUIRY. 2016. Trivedi AN, Wilson IB., Charlton ME, Kizer KW. Agreement Between HEDIS Performance Assessments in the VA and Medicare Advantage: Is Quality in the Eye of the Beholder? INQUIRY. 2016.
9.
go back to reference Department of Veterans Affairs. (2014). VHA Handbook 1101.10 Patient Aligned Care Team (PACT) Handbook. Washington, DC: Department of Veterans Affairs. Department of Veterans Affairs. (2014). VHA Handbook 1101.10 Patient Aligned Care Team (PACT) Handbook. Washington, DC: Department of Veterans Affairs.
11.
go back to reference StataCorp. (2015). Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. College Station, TX. StataCorp. (2015). Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. College Station, TX.
12.
go back to reference Prentice, J. C., Davies, M. L., & Pizer, S. D. (2013). Which Outpatient Wait-Time Measures Are Related to Patient Satisfaction? Am J Med Qual, 227–235. Prentice, J. C., Davies, M. L., & Pizer, S. D. (2013). Which Outpatient Wait-Time Measures Are Related to Patient Satisfaction? Am J Med Qual, 227–235.
13.
go back to reference Legler, A., Price, M., Parikh, M., Nebeker, J., Ward, M., Wedemeyer, L., & Pizer, S. (2019). Effect on VA Patient Satisfaction of Provider's Use of an Integrated Viewer of Multiple Electronic Health Records. J Gen Intern Med, 132–36. Legler, A., Price, M., Parikh, M., Nebeker, J., Ward, M., Wedemeyer, L., & Pizer, S. (2019). Effect on VA Patient Satisfaction of Provider's Use of an Integrated Viewer of Multiple Electronic Health Records. J Gen Intern Med, 132–36.
15.
go back to reference Hantke, N., Lajoy, M., Gould, C., Magwene, E., Sordahl, J., Hirst, R., & O'Hara, R. (2019). Patient Satisfaction with Geriatric Psychiatry Services via Video Teleconference. Am J Geriatric Psychiatry. Hantke, N., Lajoy, M., Gould, C., Magwene, E., Sordahl, J., Hirst, R., & O'Hara, R. (2019). Patient Satisfaction with Geriatric Psychiatry Services via Video Teleconference. Am J Geriatric Psychiatry.
16.
go back to reference Congress of the United States of America. (2018). VA Mission Act of 2018. Washington, DC: Congress of the United States of America. Congress of the United States of America. (2018). VA Mission Act of 2018. Washington, DC: Congress of the United States of America.
Metadata
Title
The Relationship Between Follow-up Appointments and Access to Primary Care
Authors
Megan E. Price, MS
Nicolae Done, PhD
Steven D. Pizer, PhD
Publication date
01-06-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Keyword
Care
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 6/2020
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-05785-3

Other articles of this Issue 6/2020

Journal of General Internal Medicine 6/2020 Go to the issue