Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 7/2020

01-07-2020 | Care | Original Research

Use of Primary Care and Specialty Providers: Findings from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey

Author: Melissa A. Romaire, PhD, MPH

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 7/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A comprehensive picture of how the US population engages in specialty care use is lacking, even though redesign models focused on specialty care are becoming more popular.

Objective

To describe the type of provider, primary care or specialist, most often seen by individuals, to test associations between type of provider most often seen and insurance coverage, and to test associations between the number of generalist and specialist visits and insurance coverage.

Design

Cross-sectional analysis of 2013–2016 Medicaid Expenditure Panel Survey. Logistic and negative binomial models were used in multivariate regression modeling.

Participants

Depending on the analysis, the study samples include between 71,402 and 79,518 US residents.

Main Measures

Individuals’ provider type most often seen, primary care visits, and specialist visits were reported.

Key Results

More than half of the sample (55%) predominantly visited primary care providers (or generalists), and 36% predominantly visited specialists. Among individuals primarily visiting generalists, 80% visited only one type of primary care provider, and 24% also visited one or more specialists. Among individuals primarily visiting specialists, 48% visited only one type of specialist, and 47% did not visit any generalists in the year. Among Medicare enrollees, 50% predominantly visited specialists, and 40% predominantly visited generalists. Medicare enrollment was associated with greater odds of predominantly visiting specialists (p < 0.05), and Medicare-Medicaid enrollment and having no insurance were associated with lower odds of predominantly visiting specialists (p < 0.05). Medicare enrollment was associated with 13% more generalist visits and 35% more specialist visits, and Medicare-Medicaid enrollment was associated with 38% more generalist visits and 15% more specialist visits (all p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Given the overall frequency of specialty care use and the reliance on multiple specialists in any given year, particularly among Medicare enrollees, public payers are uniquely positioned to promote specialty care redesign and champion improved coordination between specialists.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Starfeld B. Primary Care: Balancing Health Needs, Services, and Technology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998. Starfeld B. Primary Care: Balancing Health Needs, Services, and Technology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.
20.
go back to reference Zuckerman S, Skopec L, Epstein M. Medicaid Physician Fees after the ACA Primary Care Fee Bump. Washington, DC: Urban Institute; 2017. Zuckerman S, Skopec L, Epstein M. Medicaid Physician Fees after the ACA Primary Care Fee Bump. Washington, DC: Urban Institute; 2017.
22.
go back to reference National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA). NCQA Patient-Centered Specialty Practice (PCSP) Standards and Guidelines. 1 ed. Washington, DC: National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA); 2019. National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA). NCQA Patient-Centered Specialty Practice (PCSP) Standards and Guidelines. 1 ed. Washington, DC: National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA); 2019.
Metadata
Title
Use of Primary Care and Specialty Providers: Findings from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey
Author
Melissa A. Romaire, PhD, MPH
Publication date
01-07-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Keyword
Care
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 7/2020
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-05773-7

Other articles of this Issue 7/2020

Journal of General Internal Medicine 7/2020 Go to the issue