Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 5/2020

01-05-2020 | Original Research

Preventing Hospital Readmissions: Healthcare Providers’ Perspectives on “Impactibility” Beyond EHR 30-Day Readmission Risk Prediction

Authors: Natalie Flaks-Manov, MPH, PhDc, Einav Srulovici, PhD, Rina Yahalom, MD, Henia Perry-Mezre, MHA, Ran Balicer, PhD, Efrat Shadmi, PhD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 5/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Predictive models based on electronic health records (EHRs) are used to identify patients at high risk for 30-day hospital readmission. However, these models’ ability to accurately detect who could benefit from inclusion in prevention interventions, also termed “perceived impactibility”, has yet to be realized.

Objective

We aimed to explore healthcare providers’ perspectives of patient characteristics associated with decisions about which patients should be referred to readmission prevention programs (RPPs) beyond the EHR preadmission readmission detection model (PREADM).

Design

This cross-sectional study employed a multi-source mixed-method design, combining EHR data with nurses’ and physicians’ self-reported surveys from 15 internal medicine units in three general hospitals in Israel between May 2016 and June 2017, using a mini-Delphi approach.

Participants

Nurses and physicians were asked to provide information about patients 65 years or older who were hospitalized at least one night.

Main Measures

We performed a decision-tree analysis to identify characteristics for consideration when deciding whether a patient should be included in an RPP.

Key Results

We collected 817 questionnaires on 435 patients. PREADM score and RPP inclusion were congruent in 65% of patients, whereas 19% had a high PREADM score but were not referred to an RPP, and 16% had a low-medium PREADM score but were referred to an RPP. The decision-tree analysis identified five patient characteristics that were statistically associated with RPP referral: high PREADM score, eligibility for a nursing home, having a condition not under control, need for social-services support, and need for special equipment at home.

Conclusions

Our study provides empirical evidence for the partial congruence between classifications of a high PREADM score and perceived impactibility. Findings emphasize the need for additional research to understand the extent to which combining EHR data with provider insights leads to better selection of patients for RPP inclusion.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kansagara D, Englander H, Salanitro A, et al. Risk prediction models for hospital readmission: a systematic review. JAMA. 2011;306:1688–98.CrossRef Kansagara D, Englander H, Salanitro A, et al. Risk prediction models for hospital readmission: a systematic review. JAMA. 2011;306:1688–98.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hansen LO, Young RS, Hinami K, et al. Interventions to reduce 30-day rehospitalization: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:520–28.CrossRef Hansen LO, Young RS, Hinami K, et al. Interventions to reduce 30-day rehospitalization: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:520–28.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kripalani S, Theobald CN, Anctil B, et al. Reducing hospital readmission rates: current strategies and future directions. Annu Rev Med. 2014;65:471–85.CrossRef Kripalani S, Theobald CN, Anctil B, et al. Reducing hospital readmission rates: current strategies and future directions. Annu Rev Med. 2014;65:471–85.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Naylor MD, Shaid EC, Carpenter D, et al. Components of comprehensive and effective transitional care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017;5: 1119–25.CrossRef Naylor MD, Shaid EC, Carpenter D, et al. Components of comprehensive and effective transitional care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017;5: 1119–25.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Leppin AL, Gionfriddo MR, Kessler M, et al. Preventing 30-day hospital readmissions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174:1095–107.CrossRef Leppin AL, Gionfriddo MR, Kessler M, et al. Preventing 30-day hospital readmissions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174:1095–107.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Zhou H, Della PR, Roberts P, et al. Utility of models to predict 28-day or 30-day unplanned hospital readmissions: an updated systematic review. BMJ Open. 2016;6. Zhou H, Della PR, Roberts P, et al. Utility of models to predict 28-day or 30-day unplanned hospital readmissions: an updated systematic review. BMJ Open. 2016;6.
7.
go back to reference Lewis GH. “Impactibility models”: identifying the subgroup of high-risk patients most amenable to hospital-avoidance programs. Milbank Q. 2010; 88:240–55.CrossRef Lewis GH. “Impactibility models”: identifying the subgroup of high-risk patients most amenable to hospital-avoidance programs. Milbank Q. 2010; 88:240–55.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Jackson C, DuBard A. It’s all about impactability! Optimizing targeting for care management of complex patients. Community Care of North Carolina. 2015. Jackson C, DuBard A. It’s all about impactability! Optimizing targeting for care management of complex patients. Community Care of North Carolina. 2015.
9.
go back to reference Steventon A, Billings J. Preventing hospital readmissions: the importance of considering ‘impactibility,’ not just predicted risk. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017;26:782–5.CrossRef Steventon A, Billings J. Preventing hospital readmissions: the importance of considering ‘impactibility,’ not just predicted risk. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017;26:782–5.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Freund T, Mahler C, Erler A, et al. Identification of patients likely to benefit from care management programs. Am J Manag Care. 2011;17:345–352.PubMed Freund T, Mahler C, Erler A, et al. Identification of patients likely to benefit from care management programs. Am J Manag Care. 2011;17:345–352.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Shadmi E, Flaks-Manov N, Hoshen M, et al. Predicting 30-day readmissions with preadmission electronic health record data. Med Care. 2015;53:283–89.CrossRef Shadmi E, Flaks-Manov N, Hoshen M, et al. Predicting 30-day readmissions with preadmission electronic health record data. Med Care. 2015;53:283–89.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Armstrong JS. (2008). Methods to elicit forecasts from groups: Delphi and prediction markets compared. Available at SSRN 1153124. Armstrong JS. (2008). Methods to elicit forecasts from groups: Delphi and prediction markets compared. Available at SSRN 1153124.
13.
go back to reference Khosrow-Pour M. Encyclopedia of information science and technology 2005; IGI Global. Khosrow-Pour M. Encyclopedia of information science and technology 2005; IGI Global.
14.
go back to reference Eubank BH, Mohtadi NG, Lafave MR, et al. Using the modified Delphi method to establish clinical consensus for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with rotator cuff pathology. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16:56.CrossRef Eubank BH, Mohtadi NG, Lafave MR, et al. Using the modified Delphi method to establish clinical consensus for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with rotator cuff pathology. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16:56.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Skulmoski GJ, Hartman FT, Krahn J. The Delphi method for graduate research. J Inf Technol Educ Res. 2007;6:1–21. Skulmoski GJ, Hartman FT, Krahn J. The Delphi method for graduate research. J Inf Technol Educ Res. 2007;6:1–21.
16.
go back to reference Song YY, Ying LU. Decision tree methods: applications for classification and prediction. Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2015;27(2):130.PubMedPubMedCentral Song YY, Ying LU. Decision tree methods: applications for classification and prediction. Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2015;27(2):130.PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Flaks-Manov N, Topaz M, Hoshen M, et al. Identifying patients at highest-risk: the best timing to apply a readmission predictive model. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019;19(1):118.CrossRef Flaks-Manov N, Topaz M, Hoshen M, et al. Identifying patients at highest-risk: the best timing to apply a readmission predictive model. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019;19(1):118.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Balicer RD, Shadmi E, Israeli A. Interventions for reducing readmissions–are we barking up the right tree? Isr J Health Policy Res. 2013;2(1):2.CrossRef Balicer RD, Shadmi E, Israeli A. Interventions for reducing readmissions–are we barking up the right tree? Isr J Health Policy Res. 2013;2(1):2.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Shadmi E, Zeltzer D, Flaks-Manov N, et al. Reducing readmission rates: evidence from a large intervention in Israel. The Practice of Patient Centered Care: Empowering and Engaging Patients in the Digital Era, vol 244; 2017:109. Shadmi E, Zeltzer D, Flaks-Manov N, et al. Reducing readmission rates: evidence from a large intervention in Israel. The Practice of Patient Centered Care: Empowering and Engaging Patients in the Digital Era, vol 244; 2017:109.
20.
go back to reference Creswell JW, Clark VLP. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications, 2017. Creswell JW, Clark VLP. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications, 2017.
21.
go back to reference Cook TD, Campbell DT, Shadish W. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin 2002. Cook TD, Campbell DT, Shadish W. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin 2002.
22.
go back to reference Masyn KE, Little T. The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods in psychology. 2013. Masyn KE, Little T. The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods in psychology. 2013.
Metadata
Title
Preventing Hospital Readmissions: Healthcare Providers’ Perspectives on “Impactibility” Beyond EHR 30-Day Readmission Risk Prediction
Authors
Natalie Flaks-Manov, MPH, PhDc
Einav Srulovici, PhD
Rina Yahalom, MD
Henia Perry-Mezre, MHA
Ran Balicer, PhD
Efrat Shadmi, PhD
Publication date
01-05-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 5/2020
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-05739-9

Other articles of this Issue 5/2020

Journal of General Internal Medicine 5/2020 Go to the issue