Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 6/2020

01-06-2020 | Original Research

Differences in the Complexity of Office Visits by Physician Specialty: NAMCS 2013–2016

Authors: John D. Goodson, M.D., Sara Shahbazi, Ph.D., Karthik Rao, M.D., Zirui Song, M.D., Ph.D.

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 6/2020

Login to get access

ABSTRACT

Background

Specialty-to-specialty variation in use of outpatient evaluation and management service codes could lead to important differences in reimbursement among specialties.

Objective

To compare the complexity of visits to physicians whose incomes are largely dependent on evaluation and management services to the complexity of visits to physicians whose incomes are largely dependent on procedures.

Design, Setting, and Participants

We analyzed 53,670 established patient outpatient visits reported by physicians in the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) from 2013 to 2016. We defined high complexity visits as those with an above average number of diagnoses (> 2) and/or medications (> 3) listed We based our comparison on time intervals corresponding to typical outpatient evaluation and management times as defined by the Current Procedural Terminology Manual and specialty utilization of evaluation and management codes based on 2015 Medicare payments.

Main Outcome and Measures

Proportion of complex visits by specialty category.

Key Results

We found significant differences in the content of similar-length office visits provided by different specialties. For level 4 established outpatient visits (99214), the percentage involving high diagnostic complexity ranged from 62% for internal medicine, 52% for family medicine/general practice, and 41% for neurology (specialties whose incomes are largely dependent on evaluation and management codes), to 34% for dermatology, 42% for ophthalmology, and 25% for orthopedic surgery (specialties whose incomes are more dependent on procedure codes) (p value of the difference < 0.001). High medication complexity was found in the following proportions of visits: internal medicine 56%, family medicine/general practice 49%, and neurology 43%, as compared with dermatology 33%, ophthalmology 30%, and orthopedic surgery 30% (p value of the difference < 0.001).

Conclusion

Within the same duration visits, specialties whose incomes depend more on evaluation and management codes on average addressed more clinical issues and managed more medications than specialties whose incomes are more dependent on procedures.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kumetz EA, Goodson JD. The Undervaluation of Evaluation and Management Professional Services: The Lasting Impact of Current Procedural Terminology Code Deficiencies on Physician Payment. Chest. 2013;144(3):740–745.CrossRef Kumetz EA, Goodson JD. The Undervaluation of Evaluation and Management Professional Services: The Lasting Impact of Current Procedural Terminology Code Deficiencies on Physician Payment. Chest. 2013;144(3):740–745.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Landon BE. A Step toward Protecting Payments for Primary Care. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(6):507–510.CrossRef Landon BE. A Step toward Protecting Payments for Primary Care. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(6):507–510.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Abbo ED, Zhang Q, Zelder M, et al. The increasing number of clinical items addressed during the time of adult primary care visits. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(12):2058–2065.CrossRef Abbo ED, Zhang Q, Zelder M, et al. The increasing number of clinical items addressed during the time of adult primary care visits. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(12):2058–2065.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Katerndahl D, Wood R, Jaen CR. Complexity of ambulatory care across disciplines. Healthc (Amst). 2015;3(2):89–96.CrossRef Katerndahl D, Wood R, Jaen CR. Complexity of ambulatory care across disciplines. Healthc (Amst). 2015;3(2):89–96.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Horner RD, Matthews G, Yi MS. A conceptual model of physician work intensity: guidance for evaluating policies and practices to improve health care delivery. Med Care. 2012;50(8):654–661.CrossRef Horner RD, Matthews G, Yi MS. A conceptual model of physician work intensity: guidance for evaluating policies and practices to improve health care delivery. Med Care. 2012;50(8):654–661.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Katerndahl DA, Wood R, Jaen CR. A method for estimating relative complexity of ambulatory care. Ann Fam Med. 2010;8(4):341–347.CrossRef Katerndahl DA, Wood R, Jaen CR. A method for estimating relative complexity of ambulatory care. Ann Fam Med. 2010;8(4):341–347.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Horner RD, Szaflarski JP, Jacobson CJ, et al. Clinical work intensity among physician specialties: how might we assess it? What do we find? Med Care. 2011;49(1):108–113.CrossRef Horner RD, Szaflarski JP, Jacobson CJ, et al. Clinical work intensity among physician specialties: how might we assess it? What do we find? Med Care. 2011;49(1):108–113.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference George J, Phun YT, Bailey MJ, Kong DC, Stewart K. Development and validation of the medication regimen complexity index. Ann Pharmacother. 2004;38(9):1369–1376.CrossRef George J, Phun YT, Bailey MJ, Kong DC, Stewart K. Development and validation of the medication regimen complexity index. Ann Pharmacother. 2004;38(9):1369–1376.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Goodson JD, Song Z, Shahbazi S. Physician Payment Disparities and Access to Services—A Look Across Specialties. J Gen Intern Med. 2019. Accepted for publication. Goodson JD, Song Z, Shahbazi S. Physician Payment Disparities and Access to Services—A Look Across Specialties. J Gen Intern Med. 2019. Accepted for publication.
11.
go back to reference National Center for Health Statistics. 2016 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) micro-data file documentation. Hyattsville, MD. . National Center for Health Statistics. 2016 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) micro-data file documentation. Hyattsville, MD. .
15.
go back to reference Muir AJ, Sanders LL, Wilkinson WE, Schmader K. Reducing medication regimen complexity: a controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(2):77–82.CrossRef Muir AJ, Sanders LL, Wilkinson WE, Schmader K. Reducing medication regimen complexity: a controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(2):77–82.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Linnebur, SA, Vande Griend, J, Metz, K. Patient-level medication regimen complexity in older adults with depression. Clin Ther. 2014; 36(11): 1538–1546.CrossRef Linnebur, SA, Vande Griend, J, Metz, K. Patient-level medication regimen complexity in older adults with depression. Clin Ther. 2014; 36(11): 1538–1546.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Bazargan M, Smith J, Yazdanshenas H, Movassaghi M, Martins D, Orum G. Non-adherence to medication regimens among older African-American adults. BMC Geriatrics. 2017;17(1):163.CrossRef Bazargan M, Smith J, Yazdanshenas H, Movassaghi M, Martins D, Orum G. Non-adherence to medication regimens among older African-American adults. BMC Geriatrics. 2017;17(1):163.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Berenson RA, Goodson JD. Finding Value in Unexpected Places--Fixing the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(14):1306–1309.CrossRef Berenson RA, Goodson JD. Finding Value in Unexpected Places--Fixing the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(14):1306–1309.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Berenson RA, Ginsburg PB. Improving The Medicare Physician Fee Schedule: Make It Part Of Value-Based Payment. Health Aff (Millwood). 2019;38(2):246–252.CrossRef Berenson RA, Ginsburg PB. Improving The Medicare Physician Fee Schedule: Make It Part Of Value-Based Payment. Health Aff (Millwood). 2019;38(2):246–252.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Chan DC, Huynh J, Studdert DM. Accuracy of Valuations of Surgical Procedures in the Medicare Fee Schedule. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(16):1546–1554.CrossRef Chan DC, Huynh J, Studdert DM. Accuracy of Valuations of Surgical Procedures in the Medicare Fee Schedule. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(16):1546–1554.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference McCall N, Cromwell J, Braun P. Validation of physician survey estimates of surgical time using operating room logs. Med Care Res Rev. 2006;63(6):764–777.CrossRef McCall N, Cromwell J, Braun P. Validation of physician survey estimates of surgical time using operating room logs. Med Care Res Rev. 2006;63(6):764–777.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Goodson JD. Unintended consequences of resource-based relative value scale reimbursement. JAMA. 2007;298(19):2308–2310.CrossRef Goodson JD. Unintended consequences of resource-based relative value scale reimbursement. JAMA. 2007;298(19):2308–2310.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Berenson RA, Basch P, Sussex A. Revisiting E&M visit guidelines--a missing piece of payment reform. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(20):1892–1895.CrossRef Berenson RA, Basch P, Sussex A. Revisiting E&M visit guidelines--a missing piece of payment reform. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(20):1892–1895.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Schroeder SA, Frist W. Phasing out fee-for-service payment. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(21):2029–2032.CrossRef Schroeder SA, Frist W. Phasing out fee-for-service payment. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(21):2029–2032.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Katz S, Melmed G. How Relative Value Units Undervalue the Cognitive Physician Visit: A Focus on Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2016;12(4):240–244. Katz S, Melmed G. How Relative Value Units Undervalue the Cognitive Physician Visit: A Focus on Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2016;12(4):240–244.
Metadata
Title
Differences in the Complexity of Office Visits by Physician Specialty: NAMCS 2013–2016
Authors
John D. Goodson, M.D.
Sara Shahbazi, Ph.D.
Karthik Rao, M.D.
Zirui Song, M.D., Ph.D.
Publication date
01-06-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 6/2020
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05624-0

Other articles of this Issue 6/2020

Journal of General Internal Medicine 6/2020 Go to the issue