Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 9/2018

01-09-2018 | Original Research

Which Complex Patients Should Be Referred for Intensive Care Management? A Mixed-Methods Analysis

Authors: Maria E. Garcia, MD, MPH, MAS, Connie S. Uratsu, RN, MS, CNS, Julie Sandoval-Perry, MD, Richard W. Grant, MD, MPH

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 9/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A large and increasing proportion of health care costs are spent caring for a small segment of medically and socially complex patients. To date, it has been difficult to identify which patients are best served by intensive care management.

Objective

To characterize factors that best identify which complex patients are most suited for intensive care management.

Design

We conducted a mixed-methods study involving 35 care managers (CMs; 10 licensed social workers and 25 registered nurses) working in intensive care management programs within Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) outpatient medical centers. We asked CMs to review a randomly selected list of up to 50 patients referred to them in the prior year and to categorize each patient as either (1) “good candidates” for care management, (2) “not needing” intensive care management, or (3) “needing more” than traditional care management could provide. We then conducted semi-structured interviews to understand how CMs separated patients into these three groups.

Results

CMs assigned 1178 patients into the 3 referral categories. Less than two thirds (62%, n = 736) of referred patients were considered good candidates, with 18% (n = 216) categorized as not needing care management and 19% (n = 226) as needing more. Compared to the other two categories, good candidates were older (76.2 years vs. 73.2 for not needing and 69.8 for needing more, p < 0.001), prescribed more medications (p = 0.02) and had more prior year outpatient visits (p = 0.04), while the number of prior year hospital and emergency room admissions were greater than not needing but less than needing more (p < 0.001). A logistic regression model using available electronic record data predicted good candidate designation with a c statistic of 0.75. Several qualitative themes emerged that helped define appropriateness for referral, including availability of social support, patient motivation, non-medical transitions, recent trajectory of medical condition, and psychiatric or substance use issues.

Conclusion

Many apparently complex patients are not good candidates for intensive care management. Current electronic medical records do not capture several of the most salient characteristics that determine appropriateness for care management. Our findings suggest that systematic collection of social support, patient motivation, and recent non-medically related life change information may help identify which complex patients are most likely to benefit from care management.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cohen SB, Yu, W, The Concentration and Persistence in the Level of Health Expenditures over Time: Estimates for the U.S. Population, 2009-2010. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2012. Cohen SB, Yu, W, The Concentration and Persistence in the Level of Health Expenditures over Time: Estimates for the U.S. Population, 2009-2010. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2012.
3.
go back to reference Gurwitz JH, Field TS, Harrold LR, et al. Incidence and preventability of adverse drug events among older persons in the ambulatory setting. JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association 2003; 289:1107–16.CrossRefPubMed Gurwitz JH, Field TS, Harrold LR, et al. Incidence and preventability of adverse drug events among older persons in the ambulatory setting. JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association 2003; 289:1107–16.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Tinetti ME, McAvay G, Chang SS, et al. Effect of chronic disease-related symptoms and impairments on universal health outcomes in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2011; 59:1618–27.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tinetti ME, McAvay G, Chang SS, et al. Effect of chronic disease-related symptoms and impairments on universal health outcomes in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2011; 59:1618–27.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Fernandez A, Schillinger D, Warton EM, et al. Language barriers, physician-patient language concordance, and glycemic control among insured Latinos with diabetes: the Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE). J Gen Intern Med 2011; 26:170–6.CrossRefPubMed Fernandez A, Schillinger D, Warton EM, et al. Language barriers, physician-patient language concordance, and glycemic control among insured Latinos with diabetes: the Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE). J Gen Intern Med 2011; 26:170–6.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Karter AJ, Parker MM, Moffet HH, et al. Missed appointments and poor glycemic control: an opportunity to identify high-risk diabetic patients. Medical Care 2004; 42:110–5.CrossRefPubMed Karter AJ, Parker MM, Moffet HH, et al. Missed appointments and poor glycemic control: an opportunity to identify high-risk diabetic patients. Medical Care 2004; 42:110–5.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Wolff JL, Starfield B, Anderson G. Prevalence, expenditures, and complications of multiple chronic conditions in the elderly. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162:2269–76.CrossRefPubMed Wolff JL, Starfield B, Anderson G. Prevalence, expenditures, and complications of multiple chronic conditions in the elderly. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162:2269–76.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Galea S, Tracy M, Hoggatt KJ, Dimaggio C, Karpati A. Estimated deaths attributable to social factors in the United States. Am J Public Health 2011; 101:1456–65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Galea S, Tracy M, Hoggatt KJ, Dimaggio C, Karpati A. Estimated deaths attributable to social factors in the United States. Am J Public Health 2011; 101:1456–65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Mattke S, Mengistu T, Klautzer L, Sloss EM, Brook RH. Improving Care for Chronic Conditions: Current Practices and Future Trends in Health Plan Programs. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; 2016. Mattke S, Mengistu T, Klautzer L, Sloss EM, Brook RH. Improving Care for Chronic Conditions: Current Practices and Future Trends in Health Plan Programs. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; 2016.
10.
go back to reference McAlister FA, Lawson FM, Teo KK, Armstrong PW. A systematic review of randomized trials of disease management programs in heart failure. The American journal of medicine 2001; 110:378–84.CrossRefPubMed McAlister FA, Lawson FM, Teo KK, Armstrong PW. A systematic review of randomized trials of disease management programs in heart failure. The American journal of medicine 2001; 110:378–84.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Ahmed OI. Disease Management, Case Management, Care Management, and Care Coordination: A Framework and a Brief Manual for Care Programs and Staff. Prof Case Manag 2016; 21:137–46.PubMed Ahmed OI. Disease Management, Case Management, Care Management, and Care Coordination: A Framework and a Brief Manual for Care Programs and Staff. Prof Case Manag 2016; 21:137–46.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Joo JY, Huber DL. Scoping Review of Nursing Case Management in the United States. Clin Nurs Res 2017:1054773817717861. Joo JY, Huber DL. Scoping Review of Nursing Case Management in the United States. Clin Nurs Res 2017:1054773817717861.
13.
go back to reference Jack BW, Chetty VK, Anthony D, et al. A Reengineered Hospital Discharge Program to Decrease Rehospitalization: A Randomized Trial. Annals of Internal Medicine 2009; 150:178–87.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jack BW, Chetty VK, Anthony D, et al. A Reengineered Hospital Discharge Program to Decrease Rehospitalization: A Randomized Trial. Annals of Internal Medicine 2009; 150:178–87.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
15.
go back to reference Mayo NE, Scott S. Evaluating a complex intervention with a single outcome may not be a good idea: an example from a randomised trial of stroke case management. Age Ageing 2011; 40:718–24.CrossRefPubMed Mayo NE, Scott S. Evaluating a complex intervention with a single outcome may not be a good idea: an example from a randomised trial of stroke case management. Age Ageing 2011; 40:718–24.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Peikes D, Chen A, Schore J, Brown R. Effects of care coordination on hospitalization, quality of care, and health care expenditures among Medicare beneficiaries: 15 randomized trials. JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association 2009; 301:603–18.CrossRefPubMed Peikes D, Chen A, Schore J, Brown R. Effects of care coordination on hospitalization, quality of care, and health care expenditures among Medicare beneficiaries: 15 randomized trials. JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association 2009; 301:603–18.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Boult C, Reider L, Leff B, et al. The effect of guided care teams on the use of health services: results from a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Archives of internal medicine 2011; 171:460–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Boult C, Reider L, Leff B, et al. The effect of guided care teams on the use of health services: results from a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Archives of internal medicine 2011; 171:460–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Hickam DH, Weiss, J.W., Guise, J-M., Buckley, D., Motu'apuaka, M., Graham, E., Wasson, N., Saha, S. Outpatient Case Management for Adults With Medical Illness and Complex Care Needs AHRQ; 2013. Hickam DH, Weiss, J.W., Guise, J-M., Buckley, D., Motu'apuaka, M., Graham, E., Wasson, N., Saha, S. Outpatient Case Management for Adults With Medical Illness and Complex Care Needs AHRQ; 2013.
19.
go back to reference Moffet HH, Adler N, Schillinger D, et al. Cohort Profile: The Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE)--objectives and design of a survey follow-up study of social health disparities in a managed care population. Int J Epidemiol 2009; 38:38–47.CrossRefPubMed Moffet HH, Adler N, Schillinger D, et al. Cohort Profile: The Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE)--objectives and design of a survey follow-up study of social health disparities in a managed care population. Int J Epidemiol 2009; 38:38–47.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Patton MQ. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1990. Patton MQ. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1990.
21.
go back to reference Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 2007; 19:349–57.CrossRefPubMed Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 2007; 19:349–57.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Devers KJ. How will we know "good" qualitative research when we see it? Beginning the dialogue in health services research. Health services research 1999; 34:1153–88.PubMedPubMedCentral Devers KJ. How will we know "good" qualitative research when we see it? Beginning the dialogue in health services research. Health services research 1999; 34:1153–88.PubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Shtatland ES, Barton MB, Cain E. The Perils of Stepwise Logistic Regression and How to Escape Them Using Information Criteria and the Output Delivery System. In: 26th SAS Users Group International Conference. Long Beach, CA; 2001. Shtatland ES, Barton MB, Cain E. The Perils of Stepwise Logistic Regression and How to Escape Them Using Information Criteria and the Output Delivery System. In: 26th SAS Users Group International Conference. Long Beach, CA; 2001.
24.
go back to reference Westra BL, Subramanian A, Hart CM, et al. Achieving "meaningful use" of electronic health records through the integration of the Nursing Management Minimum Data Set. J Nurs Adm 2010; 40:336–43.CrossRefPubMed Westra BL, Subramanian A, Hart CM, et al. Achieving "meaningful use" of electronic health records through the integration of the Nursing Management Minimum Data Set. J Nurs Adm 2010; 40:336–43.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Kunkel DE, Westra BL, Hart CM, Subramanian A, Kenny S, Delaney CW. Updating and normalization of the Nursing Management Minimum Data Set element 6: patient/client accessibility. Comput Inform Nurs 2012; 30:134–41.CrossRefPubMed Kunkel DE, Westra BL, Hart CM, Subramanian A, Kenny S, Delaney CW. Updating and normalization of the Nursing Management Minimum Data Set element 6: patient/client accessibility. Comput Inform Nurs 2012; 30:134–41.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Adler NE, Stead WW. Patients in context--EHR capture of social and behavioral determinants of health. N Engl J Med 2015; 372:698–701.CrossRefPubMed Adler NE, Stead WW. Patients in context--EHR capture of social and behavioral determinants of health. N Engl J Med 2015; 372:698–701.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Pantell M, Rehkopf D, Jutte D, Syme SL, Balmes J, Adler N. Social isolation: a predictor of mortality comparable to traditional clinical risk factors. Am J Public Health 2013; 103:2056–62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pantell M, Rehkopf D, Jutte D, Syme SL, Balmes J, Adler N. Social isolation: a predictor of mortality comparable to traditional clinical risk factors. Am J Public Health 2013; 103:2056–62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Hibbard JH, Greene J. What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013; 32:207–14.CrossRef Hibbard JH, Greene J. What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013; 32:207–14.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Which Complex Patients Should Be Referred for Intensive Care Management? A Mixed-Methods Analysis
Authors
Maria E. Garcia, MD, MPH, MAS
Connie S. Uratsu, RN, MS, CNS
Julie Sandoval-Perry, MD
Richard W. Grant, MD, MPH
Publication date
01-09-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 9/2018
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-018-4488-5

Other articles of this Issue 9/2018

Journal of General Internal Medicine 9/2018 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.