Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 5/2018

01-05-2018 | Original Research

Evaluating the Quality of Patient Decision-Making Regarding Post-Acute Care

Authors: Robert E. Burke, MD, MS, Jacqueline Jones, RN, PhD, FAAN, Emily Lawrence, MPH, Amy Ladebue, BA, Roman Ayele, MPH, Chelsea Leonard, PhD, Brandi Lippmann, MA, Daniel D. Matlock, MD, MPH, Rebecca Allyn, MD, Ethan Cumbler, MD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 5/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Despite a national focus on post-acute care brought about by recent payment reforms, relatively little is known about how hospitalized older adults and their caregivers decide whether to go to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) after hospitalization.

Objective

We sought to understand to what extent hospitalized older adults and their caregivers are empowered to make a high-quality decision about utilizing an SNF for post-acute care and what contextual or process elements led to satisfaction with the outcome of their decision once in SNF.

Design

Qualitative inquiry using the Ottawa Decision Support Framework (ODSF), a conceptual framework that describes key components of high-quality decision-making.

Participants

Thirty-two previously community-dwelling older adults (≥ 65 years old) and 22 caregivers interviewed at three different hospitals and three skilled nursing facilities.

Main Measures

We used key components of the ODSF to identify elements of context and process that affected decision-making and to what extent the outcome was characteristic of a high-quality decision: informed, values based, and not associated with regret or blame.

Key Results

The most important contextual themes were the presence of active medical conditions in the hospital that made decision-making difficult, prior experiences with hospital readmission or SNF, relative level of caregiver support, and pressure to make a decision quickly for which participants felt unprepared. Patients described playing a passive role in the decision-making process and largely relying on recommendations from the medical team. Patients commonly expressed resignation and a perceived lack of choice or autonomy, leading to dissatisfaction with the outcome.

Conclusions

Understanding and intervening to improve the quality of decision-making regarding post-acute care supports is essential for improving outcomes of hospitalized older adults. Our results suggest that simply providing information is not sufficient; rather, incorporating key contextual factors and improving the decision-making process for both patients and clinicians are also essential.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Burke RE, Cumbler E, Coleman EA, Levy C. Post-acute care reform: Implications and opportunities for hospitalists. J Hosp Med. 2017;12(1):46-51.CrossRefPubMed Burke RE, Cumbler E, Coleman EA, Levy C. Post-acute care reform: Implications and opportunities for hospitalists. J Hosp Med. 2017;12(1):46-51.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Nelson KM, Starkebaum GA, Reiber GE. Veterans using and uninsured veterans not using Veterans Affairs (VA) health care. Public Health Rep Wash DC 1974. 2007;122(1):93–100. Nelson KM, Starkebaum GA, Reiber GE. Veterans using and uninsured veterans not using Veterans Affairs (VA) health care. Public Health Rep Wash DC 1974. 2007;122(1):93–100.
16.
go back to reference Randall M, Kilpatrick KE, Pendergast JF, Jones KR, Vogel WB. Differences in patient characteristics between Veterans Administration and community hospitals. Implications for VA planning. Med Care. 1987;25(11):1099-1104.CrossRefPubMed Randall M, Kilpatrick KE, Pendergast JF, Jones KR, Vogel WB. Differences in patient characteristics between Veterans Administration and community hospitals. Implications for VA planning. Med Care. 1987;25(11):1099-1104.CrossRefPubMed
19.
21.
go back to reference Kosecoff J, Kahn KL, Rogers WH, et al. Prospective payment system and impairment at discharge. The “quicker-and-sicker” story revisited. JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 1990;264(15):1980-1983.CrossRef Kosecoff J, Kahn KL, Rogers WH, et al. Prospective payment system and impairment at discharge. The “quicker-and-sicker” story revisited. JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 1990;264(15):1980-1983.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Evaluating the Quality of Patient Decision-Making Regarding Post-Acute Care
Authors
Robert E. Burke, MD, MS
Jacqueline Jones, RN, PhD, FAAN
Emily Lawrence, MPH
Amy Ladebue, BA
Roman Ayele, MPH
Chelsea Leonard, PhD
Brandi Lippmann, MA
Daniel D. Matlock, MD, MPH
Rebecca Allyn, MD
Ethan Cumbler, MD
Publication date
01-05-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 5/2018
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-017-4298-1

Other articles of this Issue 5/2018

Journal of General Internal Medicine 5/2018 Go to the issue