Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 10/2018

01-10-2018 | Original Research

Prediction Model for Two-Year Risk of Opioid Overdose Among Patients Prescribed Chronic Opioid Therapy

Authors: Jason M. Glanz, PhD, Komal J. Narwaney, PhD, Shane R. Mueller, MSW, Edward M. Gardner, MD, Susan L. Calcaterra, MD, MPH, Stanley Xu, PhD, Kristin Breslin, MPH, Ingrid A. Binswanger, MD, MPH

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 10/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Naloxone is a life-saving opioid antagonist. Chronic pain guidelines recommend that physicians co-prescribe naloxone to patients at high risk for opioid overdose. However, clinical tools to efficiently identify patients who could benefit from naloxone are lacking.

Objective

To develop and validate an overdose predictive model which could be used in primary care settings to assess the need for naloxone.

Design

Retrospective cohort.

Setting

Derivation site was an integrated health system in Colorado; validation site was a safety-net health system in Colorado.

Participants

We developed a predictive model in a cohort of 42,828 patients taking chronic opioid therapy and externally validated the model in 10,708 patients.

Main Measures

Potential predictors and outcomes (nonfatal pharmaceutical and heroin overdoses) were extracted from electronic health records. Fatal overdose outcomes were identified from state vital records. To match the approximate shelf-life of naloxone, we used Cox proportional hazards regression to model the 2-year risk of overdose. Calibration and discrimination were assessed.

Key Results

A five-variable predictive model showed good calibration and discrimination (bootstrap-corrected c-statistic = 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69–0.78) in the derivation site, with sensitivity of 66.1% and specificity of 66.6%. In the validation site, the model showed good discrimination (c-statistic = 0.75, 95% CI 0.70–0.80) and less than ideal calibration, with sensitivity and specificity of 82.2% and 49.5%, respectively.

Conclusions

Among patients on chronic opioid therapy, the predictive model identified 66–82% of all subsequent opioid overdoses. This model is an efficient screening tool to identify patients who could benefit from naloxone to prevent overdose deaths. Population differences across the two sites limited calibration in the validation site.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Rudd RA, Paulozzi LJ, Bauer MJ, et al. Increases in heroin overdose deaths - 28 States, 2010 to 2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2014;63(39):849-54.PubMedPubMedCentral Rudd RA, Paulozzi LJ, Bauer MJ, et al. Increases in heroin overdose deaths - 28 States, 2010 to 2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2014;63(39):849-54.PubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Wheeler E, Jones TS, Gilbert MK, Davidson PJ, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Opioid Overdose Prevention Programs Providing Naloxone to Laypersons - United States, 2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2015;64(23):631-5.PubMedPubMedCentral Wheeler E, Jones TS, Gilbert MK, Davidson PJ, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Opioid Overdose Prevention Programs Providing Naloxone to Laypersons - United States, 2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2015;64(23):631-5.PubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Oliva EM, Nevedal AL, Lewis ET, et al. Patient Perspectives on an Opioid Overdose Education and Naloxone Distribution Program in the US Department of Veterans Affairs. Subst Abus 2016;37(1).CrossRef Oliva EM, Nevedal AL, Lewis ET, et al. Patient Perspectives on an Opioid Overdose Education and Naloxone Distribution Program in the US Department of Veterans Affairs. Subst Abus 2016;37(1).CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Lenton SR, Hargreaves KM. Should we conduct a trial of distributing naloxone to heroin users for peer administration to prevent fatal overdose? Med J Aust 2000;173(5):260-3.PubMed Lenton SR, Hargreaves KM. Should we conduct a trial of distributing naloxone to heroin users for peer administration to prevent fatal overdose? Med J Aust 2000;173(5):260-3.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Injury Prevention Workgroup 7. Consensus Recommendations for National and State Poisoning Surveillance. The Safe States Alliance. Atlanta, GA. April 2012. Injury Prevention Workgroup 7. Consensus Recommendations for National and State Poisoning Surveillance. The Safe States Alliance. Atlanta, GA. April 2012.
26.
go back to reference Binswanger IA, Stern MF, Deyo RA, et al. Release from prison--a high risk of death for former inmates. N Engl J Med 2007;356(2):157-65.CrossRef Binswanger IA, Stern MF, Deyo RA, et al. Release from prison--a high risk of death for former inmates. N Engl J Med 2007;356(2):157-65.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Green CA, Perrin NA, Janoff SL, Campbell CI, Chilcoat HD, Coplan PM. Assessing the accuracy of opioid overdose and poisoning codes in diagnostic information from electronic health records, claims data, and death records. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2017;26(5):509-17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.4157 CrossRefPubMed Green CA, Perrin NA, Janoff SL, Campbell CI, Chilcoat HD, Coplan PM. Assessing the accuracy of opioid overdose and poisoning codes in diagnostic information from electronic health records, claims data, and death records. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2017;26(5):509-17. doi:https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​pds.​4157 CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Moons KG, Kengne AP, Grobbee DE, et al. Risk prediction models: II. External validation, model updating, and impact assessment. Heart 2012;98:691-8.CrossRef Moons KG, Kengne AP, Grobbee DE, et al. Risk prediction models: II. External validation, model updating, and impact assessment. Heart 2012;98:691-8.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Harrell Jr FE. Resampling, validating, describing, and simplifying the model. Regression Modeling Strategies. New York: Springer; 2001. p. 87-103. Harrell Jr FE. Resampling, validating, describing, and simplifying the model. Regression Modeling Strategies. New York: Springer; 2001. p. 87-103.
31.
go back to reference Demler OV, Paynter NP, Cook NR. Tests of calibration and goodness-of-fit in the survival setting. Stat Med 2015;34(10):1659-80.CrossRef Demler OV, Paynter NP, Cook NR. Tests of calibration and goodness-of-fit in the survival setting. Stat Med 2015;34(10):1659-80.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Lumley T, Kronmal RA, Cushman M, Manolio TA, Goldstein S. A stroke prediction score in the elderly: validation and Web-based application. J Clin Epidemiol 2002;55(2):129-36.CrossRef Lumley T, Kronmal RA, Cushman M, Manolio TA, Goldstein S. A stroke prediction score in the elderly: validation and Web-based application. J Clin Epidemiol 2002;55(2):129-36.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Royston P. Explained variation for survival models. Stata J 2006;6(1):83-96. Royston P. Explained variation for survival models. Stata J 2006;6(1):83-96.
36.
go back to reference Sullivan LM, Massaro JM, D'Agostino RB. Presentation of multivariate data for clinical use: The Framingham Study risk score functions. Stat Med 2004;23(10):1631-60.CrossRef Sullivan LM, Massaro JM, D'Agostino RB. Presentation of multivariate data for clinical use: The Framingham Study risk score functions. Stat Med 2004;23(10):1631-60.CrossRef
38.
42.
go back to reference Jones CM, Logan J, Gladden RM, Bohm MK. Vital Signs: Demographic and Substance Use Trends Among Heroin Users - United States, 2002-2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2015;64(26):719-25.PubMedPubMedCentral Jones CM, Logan J, Gladden RM, Bohm MK. Vital Signs: Demographic and Substance Use Trends Among Heroin Users - United States, 2002-2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2015;64(26):719-25.PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Prediction Model for Two-Year Risk of Opioid Overdose Among Patients Prescribed Chronic Opioid Therapy
Authors
Jason M. Glanz, PhD
Komal J. Narwaney, PhD
Shane R. Mueller, MSW
Edward M. Gardner, MD
Susan L. Calcaterra, MD, MPH
Stanley Xu, PhD
Kristin Breslin, MPH
Ingrid A. Binswanger, MD, MPH
Publication date
01-10-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 10/2018
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-017-4288-3

Other articles of this Issue 10/2018

Journal of General Internal Medicine 10/2018 Go to the issue