Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 1/2018

Open Access 01-01-2018 | Original Research

Effect of Reminding Patients to Complete Fecal Immunochemical Testing: A Comparative Effectiveness Study of Automated and Live Approaches

Authors: Gloria D. Coronado, PhD, Jennifer S. Rivelli, MA, Morgan J. Fuoco, MA, William M. Vollmer, PhD, Amanda F. Petrik, MS, Erin Keast, MPH, Sara Barker, MPH, Emily Topalanchik, Ricardo Jimenez, MD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The Community Preventive Services Task Force recommends multi-component interventions, including patient reminders, to improve uptake of colorectal cancer screening.

Objective

We sought to compare the effectiveness of different forms of reminders for a direct-mail fecal immunochemical test (FIT) program.

Design

Patient-randomized controlled trial.

Participants

2772 adults aged 50–75, not up to date with colorectal cancer screening recommendations, with a clinic visit in the previous year at any of four participating health center clinics.

Intervention

Participants were mailed an introductory letter and FIT. Those who did not complete their FIT within 3 weeks were randomized to receive (1) a reminder letter, (2) two automated phone calls, (3) two text messages, (4) a live phone call, (5) a reminder letter and a live phone call, (6) two automated phone calls and a live phone call, or (7) two text messages and a live phone call. Patients with a patient portal account were sent two email reminders, but were not randomized.

Main Measures

FIT return rates for each group, 6 months following randomization.

Key Results

A total of 255 (10%) participants returned their FIT within 3 weeks of the mailing. Among randomized participants (n = 2010), an additional 25.5% returned their FITs after reminders were delivered (estimated overall return rate = 32.7%). In intention-to-treat analysis, compared to the group allocated to receive a reminder letter, return rates were higher for the group assigned to receive the live phone call (OR = 1.51 [1.03–2.21]) and lower for the group assigned to receive text messages (OR = 0.66 [0.43–0.99]). Reminder effectiveness differed by language preference.

Conclusions

Our data suggest that FIT reminders that included a live call were more effective than reminders that relied solely on written communication (a text message or letter).
Literature
1.
go back to reference American Cancer Society. Colorectal Cancer Facts & Figures 2017-2019. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society 2017. American Cancer Society. Colorectal Cancer Facts & Figures 2017-2019. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society 2017.
5.
go back to reference Gupta S, Halm EA, Rockey DC, Hammons M, Koch M, Carter E, et al. Comparative effectiveness of fecal immunochemical test outreach, colonoscopy outreach, and usual care for boosting colorectal cancer screening among the underserved: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(18):1725-32.PubMedPubMedCentral Gupta S, Halm EA, Rockey DC, Hammons M, Koch M, Carter E, et al. Comparative effectiveness of fecal immunochemical test outreach, colonoscopy outreach, and usual care for boosting colorectal cancer screening among the underserved: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(18):1725-32.PubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Baker DW, Brown T, Goldman SN, Liss DT, Kollar S, Balsley K, et al. Two-year follow-up of the effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to improve adherence to annual colorectal cancer screening in community health centers. Cancer Causes Contrl. 2015;26(11):1685-90. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-015-0650-0 CrossRef Baker DW, Brown T, Goldman SN, Liss DT, Kollar S, Balsley K, et al. Two-year follow-up of the effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to improve adherence to annual colorectal cancer screening in community health centers. Cancer Causes Contrl. 2015;26(11):1685-90. doi:https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10552-015-0650-0 CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Effect of Reminding Patients to Complete Fecal Immunochemical Testing: A Comparative Effectiveness Study of Automated and Live Approaches
Authors
Gloria D. Coronado, PhD
Jennifer S. Rivelli, MA
Morgan J. Fuoco, MA
William M. Vollmer, PhD
Amanda F. Petrik, MS
Erin Keast, MPH
Sara Barker, MPH
Emily Topalanchik
Ricardo Jimenez, MD
Publication date
01-01-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-017-4184-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Journal of General Internal Medicine 1/2018 Go to the issue
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.