Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 8/2017

01-08-2017 | Health Policy

Ethical Implications of the Electronic Health Record: In the Service of the Patient

Authors: Lois Snyder Sulmasy, JD, Ana María López, MD, MPH, FACP, Carrie A. Horwitch, MD, MPH, FACP, , American College of Physicians Ethics, Professionalism and Human Rights Committee

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 8/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Electronic health records (EHRs) provide benefits for patients, physicians, and clinical teams, but also raise ethical questions. Navigating how to provide care in the digital age requires an assessment of the impact of the EHR on patient care and the patient–physician relationship. EHRs should facilitate patient care and, as an essential component of that care, support the patient–physician relationship. Billing, regulatory, research, documentation, and administrative functions determined by the operational requirements of health care systems, payers, and others have resulted in EHRs that are better able to satisfy such external functions than to ensure that patient care needs are met. The profession has a responsibility to identify and address this mismatch. This position paper by the American College of Physicians (ACP) Ethics, Professionalism and Human Rights Committee does not address EHR design, user variability, meaningful use, or coding requirements and other government and payer mandates per se; these issues are discussed in detail in ACP’s Clinical Documentation policy. This paper focuses on EHRs and the patient–physician relationship and patient care; patient autonomy, privacy and confidentiality; and professionalism, clinical reasoning and training. It explores emerging ethical challenges and concerns for and raised by physicians across the professional lifespan, whose ongoing input is crucial to the development and use of information technology that truly serves patients.

Literature
  1. Frankel RM. Computers in the examination room. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176:128–9.View ArticlePubMed
  2. National Partnership for Women & Families Report. Engaging patients and families: how consumers value and use health IT; December 2014. Accessed at www.​nationalpartners​hip.​org/​research-library/​health-care/​HIT/​engaging-patients-and-families.​pdf on 10 February 2017.
  3. Ober KP, Applegate WB. The electronic health record. Are we the tools of our tools? Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc. 2015;78:8–14.PubMed
  4. Kuhn T, Basch P, Barr M, Yackel T, for the American College of Physicians Medical Informatics Committee. Clinical documentation in the 21st century: executive summary of a policy position paper from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162:301–3.View ArticlePubMed
  5. Cimino JJ. Improving the electronic health record—are clinicians getting what they wished for? JAMA. 2013;309:991–2.View ArticlePubMed
  6. ACP Regent and Governor EHR Workgroup Accessed at https://​leadership.​acponline.​org/​resources/​chapter-resources/​planning-your-chapter-meeting/​resources-enhancing-basics/​bringing on 10 February 2017.
  7. Hyman P. The day the EHR died. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160:576–7.View ArticlePubMed
  8. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Committee on Diagnostic Error in Health Care. Improving diagnosis in health care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2015.
  9. Wright A. You, me, and the computer makes three: navigating the doctor-patient relationship in the age of electronic health records. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30:1–2.View ArticlePubMed
  10. Eliot TS. The Rock. London: Faber & Faber; 1934.
  11. Verghese A. Culture shock—patient as icon, icon as patient. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2748–51.View ArticlePubMed
  12. Snyder L, for the American College of Physicians Ethics, Professionalism, and Human Rights Committee. American College of Physicians Ethics Manual: sixth edition. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156:73–104.View ArticlePubMed
  13. Lown BA, Rodriguez D. Lost in translation? How electronic health records structure communication, relationships, and meaning [commentary]. Acad Med. 2012;87:392–4.View ArticlePubMed
  14. Pearce C, Arnold M, Phillips C, Trumble S, Dwan K. The patient and the computer in primary care consultation. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011;18:138–42.View ArticlePubMedPubMed Central
  15. Peled JU, Sagher O, Morrow JB, Dobbie AE. Do electronic health records help or hinder medical education? PLoS Med. 2009;6:1–5.View Article
  16. Chi J, Verghese A. Clinical education and the electronic health record: the flipped patient. JAMA. 2014;312:2331–2.View ArticlePubMed
  17. Ratanawongsa N, Barton JL, Lyles CR, Wu M, Yelin EH, Martinez D, et al. Association between clinician computer use and communication with patients in safety-net clinics. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176:125–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed Central
  18. Ofri D. The physical exam as refuge. New York Times. 10 July 2014. Accessed at https://​well.​blogs.​nytimes.​com/​2014/​07/​10/​the-physical-exam-as-refuge/​?​_​r=​0 on 13 February 2017.
  19. Sinsky C, Colligan L, Li L, Prgomet M, Reynolds S, Goeders L, et al. Allocation of physician time in ambulatory practice: a time and motion study in 4 specialties. Ann Intern Med. 2016;165:753–760.View ArticlePubMed
  20. Duke P, Frankel RM, Reis S. How to integrate the electronic health record and patient-centered communication into the medical visit: a skills-based approach. Teach Learn in Med. 2013;25:358–65.View Article
  21. Riess H, Kraft-Todd G. E.M.P.A.T.H.Y.: A tool to enhance nonverbal communication between clinicians and their patients. Acad Med. 2014;89:1108–12.View ArticlePubMed
  22. Pellegrino ED. Medical professionalism: can it, should it survive? J Am Board Fam Pract. 2000;13:147–9.View ArticlePubMed
  23. Sinsky CA, Beasley JW, Simmons GE, Baron RJ. Electronic health records: design, implementation, and policy for higher-value primary care. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160:727–8.View ArticlePubMed
  24. Linzer M, Bitton A, Tu SP, Plews-Ogan M, Horowitz KR, Schwartz MD, et al. The end of the 15–20 minute primary care visit. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30:1584–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed Central
  25. Braddock CH, Snyder L. The doctor will see you shortly. The ethical significance of time for the patient-physician relationship. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:1057–62.View ArticlePubMedPubMed Central
  26. Koshy S, Feustel PJ, Hong M, Kogan BA. Scribes in an ambulatory urology practice: patient and physician satisfaction. J Urol. 2010;184:258–62.View ArticlePubMed
  27. Gellert GA, Ramirea R, Webster SL. The rise of the medical scribe industry: implications for the advancement of electronic health records. JAMA. 2014;313:1315–6.View Article
  28. Funk KA, Davis M. Enhancing the role of the nurse in primary care: the RN “co-visit” model. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30:1871–3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed Central
  29. Sinsky CA, Willard-Grace R, Schutzbank AM, Sinsky TA, Margolius D, Bodenheimer T. In search of joy in practice: a report of 23 high-functioning primary care practices. Ann Fam Med. 2013;11:272–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed Central
  30. Friedberg MW, Chen PG, Van Busum KR, Aunon FM, Pham C, Caloyeras JP, et al. Factors affecting physician professional satisfaction and their implications for patient care, health systems, and health policy. 2013. Rand Report. Accessed at http://​www.​rand.​org/​pubs/​research_​reports/​RR439.​html on 13 February 2017.
  31. Bodenheimer T, Sinsky C. From triple to quadruple aim: care of the patient requires care of the provider. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12:573–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed Central
  32. Chi J, Kugler J, Chu IM, Loftus PD, Evans KH, Oskotsky T, et al. Medical students and the electronic health record: “an epic use of time.”. Am J Med. 2014;127:891–5.View ArticlePubMed
  33. Tierney MJ, Pageler NM, Kahana M, Pantaleoni JL, Longhurst CA. Medical education in the electronic medical record (EMR) era: benefits, challenges and future directions. Acad Med. 2013;88:748–52.View ArticlePubMed
  34. Charon R. The patient-physician relationship. Narrative medicine: a model for empathy, reflection, profession, and trust. JAMA. 2001;286:1897–1902.View ArticlePubMed
  35. Institute of Medicine. Capturing social and behavioral domains in electronic health records: Phase 1. 2014. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Accessed at http://​www.​nationalacademie​s.​org/​hmd/​Reports/​2014/​Capturing-Social-and-Behavioral-Domains-in-Electronic-Health-Records-Phase-1.​aspx on 13 February 2017.
  36. Hartzband P, Groopman J. Off the record—avoiding the pitfalls of going electronic. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1656–8.View ArticlePubMed
  37. Groopman JE. How doctors think. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 2007.
  38. Siegler EL, Adelman R. Copy and paste: a remediable hazard of electronic health records [comment]. Am J Med. 2009;122:495–6.View ArticlePubMed
  39. Rattner S, Mathes M, Siegler E. Copied, pasted, and misdiagnosed (or cloned notes and blind alleys). American College of Physicians Ethics Case Studies. 2012. Accessed at http://​www.​medscape.​org/​viewarticle/​763617 on 13 February 2017.
  40. Croskerry P. The importance of cognitive errors in diagnosis and strategies to minimize them. Acad Med. 2003;78:775–80.View ArticlePubMed
  41. Galbraith KL. What’s so meaningful about meaningful use? Hastings Cent Rep. 2013;43:15–7.View ArticlePubMed
  42. Delbanco T, Walker J, Bell SK, Darer JD, Elmore JG, Farag N, et al. Inviting patients to read their doctors’ notes: a quasi-experimental study and a look ahead. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157:461–70. Erratum in: Ann Intern Med. 2015;168:532.
  43. Caine K, Kohn S, Lawrence C, Hanania R, Meslin EM, Tierney WM. Designing a patient-centered user interface for access decisions about EHR data: implications from patient interviews. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30:S7–16.View ArticlePubMed
  44. Hatton D; for the ACP Medical Practice and Quality Committee. Letter to HHS commenting on the proposed rule: CLIA program and HIPAA privacy rule; patients’ access to test reports, 45 CFR Part 164 [CMS-2319-P]. 2011.
  45. Levy H, Janke AT, Langa KM. Health literacy and the digital divide among older Americans. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;30:284–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed Central
  46. Laskowski RJ. The power of “my”. JAMA. 2016;315:1235.View ArticlePubMed
  47. Hartzband P, Groopman J. Medical Taylorism. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:106–8.View ArticlePubMed
Metadata
Title
Ethical Implications of the Electronic Health Record: In the Service of the Patient
Authors
Lois Snyder Sulmasy, JD
Ana María López, MD, MPH, FACP
Carrie A. Horwitch, MD, MPH, FACP
, American College of Physicians Ethics, Professionalism and Human Rights Committee
Publication date
01-08-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 8/2017
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-017-4030-1

Other articles of this Issue 8/2017

Journal of General Internal Medicine 8/2017 Go to the issue