Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 2/2017

01-02-2017 | Editorial

Barriers to Choosing Wisely® in Primary Care: It’s Not Just About “the Money”

Author: Eugene C. Rich, MD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Excerpt

In this issue of the Journal of General Internal Medicine, Zikmund-Fisher and colleagues report on results from two national surveys of primary care clinicians exploring the barriers to implementing 12 specific Choosing Wisely® (CW) recommendations.1 The investigators describe survey findings from 34 % of 2000 internal medicine, family medicine, and geriatrics physicians contacted through a nationally representative random sample and 48 % of 2500 representative primary care clinicians (physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants) practicing in Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) facilities. Despite the differences in the two surveyed clinician populations, and in their practice settings, the different respondents noted remarkably consistent concerns regarding the feasibility of following these CW recommendations in their setting. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Kullgren JT, Fagerlin A, Klamerus ML, Bernstein SJ, Kerr EA. Perceived barriers to implementing individual Choosing Wisely® recommendations in two national surveys of primary care providers. J Gen Intern Med. 2016. doi:10.1007/s11606-016-3853-5.PubMed Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Kullgren JT, Fagerlin A, Klamerus ML, Bernstein SJ, Kerr EA. Perceived barriers to implementing individual Choosing Wisely® recommendations in two national surveys of primary care providers. J Gen Intern Med. 2016. doi:10.​1007/​s11606-016-3853-5.PubMed
2.
go back to reference O’Malley AS, Collins A, Contreary K, Rich EC. Barriers to and facilitators of evidence-based decision making at the point of care: implications for delivery systems, payers, and policy makers. MDM Policy & Pract. 2016;1(1). O’Malley AS, Collins A, Contreary K, Rich EC. Barriers to and facilitators of evidence-based decision making at the point of care: implications for delivery systems, payers, and policy makers. MDM Policy & Pract. 2016;1(1).
3.
go back to reference Ryan J, Doty M, Hamel L, Norton M, Abrams M, Brodie A. Primary care providers’ views of recent trends in health care delivery and payment. Washington, DC: The Commonwealth Fund and The Kaiser Family Foundation; 2015. Ryan J, Doty M, Hamel L, Norton M, Abrams M, Brodie A. Primary care providers’ views of recent trends in health care delivery and payment. Washington, DC: The Commonwealth Fund and The Kaiser Family Foundation; 2015.
4.
go back to reference Town R, Wholey DR, Kralewski J, Dowd B. Assessing the influence of incentives on physicians and medical groups. Med Care Res Rev. 2004;61(3 Suppl):80S–118S.CrossRefPubMed Town R, Wholey DR, Kralewski J, Dowd B. Assessing the influence of incentives on physicians and medical groups. Med Care Res Rev. 2004;61(3 Suppl):80S–118S.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Reschovsky JD, Rich EC, Lake TK. Factors contributing to variations in physicians’ use of evidence at the point of care: a conceptual model. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(Suppl 3):S555–S561.CrossRefPubMed Reschovsky JD, Rich EC, Lake TK. Factors contributing to variations in physicians’ use of evidence at the point of care: a conceptual model. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(Suppl 3):S555–S561.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Kravitz RL, Epstein RM, Feldman MD, Franz CE, Azari R, Wilkes MS, et al. Influence of patients’ requests for direct-to-consumer advertised antidepressants: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005;293(16):1995–2002.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kravitz RL, Epstein RM, Feldman MD, Franz CE, Azari R, Wilkes MS, et al. Influence of patients’ requests for direct-to-consumer advertised antidepressants: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005;293(16):1995–2002.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Collins A, Stepanczuk C, Williams N, Rich E. Supporting better patient decisions at the point of care: what payers and delivery systems can do. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research; 2016. Collins A, Stepanczuk C, Williams N, Rich E. Supporting better patient decisions at the point of care: what payers and delivery systems can do. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research; 2016.
8.
go back to reference O’Malley AS, Rich EC, Maccarone A, DesRoches CM, Reid RJ. Disentangling the linkage of primary care features to patient outcomes: a review of current literature, data sources, and measurement needs. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(Suppl 3):S576–S585.CrossRefPubMed O’Malley AS, Rich EC, Maccarone A, DesRoches CM, Reid RJ. Disentangling the linkage of primary care features to patient outcomes: a review of current literature, data sources, and measurement needs. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(Suppl 3):S576–S585.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Medicare access and CHIP reauthorization act of 2015, HR2. 2015. Medicare access and CHIP reauthorization act of 2015, HR2. 2015.
10.
go back to reference Proposed Rule; Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) and Alternative Payment Model (APM) Incentive under the physician fee schedule, and criteria for physician-focused payment models, 42 CFR Parts 414 and 495. 2016. Proposed Rule; Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) and Alternative Payment Model (APM) Incentive under the physician fee schedule, and criteria for physician-focused payment models, 42 CFR Parts 414 and 495. 2016.
Metadata
Title
Barriers to Choosing Wisely® in Primary Care: It’s Not Just About “the Money”
Author
Eugene C. Rich, MD
Publication date
01-02-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-016-3916-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

Journal of General Internal Medicine 2/2017 Go to the issue

Letter to the Editor

Comparing VA to Non-VA Care

Clinical Practice: Clinical Images

Bullosis Diabeticorum