Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 3/2017

01-03-2017 | Original Research

Knowing Your Limits: A Qualitative Study of Physician and Nurse Practitioner Perspectives on NP Independence in Primary Care

Authors: Elena Kraus, MD, PhD, James M. DuBois, DSc, PhD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The shortage of primary care providers and the provisions of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) have spurred discussion about expanding the number, scope of practice (SOP), and independence of primary care nurse practitioners (NPs). Such discussions in the media and among professional organizations may insinuate that changes to the laws governing NP practice will engender acrimony between practicing physicians and NPs. However, we lack empirical, descriptive data on how practicing professionals view NP independence in primary care.

Objective

The aim of the present study was to explore and describe the attitudes about NP independence among physicians and NPs working in primary care.

Design

A qualitative study based on the principles of grounded theory.

Participants

Thirty primary care professionals in Missouri, USA, including 15 primary care physicians and 15 primary care NPs.

Approach

Semi-structured, in-depth interviews, with data analysis guided by grounded theory.

Key Results

Participants had perspectives that were not well represented by professional organizations or the media. Physicians were supportive of a wide variety of NP roles and comfortable with high levels of NP independence and autonomy. Physicians and NPs described prerequisites to NP independence that were complementary. Physicians generally believed that NPs needed some association with physicians for patient safety, and NPs preferred having a physician readily accessible as needed. The theme “knowing your limits” was important to both NPs and physicians regarding NP independence, and has not been described previously in the literature.

Conclusions

NP and physician views about NP practice in primary care are not as divergent as their representative professional organizations and the news media would suggest. The significant agreement among NPs and physicians, and some of the nuances of their perspectives, supports recommendations that may reduce the perceived acrimony surrounding discussions of NP independent practice in primary care.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine. A Manpower Policy for Primary Health Care: Report of a Study. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1978. Institute of Medicine. A Manpower Policy for Primary Health Care: Report of a Study. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1978.
3.
go back to reference Starfield B. Primary Care: Concept, Evaluation, and Policy. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992. Starfield B. Primary Care: Concept, Evaluation, and Policy. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992.
4.
go back to reference AAMC. The Complexities of Physician Supply and Demand: Projections from 2013 to 2025. Washington, DC: IHS Inc; 2015. AAMC. The Complexities of Physician Supply and Demand: Projections from 2013 to 2025. Washington, DC: IHS Inc; 2015.
6.
go back to reference Goolsby MJ. Nurse practitioners in primary care. Am Acad Nurse Practitioner. 2011;1–2. Goolsby MJ. Nurse practitioners in primary care. Am Acad Nurse Practitioner. 2011;1–2.
7.
go back to reference Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The Number of Nurse Practitioners and Physician Assistants Practicing Primary Care in the United States. Primary Care Workforce Facts and Stats No. 2: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services; 2013. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The Number of Nurse Practitioners and Physician Assistants Practicing Primary Care in the United States. Primary Care Workforce Facts and Stats No. 2: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services; 2013.
8.
go back to reference AANP. NP Fact Sheet. American Association of Nurse Practitioners; 2015. AANP. NP Fact Sheet. American Association of Nurse Practitioners; 2015.
9.
go back to reference Bauer JC. Nurse practitioners as an underutilized resource for health reform: evidence-based demonstrations of cost-effectiveness. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2010;22(4):228–31.CrossRefPubMed Bauer JC. Nurse practitioners as an underutilized resource for health reform: evidence-based demonstrations of cost-effectiveness. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2010;22(4):228–31.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Hooker RS, Nicholosn JG, Le T. Does the employment of physician assistants and nurse practitioners increase liability? J Med Licens Discipl. 2009;95(2):6–16. Hooker RS, Nicholosn JG, Le T. Does the employment of physician assistants and nurse practitioners increase liability? J Med Licens Discipl. 2009;95(2):6–16.
11.
go back to reference Horrocks S, Anderson E, Salisbury C. Systematic review of whether nurse practitioners working in primary care can provide equivalent care to doctors. BMJ. 2002;324(7341):819–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Horrocks S, Anderson E, Salisbury C. Systematic review of whether nurse practitioners working in primary care can provide equivalent care to doctors. BMJ. 2002;324(7341):819–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Newhouse RP, Stanik-Hutt J, White KM, Johantgen M, Bass EB, Zangaro G, et al. Advanced practice nurse outcomes 1990–2008: a systematic review. 2011;29(5):230-50- quiz 51. Newhouse RP, Stanik-Hutt J, White KM, Johantgen M, Bass EB, Zangaro G, et al. Advanced practice nurse outcomes 1990–2008: a systematic review. 2011;29(5):230-50- quiz 51.
13.
go back to reference Page L. Midlevels: boost or burden? Med Econ. 2008;85(17):26–8. 31.PubMed Page L. Midlevels: boost or burden? Med Econ. 2008;85(17):26–8. 31.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Grumbach K, Bodenheimer T, Grundy P. Outcomes of implementing patient-centered Medical Home interventions: a review of the evidence on quality, access and cost from recent prospective evaluation studies, August 2009, updated November 16, 2010. 2010. Grumbach K, Bodenheimer T, Grundy P. Outcomes of implementing patient-centered Medical Home interventions: a review of the evidence on quality, access and cost from recent prospective evaluation studies, August 2009, updated November 16, 2010. 2010.
15.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine. The future of nursing: leading change, advancing health. Committee on the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Initiative on the Future of Nursing; 2010. Institute of Medicine. The future of nursing: leading change, advancing health. Committee on the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Initiative on the Future of Nursing; 2010.
16.
go back to reference McClellan F, Hansen-Turton T. Nurse practitioners in primary care. Temple Law Rev. 2011. McClellan F, Hansen-Turton T. Nurse practitioners in primary care. Temple Law Rev. 2011.
17.
go back to reference AAFP. Independent practice authority for NPs threatens to splinter care, undermine PCMH, says AAFP report. Am Acad Family Phys. 2012. AAFP. Independent practice authority for NPs threatens to splinter care, undermine PCMH, says AAFP report. Am Acad Family Phys. 2012.
20.
go back to reference Isaacs S, Jellinek P. Accept no substitute: a report on scope of practice. Phys Found. 2012;1–68. Isaacs S, Jellinek P. Accept no substitute: a report on scope of practice. Phys Found. 2012;1–68.
22.
go back to reference American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Pediatric Workforce: scope of practice issues in the delivery of pediatric health care. Pediatrics. 2003;111(2):426–35.CrossRef American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Pediatric Workforce: scope of practice issues in the delivery of pediatric health care. Pediatrics. 2003;111(2):426–35.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Phillips RL, Harper DC, Wakefield M, Green LA, Fryer GE. Can nurse practitioners and physicians beat parochialism into plowshares? Health Aff (Millwood). 2002;21(5):133–42.CrossRef Phillips RL, Harper DC, Wakefield M, Green LA, Fryer GE. Can nurse practitioners and physicians beat parochialism into plowshares? Health Aff (Millwood). 2002;21(5):133–42.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Carr J, Bethea J, Hancock B. The attitudes of GPs towards the nurse-practitioner role. Br J Community Nurs. 2001;6(9):444–81.CrossRefPubMed Carr J, Bethea J, Hancock B. The attitudes of GPs towards the nurse-practitioner role. Br J Community Nurs. 2001;6(9):444–81.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Carr J, Armstrong S, Hancock B, Bethea J. GPs’ perceptions of the nurse practitioner role in primary care. Br J Community Nurs. 2002;7(8):408–13.CrossRefPubMed Carr J, Armstrong S, Hancock B, Bethea J. GPs’ perceptions of the nurse practitioner role in primary care. Br J Community Nurs. 2002;7(8):408–13.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Bergeson J, Cash R, Boulger J, Bergeron D. The attitudes of rural Minnesota family physicians toward nurse practitioners and physician assistants. J Rural Health. 1997;13(3):196–205.CrossRefPubMed Bergeson J, Cash R, Boulger J, Bergeron D. The attitudes of rural Minnesota family physicians toward nurse practitioners and physician assistants. J Rural Health. 1997;13(3):196–205.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Wilson A, Pearson D, Hassey A. Barriers to developing the nurse practitioner role in primary care—the GP perspective. Fam Pract. 2002;19(6):641–6.CrossRefPubMed Wilson A, Pearson D, Hassey A. Barriers to developing the nurse practitioner role in primary care—the GP perspective. Fam Pract. 2002;19(6):641–6.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Bezjak JE. Physician-perceived incentives for association with nurse practitioners. Nurse Pract. 1987;12(3):66–8. 72–4.CrossRefPubMed Bezjak JE. Physician-perceived incentives for association with nurse practitioners. Nurse Pract. 1987;12(3):66–8. 72–4.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Fletcher CE, Baker SJ, Copeland LA, Reeves PJ, Lowery JC. Nurse practitioners’ and physicians’ views of NPs as providers of primary care to veterans. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2007;39(4):358–62.CrossRefPubMed Fletcher CE, Baker SJ, Copeland LA, Reeves PJ, Lowery JC. Nurse practitioners’ and physicians’ views of NPs as providers of primary care to veterans. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2007;39(4):358–62.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Ford VH, Kish CP. Family physician perceptions of nurse practitioners and physician assistants in a family practice setting. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 1998;10(4):167–71.CrossRefPubMed Ford VH, Kish CP. Family physician perceptions of nurse practitioners and physician assistants in a family practice setting. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 1998;10(4):167–71.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Hallas DM, Butz A, Gitterman B. Attitudes and beliefs for effective pediatric nurse practitioner and physician collaboration. J Pediatr Health Care. 2004;18(2):77–86.PubMed Hallas DM, Butz A, Gitterman B. Attitudes and beliefs for effective pediatric nurse practitioner and physician collaboration. J Pediatr Health Care. 2004;18(2):77–86.PubMed
32.
33.
go back to reference Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of Qualitative Research. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, Inc.; 2008. Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of Qualitative Research. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, Inc.; 2008.
34.
go back to reference Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–88.CrossRefPubMed Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–88.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Speziale HJS, Carpenter DR. Qualitative Research in Nursing: Advancing the Humanistic Imperative. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007. Speziale HJS, Carpenter DR. Qualitative Research in Nursing: Advancing the Humanistic Imperative. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.
36.
go back to reference Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods. 2006;18(1):59–82.CrossRef Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods. 2006;18(1):59–82.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Pearson L. The 2012 Pearson Report: A National Overview of Nurse Practitioner Legislation and Health Care Issues. American Journal of Nurse Practitioners, Malden MA. 2012. Pearson L. The 2012 Pearson Report: A National Overview of Nurse Practitioner Legislation and Health Care Issues. American Journal of Nurse Practitioners, Malden MA. 2012.
40.
go back to reference Laurant M, Reeves D, Hermens R, Braspenning J, Grol R, Sibbald B. Substitution of doctors by nurses in primary care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009(2):CD001271. Laurant M, Reeves D, Hermens R, Braspenning J, Grol R, Sibbald B. Substitution of doctors by nurses in primary care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009(2):CD001271.
Metadata
Title
Knowing Your Limits: A Qualitative Study of Physician and Nurse Practitioner Perspectives on NP Independence in Primary Care
Authors
Elena Kraus, MD, PhD
James M. DuBois, DSc, PhD
Publication date
01-03-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-016-3896-7

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Journal of General Internal Medicine 3/2017 Go to the issue

Clinical Practice: Clinical Images

An Abscess of Urachal Remnant