Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 8/2016

01-08-2016 | Original Research

Charting a Key Competency Domain: Understanding Resident Physician Interprofessional Collaboration (IPC) Skills

Authors: Sondra Zabar, MD, Jennifer Adams, MD, Sienna Kurland, BA, Amara Shaker-Brown, BA, Barbara Porter, MD, Margaret Horlick, MD, Kathleen Hanley, MD, Lisa Altshuler, PhD, Adina Kalet, MD MPH, Colleen Gillespie, PhD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 8/2016

Login to get access

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

Interprofessional collaboration (IPC) is essential for quality care. Understanding residents’ level of competence is a critical first step to designing targeted curricula and workplace learning activities. In this needs assessment, we measured residents’ IPC competence using specifically designed Objective Structured Clinical Exam (OSCE) cases and surveyed residents regarding training needs.

METHODS

We developed three cases to capture IPC competence in the context of physician–nurse collaboration. A trained actor played the role of the nurse (Standardized Nurse – SN). The Interprofessional Education Collaborative (IPEC) framework was used to create a ten-item behaviorally anchored IPC performance checklist (scored on a three-point scale: done, partially done, well done) measuring four generic domains: values/ethics; roles/responsibilities; interprofessional communication; and teamwork. Specific skills required for each scenario were also assessed, including teamwork communication (SBAR and CUS) and patient-care–focused tasks. In addition to evaluating IPC skills, the SN assessed communication, history-taking and physical exam skills. IPC scores were computed as percent of items rated well done in each domain (Cronbach’s alpha > 0.77). Analyses include item frequencies, comparison of mean domain scores, correlation between IPC and other skills, and content analysis of SN comments and resident training needs.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy-eight residents (of 199 total) completed an IPC case and results are reported for the 162 who participated in our medical education research registry. IPC domain scores were: Roles/responsibilities mean = 37 % well done (SD 37 %); Values/ethics mean = 49 % (SD 40 %); Interprofessional communication mean = 27 % (SD 36 %); Teamwork mean = 47 % (SD 29 %). IPC was not significantly correlated with other core clinical skills. SNs’ comments focused on respect and IPC as a distinct skill set. Residents described needs for greater clarification of roles and more workplace-based opportunities structured to support interprofessional education/learning.

CONCLUSIONS

The IPC cases and competence checklist are a practical method for conducting needs assessments and evaluating IPC training/curriculum that provides rich and actionable data at both the individual and program levels.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Barr H, Koppel I, Reeves S, Hammick M and Freeth DS. Effective interprofessional education: argument, assumption and evidence (Promoting Partnership for Health), vol. 39. John Wiley & Sons; 2008. Barr H, Koppel I, Reeves S, Hammick M and Freeth DS. Effective interprofessional education: argument, assumption and evidence (Promoting Partnership for Health), vol. 39. John Wiley & Sons; 2008.
4.
go back to reference Education I, Expert C. Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice. 2011. Education I, Expert C. Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice. 2011.
6.
7.
8.
go back to reference Hall P, Marshall D, Weaver L, Boyle A, Taniguchi A. A method to enhance student teams in palliative care: piloting the McMaster-Ottawa team observed structured clinical encounter. J Palliat Med. 2011;14(6):744–50. doi:10.1089/jpm.2010.0295.CrossRefPubMed Hall P, Marshall D, Weaver L, Boyle A, Taniguchi A. A method to enhance student teams in palliative care: piloting the McMaster-Ottawa team observed structured clinical encounter. J Palliat Med. 2011;14(6):744–50. doi:10.​1089/​jpm.​2010.​0295.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Morison SL, Stewart MC. Developing interprofessional assessment. 2005;192–202. Morison SL, Stewart MC. Developing interprofessional assessment. 2005;192–202.
10.
go back to reference Gillespie C, et al. ‘We might as well be speaking different languages’: an innovative interprofessional education tool to teach and assess communication skills critical to patient safety. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2015;1(2):54–60. Gillespie C, et al. ‘We might as well be speaking different languages’: an innovative interprofessional education tool to teach and assess communication skills critical to patient safety. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2015;1(2):54–60.
11.
go back to reference Muller-Juge V, et al. Interprofessional collaboration on an internal medicine ward: role perceptions and expectations among nurses and residents. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57570.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Muller-Juge V, et al. Interprofessional collaboration on an internal medicine ward: role perceptions and expectations among nurses and residents. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57570.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Abu-Rish E, et al. Current trends in interprofessional education of health sciences students: a literature review. 2012;26:444–51. Abu-Rish E, et al. Current trends in interprofessional education of health sciences students: a literature review. 2012;26:444–51.
13.
go back to reference Canadian Interprofessional Health Collaborative. An inventory of quantitative tools measuring interprofessional education and collaborative practice outcomes. 2012. Canadian Interprofessional Health Collaborative. An inventory of quantitative tools measuring interprofessional education and collaborative practice outcomes. 2012.
17.
go back to reference Simmons B, Egan-Lee E, Wagner SJ, Esdaile M, Baker L, Reeves S. Assessment of interprofessional learning: the design of an interprofessional objective structured clinical examination (iOSCE) approach. J Interprof Care. 2011;25:73–4. doi:10.3109/13561820.2010.483746.CrossRefPubMed Simmons B, Egan-Lee E, Wagner SJ, Esdaile M, Baker L, Reeves S. Assessment of interprofessional learning: the design of an interprofessional objective structured clinical examination (iOSCE) approach. J Interprof Care. 2011;25:73–4. doi:10.​3109/​13561820.​2010.​483746.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Gillespie C, Zabar S, Altshuler L, Fox J, Pusic M, Xu J, Kalet A. The Research on Medical Education Outcomes (ROMEO) registry: addressing ethical and pratical challenges of using ‘Bigger’, longtiduinal educational data. Acad Med. 2015. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000920. Gillespie C, Zabar S, Altshuler L, Fox J, Pusic M, Xu J, Kalet A. The Research on Medical Education Outcomes (ROMEO) registry: addressing ethical and pratical challenges of using ‘Bigger’, longtiduinal educational data. Acad Med. 2015. doi:10.​1097/​ACM.​0000000000000920​.
19.
go back to reference Zabar S, Hanley K, Altshuler L, et al. Do clinical skills assessed in OSCEs transfer to the real world of clinical practice? using unannounced standardized patient visits to assess transfer. AAMC Med Educ Conf. 2014;6. Zabar S, Hanley K, Altshuler L, et al. Do clinical skills assessed in OSCEs transfer to the real world of clinical practice? using unannounced standardized patient visits to assess transfer. AAMC Med Educ Conf. 2014;6.
20.
go back to reference Panel IECE. Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: report of an expert panel. Core competencies interprofessional Collab Pract Rep an Expert panel. 2011. Panel IECE. Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: report of an expert panel. Core competencies interprofessional Collab Pract Rep an Expert panel. 2011.
22.
go back to reference Wingo MT, et al. Interprofessional collaboration milestones: advocating for common assessment criteria in graduate medical education. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15.1:1. Wingo MT, et al. Interprofessional collaboration milestones: advocating for common assessment criteria in graduate medical education. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15.1:1.
23.
go back to reference Soones TN, O’Brien BC, Julian KA. Internal medicine residents’ perceptions of team-based care and its educational value in the continuity clinic: a qualitative study. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(9):1279–85.CrossRefPubMed Soones TN, O’Brien BC, Julian KA. Internal medicine residents’ perceptions of team-based care and its educational value in the continuity clinic: a qualitative study. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(9):1279–85.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Havyer RDA, et al. Teamwork assessment in internal medicine: a systematic review of validity evidence and outcomes. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29(6):894–910.CrossRefPubMed Havyer RDA, et al. Teamwork assessment in internal medicine: a systematic review of validity evidence and outcomes. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29(6):894–910.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Charting a Key Competency Domain: Understanding Resident Physician Interprofessional Collaboration (IPC) Skills
Authors
Sondra Zabar, MD
Jennifer Adams, MD
Sienna Kurland, BA
Amara Shaker-Brown, BA
Barbara Porter, MD
Margaret Horlick, MD
Kathleen Hanley, MD
Lisa Altshuler, PhD
Adina Kalet, MD MPH
Colleen Gillespie, PhD
Publication date
01-08-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 8/2016
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-016-3690-6

Other articles of this Issue 8/2016

Journal of General Internal Medicine 8/2016 Go to the issue