Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 8/2016

01-08-2016 | Original Research

Effects of a Video on Organ Donation Consent Among Primary Care Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Authors: J. Daryl Thornton, MD, MPH, Catherine Sullivan, MS, RD, LD, Jeffrey M. Albert, PhD, Maria Cedeño, Bridget Patrick, MS, Julie Pencak, Kristine A. Wong, MPH, Margaret D. Allen, MD, DrSC(Hon), Linda Kimble, MEd, CHES, Heather Mekesa, MBA, Gordon Bowen, MS, CPTC, Ashwini R. Sehgal, MD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 8/2016

Login to get access

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

Low organ donation rates remain a major barrier to organ transplantation.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine the effect of a video and patient cueing on organ donation consent among patients meeting with their primary care provider.

DESIGN

This was a randomized controlled trial between February 2013 and May 2014.

SETTING

The waiting rooms of 18 primary care clinics of a medical system in Cuyahoga County, Ohio.

PATIENTS

The study included 915 patients over 15.5 years of age who had not previously consented to organ donation.

INTERVENTIONS

Just prior to their clinical encounter, intervention patients (n = 456) watched a 5-minute organ donation video on iPads and then choose a question regarding organ donation to ask their provider. Control patients (n = 459) visited their provider per usual routine.

MAIN MEASURES

The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who consented for organ donation. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients who discussed organ donation with their provider and the proportion who were satisfied with the time spent with their provider during the clinical encounter.

KEY RESULTS

Intervention patients were more likely than control patients to consent to donate organs (22 % vs. 15 %, OR 1.50, 95%CI 1.10–2.13). Intervention patients were also more likely to have donation discussions with their provider (77 % vs. 18 %, OR 15.1, 95%CI 11.1–20.6). Intervention and control patients were similarly satisfied with the time they spent with their provider (83 % vs. 86 %, OR 0.87, 95%CI 0.61–1.25).

LIMITATION

How the observed increases in organ donation consent might translate into a greater organ supply is unclear.

CONCLUSION

Watching a brief video regarding organ donation and being cued to ask a primary care provider a question about donation resulted in more organ donation discussions and an increase in organ donation consent. Satisfaction with the time spent during the clinical encounter was not affected.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01697137
Literature
2.
go back to reference Rodrigue JR, Krouse J, Carroll C, Giery KM, Fraga Y, Edwards E. A Department of Motor Vehicles intervention yields moderate increases in donor designation rates. Prog Transplant. 2012;22(1):18–24. doi:10.7182/pit2012436.CrossRefPubMed Rodrigue JR, Krouse J, Carroll C, Giery KM, Fraga Y, Edwards E. A Department of Motor Vehicles intervention yields moderate increases in donor designation rates. Prog Transplant. 2012;22(1):18–24. doi:10.​7182/​pit2012436.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Thornton JD, Curtis JR, Allen MD. Completion of advanced care directives is associated with willingness to donate. J Natl Med Assoc. 2006;98(6):897–904.PubMedPubMedCentral Thornton JD, Curtis JR, Allen MD. Completion of advanced care directives is associated with willingness to donate. J Natl Med Assoc. 2006;98(6):897–904.PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Thornton JD, Curtis JR, Allen MD. Primary care physicians’ attitudes and practices regarding discussing organ donation with their patients. J Natl Med Assoc. 2010;102(1):52–58.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Thornton JD, Curtis JR, Allen MD. Primary care physicians’ attitudes and practices regarding discussing organ donation with their patients. J Natl Med Assoc. 2010;102(1):52–58.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Lifeline of Ohio, Univeristy of Cincinnati Institute for Policy Research,. Report Card: the State of Organ, Eye & Tissue Donation in Ohio–April 2010. (Donate Life Ohio, Second Chance Trust Fund, Ohio Department of Health, eds.). 2010:7. Lifeline of Ohio, Univeristy of Cincinnati Institute for Policy Research,. Report Card: the State of Organ, Eye & Tissue Donation in Ohio–April 2010. (Donate Life Ohio, Second Chance Trust Fund, Ohio Department of Health, eds.). 2010:7.
11.
go back to reference Irving MJ, Tong A, Jan S, et al. Factors that influence the decision to be an organ donor: a systematic review of the qualitative literature. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27(6):2526–2533. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfr683.CrossRefPubMed Irving MJ, Tong A, Jan S, et al. Factors that influence the decision to be an organ donor: a systematic review of the qualitative literature. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27(6):2526–2533. doi:10.​1093/​ndt/​gfr683.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Ladin K, Hanto DW. Family physicians’ role in discussing organ donation with patients and the public. Virtual Mentor. 2012;14(3):194.CrossRefPubMed Ladin K, Hanto DW. Family physicians’ role in discussing organ donation with patients and the public. Virtual Mentor. 2012;14(3):194.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Spielman B, Verhulst S. Discussing organ donations with patients. Fam Med. 1996;28(10):698–701.PubMed Spielman B, Verhulst S. Discussing organ donations with patients. Fam Med. 1996;28(10):698–701.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Coolican MB, Swanson A. Primary health-care physicians: vital roles in organ and tissue donation. Conn Med. 1998;62(3):149–153.PubMed Coolican MB, Swanson A. Primary health-care physicians: vital roles in organ and tissue donation. Conn Med. 1998;62(3):149–153.PubMed
15.
go back to reference American Medical Association. Code of Medical Ethics, 2014–2015. Amer Medical Assn; 2014. American Medical Association. Code of Medical Ethics, 2014–2015. Amer Medical Assn; 2014.
17.
go back to reference Siminoff LA, Gordon N, Hewlett J, Arnold RM. Factors influencing families’ consent for donation of solid organs for transplantation. JAMA. 2001;286(1):71–77.CrossRefPubMed Siminoff LA, Gordon N, Hewlett J, Arnold RM. Factors influencing families’ consent for donation of solid organs for transplantation. JAMA. 2001;286(1):71–77.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Bidigare SA, Ellis AR. Family physicians’ role in recruitment of organ donors. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9(7):601–604. discussion605.CrossRefPubMed Bidigare SA, Ellis AR. Family physicians’ role in recruitment of organ donors. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9(7):601–604. discussion605.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Gordon NP, Shade SB. Advance directives are more likely among seniors asked about end-of-life care preferences. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(7):701–704.CrossRefPubMed Gordon NP, Shade SB. Advance directives are more likely among seniors asked about end-of-life care preferences. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(7):701–704.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Tierney WM, Dexter PR, Gramelspacher GP, Perkins AJ, Zhou XH, Wolinsky FD. The effect of discussions about advance directives on patients’ satisfaction with primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(1):32–40.PubMedPubMedCentral Tierney WM, Dexter PR, Gramelspacher GP, Perkins AJ, Zhou XH, Wolinsky FD. The effect of discussions about advance directives on patients’ satisfaction with primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(1):32–40.PubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Sehgal NKR, Scallan C, Sullivan C, et al. The relationship between verified organ donor designation and patient demographic and medical characteristics. Am J Transplant. 2015. doi:10.1111/ajt.13608. Sehgal NKR, Scallan C, Sullivan C, et al. The relationship between verified organ donor designation and patient demographic and medical characteristics. Am J Transplant. 2015. doi:10.​1111/​ajt.​13608.
Metadata
Title
Effects of a Video on Organ Donation Consent Among Primary Care Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Authors
J. Daryl Thornton, MD, MPH
Catherine Sullivan, MS, RD, LD
Jeffrey M. Albert, PhD
Maria Cedeño
Bridget Patrick, MS
Julie Pencak
Kristine A. Wong, MPH
Margaret D. Allen, MD, DrSC(Hon)
Linda Kimble, MEd, CHES
Heather Mekesa, MBA
Gordon Bowen, MS, CPTC
Ashwini R. Sehgal, MD
Publication date
01-08-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 8/2016
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-016-3630-5

Other articles of this Issue 8/2016

Journal of General Internal Medicine 8/2016 Go to the issue
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discuss last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.