Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 1/2015

01-01-2015 | Original Research

A Comparison of Web-Based Versus Print-Based Decision Aids for Prostate Cancer Screening: Participants’ Evaluation and Utilization

Authors: Catherine Tomko, BA, Kimberly M. Davis, PhD, George Luta, Ph.D, Alexander H. Krist, MD, MPH, Steven H. Woolf, MD, Kathryn L. Taylor, PhD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

Patient decision aids facilitate informed decision making for medical tests and procedures that have uncertain benefits.

OBJECTIVE

To describe participants’ evaluation and utilization of print-based and web-based prostate cancer screening decision aids that were found to improve decisional outcomes in a prior randomized controlled trial.

DESIGN

Men completed brief telephone interviews at baseline, one month, and 13 months post-randomization.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants were primary care patients, 45-70 years old, who received the print-based (N = 628) or web-based decision aid (N = 625) and completed the follow-up assessments.

MAIN MEASURES

We assessed men’s baseline preference for web-based or print-based materials, time spent using the decision aids, comprehension of the overall message, and ratings of the content.

KEY RESULTS

Decision aid use was self-reported by 64.3 % (web) and 81.8 % (print) of participants. Significant predictors of decision aid use were race (white vs. non-white, OR = 2.43, 95 % CI: 1.77, 3.35), higher education (OR = 1.68, 95 % CI: 1.06, 2.70) and trial arm (print vs. web, OR = 2.78, 95 % CI: 2.03, 3.83). Multivariable analyses indicated that web-arm participants were more likely to use the website when they preferred web-based materials (OR: 1.91, CI: 1.17, 3.12), whereas use of the print materials was not significantly impacted by a preference for print-based materials (OR: 0.69, CI: 0.38, 1.25). Comprehension of the decision aid message (i.e., screening is an individual decision) did not significantly differ between arms in adjusted analyses (print: 61.9 % and web: 68.2 %, p = 0.42).

CONCLUSIONS

Decision aid use was independently influenced by race, education, and the decision aid medium, findings consistent with the ‘digital divide.’ These results suggest that when it is not possible to provide this age cohort with their preferred decision aid medium, print materials will be more highly used than web-based materials. Although there are many advantages to web-based decision aids, providing an option for print-based decision aids should be considered.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Stacey D, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;CD001431. Stacey D, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;CD001431.
3.
go back to reference Smith RA, Brooks D, Cokkinides V, Saslow D, Brawley OW. Cancer screening in the United States, 2013: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines, current issues in cancer screening, and new guidance on cervical cancer screening and lung cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63:88–105.PubMedCrossRef Smith RA, Brooks D, Cokkinides V, Saslow D, Brawley OW. Cancer screening in the United States, 2013: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines, current issues in cancer screening, and new guidance on cervical cancer screening and lung cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63:88–105.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Feldman-Stewart D, Brennenstuhl S, Brundage MD. The information needed by Canadian early-stage prostate cancer patients for decision-making: stable over a decade. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73:437–42.PubMedCrossRef Feldman-Stewart D, Brennenstuhl S, Brundage MD. The information needed by Canadian early-stage prostate cancer patients for decision-making: stable over a decade. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73:437–42.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ilic D, Risbridger GP, Green S. The informed man: attitudes and information needs on prostate cancer screening. J Mens Health Gend. 2005;2:414–20.CrossRef Ilic D, Risbridger GP, Green S. The informed man: attitudes and information needs on prostate cancer screening. J Mens Health Gend. 2005;2:414–20.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Woolf SH, Krist AH, Johnson RE, Stenborg PS. Unwanted control: how patients in the primary care setting decide about screening for prostate cancer. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;56:116–24.PubMedCrossRef Woolf SH, Krist AH, Johnson RE, Stenborg PS. Unwanted control: how patients in the primary care setting decide about screening for prostate cancer. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;56:116–24.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Taylor KL, Williams RM, Davis K, et al. Decision making in prostate cancer screening using decision aids vs usual care: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Int Med. 2013;173:1704–12. Taylor KL, Williams RM, Davis K, et al. Decision making in prostate cancer screening using decision aids vs usual care: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Int Med. 2013;173:1704–12.
9.
go back to reference Linnan L, Steckler A, eds. Process Evaluations for Public Health Interventions and Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2002. Linnan L, Steckler A, eds. Process Evaluations for Public Health Interventions and Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2002.
10.
go back to reference Oakley A, Strange V, Bonell C, Allen E, Stephenson J. Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions. BMJ. 2006;332:413–6.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Oakley A, Strange V, Bonell C, Allen E, Stephenson J. Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions. BMJ. 2006;332:413–6.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Frosch DL, Kaplan RM, Felitti VJ. A randomized controlled trial comparing internet and video to facilitate patient education for men considering the prostate specific antigen test. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18:781–7.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Frosch DL, Kaplan RM, Felitti VJ. A randomized controlled trial comparing internet and video to facilitate patient education for men considering the prostate specific antigen test. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18:781–7.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Gattellari M, Ward JE. A community-based randomised controlled trial of three different educational resources for men about prostate cancer screening. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;57:168–82.PubMedCrossRef Gattellari M, Ward JE. A community-based randomised controlled trial of three different educational resources for men about prostate cancer screening. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;57:168–82.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lepore SJ, Wolf RL, Basch CE, et al. Informed decision making about prostate cancer testing in predominantly immigrant black men: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Behav Med. 2012;44:320–30.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Lepore SJ, Wolf RL, Basch CE, et al. Informed decision making about prostate cancer testing in predominantly immigrant black men: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Behav Med. 2012;44:320–30.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Taylor KL, Davis JL III, Turner RO, et al. Educating African American men about the prostate cancer screening dilemma: a randomized intervention. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:2179–88.PubMedCrossRef Taylor KL, Davis JL III, Turner RO, et al. Educating African American men about the prostate cancer screening dilemma: a randomized intervention. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:2179–88.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Volk RJ, Jibaja-Weiss ML, Hawley ST, et al. Entertainment education for prostate cancer screening: a randomized trial among primary care patients with low health literacy. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73:482–9.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Volk RJ, Jibaja-Weiss ML, Hawley ST, et al. Entertainment education for prostate cancer screening: a randomized trial among primary care patients with low health literacy. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73:482–9.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Williams RM, Davis KM, Luta G, et al. Fostering informed decisions: a randomized controlled trial assessing the impact of a decision aid among men registered to undergo mass screening for prostate cancer. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;91:329–36.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Williams RM, Davis KM, Luta G, et al. Fostering informed decisions: a randomized controlled trial assessing the impact of a decision aid among men registered to undergo mass screening for prostate cancer. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;91:329–36.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kutner M, Greenberg E, Jin Y, Paulsen C. The Health Literacy of America's Adults: Results From the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NCES 2006-483). Available at: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED493284.pdf. Accessed July 22, 2014. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics; 2006. Kutner M, Greenberg E, Jin Y, Paulsen C. The Health Literacy of America's Adults: Results From the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NCES 2006-483). Available at: http://​files.​eric.​ed.​gov/​fulltext/​ED493284.​pdf. Accessed July 22, 2014. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics; 2006.
18.
go back to reference Dorfman CS, Williams RM, Kassan EC, et al. The development of a web- and a print-based decision aid for prostate cancer screening. BMC Med Inf Decis Making. 2010;10:12.CrossRef Dorfman CS, Williams RM, Kassan EC, et al. The development of a web- and a print-based decision aid for prostate cancer screening. BMC Med Inf Decis Making. 2010;10:12.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kassan EC, Williams RM, Kelly SP, et al. Men's use of an Internet-based decision aid for prostate cancer screening. J Health Commun. 2012;17:677–97.PubMedCrossRef Kassan EC, Williams RM, Kelly SP, et al. Men's use of an Internet-based decision aid for prostate cancer screening. J Health Commun. 2012;17:677–97.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Lipkus IM, Samsa G, Rimer BK. General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Med Decis Making. 2001;21:37–44.PubMedCrossRef Lipkus IM, Samsa G, Rimer BK. General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Med Decis Making. 2001;21:37–44.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Levinson W, Kao A, Kuby A, Thisted RA. Not all patients want to participate in decision making. A national study of public preferences. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:531–5.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Levinson W, Kao A, Kuby A, Thisted RA. Not all patients want to participate in decision making. A national study of public preferences. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:531–5.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Murray E, Pollack L, White M, Lo B. Clinical decision-making: Patients' preferences and experiences. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;65:189–96.PubMedCrossRef Murray E, Pollack L, White M, Lo B. Clinical decision-making: Patients' preferences and experiences. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;65:189–96.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Wilkes M, Srinivasan M, Cole G, Tardif R, Richardson LC, Plescia M. Discussing uncertainty and risk in primary care: recommendations of a multi-disciplinary panel regarding communication around prostate cancer screening. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28:1410–9.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Wilkes M, Srinivasan M, Cole G, Tardif R, Richardson LC, Plescia M. Discussing uncertainty and risk in primary care: recommendations of a multi-disciplinary panel regarding communication around prostate cancer screening. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28:1410–9.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Hall IJ, Taylor YJ, Ross LE, Richardson LC, Richards TB, Rim SH. Discussions about prostate cancer screening between U.S. primary care physicians and their patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26:1098–104.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Hall IJ, Taylor YJ, Ross LE, Richardson LC, Richards TB, Rim SH. Discussions about prostate cancer screening between U.S. primary care physicians and their patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26:1098–104.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A Comparison of Web-Based Versus Print-Based Decision Aids for Prostate Cancer Screening: Participants’ Evaluation and Utilization
Authors
Catherine Tomko, BA
Kimberly M. Davis, PhD
George Luta, Ph.D
Alexander H. Krist, MD, MPH
Steven H. Woolf, MD
Kathryn L. Taylor, PhD
Publication date
01-01-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 1/2015
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-014-2994-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Journal of General Internal Medicine 1/2015 Go to the issue

Clinical Practice: Exercises in Clinical Reasoning

Don’t Drop the Anchor

Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.