Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 7/2014

01-07-2014 | Original Research

Translating the Hemoglobin A1C with More Easily Understood Feedback: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Authors: Anjali Gopalan, M.D., Emin Tahirovic, MSc, Haley Moss, M.D., M.B.A., Andrea B. Troxel, ScD., Jingsan Zhu, M.S, M.B.A, George Loewenstein, PhD, Kevin G. Volpp, M.D., PhD.

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 7/2014

Login to get access

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION

Previous work has indicated that for patients with diabetes, there is value in understanding glycemic control. Despite these findings, patient understanding of the hemoglobin A1C value (A1C) is notably poor. In this study, we test the effect of two alternative communication formats of the A1C on improving glycemic control among patients with poorly controlled diabetes.

METHODS

177 patients with poorly controlled diabetes were randomized to one of three study arms that varied in the information they received: (1) a “diabetes report card” containing individualized information about glycemic control for each participant with letter grades ranging from A to F; (2) a “report card” containing a face whose emotion reflected current glycemic control; or (3) a “report card” with glycemic control expressed with the A1C value (standard arm). The primary study outcome was change in A1C at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included changes in participant perceptions of their glycemic control.

RESULTS

The average A1C for enrolled participants was 9.9 % (S.D. 1.7) and did not differ significantly among study arms. We noted no significant differences in change in A1C at 6 months between the standard and experimental arms. Using multiple imputation to account for missing A1C values, the changes in A1C for the letter grade, face, and standard arms were -0.55 % (-1.15, 0.05), -0.89 % (-1.49, -0.29), and -0.74 % (-1.51, 0.029), respectively (p = 0.67 for control vs. grade, p = 0.76 for control vs. face).

DISCUSSION

Feedback to patients with poorly controlled diabetes in the form of letter grades and faces did not differentially impact glycemic control at 6 months or participant perceptions of current control. These efforts to improve communication and patient understanding of disease management targets need further refinement to significantly impact diabetes outcomes.

Clinical Trial ID

NCT01143870
Literature
1.
go back to reference Schillinger D, et al. Association of health literacy with diabetes outcomes. JAMA. 2002;288(4):475–82.PubMedCrossRef Schillinger D, et al. Association of health literacy with diabetes outcomes. JAMA. 2002;288(4):475–82.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Beard E, et al. Do people with diabetes understand their clinical marker of long-term glycemic control (HbA1c levels) and does this predict diabetes self-care behaviours and HbA1c? Patient Educ Couns. 2010;80:227–32.PubMedCrossRef Beard E, et al. Do people with diabetes understand their clinical marker of long-term glycemic control (HbA1c levels) and does this predict diabetes self-care behaviours and HbA1c? Patient Educ Couns. 2010;80:227–32.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Berikai P, et al. Gain in patients’ knowledge of diabetes management targets is associated with better glycemic control. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(6):1587–9.PubMedCrossRef Berikai P, et al. Gain in patients’ knowledge of diabetes management targets is associated with better glycemic control. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(6):1587–9.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Wang S, et al. Lack of knowledge of glycosylated hemoglobin in patients with diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008;81(1):e15–7.PubMedCrossRef Wang S, et al. Lack of knowledge of glycosylated hemoglobin in patients with diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008;81(1):e15–7.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Parkes G, et al. Effect on smoking quit rate of telling patients their lung age: the Step2quit randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2008;336(7644):598–600.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Parkes G, et al. Effect on smoking quit rate of telling patients their lung age: the Step2quit randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2008;336(7644):598–600.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Rosenstock IM, Strecher VJ, Becker MH. Social learning theory and the Health Belief Model. Health Educ Q. 1988;15(2):175–83.PubMedCrossRef Rosenstock IM, Strecher VJ, Becker MH. Social learning theory and the Health Belief Model. Health Educ Q. 1988;15(2):175–83.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes--2012. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(Supplement 1):S11–63. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes--2012. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(Supplement 1):S11–63.
12.
go back to reference Wong DL, Hokenberry-Eaton M, Wilson D, Winkelstein ML, Schwartz P. Wong’s Essentials of Pediatric Nursing. 6th ed. Saint Louis: Mosby Inc; 2001. Wong DL, Hokenberry-Eaton M, Wilson D, Winkelstein ML, Schwartz P. Wong’s Essentials of Pediatric Nursing. 6th ed. Saint Louis: Mosby Inc; 2001.
13.
go back to reference Kaufman L. Utilities Turn Their Customers Green, With Envy, in The New York Times. New York: The New York Times Company; 2009. Kaufman L. Utilities Turn Their Customers Green, With Envy, in The New York Times. New York: The New York Times Company; 2009.
14.
go back to reference Cavanaugh K, et al. Association of numeracy and diabetes control. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148(10):737–46.PubMedCrossRef Cavanaugh K, et al. Association of numeracy and diabetes control. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148(10):737–46.PubMedCrossRef
15.
16.
go back to reference Schwartz LM, et al. The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127(11):966–72.PubMedCrossRef Schwartz LM, et al. The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127(11):966–72.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Nathan DM, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy: a consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(8):1963–72.PubMedCrossRef Nathan DM, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy: a consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(8):1963–72.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Molyneaux LM, et al. Better glycaemic control and risk reduction of diabetic complications in Type 2 diabetes: comparison with the DCCT. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1998;42(2):77–83.PubMedCrossRef Molyneaux LM, et al. Better glycaemic control and risk reduction of diabetic complications in Type 2 diabetes: comparison with the DCCT. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1998;42(2):77–83.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Group. The relationship of glycemic exposure (HbA1c) to the risk of development and progression of retinopathy in the diabetes control and complications trial. Diabetes. 1995; 44(8):968–83. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Group. The relationship of glycemic exposure (HbA1c) to the risk of development and progression of retinopathy in the diabetes control and complications trial. Diabetes. 1995; 44(8):968–83.
20.
go back to reference Little RJA, Rubin DB. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 1987. Little RJA, Rubin DB. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 1987.
21.
go back to reference Long JA, et al. Peer mentoring and financial incentives to improve glucose control in African American veterans: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(6):416–24.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Long JA, et al. Peer mentoring and financial incentives to improve glucose control in African American veterans: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(6):416–24.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Lorincz IS, Lawson BC, Long JA. Provider and patient directed financial incentives to improve care and outcomes for patients with diabetes. Curr Diab Rep. 2013;13(2):188–95.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Lorincz IS, Lawson BC, Long JA. Provider and patient directed financial incentives to improve care and outcomes for patients with diabetes. Curr Diab Rep. 2013;13(2):188–95.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Ratanawongsa N, et al. Communication and medication refill adherence: the diabetes study of Northern California. Arch Intern Med. 2012; 1–9. Ratanawongsa N, et al. Communication and medication refill adherence: the diabetes study of Northern California. Arch Intern Med. 2012; 1–9.
Metadata
Title
Translating the Hemoglobin A1C with More Easily Understood Feedback: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Authors
Anjali Gopalan, M.D.
Emin Tahirovic, MSc
Haley Moss, M.D., M.B.A.
Andrea B. Troxel, ScD.
Jingsan Zhu, M.S, M.B.A
George Loewenstein, PhD
Kevin G. Volpp, M.D., PhD.
Publication date
01-07-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 7/2014
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-014-2810-4

Other articles of this Issue 7/2014

Journal of General Internal Medicine 7/2014 Go to the issue