Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 6/2014

01-06-2014 | Original Research

Brief Training of Student Clinicians in Shared Decision Making: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Authors: Tammy C. Hoffmann, PhD, Sally Bennett, PhD, Clare Tomsett, BOccThy (Hons), Chris Del Mar, MD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 6/2014

Login to get access

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

Shared decision making is a crucial component of evidence-based practice, but a lack of training in the “how to” of it is a major barrier to its uptake.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of a brief intervention for facilitating shared decision making skills in clinicians and student clinicians.

DESIGN

Multi-centre randomized controlled trial.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred and seven medical students, physiotherapy or occupational therapy students undertaking a compulsory course in evidence-based practice as part of their undergraduate or postgraduate degree from two Australian universities.

INTERVENTION

The 1-h small-group intervention consisted of facilitated critique of five-step framework, strategies, and pre-recorded modelled role-play. Both groups were provided with a chapter about shared decision making skills.

MAIN MEASURES

The primary outcome was skills in shared decision making and communicating evidence [Observing Patient Involvement (OPTION) scale, items from the Assessing Communication about Evidence and Patient Preferences (ACEPP) Tool], rated by a blinded assessor from videorecorded role-plays. Secondary outcomes: confidence in these skills and attitudes towards patient-centred communication (Patient Practitioner Orientation Scale (PPOS)).

KEY RESULTS

Of participants, 95 % (102) completed the primary outcome measures. Two weeks post-intervention, intervention group participants scored significantly higher on the OPTION scale (adjusted group difference = 18.9, 95 % CI 12.4 to 25.4), ACEPP items (difference = 0.9, 95 % CI 0.5 to 1.3), confidence measure (difference = 13.1, 95 % CI 8.5 to 17.7), and the PPOS sharing subscale (difference = 0.2, 95 % CI 0.1 to 0.5). There was no significant difference for the PPOS caring subscale.

CONCLUSIONS

This brief intervention was effective in improving student clinicians’ ability, attitude towards, and confidence in shared decision making facilitation. Following further testing of the longer-term effects of this intervention, incorporation of this brief intervention into evidence-based practice courses and workshops should be considered, so that student clinicians graduate with these important skills, which are typically neglected in clinician training.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician–patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Patient Educ Couns. 1999;49:651–661. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician–patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Patient Educ Couns. 1999;49:651–661.
3.
go back to reference Barratt A. Evidence based medicine and shared decision making: the challenge of getting both evidence and preferences into health care. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73:407–412.PubMedCrossRef Barratt A. Evidence based medicine and shared decision making: the challenge of getting both evidence and preferences into health care. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73:407–412.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Légaré F, Ratté S, Gravel K, Graham ID. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73:526–535.PubMedCrossRef Légaré F, Ratté S, Gravel K, Graham ID. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73:526–535.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Stiggelbout A, Van der Weijden T, De Wit M, et al. Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare. BMJ. 2012;344:e256.PubMedCrossRef Stiggelbout A, Van der Weijden T, De Wit M, et al. Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare. BMJ. 2012;344:e256.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Barry MJ, Edgman-Levitan S. Shared decision making—the pinnacle of patient-centered care. NEJM. 2012;366:780–781.PubMedCrossRef Barry MJ, Edgman-Levitan S. Shared decision making—the pinnacle of patient-centered care. NEJM. 2012;366:780–781.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Alston C, Paget L, Halvorson G, et al. Communicating with patients on health care evidence. Discussion paper. Washington, DC: 2012. Alston C, Paget L, Halvorson G, et al. Communicating with patients on health care evidence. Discussion paper. Washington, DC: 2012.
8.
go back to reference Elwyn G, Edwards A, Hood K, et al. Achieving involvement: process outcomes from a cluster randomized trial of shared decision making skill development and use of risk communication aids in general practice. Fam Pract. 2004;21:337–346.PubMedCrossRef Elwyn G, Edwards A, Hood K, et al. Achieving involvement: process outcomes from a cluster randomized trial of shared decision making skill development and use of risk communication aids in general practice. Fam Pract. 2004;21:337–346.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Légaré F, Ratté S, Stacey D, et al. Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;5:Art. No.: CD006732. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006732. Légaré F, Ratté S, Stacey D, et al. Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;5:Art. No.: CD006732. DOI: 10.​1002/​14651858.​CD006732.
10.
go back to reference Légaré F, Bekker H, Desroches S, et al. How can continuing professional development better promote shared decision-making? Perspectives from an international collaboration. Implement Sci. 2011;6:68.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Légaré F, Bekker H, Desroches S, et al. How can continuing professional development better promote shared decision-making? Perspectives from an international collaboration. Implement Sci. 2011;6:68.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Towle A, Godolphin W, Grams G, Lamarre A. Putting informed and shared decision making into practice. Health Expect. 2006;9:321–332.PubMedCrossRef Towle A, Godolphin W, Grams G, Lamarre A. Putting informed and shared decision making into practice. Health Expect. 2006;9:321–332.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Meats E, Heneghan C, Crilly M, Glasziou P. Evidence-based medicine teaching in UK medical schools. Med Teach. 2009;31:332–337.PubMedCrossRef Meats E, Heneghan C, Crilly M, Glasziou P. Evidence-based medicine teaching in UK medical schools. Med Teach. 2009;31:332–337.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hatala R, Guyatt G. Evaluating the teaching of evidence-based medicine. JAMA. 2002;288:1110–1112.PubMedCrossRef Hatala R, Guyatt G. Evaluating the teaching of evidence-based medicine. JAMA. 2002;288:1110–1112.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Green M. Graduate medical education training in clinical epidemiology, critical appraisal, and evidence-based medicine: A critical review of curricula. Acad Med. 1999;74:686–694.PubMedCrossRef Green M. Graduate medical education training in clinical epidemiology, critical appraisal, and evidence-based medicine: A critical review of curricula. Acad Med. 1999;74:686–694.PubMedCrossRef
15.
16.
go back to reference Von Fragstein M, Silverman J, Cushing A, Quilligan S, Salisbury H, Wiskin C. UK consensus statement on the content of communication curricula in undergraduate medical education. Med Educ. 2008;42:1100–1107.CrossRef Von Fragstein M, Silverman J, Cushing A, Quilligan S, Salisbury H, Wiskin C. UK consensus statement on the content of communication curricula in undergraduate medical education. Med Educ. 2008;42:1100–1107.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hauer K, Fernandez A, Teherani A, Boscardin C, Saba G. Assessment of medical students’ shared decision-making in standardized patient encounters. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26:367–372.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Hauer K, Fernandez A, Teherani A, Boscardin C, Saba G. Assessment of medical students’ shared decision-making in standardized patient encounters. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26:367–372.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hoffmann T, Tooth L. Talking with clients about evidence. In: Hoffmann T, Bennett S, Del Mar C, eds. Evidence-based practice across the health professions. Sydney: Elsevier Inc; 2010:276–299. Hoffmann T, Tooth L. Talking with clients about evidence. In: Hoffmann T, Bennett S, Del Mar C, eds. Evidence-based practice across the health professions. Sydney: Elsevier Inc; 2010:276–299.
20.
go back to reference Epstein RM, Alper BS, Quill TE. Communicating evidence for participatory decision making. JAMA. 2004;291:2359–2366.PubMedCrossRef Epstein RM, Alper BS, Quill TE. Communicating evidence for participatory decision making. JAMA. 2004;291:2359–2366.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Elwyn G, Hutchings H, Edwards A, et al. The OPTION scale: measuring the extent that clinicians involve patients in decision-making tasks. Health Expect. 2005;8:34–42.PubMedCrossRef Elwyn G, Hutchings H, Edwards A, et al. The OPTION scale: measuring the extent that clinicians involve patients in decision-making tasks. Health Expect. 2005;8:34–42.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Siriwardena AN, Edwards AG, Campion P, Freeman A, Elwyn G. Involve the patient and pass the MRCGP: investigating shared decision making in a consulting skills examination using a validated instrument. Br J Gen Pract. 2006;56:857–862.PubMedCentralPubMed Siriwardena AN, Edwards AG, Campion P, Freeman A, Elwyn G. Involve the patient and pass the MRCGP: investigating shared decision making in a consulting skills examination using a validated instrument. Br J Gen Pract. 2006;56:857–862.PubMedCentralPubMed
23.
go back to reference Elwyn G, Edwards A, Wensing M, Hood K, Atwell C, Grol R. Shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12:93–99.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Elwyn G, Edwards A, Wensing M, Hood K, Atwell C, Grol R. Shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12:93–99.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Shepherd HL, Barratt A, Trevena LJ, et al. Three questions that patients can ask to improve the quality of information physicians give about treatment options: a cross-over trial. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;84:379–385.PubMedCrossRef Shepherd HL, Barratt A, Trevena LJ, et al. Three questions that patients can ask to improve the quality of information physicians give about treatment options: a cross-over trial. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;84:379–385.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Krupat E, Rosenkranz SL, Yeager CM, Barnard K, Putnam SM, Inui TS. The practice orientations of physicians and patients: the effect of doctor–patient congruence on satisfaction. Patient Educ Couns. 2000;39:49–59.PubMedCrossRef Krupat E, Rosenkranz SL, Yeager CM, Barnard K, Putnam SM, Inui TS. The practice orientations of physicians and patients: the effect of doctor–patient congruence on satisfaction. Patient Educ Couns. 2000;39:49–59.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Shaw WS, Woiszwillo MJ, Krupat E. Further validation of the Patient–Practitioner Orientation Scale (PPOS) from recorded visits for back pain. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;89:288–291.PubMedCrossRef Shaw WS, Woiszwillo MJ, Krupat E. Further validation of the Patient–Practitioner Orientation Scale (PPOS) from recorded visits for back pain. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;89:288–291.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Krupat E, Yeager CM, Putnam S. Patient role orientations, doctor-patient fit, and visit satisfaction. Psychol Health. 2000;15:707–719.CrossRef Krupat E, Yeager CM, Putnam S. Patient role orientations, doctor-patient fit, and visit satisfaction. Psychol Health. 2000;15:707–719.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference McKenna K, Tooth L. Client education: a partnership approach for health practitioners. Sydney: UNSW Press; 2006. McKenna K, Tooth L. Client education: a partnership approach for health practitioners. Sydney: UNSW Press; 2006.
29.
go back to reference Sonntag U, Wiesner J, Fahrenkrog S, Renneberg B, Braun V, Heintze C. Motivational interviewing and shared decision making in primary care. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;87:62–66.PubMedCrossRef Sonntag U, Wiesner J, Fahrenkrog S, Renneberg B, Braun V, Heintze C. Motivational interviewing and shared decision making in primary care. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;87:62–66.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Fallowfield L, Jenkins V, Farewell V, Saul J, Duffy A, Eves R. Efficacy of a cancer research UK communication skills training model for oncologists: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;359:650–656.PubMedCrossRef Fallowfield L, Jenkins V, Farewell V, Saul J, Duffy A, Eves R. Efficacy of a cancer research UK communication skills training model for oncologists: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;359:650–656.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Helitzer DL, Lanoue M, Wilson B, De Hernandez BU, Warner T, Roter D. A randomized controlled trial of communication training with primary care providers to improve patient-centeredness and health risk communication. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;82:21–29.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Helitzer DL, Lanoue M, Wilson B, De Hernandez BU, Warner T, Roter D. A randomized controlled trial of communication training with primary care providers to improve patient-centeredness and health risk communication. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;82:21–29.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Salzburg statement on shared decision making. BMJ. 2011;342:d1745. Salzburg statement on shared decision making. BMJ. 2011;342:d1745.
33.
go back to reference Berkhof M, Van Rijssen H, Schellart AJM, Anema JR, Van der Beek AJ. Effective training strategies for teaching communication skills to physicians: an overview of systematic reviews. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;84:152–162.PubMedCrossRef Berkhof M, Van Rijssen H, Schellart AJM, Anema JR, Van der Beek AJ. Effective training strategies for teaching communication skills to physicians: an overview of systematic reviews. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;84:152–162.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Han P, Joekes K, Elwyn G, Mazor K, Thomson R, Sedgwick P, et al. Development and evaluation of a risk communication curriculum for medical students. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;94:43–49.PubMedCrossRef Han P, Joekes K, Elwyn G, Mazor K, Thomson R, Sedgwick P, et al. Development and evaluation of a risk communication curriculum for medical students. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;94:43–49.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Brief Training of Student Clinicians in Shared Decision Making: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
Authors
Tammy C. Hoffmann, PhD
Sally Bennett, PhD
Clare Tomsett, BOccThy (Hons)
Chris Del Mar, MD
Publication date
01-06-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 6/2014
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-014-2765-5

Other articles of this Issue 6/2014

Journal of General Internal Medicine 6/2014 Go to the issue