Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 9/2013

01-09-2013 | Original Research

Predictors of CT Colonography Utilization Among Asymptomatic Medicare Beneficiaries

Authors: Hanna M. Zafar, MD MHS, Jianing Yang, BS, Michael Harhay, MPH, Anna Lev-Toaff, MD, Katrina Armstrong, MD MSCE

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 9/2013

Login to get access

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

Although the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) denied coverage for screening computed tomography colonography (CTC) in March 2009, little is understood about whether CTC was targeted to the appropriate patient population prior to this decision.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate patient characteristics and known relative clinical indications for screening CTC among patients who received CTC compared to optical colonoscopy (OC).

DESIGN/PARTICIPANTS

Cross-sectional study of all 10,538 asymptomatic Medicare beneficiaries who underwent CTC between January 2007 and December 2008, compared to a cohort of 160,113 asymptomatic beneficiaries who underwent OC, matched on county of residence and year of examination.

MAIN MEASURES

Patient characteristics and known relative appropriate and inappropriate clinical indications for screening CTC.

KEY RESULTS

CTC utilization was higher among women, patients > 65 years of age, white patients, and those with household income > 75 % (p = 0.001). Patients with relatively appropriate clinical indications for screening CTC were more likely to undergo CTC than OC including presumed incomplete OC (OR 80.7, 95 % CI 76.01–85.63); sedation risk (OR 1.11, 95 % CI 1.05–1.17); and chronic anticoagulation risk (OR 1.46, 95 % CI 1.38–1.54), after adjusting for patient characteristics and known clinical indications. Conversely, patients undergoing high-risk screening, an inappropriate indication, were less likely to receive CTC (OR 0.4, 95 % CI 0.37–0.42). Overall, 83 % of asymptomatic patients referred to CTC had at least one clinical indication relatively appropriate for CTC (8,772/10,538).

CONCLUSION

During the 2 years preceding CMS denial for screening, CTC was targeted to asymptomatic patients with relatively appropriate clinical indications for CTC/not receiving OC. However, CTC utilization was lower among certain demographic groups, including minority patients. These findings raise the possibility that future coverage of screening CTC might exacerbate disparities in colorectal cancer screening while increasing overall screening rates.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cancer screening - United States, 2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. Jan 27 2012;61(3):41–45. Cancer screening - United States, 2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. Jan 27 2012;61(3):41–45.
2.
4.
go back to reference Cooper GS, Yuan Z, Landefeld CS, Johanson JF, Rimm AA. A national population-based study of incidence of colorectal cancer and age. Implications for screening in older Americans. Cancer. 1995;75(3):775–781.PubMedCrossRef Cooper GS, Yuan Z, Landefeld CS, Johanson JF, Rimm AA. A national population-based study of incidence of colorectal cancer and age. Implications for screening in older Americans. Cancer. 1995;75(3):775–781.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Cooper GS, Doug Kou T. Underuse of colorectal cancer screening in a cohort of Medicare beneficiaries. Cancer. 2008;112(2):293–299.PubMedCrossRef Cooper GS, Doug Kou T. Underuse of colorectal cancer screening in a cohort of Medicare beneficiaries. Cancer. 2008;112(2):293–299.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Johnson CD, Chen MH, Toledano AY, et al. Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(12):1207–1217.PubMedCrossRef Johnson CD, Chen MH, Toledano AY, et al. Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(12):1207–1217.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(23):2191–2200.PubMedCrossRef Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(23):2191–2200.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, et al. CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(14):1403–1412.PubMedCrossRef Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, et al. CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(14):1403–1412.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Hanson ME, Hinshaw JL. CT colonography: performance and program outcome measures in an older screening population. Radiology. 2010;254(2):493–500.PubMedCrossRef Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Hanson ME, Hinshaw JL. CT colonography: performance and program outcome measures in an older screening population. Radiology. 2010;254(2):493–500.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Schwartz DC, Dasher KJ, Said A, et al. Impact of a CT colonography screening program on endoscopic colonoscopy in clinical practice. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103(2):346–351.PubMedCrossRef Schwartz DC, Dasher KJ, Said A, et al. Impact of a CT colonography screening program on endoscopic colonoscopy in clinical practice. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103(2):346–351.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Svensson MH, Svensson E, Lasson A, Hellstrom M. Patient acceptance of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy: prospective comparative study in patients with or suspected of having colorectal disease. Radiology. 2002;222(2):337–345.PubMedCrossRef Svensson MH, Svensson E, Lasson A, Hellstrom M. Patient acceptance of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy: prospective comparative study in patients with or suspected of having colorectal disease. Radiology. 2002;222(2):337–345.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Pineau BC, et al. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA. 2004;291(14):1713–1719.PubMedCrossRef Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Pineau BC, et al. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA. 2004;291(14):1713–1719.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Taylor SA, Halligan S, Saunders BP, Bassett P, Vance M, Bartram CI. Acceptance by patients of multidetector CT colonography compared with barium enema examinations, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181(4):913–921.PubMedCrossRef Taylor SA, Halligan S, Saunders BP, Bassett P, Vance M, Bartram CI. Acceptance by patients of multidetector CT colonography compared with barium enema examinations, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181(4):913–921.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Gluecker TM, Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, et al. Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography, colonoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema examination: prospective assessment of patient perceptions and preferences. Radiology. 2003;227(2):378–384.PubMedCrossRef Gluecker TM, Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, et al. Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography, colonoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema examination: prospective assessment of patient perceptions and preferences. Radiology. 2003;227(2):378–384.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Pooler BD, Baumel MJ, Cash BD, et al. Screening CT colonography: multicenter survey of patient experience, preference, and potential impact on adherence. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198(6):1361–1366.PubMedCrossRef Pooler BD, Baumel MJ, Cash BD, et al. Screening CT colonography: multicenter survey of patient experience, preference, and potential impact on adherence. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198(6):1361–1366.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference McFarland EG, Fletcher JG, Pickhardt P, et al. ACR Colon Cancer Committee white paper: status of CT colonography 2009. J Am Coll Radiol. 2009;6(11):756–772. e754.PubMedCrossRef McFarland EG, Fletcher JG, Pickhardt P, et al. ACR Colon Cancer Committee white paper: status of CT colonography 2009. J Am Coll Radiol. 2009;6(11):756–772. e754.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Almond LM, Bowley DM, Karandikar SS, Roy-Choudhury SH. Role of CT colonography in symptomatic assessment, surveillance and screening. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011;26(8):959–966.PubMedCrossRef Almond LM, Bowley DM, Karandikar SS, Roy-Choudhury SH. Role of CT colonography in symptomatic assessment, surveillance and screening. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011;26(8):959–966.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ko CW, Dominitz JA, Green P, Kreuter W, Baldwin LM. Utilization and predictors of early repeat colonoscopy in Medicare beneficiaries. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105(12):2670–2679.PubMedCrossRef Ko CW, Dominitz JA, Green P, Kreuter W, Baldwin LM. Utilization and predictors of early repeat colonoscopy in Medicare beneficiaries. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105(12):2670–2679.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chron Dis. 1987;40(5):373–383.PubMedCrossRef Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chron Dis. 1987;40(5):373–383.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ko CW, Dominitz JA, Green P, Kreuter W, Baldwin LM. Accuracy of Medicare claims for identifying findings and procedures performed during colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73(3):447–453. e441.PubMedCrossRef Ko CW, Dominitz JA, Green P, Kreuter W, Baldwin LM. Accuracy of Medicare claims for identifying findings and procedures performed during colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73(3):447–453. e441.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hanson ME, Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Pfau PR. Anatomic factors predictive of incomplete colonoscopy based on findings at CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189(4):774–779.PubMedCrossRef Hanson ME, Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Pfau PR. Anatomic factors predictive of incomplete colonoscopy based on findings at CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189(4):774–779.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Cirocco WC, Rusin LC. Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;38(9):964–968.PubMedCrossRef Cirocco WC, Rusin LC. Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;38(9):964–968.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Dafnis G, Granath F, Pahlman L, Ekbom A, Blomqvist P. Patient factors influencing the completion rate in colonoscopy. Dig Liver Dis. 2005;37(2):113–118.PubMedCrossRef Dafnis G, Granath F, Pahlman L, Ekbom A, Blomqvist P. Patient factors influencing the completion rate in colonoscopy. Dig Liver Dis. 2005;37(2):113–118.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Ristvedt SL, McFarland EG, Weinstock LB, Thyssen EP. Patient preferences for CT colonography, conventional colonoscopy, and bowel preparation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98(3):578–585.PubMedCrossRef Ristvedt SL, McFarland EG, Weinstock LB, Thyssen EP. Patient preferences for CT colonography, conventional colonoscopy, and bowel preparation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98(3):578–585.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Beebe TJ, Johnson CD, Stoner SM, Anderson KJ, Limburg PJ. Assessing attitudes toward laxative preparation in colorectal cancer screening and effects on future testing: potential receptivity to computed tomographic colonography. Mayo Clin Proc. 2007;82(6):666–671.PubMed Beebe TJ, Johnson CD, Stoner SM, Anderson KJ, Limburg PJ. Assessing attitudes toward laxative preparation in colorectal cancer screening and effects on future testing: potential receptivity to computed tomographic colonography. Mayo Clin Proc. 2007;82(6):666–671.PubMed
28.
go back to reference Ko CW, Kreuter W, Baldwin LM. Persistent demographic differences in colorectal cancer screening utilization despite Medicare reimbursement. BMC Gastroenterol. 2005;5:10.PubMedCrossRef Ko CW, Kreuter W, Baldwin LM. Persistent demographic differences in colorectal cancer screening utilization despite Medicare reimbursement. BMC Gastroenterol. 2005;5:10.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Seeff LC, Nadel MR, Klabunde CN, et al. Patterns and predictors of colorectal cancer test use in the adult U.S. population. Cancer. 2004;100(10):2093–2103.PubMedCrossRef Seeff LC, Nadel MR, Klabunde CN, et al. Patterns and predictors of colorectal cancer test use in the adult U.S. population. Cancer. 2004;100(10):2093–2103.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Kandula NR, Wen M, Jacobs EA, Lauderdale DS. Low rates of colorectal, cervical, and breast cancer screening in Asian Americans compared with non-Hispanic whites: cultural influences or access to care? Cancer. 2006;107(1):184–192.PubMedCrossRef Kandula NR, Wen M, Jacobs EA, Lauderdale DS. Low rates of colorectal, cervical, and breast cancer screening in Asian Americans compared with non-Hispanic whites: cultural influences or access to care? Cancer. 2006;107(1):184–192.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Cooper GS, Koroukian SM. Racial disparities in the use of and indications for colorectal procedures in Medicare beneficiaries. Cancer. 2004;100(2):418–424.PubMedCrossRef Cooper GS, Koroukian SM. Racial disparities in the use of and indications for colorectal procedures in Medicare beneficiaries. Cancer. 2004;100(2):418–424.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Ghafoor A, Jemal A, Cokkinides V, et al. Cancer statistics for African Americans. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002;52(6):326–341.PubMedCrossRef Ghafoor A, Jemal A, Cokkinides V, et al. Cancer statistics for African Americans. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002;52(6):326–341.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Janz NK, Wren PA, Schottenfeld D, Guire KE. Colorectal cancer screening attitudes and behavior: a population-based study. Prev Med. 2003;37(6 Pt 1):627–634.PubMedCrossRef Janz NK, Wren PA, Schottenfeld D, Guire KE. Colorectal cancer screening attitudes and behavior: a population-based study. Prev Med. 2003;37(6 Pt 1):627–634.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Overholser L, Zittleman L, Kempe A, et al. Use of colon cancer testing in rural Colorado primary care practices. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(10):1095–1100.PubMedCrossRef Overholser L, Zittleman L, Kempe A, et al. Use of colon cancer testing in rural Colorado primary care practices. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(10):1095–1100.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Rajapaksa RC, Macari M, Bini EJ. Racial/ethnic differences in patient experiences with and preferences for computed tomography colonography and optical colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5(11):1306–1312.PubMedCrossRef Rajapaksa RC, Macari M, Bini EJ. Racial/ethnic differences in patient experiences with and preferences for computed tomography colonography and optical colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5(11):1306–1312.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Bach PB, Pham HH, Schrag D, Tate RC, Hargraves JL. Primary care physicians who treat blacks and whites. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(6):575–584.PubMedCrossRef Bach PB, Pham HH, Schrag D, Tate RC, Hargraves JL. Primary care physicians who treat blacks and whites. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(6):575–584.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Zafar HM, Kramer S, Bonaccorsi D, Langlotz CP, Armstrong K. Predictors of initial 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography indication among patients with colorectal cancer. Nucl Med Commun. 2012;33(7):739–746.PubMedCrossRef Zafar HM, Kramer S, Bonaccorsi D, Langlotz CP, Armstrong K. Predictors of initial 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography indication among patients with colorectal cancer. Nucl Med Commun. 2012;33(7):739–746.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Onega T, Tosteson TD, Wang Q, et al. Geographic and sociodemographic disparities in PET use by Medicare beneficiaries with cancer. J Am Coll Radiol. 2012;9(9):635–642.PubMedCrossRef Onega T, Tosteson TD, Wang Q, et al. Geographic and sociodemographic disparities in PET use by Medicare beneficiaries with cancer. J Am Coll Radiol. 2012;9(9):635–642.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Troisi RJ, Freedman AN, Devesa SS. Incidence of colorectal carcinoma in the U.S.: an update of trends by gender, race, age, subsite, and stage, 1975-1994. Cancer. 1999;85(8):1670–1676.PubMedCrossRef Troisi RJ, Freedman AN, Devesa SS. Incidence of colorectal carcinoma in the U.S.: an update of trends by gender, race, age, subsite, and stage, 1975-1994. Cancer. 1999;85(8):1670–1676.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Wardle J, Miles A, Atkin W. Gender differences in utilization of colorectal cancer screening. J Med Screen. 2005;12(1):20–27.PubMedCrossRef Wardle J, Miles A, Atkin W. Gender differences in utilization of colorectal cancer screening. J Med Screen. 2005;12(1):20–27.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference McCarthy BD, Moskowitz MA. Screening flexible sigmoidoscopy: patient attitudes and compliance. J Gen Intern Med. 1993;8(3):120–125.PubMedCrossRef McCarthy BD, Moskowitz MA. Screening flexible sigmoidoscopy: patient attitudes and compliance. J Gen Intern Med. 1993;8(3):120–125.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Lewis SF, Jensen NM. Screening sigmoidoscopy. Factors associated with utilization. J Gen Intern Med. Sep. 1996;11(9):542–544.CrossRef Lewis SF, Jensen NM. Screening sigmoidoscopy. Factors associated with utilization. J Gen Intern Med. Sep. 1996;11(9):542–544.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference von Wagner C, Ghanouni A, Halligan S, et al. Patient acceptability and psychologic consequences of CT colonography compared with those of colonoscopy: results from a multicenter randomized controlled trial of symptomatic patients. Radiology. 2012;263(3):723–731.CrossRef von Wagner C, Ghanouni A, Halligan S, et al. Patient acceptability and psychologic consequences of CT colonography compared with those of colonoscopy: results from a multicenter randomized controlled trial of symptomatic patients. Radiology. 2012;263(3):723–731.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Imaeda A, Bender D, Fraenkel L. What is most important to patients when deciding about colorectal screening? J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(7):688–693.PubMedCrossRef Imaeda A, Bender D, Fraenkel L. What is most important to patients when deciding about colorectal screening? J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(7):688–693.PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference McGregor SE, Hilsden RJ, Li FX, Bryant HE, Murray A. Low uptake of colorectal cancer screening 3 yr after release of national recommendations for screening. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102(8):1727–1735.PubMedCrossRef McGregor SE, Hilsden RJ, Li FX, Bryant HE, Murray A. Low uptake of colorectal cancer screening 3 yr after release of national recommendations for screening. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102(8):1727–1735.PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Anderson JC, Messina CR, Cohn W, et al. Factors predictive of difficult colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54(5):558–562.PubMedCrossRef Anderson JC, Messina CR, Cohn W, et al. Factors predictive of difficult colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54(5):558–562.PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Anderson JC, Gonzalez JD, Messina CR, Pollack BJ. Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy: thinner is not always better. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95(10):2784–2787.PubMedCrossRef Anderson JC, Gonzalez JD, Messina CR, Pollack BJ. Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy: thinner is not always better. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95(10):2784–2787.PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Shah HA, Paszat LF, Saskin R, Stukel TA, Rabeneck L. Factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy: a population-based study. Gastroenterology. 2007;132(7):2297–2303.PubMedCrossRef Shah HA, Paszat LF, Saskin R, Stukel TA, Rabeneck L. Factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy: a population-based study. Gastroenterology. 2007;132(7):2297–2303.PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Ramakrishnan K, Scheid DC. Predictors of incomplete flexible sigmoidoscopy. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2003;16(6):478–484.PubMedCrossRef Ramakrishnan K, Scheid DC. Predictors of incomplete flexible sigmoidoscopy. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2003;16(6):478–484.PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Yucel C, Lev-Toaff AS, Moussa N, Durrani H. CT colonography for incomplete or contraindicated optical colonoscopy in older patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190(1):145–150.PubMedCrossRef Yucel C, Lev-Toaff AS, Moussa N, Durrani H. CT colonography for incomplete or contraindicated optical colonoscopy in older patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190(1):145–150.PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Cucino C, Buchner AM, Sonnenberg A. Continued rightward shift of colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45(8):1035–1040.PubMedCrossRef Cucino C, Buchner AM, Sonnenberg A. Continued rightward shift of colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45(8):1035–1040.PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Rabeneck L, Davila JA, El-Serag HB. Is there a true "shift" to the right colon in the incidence of colorectal cancer? Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98(6):1400–1409.PubMed Rabeneck L, Davila JA, El-Serag HB. Is there a true "shift" to the right colon in the incidence of colorectal cancer? Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98(6):1400–1409.PubMed
53.
go back to reference Murphy G, Devesa SS, Cross AJ, Inskip PD, McGlynn KA, Cook MB. Sex disparities in colorectal cancer incidence by anatomic subsite, race and age. Int J Cancer. 2011;128(7):1668–1675.PubMedCrossRef Murphy G, Devesa SS, Cross AJ, Inskip PD, McGlynn KA, Cook MB. Sex disparities in colorectal cancer incidence by anatomic subsite, race and age. Int J Cancer. 2011;128(7):1668–1675.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Predictors of CT Colonography Utilization Among Asymptomatic Medicare Beneficiaries
Authors
Hanna M. Zafar, MD MHS
Jianing Yang, BS
Michael Harhay, MPH
Anna Lev-Toaff, MD
Katrina Armstrong, MD MSCE
Publication date
01-09-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 9/2013
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-013-2414-4

Other articles of this Issue 9/2013

Journal of General Internal Medicine 9/2013 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.