Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 12/2011

01-12-2011 | Original Research

Assessing the Impact of Screening Colonoscopy on Mortality in the Medicare Population

Authors: Cary P. Gross, MD, Pamela R. Soulos, MPH, Joseph S. Ross, MD, MHS, Laura D. Cramer, PhD, Christopher Guerrero, MPH, Mary E. Tinetti, MD, R. Scott Braithwaite, MD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 12/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Some have recommended against routine screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) among patients ≥75 years of age, while others have suggested that screening colonoscopy (SC) is less beneficial for women than men. We estimated the expected benefits (decreased mortality from CRC) and harms (SC-related mortality) of SC based on sex, age, and comorbidity.

Objective

To stratify older patients according to expected benefits and harms of SC based on sex, age, and comorbidity.

Design

Retrospective study using Medicare claims data.

Participants

Medicare beneficiaries 67–94 years old with and without CRC.

Main Measures

Life expectancy, CRC- and colonoscopy-attributable mortality rates across strata of sex, age, and comorbidity, pay-off time (i.e. the minimum time until benefits from SC exceeded harms), and life-years saved for every 100,000 SC.

Key Results

Increasing age and comorbidity were associated with lower CRC-attributable mortality. Due to shorter life expectancy and CRC-attributable mortality, the benefits associated with SC were substantially lower among patients with greater comorbidity. Among men aged 75–79 years with no comorbidity, the number of life-years saved was 459 per 100,000 SC, while men aged 67–69 with ≥3 comorbidities had 81 life-years saved per 100,000 SC. There was no evidence that SC was less effective in women. Among men and women 75–79 with no comorbidity, number of life-years saved was 459 and 509 per 100,000 SC, respectively; among patients with ≥3 comorbidities, there was no benefit for either men or women.

Conclusions

Although the effectiveness of SC was equivalent for men and women, there was substantial variation in SC effectiveness within age groups, arguing against screening recommendations based solely on age.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Force USPST. Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(9):627–37. Force USPST. Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(9):627–37.
2.
go back to reference Zauber AG, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Knudsen AB, Wilschut J, van Ballegooijen M, Kuntz KM. Evaluating test strategies for colorectal cancer screening: a decision analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(9):659–69.PubMed Zauber AG, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Knudsen AB, Wilschut J, van Ballegooijen M, Kuntz KM. Evaluating test strategies for colorectal cancer screening: a decision analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(9):659–69.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Rex DK, Johnson DA, Anderson JC, et al. American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009 [corrected]. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104(3):739–50.PubMedCrossRef Rex DK, Johnson DA, Anderson JC, et al. American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009 [corrected]. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104(3):739–50.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference American College of O, Gynecologists. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 384 November 2007: colonoscopy and colorectal cancer screening and prevention. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(5):1199–202.CrossRef American College of O, Gynecologists. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 384 November 2007: colonoscopy and colorectal cancer screening and prevention. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(5):1199–202.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference (CDC) CfDCaP. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data. Vol. 2009. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2009. (CDC) CfDCaP. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data. Vol. 2009. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2009.
6.
go back to reference Klabunde CN, Lanier D, Nadel MR, McLeod C, Yuan GG, Vernon SW. Colorectal Cancer Screening by Primary Care Physicians Recommendations and Practices, 2006–2007. Am J Prev Med. 2009;37(1):8–16.PubMedCrossRef Klabunde CN, Lanier D, Nadel MR, McLeod C, Yuan GG, Vernon SW. Colorectal Cancer Screening by Primary Care Physicians Recommendations and Practices, 2006–2007. Am J Prev Med. 2009;37(1):8–16.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Roy HK, Bianchi LK. Differences in colon adenomas and carcinomas among women and men: potential clinical implications. JAMA. 2009;302(15):1696–7.PubMedCrossRef Roy HK, Bianchi LK. Differences in colon adenomas and carcinomas among women and men: potential clinical implications. JAMA. 2009;302(15):1696–7.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Selby J, Friedman G, Quesenberry C, Weis N. A case-control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:653–7.PubMedCrossRef Selby J, Friedman G, Quesenberry C, Weis N. A case-control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:653–7.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(27):1977–81.PubMedCrossRef Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(27):1977–81.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Muller AD, Sonnenberg A. Protection by endoscopy against death from colorectal cancer. A case-control study among veterans. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155(16):1741–8.PubMedCrossRef Muller AD, Sonnenberg A. Protection by endoscopy against death from colorectal cancer. A case-control study among veterans. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155(16):1741–8.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Walter LC, Covinsky KE. Cancer screening in elderly patients: a framework for individualized decision making. JAMA. 2001;285(21):2750–6.PubMedCrossRef Walter LC, Covinsky KE. Cancer screening in elderly patients: a framework for individualized decision making. JAMA. 2001;285(21):2750–6.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ko CW, Sonnenberg A. Comparing risks and benefits of colorectal cancer screening in elderly patients. Gastroenterology. 2005;129(4):1163–70.PubMedCrossRef Ko CW, Sonnenberg A. Comparing risks and benefits of colorectal cancer screening in elderly patients. Gastroenterology. 2005;129(4):1163–70.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Winawer SJ, Fletcher RH, Miller L, et al. Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale. Gastroenterology. 1997;112(2):594–642.PubMedCrossRef Winawer SJ, Fletcher RH, Miller L, et al. Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale. Gastroenterology. 1997;112(2):594–642.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Berg AO. Screening for colorectal cancer: recommendations and rationale. Am J Nurs. 2002;102(9):107–17.PubMed Berg AO. Screening for colorectal cancer: recommendations and rationale. Am J Nurs. 2002;102(9):107–17.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Eyre HJ. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer, 2003. CA Cancer J Clin. 2003;53(1):27–43.PubMedCrossRef Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Eyre HJ. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer, 2003. CA Cancer J Clin. 2003;53(1):27–43.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Yamokoski LM, Hasselblad V, Moser DK, et al. Prediction of rehospitalization and death in severe heart failure by physicians and nurses of the ESCAPE trial. J Card Fail. 2007;13(1):8–13.PubMedCrossRef Yamokoski LM, Hasselblad V, Moser DK, et al. Prediction of rehospitalization and death in severe heart failure by physicians and nurses of the ESCAPE trial. J Card Fail. 2007;13(1):8–13.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Fox E, Landrum-McNiff K, Zhong Z, Dawson NV, Wu AW, Lynn J. Evaluation of prognostic criteria for determining hospice eligibility in patients with advanced lung, heart, or liver disease. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. JAMA. 1999;282(17):1638–45.PubMedCrossRef Fox E, Landrum-McNiff K, Zhong Z, Dawson NV, Wu AW, Lynn J. Evaluation of prognostic criteria for determining hospice eligibility in patients with advanced lung, heart, or liver disease. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. JAMA. 1999;282(17):1638–45.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Vigano A, Dorgan M, Bruera E, Suarez-Almazor ME. The relative accuracy of the clinical estimation of the duration of life for patients with end of life cancer. Cancer. 1999;86(1):170–6.PubMedCrossRef Vigano A, Dorgan M, Bruera E, Suarez-Almazor ME. The relative accuracy of the clinical estimation of the duration of life for patients with end of life cancer. Cancer. 1999;86(1):170–6.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Warren JL, Harlan LC, Fahey A, et al. Utility of the SEER-Medicare data to identify chemotherapy use. Med Care. 2002;40(8 Suppl):IV-55–61. Warren JL, Harlan LC, Fahey A, et al. Utility of the SEER-Medicare data to identify chemotherapy use. Med Care. 2002;40(8 Suppl):IV-55–61.
20.
go back to reference Warren J, Klabunde C, Schrag D, Bach P, Riley G. Overview of SEER-Medicare data: content, research applictions, and generalizability to the United States elderly population. Medical Care. 2002;40(supp):IV-3–IV-18. Warren J, Klabunde C, Schrag D, Bach P, Riley G. Overview of SEER-Medicare data: content, research applictions, and generalizability to the United States elderly population. Medical Care. 2002;40(supp):IV-3–IV-18.
21.
go back to reference Lamont EB, Lauderdale DS, Schilsky RL, Christakis NA. Construct validity of medicare chemotherapy claims: the case of 5FU. Med Care. 2002;40(3):201–11.PubMedCrossRef Lamont EB, Lauderdale DS, Schilsky RL, Christakis NA. Construct validity of medicare chemotherapy claims: the case of 5FU. Med Care. 2002;40(3):201–11.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Lamont EB, Herndon JE 2nd, Weeks JC, et al. Criterion validity of Medicare chemotherapy claims in Cancer and Leukemia Group B breast and lung cancer trial participants. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97(14):1080–3.PubMedCrossRef Lamont EB, Herndon JE 2nd, Weeks JC, et al. Criterion validity of Medicare chemotherapy claims in Cancer and Leukemia Group B breast and lung cancer trial participants. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97(14):1080–3.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Klabunde CN, Potosky AL, Legler JM, Warren JL. Development of a comorbidity index using physician claims data. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53(12):1258–67.PubMedCrossRef Klabunde CN, Potosky AL, Legler JM, Warren JL. Development of a comorbidity index using physician claims data. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53(12):1258–67.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Potosky A, Riley G, Lubitz J, Mentnech R, Kessler L. Potential for cancer related health services research using a linked Medicare-tumor related database. Medical Care. 1993;31:732–48.PubMedCrossRef Potosky A, Riley G, Lubitz J, Mentnech R, Kessler L. Potential for cancer related health services research using a linked Medicare-tumor related database. Medical Care. 1993;31:732–48.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Hebert PL, Geiss LS, Tierney EF, Engelgau MM, Yawn BP, McBean AM. Identifying persons with diabetes using Medicare claims data. Am J Med Qual. 1999;14(6):270–7.PubMedCrossRef Hebert PL, Geiss LS, Tierney EF, Engelgau MM, Yawn BP, McBean AM. Identifying persons with diabetes using Medicare claims data. Am J Med Qual. 1999;14(6):270–7.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, Coffey RM. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care. 1998;36(1):8–27.PubMedCrossRef Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, Coffey RM. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care. 1998;36(1):8–27.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Cooper GS, Koroukian SM. Geographic variation among Medicare beneficiaries in the use of colorectal carcinoma screening procedures. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99(8):1544–50.PubMedCrossRef Cooper GS, Koroukian SM. Geographic variation among Medicare beneficiaries in the use of colorectal carcinoma screening procedures. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99(8):1544–50.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Gross CP, Andersen MS, Krumholz HM, McAvay GJ, Proctor D, Tinetti ME. Relation between Medicare screening reimbursement and stage at diagnosis for older patients with colon cancer. JAMA. 2006;296(23):2815–22.PubMedCrossRef Gross CP, Andersen MS, Krumholz HM, McAvay GJ, Proctor D, Tinetti ME. Relation between Medicare screening reimbursement and stage at diagnosis for older patients with colon cancer. JAMA. 2006;296(23):2815–22.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Ko CW, Kreuter W, Baldwin LM. Effect of Medicare coverage on use of invasive colorectal cancer screening tests. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(22):2581–6.PubMedCrossRef Ko CW, Kreuter W, Baldwin LM. Effect of Medicare coverage on use of invasive colorectal cancer screening tests. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(22):2581–6.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Inadomi JM, Sonnenberg A. The impact of colorectal cancer screening on life expectancy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;51(5):517–23.PubMedCrossRef Inadomi JM, Sonnenberg A. The impact of colorectal cancer screening on life expectancy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;51(5):517–23.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Beck JR, Kassirer JP, Pauker SG. A convenient approximation of life expectancy (the "DEALE"). I. Validation of the method. Am J Med. 1982;73(6):883–8.PubMedCrossRef Beck JR, Kassirer JP, Pauker SG. A convenient approximation of life expectancy (the "DEALE"). I. Validation of the method. Am J Med. 1982;73(6):883–8.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference SEER Cancer Statistics Review: 1973–1993. In: Institute NC, ed. Vol. 2009. Bethesda, MD. SEER Cancer Statistics Review: 1973–1993. In: Institute NC, ed. Vol. 2009. Bethesda, MD.
33.
go back to reference Brenner H, Haug U, Arndt V, Stegmaier C, Altenhofen L, Hoffmeister M. Low risk of colorectal cancer and advanced adenomas more than 10 years after negative colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2010;138(3):870–6.PubMedCrossRef Brenner H, Haug U, Arndt V, Stegmaier C, Altenhofen L, Hoffmeister M. Low risk of colorectal cancer and advanced adenomas more than 10 years after negative colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2010;138(3):870–6.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM, Sturmer T, Hoffmeister M. Does a negative screening colonoscopy ever need to be repeated? Gut. 2006;55(8):1145–50.PubMedCrossRef Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM, Sturmer T, Hoffmeister M. Does a negative screening colonoscopy ever need to be repeated? Gut. 2006;55(8):1145–50.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Brenner H, Arndt V, Sturmer T, Stegmaier C, Ziegler H, Dhom G. Long-lasting reduction of risk of colorectal cancer following screening endoscopy. Br J Cancer. 2001;85(7):972–6.PubMedCrossRef Brenner H, Arndt V, Sturmer T, Stegmaier C, Ziegler H, Dhom G. Long-lasting reduction of risk of colorectal cancer following screening endoscopy. Br J Cancer. 2001;85(7):972–6.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Newcomb PA, Storer BE, Morimoto LM, Templeton A, Potter JD. Long-term efficacy of sigmoidoscopy in the reduction of colorectal cancer incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95(8):622–5.PubMedCrossRef Newcomb PA, Storer BE, Morimoto LM, Templeton A, Potter JD. Long-term efficacy of sigmoidoscopy in the reduction of colorectal cancer incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95(8):622–5.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Singh H, Turner D, Xue L, Targownik LE, Bernstein CN. Risk of developing colorectal cancer following a negative colonoscopy examination: evidence for a 10-year interval between colonoscopies. JAMA. 2006;295(20):2366–73.PubMedCrossRef Singh H, Turner D, Xue L, Targownik LE, Bernstein CN. Risk of developing colorectal cancer following a negative colonoscopy examination: evidence for a 10-year interval between colonoscopies. JAMA. 2006;295(20):2366–73.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Pignone M, Rich M, Teutsch SM, Berg AO, Lohr KN. Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(2):132–41.PubMed Pignone M, Rich M, Teutsch SM, Berg AO, Lohr KN. Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(2):132–41.PubMed
39.
go back to reference Mandel J, Bond J, Church T. Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:1365–71.PubMedCrossRef Mandel J, Bond J, Church T. Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:1365–71.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J, Jorgensen OD, Sondergaard O. Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test. Lancet. 1996;348(9040):1467–71.PubMedCrossRef Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J, Jorgensen OD, Sondergaard O. Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test. Lancet. 1996;348(9040):1467–71.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MH, et al. Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet. 1996;348(9040):1472–7.PubMedCrossRef Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MH, et al. Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet. 1996;348(9040):1472–7.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Warren JL, Klabunde CN, Mariotto AB, et al. Adverse events after outpatient colonoscopy in the Medicare population. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(12):849–57. W152.PubMed Warren JL, Klabunde CN, Mariotto AB, et al. Adverse events after outpatient colonoscopy in the Medicare population. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(12):849–57. W152.PubMed
43.
go back to reference Gatto NM, Frucht H, Sundararajan V, Jacobson JS, Grann VR, Neugut AI. Risk of perforation after colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy: a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95(3):230–6.PubMedCrossRef Gatto NM, Frucht H, Sundararajan V, Jacobson JS, Grann VR, Neugut AI. Risk of perforation after colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy: a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95(3):230–6.PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Braithwaite RS, Fiellin D, Justice AC. The payoff time: a flexible framework to help clinicians decide when patients with comorbid disease are not likely to benefit from practice guidelines. Med Care. 2009;47(6):610–7.PubMedCrossRef Braithwaite RS, Fiellin D, Justice AC. The payoff time: a flexible framework to help clinicians decide when patients with comorbid disease are not likely to benefit from practice guidelines. Med Care. 2009;47(6):610–7.PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Albertsen PC, Walters S, Hanley JA. A comparison of cause of death determination in men previously diagnosed with prostate cancer who died in 1985 or 1995. J Urol. 2000;163(2):519–23.PubMedCrossRef Albertsen PC, Walters S, Hanley JA. A comparison of cause of death determination in men previously diagnosed with prostate cancer who died in 1985 or 1995. J Urol. 2000;163(2):519–23.PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Hoffman RM, Stone SN, Hunt WC, Key CR, Gilliland FD. Effects of misattribution in assigning cause of death on prostate cancer mortality rates. Ann Epidemiol. 2003;13(6):450–4.PubMedCrossRef Hoffman RM, Stone SN, Hunt WC, Key CR, Gilliland FD. Effects of misattribution in assigning cause of death on prostate cancer mortality rates. Ann Epidemiol. 2003;13(6):450–4.PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Regula J, Rupinski M, Kraszewska E, et al. Colonoscopy in colorectal-cancer screening for detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(18):1863–72.PubMedCrossRef Regula J, Rupinski M, Kraszewska E, et al. Colonoscopy in colorectal-cancer screening for detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(18):1863–72.PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Ransohoff DF. How much does colonoscopy reduce colon cancer mortality? Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(1):50–2.PubMed Ransohoff DF. How much does colonoscopy reduce colon cancer mortality? Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(1):50–2.PubMed
49.
go back to reference Baxter NN, Rabeneck L. Is the effectiveness of colonoscopy "good enough" for population-based screening? J Natl Cancer Inst;102(2):70–1. Baxter NN, Rabeneck L. Is the effectiveness of colonoscopy "good enough" for population-based screening? J Natl Cancer Inst;102(2):70–1.
50.
go back to reference Baxter NN, Goldwasser MA, Paszat LF, Saskin R, Urbach DR, Rabeneck L. Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(1):1–8.PubMed Baxter NN, Goldwasser MA, Paszat LF, Saskin R, Urbach DR, Rabeneck L. Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(1):1–8.PubMed
51.
go back to reference Singh H, Nugent Z, Demers AA, Kliewer EV, Mahmud SM, Bernstein CN. The reduction in colorectal cancer mortality after colonoscopy varies by site of the cancer. Gastroenterology;139(4):1128–37. Singh H, Nugent Z, Demers AA, Kliewer EV, Mahmud SM, Bernstein CN. The reduction in colorectal cancer mortality after colonoscopy varies by site of the cancer. Gastroenterology;139(4):1128–37.
Metadata
Title
Assessing the Impact of Screening Colonoscopy on Mortality in the Medicare Population
Authors
Cary P. Gross, MD
Pamela R. Soulos, MPH
Joseph S. Ross, MD, MHS
Laura D. Cramer, PhD
Christopher Guerrero, MPH
Mary E. Tinetti, MD
R. Scott Braithwaite, MD
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 12/2011
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1816-4

Other articles of this Issue 12/2011

Journal of General Internal Medicine 12/2011 Go to the issue

Healing Arts: Materia Medica

The Last Prayer

Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.